Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geo 2 - Compressibility
Geo 2 - Compressibility
Consolidation
CE 422
= − ∆ = − ∆ = −∆
() ( ) ∆ =
General Shape of the Deformation Curve: Compressibility Parameters:
Three Distinct Stages :
1. Compression Index, Cc
Stage 1: Initial Compression: caused mostly - slope of virgin consolidation curve
Stage 1 by preloading
sample:
Stage 2: Primary Consolidation: excess water
=
pressure is gradually transferred into
Stage 2 effective stress because of the expulsion of 2. Swelling Index, Cs
pore water
- slope of rebound curve
Stage 3: Secondary Consolidation: occurs
after complete dissipation of the excess pore sample:
water pressure, caused by plastic =
Stage 3
readjustment of soil fabric
where:
= preconsolidation pressure
= present overburden pressure (vertical effective stress)
Correlations for Compression Index (CC): Correlations for Compression Index (CC):
Empirical expression of Skempton (1944): Park and Koumoto (2004):
= 0.009 − 10 where:
Rendon-Herrero (1983): = = , ℎ : =
371.747 − 4.275
1+
. =
= 0.141 . =
=
Nagaraj and Murty (1985):
%
= 0.2343
100
Cam Clay Model of Wroth and Wood (1978):
%
≈ 0.5
100
Kulhawy and Mayne (1990):
≈
74
Correlations for Swell Index (CS): Primary Consolidation(SC):
CS is smaller in magnitude than CC: Normally Consolidated Clay: where:
1 1 C H σ + ∆σ = initial void ratio of the clay layer
≈ , S = log
5 10 1+e σ H = thickness of the clay layer
ℎ : =
= overburden pressure (vertical effective
Overconsolidated Clay: stress) at the middle of the clay layer
Nagaraj and Murty (1985): For: σ + ∆σ ≤ σ ∆ = uniformly distributed load at the
% CH σ + ∆σ ground surface
= 0.0463 S = log
100 1+e σ = preconsolidation pressure
= compression index
Cam Clay Model of Wroth and Wood (1978): For: σ + ∆σ > σ = swell index
≈ CH σ C H σ + ∆σ
370 S = log + log
1+e σ 1+e σ
Problem
Differential Settlement:
S1 θ S2
ΔS
L
∆
= ≤ 0.002 ( )
Note: if > 0.002, then provide tie beam