Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JURNAL 7 Gusti Ayu PTK
JURNAL 7 Gusti Ayu PTK
ABSTRACT
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membuktikan bahwa implementasi teknik Information
Gap efektif untuk mengembangkan keterampilan berbicara siswa kelas X di SMA Negeri 1
Balinggi. Desain penelitian eksperimental semu diterapkan dengan 60 siswa sebagai sampel
yang dipilih dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Sampel penelitian ini adalah
kelas X MIPA2 dan X MIPA3. Analisis datanya menunjukan bahwa ada perbedaan signifikan
antara hasil pretest dan posttest. Nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen secara signifikan
meningkat dari 39,72 ke 61,94, sedangkan, nilai rata-rata kelas control meningkat dari 38,05
ke 4,83. Berdasarkan hasil pretest dan posttest itu nilai t-counted adalah 6,53. Dengan
menerapkan derajat kebebasan (df) 58 dan 0,05 tingkat signifikans, nilai t-table adalah 2,02,
sehingga nilai t-counted (6,53) lebih besar daripada nilai t-table (2,02). Jadi, implementasi teknik
Information Gap itu dapat mengembangkan keterampilan berbicara siswa kelas X itu.
INTRODUCTION
Beside writing, speaking is one of analyzing, and presenting developments of the
productive language skills needed to carry out concrete and abstract domains of the learned
an interactive process in order to construct materials and being able to apply various
information. Specifically, mastery of speaking methods based on scientific principles. As a
is a priority for students both in schools and result, their teacher should develop his/her
universities. In communicative model of the methods and techniques in teaching and
English speaking class, the students should be learning process and develop the students’
taught how to speak well by using components speaking skill. English teachers and lecturers
of English speaking skills, namely fluency, should provide a rich environment where
accuracy, and appropriacy. meaningful communication takes place. Due
Based on Kurikulum 2013, teaching to the fact, various speaking activities which
English speaking at senior high school level is can contribute to the students developing
that students are demanded for processing, communication skills necessary for life should
E-mail: normayanti150117@gmail.com
27 EW 25 50 25 23 KF 33.33 50 16.67
24 MIP 50 50 0
28 HS 25 50 25
25 NS 41.67 41.67 0
29 MEA 25 50 25 26 ATP 25 50 25
The table 3 indicates that the mean Mean 38.05 45.83 7.78
score of pretest of experimental class is 39.72.
The highest score is 66.67 and the lowest
score is 25. The highest score of the posttest of The students’ individual scores of the
the experimental class is 91.67 and the lowest control class were calculated by using the
score is 50. Furthermore, the mean score of same formula as in experimental class. As a
the posttest of the experimental class is 61.94. result, the mean score of pretest of control
It means that the development of the result of class is 38.05. The highest score is 66.67 and
the experimental class is 22.22. It increased the lowest score is 25.
from 39.72 to 61.94. Results of the pretest and After calculating the score of pretest,
posttest of the control class is presented on the the score of posttest is counted. The highest
following table: score of the posttest of the control class is 75
and the lowest score is 25. Furthermore, the
Table 4: Results of Pretest and Posttest of the mean score of posttest of the control class
Control Class 45.83. There is also development of the result
of the control class. The development of the
Score
control class is 7.78. It developed from 38.05
No Initial Deviation
Pretest Posttest to 45.83.
After gathering all the data of
1 MRE 66.67 75 8.33 experimental class and control one, the mean
2 IBMB 41.67 41.67 0
score of deviation and the sum of square of
deviation were counted from both classes. The
3 KBC 41.67 58.33 16.66
mean score of deviation of experimental group
4 WLY 50 58.33 8.33
was found and it was 22.22. Furthermore, the
5 RM 25 25 0
sum of square deviation of the experimental
6 NLM 33.33 33.33 0 class is 1,985.12. Besides, the mean score of
7 NMW 50 50 0 deviation of the control class is 7.78 and the
8 IAW 41.67 50 8.33 sum of square deviation of the control class is
9 WDD 58.33 66.67 8.34 2,768.67.
10 AAAR 25 33.33 8.33 Moreover, the value of t-counted was
11 GNW 25 25 0
calculated by using t-test formula as proposed
by Arikunto (2006) to see the significant
12 GNA 25 58.33 33.33
difference of both classes. By applying the t-test
13 NAS 33.33 33.33 0