Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asalytica Chimica AC-l-A: It SRNNLL
Asalytica Chimica AC-l-A: It SRNNLL
Asalytica Chimica AC-l-A: It SRNNLL
MS-IO
H
-
l!El 0
0
0
RI
rc 0.
t He out
every 3.5 min. Or, the sl~cctromctcr can be set on one ?tz/e value and the output
recorclctl as a function of time on recorder 1x1 or of temperature on rccordcr 113.
Usually, the latter method WIS cmployccl after an initial run had been performed to
cletermine the comllosition of the cvolvecl gases in the GEA curve peaks. If several
different products were evolved during the pyrolysis, multiple runs were made rach
at a cliffcrent ns/e vnluc.
,210°
[Cu(NH:,)~:JSO~ . I-Is0 = CuS0.r . zNF13 . IInO -+
From the crystal structure of [Cu(N Ii:~)+O,~ Hd..), as rcportctl by M~zr 10, it is highly
l
.E _ -mm..
MSA
Fig. 3. GEA and hlSA curves of [Ch(NI-I~).~~SO.~ + I+90; ilciltillg rntc of G.oO/nlin; snmplc size of
80 mg ; helium flow-rcltr?of 50 ml/min.
APPARATUS 1’01~ SIMULTASEOUS GEA AXD MSA 409
355”. 380”, and &o”, respectively. B-v itself, the GEA curve is impossible to interpret
nltl~ougll “intelligent gue~scs” may bc made. All that can be definitely concluded is
that each peak reprcscnts the evolution of a gaseous product which may be water,
ammonia, or other substances.
The MS.4 curves, lmwcvcr, enahlc a complete interpretation to be made of the
thermal dissociation process. The first peak, at x45”, is clue to the evolution of water.
This peak was recorded by a pyrolysis scan at a W/Cof 18. The next 3 peaks, at 175”.
29o”, and 360”, are clue to the evolution of ammonia, as revcalcd by a pyrolysis scan
at ‘a W/E of 17. No correction was made for the contribution of water to tl1e atnmonia
peaks. The 3S2” and 460” peaks were due to the evolution of .;ulfur dioxide; these
were causccl by the ciecompot;ition of anhydrous copper sulfate to CuSO4 * CuO11.
Thus, it is seen that tl1e interpretation by PPEIF~SR~ is entirely erroneous. The
tl1crmal clissaciation of [Cu(NH3)4]SO4 0 H& takes place according to the scclucncc:
[Cu (N H:,)4]S04 - HzO(s) + I:Cu(NH:+,]SO4(s) + HzO(v)
(Cu(NI-r3)4]SO 4 (.)
s --j. Cu(NHn)n_SO.r(s) -t_ zNHn(g)
Cu(NHn)zSO 4 (.)s --t Cu(NH3)SO&) + NI-I:%(g)
Cu(NHa)SO.r (s) --f CuS0.a (s) + NH:t (g)
CllsO.+) + cue * CUSOJ (s) $- so?(g) + $0,(g)
Not a &Teat amount of significance can bc placecl upon tl1c peak maxima temperatures
since they are dq~cnclent on the pyrolysis apparatus cxperimcntal parameters such
its sample size, carrier gas flow-rate, furnace heating-rate, and so on1.
Thus, the use of the GEA-MSA technique enables the exact intcrprctation
of thermal decomposition reaction involving low molecular weight products. It is
unlikely tl1at quantitative clata can bc obtainccl because of the difficulty in regulating
the pressure in the mass spectrometer. However, quantitative data are easily obtnincd
by other chemical methods sucl1 as sample collection on various absorbents and
others. The qualitative identification of gas mixtures is, however, easily carried out
with this apparatus. ‘I’here appears to bc no reasc>n why the MSA technique could
not bc couplccl witl1 other thermal mcthocls such as ‘WA, lXA, high temperature
X-ray, pyrolytic mctl1ods, and others. Such an attempt has been mntle wit11 DTA*“,
but tl1c sample was pyrolyzccl in ZJNCILO causing a reduction in the resolution of tl1c
DTA peaks.
The support of this work by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and tl1c
Robert A. Welch Foundation is gratefully acknowlcdgccl.
An apparatus is describecl whicl1 enables the g;w evolution analysis (GEA) and
mass spcctromctric analysis (MSA) curves of a sample to be recorded simultaneously.
The sample is pyrolyzed in a chamber in a dynamic helium atmosphere. The cvolvccl
products arc detected in the helium gas by a thermal conductivity cell which results
in the GEA curve. An inexpensive mass spectrometer is used to monitor the helium
gas stream whicl1 gives the MSA curve. The advantages of the apparatus over other
recent techniques are given.
4x0 W. W. WENDLAXDT, ‘r. h1. SOUTHERN