Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pro-Quality Associates: Trg. Date(s) - TRAINING ASSESSMENT - SPC / 00
Pro-Quality Associates: Trg. Date(s) - TRAINING ASSESSMENT - SPC / 00
This is a self assessment. You may mark your assessment sheet as per the correct answers provided
by the Trainer at the end of the test ( Time allotted is 15 minutes.)
DESIGNATION-------------------------------------------------------Maximum Marks:30
COMPANY------------------------------------------------------------DEPARTMENT-----------------------
1.1 Cause and Effect Diagram is also known as Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram Y/N
1.2 Pareto-Chart is used to establish Priority of Action on defects Y/N
1.3 Process is considered capable when the Data follows Normal Distribution Y/N
1.4 Process is considered in control when within Specified limits Y/N
1.5 Process may be capable but not in control Y/N
1.6 Presence of only Common cause variance ensures statistical stability of the process Y/N
3.1 In random data-collection ---------- ---------------- is usually taken as 1/10th of the total
Specified Tolerance.
3.5 Upper and Lower control limits for regular process monitoring are taken from ----------------
--------------------- -------------------
4.3 Arithmetic
Mean------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.4 Deviation----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How will you establish monitoring frequency during regular running of the
process?
PRO-QUALITY ASSOCIATES
1.1 Cause and Effect Diagram is also known as Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram Y
1.2 Pareto-Chart is used to establish Priority of Action on defects Y
1.3 Process is considered capable when the Data follows Normal Distribution N
1.4 Process is considered in control when within Specified limits N
1.5 Process may be capable but not in control Y
1.6 Presence of only Common cause variance ensures statistical stability of the process Y
3.1 In random data-collection Class Interval is usually taken as 1/10th of the total Specified
Tolerance.
3.3 During Preliminary Process Capability Study Homogenization of Data is a must for
establishing final Upper and Lower Control Limits for the process.
3.5 Upper and Lower control limits for regular process monitoring are taken from Preliminary
Process Capability Study.
How will you establish monitoring frequency during regular running of the
process?