A sovereign state is, in international law, a nonphysical juridical entity that is represented by

one centralized government that has sovereignty over a geographic area. International law defines

sovereign states as having a permanent population, defined territory, one government, and the
capacity to enter into relations with other sovereign states.It is also normally understood that a
sovereign state is neither dependent on nor subjected to any other power or state.
While according to the declarative theory of statehood, a sovereign state can exist without
being recognised by other sovereign states, unrecognised states will often find it hard to exercise full
treaty-making powers and engage in diplomatic relations with other sovereign states.

Westphalian sovereignty
Westphalian sovereignty is the concept of nation-state sovereignty based on territoriality and the
absence of a role for external agents in domestic structures. It is an international system of
states, multinational corporations, and organizations that began with the Peace of Westphalia in
1648.
Sovereignty is a term that is frequently misused. Up until the 19th century, the radicalised concept of
a "standard of civilization" was routinely deployed to determine that certain peoples in the world were
"uncivilised", and lacking organised societies. That position was reflected and constituted in the
notion that their "sovereignty" was either completely lacking, or at least of an inferior character when
compared to that of "civilised" people." Lassa Oppenheim said, "There exists perhaps no conception
the meaning of which is more controversial than that of sovereignty. It is an indisputable fact that this
conception, from the moment when it was introduced into political science until the present day, has
never had a meaning which was universally agreed upon." In the opinion of H. V. Evatt of the High
Court of Australia, "sovereignty is neither a question of fact, nor a question of law, but a question that
does not arise at all."
Sovereignty has taken on a different meaning with the development of the principle of self-
determination and the prohibition against the threat or use of force as jus cogens norms of
modern international law. The United Nations Charter, the Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of
States, and the charters of regional international organizations express the view that all states are
juridically equal and enjoy the same rights and duties based upon the mere fact of their existence as
persons under international law. The right of nations to determine their own political status and
exercise permanent sovereignty within the limits of their territorial jurisdictions is widely recognized.
In political science, sovereignty is usually defined as the most essential attribute of the state in the
form of its complete self-sufficiency in the frames of a certain territory, that is its supremacy in the
domestic policy and independence in the foreign one.
Named after the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, the Westphalian System of state sovereignty, which
according to Bryan Turner is "made a more or less clear separation between religion and state, and
recognised the right of princes 'to confessionalise' the state, that is, to determine the religious
affiliation of their kingdoms on the pragmatic principle of cuius regio eius religio [whose realm, his
religion]."
The Westphalian model of state sovereignty has increasingly come under fire from the "non-west" as
a system imposed solely by Western Colonialism. What this model did was make religion a
subordinate to politics, a problem that has caused some issues in the Islamic world. This system
does not fit in the Islamic world because concepts such as "separation of church and state" and
"individual conscience" are not recognised in the Islamic religion as social systems.
In casual usage, the terms "country", "nation", and "state" are often used as if they
were synonymous; but in stricter usage they can be distinguished.
 Country denotes a region of land defined by geographical features or political boundaries.
 Nation denotes a people who are believed to or deemed to share common customs, religion,
language, origins, ancestry or history. However, the adjectives national and international are
frequently used to refer to matters pertaining to what are strictly sovereign states, as in national
capital, international law.
 State refers to the set of governing and supportive institutions that have sovereignty over a
definite territory and population. Sovereign states are legal persons.

Recognition[edit]
State recognition signifies the decision of a sovereign state to treat another entity as also being a
sovereign state. Recognition can be either expressed or implied and is usually retroactive in its
effects. It does not necessarily signify a desire to establish or maintain diplomatic relations.
There is no definition that is binding on all the members of the community of nations on the criteria
for statehood. In actual practice, the criteria are mainly political, not legal.] L.C. Green cited the
recognition of the unborn Polish and Czechoslovak states in World War I and explained that "since
recognition of statehood is a matter of discretion, it is open to any existing State to accept as a state
any entity it wishes, regardless of the existence of territory or of an established government."
In international law, however, there are several theories of when a state should be recognised as
sovereign.

Constitutive theory
The constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person of international law if, and only if,
it is recognised as sovereign by other states. This theory of recognition was developed in the 19th
century. Under it, a state was sovereign if another sovereign state recognised it as such. Because of
this, new states could not immediately become part of the international community or be bound by
international law, and recognised nations did not have to respect international law in their dealings
with them. In 1815, at the Congress of Vienna the Final Act recognised only 39 sovereign states in
the European diplomatic system, and as a result it was firmly established that in the future new
states would have to be recognised by other states, and that meant in practice recognition by one or
more of the great powers.
One of the major criticisms of this law is the confusion caused when some states recognise a new
entity, but other states do not. Hersch Lauterpacht, one of the theory's main proponents, suggested
that it is a state's duty to grant recognition as a possible solution. However, a state may use any
criteria when judging if they should give recognition and they have no obligation to use such criteria.
Many states may only recognise another state if it is to their advantage.
In 1912, L. F. L. Oppenheim had the following to say on constitutive theory:
International Law does not say that a State is not in existence as long as it isn't recognised, but it
takes no notice of it before its recognition. Through recognition only and exclusively a State
becomes an International Person and a subject of International Law.

