Diagnostic Discussion :

1. A real party- in -interest is the party who stand to be benefited or injured by the judgment in a
suit.
2. Not only are contracts done with other people but contracts one can have with oneself is also
permitted and this is called auto contracts.
3. Taxes are the lifeblood of the government since they defray the necessary expenses of it
existence and operation.
4. What is needed right now is a few more corroborating witnesses.
5. If I were the judge, I would rule in the negative.
6. Necessary parties are ones who are not indispensable but are joined to obtain a complete relief.
7. The totality of injury that my client has suffered – the sleepless nights, the mental anxiety, the
pain, and the anguish – is not soon forgotten.
8. The attorney’s bread and butter are not subjected to haggling.
9. None is so bold to sue the judge with the exception of Atty. Fortun.
10. Either the plaintiff or defendants desires for continuance of the trial.
11. The number of rising plaintiffs are sufficient enough to represent all persons to a suit against
Senator Pimentel.
12. Provisions about the archipelagic passage through sea lanes do not impair Philippine sovereignty
13. A number of homeowners has expressed their desire to sign the petition.
14. A settlement usually ends in a give and take which are essential to a successful compromise.
15. His stuttering alongside the inconsistencies are being cited as grounds for his inadmissible
testimony.
16. Does every page of the will bear the signature of the testator?
17. The problem with his theory is its many loopholes.
18. The only sign of truth is the facts that can be shown in court.
19. One of the major causes for the failure to proceed with the suit is the lack of credible witnesses.
20. None of the requirement is been complied with.
21. The father – in – laws deny the allegations in the complaint.
22. Each of the three credible witnesses have signed the instrument.
23. There are currently one eyewitness and some documentary evidences that supports their
argument.
24. Dr. Hefner, alongside Mrs. Cez and Atty. Joson , are on our deposition list.
25. The two opposing sides have presented their arguments. Are either of the arguments tenable?
26. Beside being a competent litigator; he is also a good professor.

Write a 5- sentence description about any TWO of the following.

1. Constructive contempt
2. The principle of stare decisis
3. The principle of res judicata
4. The doctrine of primary jurisdiction
5. Civil interdiction