Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING On Motion in Limine To Preclude Admission of Trustees Deed After Sale
Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING On Motion in Limine To Preclude Admission of Trustees Deed After Sale
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS
8
10
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on August 4, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Department
26
D-22, Defendant Anthony J. Martin moved the court for an Order precluding admission of
27
Plaintiff’s Exhibit Trustee’s Deed After Sale.
28
1
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION
OF THE TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE
Attorney Timothy L. McCandless appeared on behalf of Defendant Anthony J. Martin,
1
3 The court having reviewed the moving papers and after oral argument granted
4
Defendant’s Motion in Limine.
5
7
ORDER
8 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Trustee’s Deed After Sale being offered by
9 the Plaintiff is inadmissible, is irrelevant and an insufficient evidentiary foundation exists for its
10
admission, and will not be admitted into evidence during trial of this matter.
11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ___________________________________________
12
13 ___________________________________________________________________________
14 __________________________________________________________________________.
15
DATED:___________________
16
17
________________________________
18
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION
OF THE TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3
I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. My business address is
4
________________________, which is located in the county where the mailing described took
5 place.
6 On January 15, 2011, I served the foregoing document(s) described: (PROPOSED) ORDER
7
AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO
PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE which were served upon:
8
ATTORNEYS FOR U.S. BANK
9
10
John E. Bouzane, Esq.
Law Offices of John E. Bouzane
11 634 Oak Court
San Bernardino, CA 92410
12
13
___ I deposited the foregoing documents in the Federal Express Mail (FedEx). Executed
14 on:, in Victorville, California.
15
16 (State) XXXX I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the above is true and correct.
17
(Federal) ____ I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at
18
whose direction the service was made.
19
_______ BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION I personally transmitted the aforementioned
20 document by facsimile to the addressee. Executed August 3, 2010, in San Bernardino, California.
21
22
________________________________
23 BERNIE KIMMERLE
24
25
26
27
28
3
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION
OF THE TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE