FACULTY OF CHEMICAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

ENGINEERING
IPBL (10%)
BKC 3771 (ENVIRONMETAL
ENGINEERING LAB)

Group : 01, section 02

GROUP NAME ID
MEMBERS NUMBER
S1 MUSTAF MOHAMED KA15301
S2 GAUCIGAN A/L ELAMPARITHY KA16051
S3 MUHAMMAD SYAHRUL RIDHZUAN KA17297
BIN MAZILAN
S4 MUHAMMAD AMIR KA17296
S5 AMER MOHAMMED KA14186

Unacceptable Acceptable Good Very Good

Item Assessed Score
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Introduction Very little Has the following item; Has the following Has the following item; 2x
(PO3,PO6) 20% background • Background item; • Background
information or • Background • Presentation is
information is But made interesting
incorrect. • Unclear problem But and easy to
statement • Points badly understand
organized;
presentation is
difficult to
understand

Results and Poor clarity of Has the following item; Has the following Has the following item; 3x
Discussion 30% figures and tables • Results (Fig. & item; • Results (Fig. &
(PO3) but has a Table) presented • Results (Fig. & Table)
discussion on in acceptable Table) presented in
result trend. clarity presented in acceptable
• Discussion on the acceptable clarity
result trend clarity • Discussion on
• Discussion on the result trend
the result trend • Validation:
• Discussion easy Comparison with
to follow theory or
• Explanation for previous work
discrepancy with citation
• Explanation
for
discrepancy
supported
with literature
• Discussion easy
to follow
 Unacceptable Acceptable Good Very Good
Item Assessed Score
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation is Recommendation is Recommendation is 3x
based on the is not related to related to the related to the project related to the project
analyses: The the project project
propose treatment Justify the chosen
Explain the chosen
recommendation recommendation.

Conclusion and Conclusion not Has conclusion that Explain the Conclusion related to 0.5x
Recommendation related to related to objective conclusion that objective. Main
objective related to objective findings are
summarized
complete with
limitation.

References & Citing unrelated At least 2 articles cited At least 3 articles 5 or more articles 0.5x
citation (PO10) articles. Useful and its useful content cited and its useful cited and its useful
5% content digested digested and included content digested and content (all article)
and included in in the presentation. included in the digested and
the presentation. presentation. included in the
Less comment on other presentation.
No comment on references Able to comment and
other article refer to other
references.
Style and Student only read Less fluent on the Some mumbling but Clear articulation but 0.5x
language the slide and no material of audible most of the not as polished. The
proficiency eye-contact. presentation. time, little eye slides contribute to the
Occasional but un- contact. quality of presentation.
sustained eye-contact. Good eye-contact.

Ability to answer Wrong answer to Student answers the Acceptable answer Good answer
the question. question but still and explanation. supported with some
Zero marks for not unclear about the evidence (reference)
answering. subject. or data.
Confident with his/her
answer.

Presentation Poorly prepared Poorly prepared slides, Acceptable font size Font size large 0.5x
slides, small font & small font; good good contrast. enough for entire
& poor contrast. contrast. Over 5 Over 4 minutes classroom good
Over 6 minutes minutes longer than longer than allocated contrast. Over 3
longer than allocated time. time. minutes longer than
allocated time. allocated time.

TOTAL
44