This document discusses criteria for assessing the criticality of equipment in industrial plants. It outlines three criteria: 1) Equipment criticality assessment (ECA) is meant to identify strategically important equipment and should not replace risk assessment analyses. 2) Equipment importance characterizes the consequences of equipment failure and categorizes equipment as strategic, important, primary, secondary, or backup based on failure consequences. 3) Equipment reliability characterizes the overall health and repair constraints of equipment based on factors like failure rate, precision, operating conditions, and maintenance practices.
This document discusses criteria for assessing the criticality of equipment in industrial plants. It outlines three criteria: 1) Equipment criticality assessment (ECA) is meant to identify strategically important equipment and should not replace risk assessment analyses. 2) Equipment importance characterizes the consequences of equipment failure and categorizes equipment as strategic, important, primary, secondary, or backup based on failure consequences. 3) Equipment reliability characterizes the overall health and repair constraints of equipment based on factors like failure rate, precision, operating conditions, and maintenance practices.
This document discusses criteria for assessing the criticality of equipment in industrial plants. It outlines three criteria: 1) Equipment criticality assessment (ECA) is meant to identify strategically important equipment and should not replace risk assessment analyses. 2) Equipment importance characterizes the consequences of equipment failure and categorizes equipment as strategic, important, primary, secondary, or backup based on failure consequences. 3) Equipment reliability characterizes the overall health and repair constraints of equipment based on factors like failure rate, precision, operating conditions, and maintenance practices.
Document Responsibility: Pumps, Seals and Mixers SABP-G-017
Issue Date: 10 April 2010
Next Planned Update: TBD Equipment Criticality Assessment
ECA is not meant to replace or substitute any of Risk-Assessment analysis.
Performing an ECA does not exempt Plants’ from, timely and adequately, performing the required Risk-Assessment studies to mitigate and control the risks within their plants and facilities. Risk-Assessment studies include: Process Hazard Analysis PHA, Hazard and Operability (HazOp) analysis, Hazard Identification (HAZID), Major Hazard Analysis (MHA), Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA), etc.
b. Equipment Importance
This criterion characterizes the consequences of an equipment failure in
the production process as defined by the logical Process Flow Function. It is a holistic assessment of equipment failure consequences in plants’ business objectives and shall reflect the interdependence of different equipment in the production system.
The objective with this criterion is to segregate plants’ equipment in one of
the following categories: Strategic equipment, Important equipment, Primary equipment, Secondary equipment, and finally Back-up equipment.
Equipment Importance shall be defined and ranked according the Criteria
Scoring Guidelines defined in Section 5.2 (Equipment Criticality Scoring Guidelines).
c. Equipment Reliability
This criterion characterizes the equipment overall health and repair
constraints. Equipment reliability can be characterized in general from its Mean-Time-Between-Failure (MTBF), its failure rate (infant mortality, fatigue, wear-out, etc.), its precision and its operating conditions (operating envelops, service factor, actual/design utilization rates, vibration, temperature, humidity, dust, etc.), and finally the obsolescence of its parts and the state of its components.
Equipment Reliability criterion shall also take into account equipment
existing maintenance practices that would reflect the health of the equipment based on the actual or assumed quality of preventive maintenance tasks carried out on the equipment.