Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measuring Health Status With The SF-36: The Need For Regional Norms
Measuring Health Status With The SF-36: The Need For Regional Norms
46-50
Printed in Great Britain
TABLE 1 Comparison between Aberdeen and West Glamorgan scores on the SF-36
TABLE 2 Differences between West Glamorgan and Oxford scores on the eight variables of the SF-36. The x 2 test
TABLE 3 Mean (SD) scores and sample sizes for eight dimensions of SF-36 in
the interviewed and postal samples
TABLE 4 Mean (SD) scores and sample sizes for eight dimensions of SF-36 for men by age (postal sample)
Age (years)
General health perceptions 78-3(16-8) 77-8(22-5) 70-9(23-7) 65-6(25-9) 52-9(26 4) 55-3(32-8) 590(21-2)
/? = 31 n = 46 n = 30 n = 37 /? = 39 n = 28 /7 = 6
who were likely to have moved or died as in the the West Glamorgan postal sample (age range 20-89
interviewed branch, yielded a corrected response rate of years) with the Aberdeen means. Scores from the West
69 per cent. The age and sex distribution of the postal Glamorgan sample were on average 5 0 points lower
and interviewed samples were similar and comparable [95 per cent confidence interval (CI) -2-92 to -7-10].
with the population distribution in the 1991 Census. 6 In the Oxford study means were given by decennial
The Aberdeen study published normative data for age groups and sex. Sixty-four possible age and sex
the entire postal sample, whose age ranged from 16 to groups were compared (age groups 25-34, 35-44, 4 5 -
91 years. 4 Table 1 compares the population mean from 54, 55-64 years; both sexes, eight parameters of the SF-
TABLE 5 Mean <SL>) scores and sample sizes for eight dimensions of SF-36 for women by age (postal sample)
Age (years)
Role limitations - emotional 77-8(35-3) 79-7(34 8) 71-2(40-3) 73-6(420) 61-9(46-2) 56-9(48-4) 51-1(48-6)
/? = 39 /? = 46 /7 = 59 o = 41 n = 52 /7 = 40 n = 15
Mental health 68-4(21-1) 72-6(180) 66-4(22-7) 64-7(20-1) 71-1(19-1) 72-8(190) 639(28-3)
r) = 40 ri == 46 n ^ 56 n ^ 40 A7 ^ 53 rt ^ 40 ^7 = 1 5
Vitality 55-2(24-0) 65-8(20-5) 51-4(23-7) 48-8(240) 54-2(23-8) 512(24-6) 30-3(24-6)
36). Average scores in West Glamorgan were 6-61 assigned to social classes 4 and 5 (21-2 per cent versus
points lower (95 per cent CI -4-81 to —8-41). In the 15-3 per cent) whereas the proportions from social
younger age groups, differences in scores tended to be classes 1 and 2 were similar in the two areas (36-1 per
smaller, whereas scores diverged in the older groups. cent and 36-8 percent). However, the higher proportion
Table 2 shows the mean scores in men and women aged of persons from social classes 4 and 5 is not the
55-64 in the West Glamorgan and Oxford samples. complete explanation for the difference in mean scores
When the postal and interviewed samples from West between the two areas; when scores were compared
Glamorgan were compared, the postal means were between Oxford and West Glamorgan by social class
significantly lower than the interviewed means in five of groupings for each of the eight variables of the SF-36,
the eight variables measured by the SF-36 (Table 3). the West Glamorgan scores remained lower on average
Normative data for West Glamorgan men and women (mean difference -2-84, 95 per cent CI —1-26 to
are shown in Tables 4 and 5. The data in the tables are -4-42).
from the postal samples. Normative data from the The other possible explanation for the lower scores in
interviewed samples are available from the authors on West Glamorgan may be related to a response rate bias.
request. In the Oxford study the response rate was 72 per cent,
compared with 58 per cent in the West Glamorgan