Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finite Element Analysis of Gasketed Flange Bolted Joint++++ PDF
Finite Element Analysis of Gasketed Flange Bolted Joint++++ PDF
Finite Element Analysis of Gasketed Flange Bolted Joint++++ PDF
I. INTRODUCTION
Flanged joints with gaskets are very common in pressure
vessel and piping systems, and are designed mainly for
internal pressure. These joints are also used in special
applications such as in nuclear reactors and space vehicles. Fig. 2: Geometry of Flange Joint
Prevention of fluid leakage is the prime
requirement of flanged joints. B. Flange
Gaskets are used to create a static seal between two B = Inside diameter of the flange = 406.4 mm
stationary members of a mechanical assembly and to A = Outside diameter of the flange = 558.8 mm
maintain that seal under operating conditions which may t = Flange thickness = 44.45 mm
vary dependent upon changes in pressures and temperatures. r = Hub radius = 9.525 mm
The investigation of flanged joints for ASME g0 = thickness of the hub at the small end = 19.05 mm
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII (1)
C. Gasket
allowable stress compliance, flange rigidity and additional
investigation for gasket contact stress under all loading GOD = Gasket OD = 450.85 mm
conditions is necessary to confirm the leak tightness of the GID = Gasket ID = 412.75 mm
assembly. D. Bolting
In order to ensure the maintenance of the seal
C = bolt-circle diameter = 514.35 mm
throughout the life expectancy of the assembly, sufficient
Number of bolts = 16
stress must remain on the gasket surface to prevent leakage.
For finite element modeling the simulation module of
The residual bolt load on the gasket should at all times be
program is used. Finite element programme divides the
greater than the hydrostatic end force acting against it. The
element into a grid of ‘element’, which form a model of real
hydrostatic end force is the force produced by the internal
structure.
pressure which acts to separate the flanges. Internal Pressure
A finite model is complete idealization of the entire
is exerted against both the flange and the gasket.
structural problem, including the node locations, the
elements, physical and materials properties, loads and
boundary condition. The model is supposed to be defined
differently for different types of analysis: static structural
loads, dynamic or thermal analysis. The goal of finite
element model is not to make a model look like structure.
The purpose of finite element modeling is to make a model
that behaves mathematically like the structure modeled, not
necessarily one looks like real structure.
Fig. 1: Forces acting on a gasket Flange joint
III. FINITE ELEMENTS MODELING AND STRESS ANALYSIS
II. SELECTION OF SOFTWARE FOR MODELING AND STRESS It consists of three steps. Which are:
ANALYSIS Pre-processing
Solution
The accurate result of the software analysis depends upon
the effectiveness and simplicity of analysis software Post processing.
together with its speed and simple user interface. There for A. Pre-processing
among many options. Pro/ENGINEER is selected for This includes the entire process of developing the geometry
modeling and ANSYS is selected for stress analysis of of a finite element model, entering physical and material
gasketed flange Bolted joint. properties, describing the boundary conditions and loads and
checking the model. ‘CAD model’ generated with the help B. Solution
of Pro/ENGINEER shown in fig.3. The solution phase can be performed in the model solution
task of the simulation application, or an external finite
element analysis program.
C. Post processing
The post processing task of simulation application provides
tools to display and interpret the results after the solution is
finished. Results of Nodal Stress Joint Assembly for post
processing which is shown in fig.6.
V. CONCLUSION
By Finite element analysis, the stress at the Gasketed Flange
joint has studied. From the comparison of design
calculations as per ASME codes and Stress results obtained
Fig. 5: Boundary Condition from the F.E.A. analysis indicated that the flanged joint is
within acceptable levels.
REFERENCES
[1] Jaroslav Bartonicek, Manfred Schaaf, Friedrich
Schoeckle; “Use of gasket factors in flange calculations
”; ASME PVP Conference; 2000.
[2] Muhsen Al-Sannaa and Abdulmalik Alghamdi; “Two
dimensional finite element analysis for large diameter
steel flanges”; December 2002.
[3] Brett C Taylor ; “Assessment of Appropriate Pressure
Vessel Flange Bolt Tension by Finite Element
Modelling ”
[4] Muhammad Abid; “Determination of safe operating
conditions for gasketed flange joint under combined
internal pressure and temperature: A finite element
approach”; 2005.
[5] M. Abid and D.H. Nash; “Structural strength: Gasketed
vs non-gasketed flange joint under bolt up and
operating condition”; International Journal of Solids
and Structures; March 2005.
[6] Muhammad Abid; “Stress Variation in the Flange of a
Gasketed Flanged Pipe Joint during Bolt up and
Operating Conditions”; 2006.
[7] M. Murali Krishna, M.S. Shunmugam, N. Siva Prasad;
“A study on the sealing performance of bolted flange
joints with gaskets using finite element analysis ”;
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.
[8] Pushpak M. Patel, Piyush P. Gohil; “Stress Variation in
Gasketed Flange Joint during Bolt up and Operating
Condition”; Indian Journal of Technical Education;
2012.
[9] “Gasket Handbook”; Lamons Gasket Company.
[10] “Gasket Design Criteria”; Flexitallic.
[11] Catalogue of Intermech Sealing Solutions Ltd.
[12] Chapter: 22 Seal Technology; “Mechanical Engineers'
Handbook,”; By Myer Kutz; Second Edition; John
Wiley & Sons;1998.
[13] Catalogue of Pressure Vessel Engineering Ltd (ASME
Vessel Code Calculations - Finite Element Analysis ).
[14] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section - VIII,
Div 1, Appendix 2.
[15] Jordan Christopher Baker; “Analysis of Bolting in
Flanged Connections”; April 2009.
[16] “Guidelines for safe seal usage Flanges and Gaskets -
”;ESA / FSA Publication; September, 1998.
[17] William J. Koves; “Bolted-Flange Joints And
Connections”; 2009.