Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 12 20
5 12 20
DIAGNOSIS:
- First-line testing to evaluate for chronic pancreatitis should be either CT or MRI (strong rec,
low quality evidence)
o EUS should be second-line due to invasiveness and lack of specificity—consider
after cross-sectional imaging (no RCTs comparing EUS to imaging)
- History and physical exam, laboratory values (including direct and indirect pancreatic
function tests) still key
- Secretin-enhanced MRCP (s-MRCP) can be used in patients who have had EUS or cross-
sectional imaging that is non-diagnostic, but clinical suspicion is high (conditional rec, low
quality)
o Improved visualization of main and side-branch ducts due to increased release of
bicarb from pancreatic ductal cells
o Quantification of degree of filling in duodenum—can help quantify degree of
pancreatic exocrine function and severity of chronic pancreatitis
- Pancreatic function testing—not necessary to diagnose CP, but can be helpful to diagnose
exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI)
o Typically require >90% loss of function to manifest in clinically apparent symptoms
(i.e. steatorrhea, azotorrhea, vitamin deficiencies)
o Hormonal tests:
CCK stimulation test (acinar cells stimulated to produce trypsin or lipase)
2-3 hour test
Uncomfortable for patients (catheter placed in duodenum), not
widely available
Secretin stimulation test (ductal cells stimulated to produce bicarb)
60-minute test
Performed endoscopically—increased risk and cost
o Non-hormonal tests:
Fecal-elastase-1—limited specificity in diarrhea, limited use in mild disease
ACG Clinical Guideline—Chronic Pancreatitis
Updated March 2020
Heidi Ahmed, May 12th 2020
72-hour fecal fat—recommended over Sudan stain for fecal fat, but
cumbersome
13C-mixed triglyceride test—90% sensitivity
4-6 hour test
Serum trypsinogen/trypsin
Quantifiable—can track over time
Does not measure GI tract enzymes
Increased in pancreatic pain
- Histology: If imaging has been inconclusive and patient is high-risk for CP, histological
examination is gold standard for diagnosis (conditional, very low quality)
o Easier to do now with EUS
o Sensitivity is poor—limited due to sampling error, complications in obtaining
biopsy, patchy nature of pancreatic inflammation
- Genetic testing:
o Recommended in patients with clinical evidence of pancreatitis-associated disorder or
possible CP in which the etiology is unclear, especially in younger patients (strong, low
quality)
o Can help distinguish whether patients are likely to develop progressive, severe
chronic pancreatitis and pathways involved, even if no immediate treatment change
o Autosomal dominant
PRSS1 mutations (hereditary pancreatitis)
CTRC (chymotrypsin C)
o Autosomal recessive
CFTR with 2 severe variants (cystic fibrosis)
CFTR with <2 severe variants (CFTR-RD)
SPINK1
o Hypertriglyceridemia
o Idiopathic CP patients should have at least germline mutation evaluation for PRSS1,
CTRC, CFTR, and SPINK1
NATURAL HISTORY:
- Primary clinical outcomes: Abdominal pain, exocrine insufficiency (fat-soluble vitamin
deficiency, malnutrition, osteoporosis), pancreatic malignancy, endocrine insufficiency
(diabetes)
o Typically irreversible, very little is modifiable
- 10% of acute pancreatitis progresses to CP, and 30% of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP)
progress to CP
o Progression from EtOH is twice as likely than genetic or idiopathic etiology
- Exocrine insufficiency:
o 40-75% of patients with CP will have exocrine insufficiency
o Risk highest in patients with alcoholic use, tobacco use, or fibrocalcific/tropical
pancreatitis
o Recommend using pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy to improve malnutrition
complications
ACG Clinical Guideline—Chronic Pancreatitis
Updated March 2020
Heidi Ahmed, May 12th 2020