The student submitted the final paper appropriately following the instructions and meeting all the steps of the activity. They used proper order of adjectives to describe their feelings in the writing assignment. However, their vocabulary in the activity was too limited according to the guidelines. The student contributed appropriately and meaningfully to the construction of the final paper in the forum according to their role, following netiquette rules and meeting deadlines. Their participation was relevant and linked to contribute to the final output.
The student submitted the final paper appropriately following the instructions and meeting all the steps of the activity. They used proper order of adjectives to describe their feelings in the writing assignment. However, their vocabulary in the activity was too limited according to the guidelines. The student contributed appropriately and meaningfully to the construction of the final paper in the forum according to their role, following netiquette rules and meeting deadlines. Their participation was relevant and linked to contribute to the final output.
The student submitted the final paper appropriately following the instructions and meeting all the steps of the activity. They used proper order of adjectives to describe their feelings in the writing assignment. However, their vocabulary in the activity was too limited according to the guidelines. The student contributed appropriately and meaningfully to the construction of the final paper in the forum according to their role, following netiquette rules and meeting deadlines. Their participation was relevant and linked to contribute to the final output.
The student submitted the final paper appropriately following the instructions and meeting all the steps of the activity. They used proper order of adjectives to describe their feelings in the writing assignment. However, their vocabulary in the activity was too limited according to the guidelines. The student contributed appropriately and meaningfully to the construction of the final paper in the forum according to their role, following netiquette rules and meeting deadlines. Their participation was relevant and linked to contribute to the final output.
units and it is assignment, according to the besides it was guidelines. The too limited. student used properly the order of adjectives to describe his feelings. (Up to 15 (Up to 8 (0 points) points) points) The student developed and submitted the The student final paper but submitted it was The appropriately the incomplete. The student did final paper assignment met not follwing the Final the structures participate instructions. The 15 points product partially. The in the student met all students did activity. the steps of this not send the activity. final taks in the correct environment. (Up to 15 (Up to 8 (0 points) points) points) Performance levels of collaborative activity Item Low Score High score Media score score Participations The student’s were relevant, participations The Participatio linked and were por and/or student n and contribute to the did not met the did not interaction 30 points construction of requirements. participate in the the final paper. The student did in the forum The student not choose a activity. contributed role nor made appropiately and comments about meaningful his partners’ according to his contributions. role. The student’s contributions follow the netiquette rules and were sent on time. The student met his roles. (Up to 30 (Up to 15 (0 points) points) points) Final score 95 points