Design Loads On Floor Beams and Columns

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Design loads acting on elements

Example 2.3 Design loads on floor beams and columns


The floor shown below with an overall depth of 225 mm is to be designed to carry an imposed load of 3 kN m−2 plus
floor finishes and ceiling loads of 1 kN m−2. Calculate the design loads acting on beams B1–C1, B2–C2 and B1–B3 and
columns B1 and C1. Assume that all the column heights are 3 m and that the beam and column weights are 70 and
60 kg m−1 run respectively.

UNIT WEIGHTS OF MATERIALS


Reinforced concrete
From Table 2.1, unit mass of reinforced concrete is 2400 kg m−3. Assuming the gravitational constant is 10 m s−2, the
unit weight of reinforced concrete is
2400 × 10 = 24 000 N m−3 = 24 kN m−3

Steel beams
Unit mass of beam = 70 kg m−1 run
Unit weight of beam = 70 × 10 = 700 N m−1 run = 0.7 kN m−1 run

Steel columns
Unit mass of column = 60 kg m−1 run
Unit weight of column = 60 × 10 = 600 N m−1 run = 0.6 kN m−1 run

LOADING
Slab
Slab dead load (g k ) = self-weight + finishes
= 0.225 × 24 + 1 = 6.4 kN m−2
Slab imposed load (q k ) = 3 kN m−2
Slab ultimate load = 1.4g k + 1.6q k
= 1.4 × 6.4 + 1.6 × 3 = 13.76 kN m−2

Beam
Beam dead load (g k ) = self-weight = 0.7 kN m−1 run
Beam ultimate load = 1.4g k = 1.4 × 0.7 = 0.98 kN m−1 run

Column
Column dead load (g k ) = 0.6 kN m−1 run
Column ultimate load = 1.4g k = 1.4 × 0.6 = 0.84 kN m−1 run
15

9780415467193_C02 15 9/3/09, 12:37 PM


Basic structural concepts and material properties

Example 2.3 continued


DESIGN LOADS
Beam B1–C1
Assuming that the slab is simply supported, beam B1–C1 supports a uniformly distributed load from a 1.5 m width of
slab (hatched //////) plus self-weight of beam. Hence
Design load on beam B1–C1 = slab load + self-weight of beam
= 13.76 × 6 × 1.5 + 0.98 × 6
= 123.84 + 5.88 = 129.72 kN

Since the beam is symmetrically loaded,


RB1 = R C1 = 129.72/2 = 64.86 kN

Beam B2–C2
Assuming that the slab is simply supported, beam B2–C2 supports a uniformly distributed load from a 3 m width of
slab (hatched \\\\\) plus its self-weight. Hence
Design load on beam B2–C2 = slab load + self-weight of beam
= 13.76 × 6 × 3 + 0.98 × 6
= 247.68 + 5.88 = 253.56 kN

Since the beam is symmetrically loaded, R B2 and R C2 are the same and equal to 253.56/2 = 126.78 kN.

Beam B1–B3
Assuming that the slab is simply supported, beam B1–B3 supports a uniformly distributed load from a 1.5 m width of
slab (shown cross-hatched) plus the self-weight of the beam and the reaction transmitted from beam B2–C2 which
acts as a point load at mid-span. Hence
Design load on beam B1–B3 = uniformly distributed load from slab plus self-weight of beam
+ point load from reaction RB2
= (13.76 × 1.5 × 6 + 0.98 × 6) + 126.78
= 129.72 + 126.78 = 256.5 kN

16

9780415467193_C02 16 9/3/09, 12:37 PM


Structural analysis

Example 2.3 continued


Since the beam is symmetrically loaded,
RB1 = RB3 = 256.5/2 = 128.25 kN

Column B1

Column B1 supports the reactions from beams A1–B1, B1–C1 and B1–B3 and its self-weight. From the above, the
reaction at B1 due to beam B1–C1 is 64.86 kN and from beam B1–B3 is 128.25 kN. Beam A1–B1 supports only its
self-weight = 0.98 × 3 = 2.94 kN. Hence reaction at B1 due to A1–B1 is 2.94/2 = 1.47 kN. Since the column height is
3 m, self-weight of column = 0.84 × 3 = 2.52 kN. Hence
Design load on column B1 = 64.86 + 128.25 + 1.47 + 2.52
= 197.1 kN

Column C1

Column C1 supports the reactions from beams B1–C1 and C1–C3 and its self-weight. From the above, the reaction at
C1 due to beam B1–C1 is 64.86 kN. Beam C1–C3 supports the reactions from B2–C2 (= 126.78 kN) and its self-
weight (= 0.98 × 6) = 5.88 kN. Hence the reaction at C1 is (126.78 + 5.88)/2 = 66.33 kN. Since the column height
is 3 m, self-weight = 0.84 × 3 = 2.52 kN. Hence
Design load on column C1 = 64.86 + 66.33 + 2.52 = 133.71 kN

2.4 Structural analysis 1. equilibrium equations


2. formulae
The design axial loads can be used directly to size col- 3. computer methods.
umns. Column design will be discussed more fully
in section 2.5. However, before flexural members Hand calculations are suitable for analysing
such as beams can be sized, the design bending statically determinate structures such as simply sup-
moments and shear forces must be evaluated. ported beams and slabs (section 2.4.1). For various
Such calculations can be performed by a variety of standard load cases, formulae for calculating the
methods as noted below, depending upon the com- maximum bending moments, shear forces and
plexity of the loading and support conditions: deflections are available which can be used to rapidly
17

9780415467193_C02 17 9/3/09, 12:37 PM

You might also like