Declarative theory
By contrast, the declarative theory of statehood defines a state as a person in international law if it
meets the following criteria: 1) a defined territory; 2) a permanent population; 3) a government and 4)
a capacity to enter into relations with other states. According to declarative theory, an entity's
statehood is independent of its recognition by other states, as long as the sovereignty was not
gained by military force. The declarative model was most famously expressed in the
1933 Montevideo Convention.
Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention declares that political statehood is independent of recognition
by other states, and the state is not prohibited from defending itself. In contrast, recognition is
considered a requirement for statehood by the constitutive theory of statehood. An important part of
the convention was Aricle 11 that prohibits using military force to gain sovereignty.
A similar opinion about "the conditions on which an entity constitutes a state" is expressed by
the European Economic Community Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee, which found
that a state was defined by having a territory, a population, government, and capacity to enter into
relations with other states.

State recognition
State practice relating to the recognition of states typically falls somewhere between the declaratory
and constitutive approaches. International law does not require a state to recognise other
states. Recognition is often withheld when a new state is seen as illegitimate or has come about in
breach of international law. Almost universal non-recognition by the international community
of Rhodesia and Northern Cyprus are good examples of this, the former only having been
recognized by South Africa, and the latter only recognized by Turkey. In the case of Rhodesia,
recognition was widely withheld when the white minority seized power and attempted to form a state
along the lines of Apartheid South Africa, a move that the United Nations Security Council described
as the creation of an "illegal racist minority régime". In the case of Northern Cyprus, recognition was
withheld from a state created in Northern Cyprus. International law contains no prohibition on
declarations of independence, and the recognition of a country is a political issue. As a
result, Turkish Cypriots gained "observer status" in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe, and their representatives are elected in the Assembly of Northern Cyprus; and Northern
Cyprus became an observer member of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Economic
Cooperation Organization.

De facto and de jure states
Most sovereign states are states de jure and de facto (i.e., they exist both in law and in reality).
However, a state may be recognised only as a de jure state, in that it is recognised as being the
legitimate government of a territory over which it has no actual control. For example, during
the Second World War, governments-in-exile of a number of continental European states continued
to enjoy diplomatic relations with the Allies, notwithstanding that their countries were under Nazi
occupation. The PLO and Palestinian Authority claim that the State of Palestine is a sovereign state,
a claim which has been recognised by most states, though the territory it claims is under the de
facto control of Israel. Other entities may have de facto control over a territory but lack international
recognition; these may be considered by the international community to be only de facto states.
They are considered de jure states only according to their own law and by states that recognise
them. For example, Somaliland is commonly considered to be such a state. For a list of entities that
wish to be universally recognised as sovereign states, but do not have complete
worldwide diplomatic recognition, see the list of states with limited recognition.

Relationship between state and government

Although the terms "state" and "government" are often used interchangeably, international law
distinguishes between a non-physical state and its government; and in fact, the concept of
"government-in-exile" is predicated upon that distinction. States are non-physical juridical entities,
and not organisations of any kind.However, ordinarily, only the government of a state can obligate or
bind the state, for example by treaty.

State extinction
Generally speaking, states are durable entities, though it is possible for them to become
extinguished, either through voluntary means or outside forces, such as military conquest. Violent
state abolition has virtually ceased since the end of World War II.Because states are non-physical
juridical entities, it has been argued their extinction cannot be due to physical force alone.Instead,
the physical actions of the military must be associated with the correct social or judiciary actions in
order to abolish a state.

Ontological status of the state

The ontological status of the state has been the subject of debate, specially, whether or not the
state, being an object that no one can see, taste, touch, or otherwise detect,actually exists.

The state as "quasi-abstract"

It has been argued that one potential reason as to why the existence of states has been
controversial is because states do not have a place in the traditional Platonist duality of the concrete
and the abstract.Characteristically, concrete objects are those that have position in time and space,
which states do not have (though their territories have spatial position, but states are distinct from
their territories), and abstract objects have position in neither time nor space, which does not fit the
supposed characteristics of states either, since states do have temporal position (they can be
created at certain times and then become extinct at a future time). Therefore, it has been argued that
states belong to a third category, the quasi-abstract, that has recently begun to garner philosophical
attention, especially in the area of documentality, an ontological theory that seeks to understand the
role of documents in understanding all of social reality. Quasi-abstract objects, such as states, can
be brought into being through document acts, and can also be used to manipulate them, such as by
binding them by treaty or surrendering them as the result of a war.
Scholars in international relations can be broken up into two different practices, realists and
pluralists, of what they believe the ontological state of the state is. Realists believe that the world is
one of only states and interstate relations and the identity of the state is defined before any
international relations with other states. On the other hand, pluralists believe that the state is not the
only actor in international relations and interactions between states and the state is competing
against many other actors.

The state as "spiritual entity"

Another theory of the ontology of the state is that the state is a spiritual, or "mystical entity"with its
own being, distinct from the members of the state.The German Idealist philosopher Georg
Hegel (1770–1831) was perhaps the greatest proponent of this theory. The Hegelian definition of the
state is "the Divine Idea as it exists on Earth.

Trends in the number of states

Since the end of World War II, the number of sovereign states in the international system has
surged.Some research suggests that the existence of international and regional organisations, the
greater availability of economic aid, and greater acceptance of the norm of self-determination have
increased the desire of political units to secede and can be credited for the increase in the number of
states in the international system. Harvard economist Alberto Alesina and Tufts economist Enrico
Spolaore argue in their book, Size of Nations, that the increase in the number of states can partly be
credited to a more peaceful world, greater free trade and international economic integration,
democratisation, and the presence of international organisations that co-ordinate economic and
political policies.