Shadow usefulness recognizes oneness and innerness while

clearness is zoom in exposing of ownership around away

draft copy 07/29/20

In fact the major main principles of driving inertial innerness or operative oneness has to discuss the
dynamics and the objectivity of movability and movement motion.
∂2 progress
∂time 2
¿ challenge=
clear ⋅ behavior
illusion∓
dynamics
¿
¿
Therefore intentional imaging impact shall perform knowledge processing or cultivation (implement
knowledge in order to evaluate reality of trust in selfish confidence would work on principles of driving
the great challenge of having thing’s movability across assistance of measurable motion or
meaningfulness of movement has to defend std::ios::beg, std::ios::end and std::ios::cur (cursor) for (if
p 1− p
(
stream tell get() :: ¿ clear ( p )= −1+ e
1− p
, −1+e p )that imposes operative boundary barrier limits in
¿
¿
dragging design of trust in selfish confidence only because the proportional processing is getting
thinking about moving up extensible “weigh” can benefit from an inner processing does expect to
return valuable reality of “data gathering or information or of to gather information throughout
dynamics technology of “ongoing edges”.

Therefore, digital insistence on exploitation liable linguistic logic’s (O Lord Creator God please
English Schooling in English) whose intentional innerness is round around tryout of settlement set =
{(measurable::amount, utility::tools (usefulness)), (instill::node (road map), infuse::edge (ongoing
stepping around chance), (custom(event::happening or occurrence or appearance), trust(time::count a
day away to be aware))} settlement set in extractive shape of real matter does encourage digital
inventor to stand around behind the dominance of language terms which could learn more from piece
string = “Early soul in body”, a linguistic power would weigh the manipulation of timing simulation
has to reserve its responsibility turning its attention to dynamics of existence (only because the
thinkable energy soul is an enlargement of vivid vital mechanism would empower any predictable
expectation ( it seems that it’s expected that “Early soul or “before any” standards of vital involvement
has to ask for required necessity of embodiment or has to refer to targeting movement or movability
std::ios::be (Prophet Adams and the highest virtuality to access the fully exploitation of land or of earth
or the first appliance of agriculture handling platform (only because some people believe that the first
Prophet on the Earth was keeping power exploiting land or Earth within farming schemes through
technical solution was imported from God’s instrumentation. Thus in many Holly Book, the best story
of exploiting farming around across away to produce recording reality on what timing simulation has to
confirm while ratio of 1 over (24 * 180) would be translated to manipulation of multiplication of 6 by
30 = 180 day and more … etc .. However the major main cheerful is to justify meaningfulness of a
computing an hour. Let’s know that in actual sensitivity show, the ratio of 1 to 24 is a strike in making
leadership to governable topics is very important called = how to make food or meal in only one hour::
for example when thinking about Spaghetti in eight minutes or ten minutes times enforce having all
liberty to validate the tastefulness of corresponding Spaghetti. Although to get Spaghetti from farming
reserves, transportation time will be priority would pay less attention than the production of Spaghetti
itself. Thus, from conceptual accordance “std::ios::beg”, which to point to formal knowledge on what a
process of ten minutes Spaghetti has to compute about one hour recognition of great industry
monitoring the translation of grain into usefulness of Earth and terms of extravagance ( payroll, full
measure, fullness, overflow) that ranking the effect of “if stream tell get()” or the importance of
extensible exploration std::ios::cur (or wanted cursor ::logistics (deliverance to cooking process and
estimation of std::ios::end).

Therefor, liable linguist logic’s policy is investing time to expend this principles of “Early soul in body
<=> guarantee of believing in comprehensive chance can explore advisory role that the Holly Marry
did wait effects of standard soul (thinkable energy support the powerful existence has access to modify
commonly sense of human cheerfulness) while the great opportunity of believing in Jesus inspired
being great help from Lord Creator God to Holly Marry helping Holly Marry believing in the greatness
of Lord Creator God who can create human body within any need to anyone else. This creation is
creating the features of “Early soul, soul had been charged to communicate with a world of knowledge
through a meeting opportunity transporting the abstract shielding can shape a world of innocence in
which or where there human souls have to meet dialogue debating on what future has to promote away.
Thus it is great earning of “Early soul in body” (story of birth of Jesus looks like giving birth for
Adams to be Prophet proud on what did keep running on the Earth).
Thus this “Early soul in body <=> timing simulation does valuate the principles of productivity in
commonly exposition of (faster = only one hour will be need to produce a meal from battleground up
that is point to selectivity of “implementable cultivation ::: carrots, appel, legumes, fruits, … something
referencing to be cooking around over away while the containment is engendering principles of
testimony and validation (yeah to validate relevance, yeah to validate process of productivity, yeah to
validate readability, yeah to validate balance benefits, yeah to validate competition and digital
threads, ...yeah to validate something and something else, something can debate for clear context of
improvement and dependence of original enhancement , something can discuss charging choice and to
maintain real relationship engaged to perform more supervisory roles and surveillance of translated
usefulness::: usefulness refers to Earth’s exploitation within the study of (faster = pay attention to a
progress = ratio of 1 to 24 (daily it is poorest possible to work around basic improvement would reach
1 over 24, slower = wait on seniority on trust in selfish confidence does hold for innovative opportunity
1
p
(platform for research and making things more useful 0 2
(
¿ ∫ log 1+
)
1+ p ⋅ ∫ key ()∂ tellg ( )
tellg()
¿
∂p

¿
thought used to recognize principles of trust in selfish confidence within entirely exposition of
valuation, valuation has to push on meaningfulness of:
1. dictionary language: Value set upon a thing; estimated value or worth; as, the goods sold for
more than their valuation. This dictionary language that has to has to compare “Estimation <=>
Valuation” in a neutrality of “pick up” something does exist around over away. Thus, “Early
soul in body <=> Prophet Joseph is the Prince but later Lord Creator God will be the King for
any around the globe, has to threaten valuable estimation process shall assembly the greatness
of expertise with legacy of law made in proper profit of being consciously integrated in
delivering something can understand environmental choice of usefulness acting on human
1
1 −2 ⋅ p
quietness
¿ dynamics=∫ log 1+
0 2
( 1 − p ⋅ ( 1− p )
∂p )
which has to support principles of movement
¿
¿
and movability around over away in entirely exploitation of probabilistic world has to respect
principles of centric metrics approach.

2. prediction is rushy show on congratulating the kindness for more chance while exponential
policy (as many people vote for ) can speak clear language of diversity and variety around over
away. Therefor, it is exponential policy has to generate principles for resistance and much more
A
y ( kindness ) ⋅
a
¿ e vector (x )= , binary=2n ,n=0,1,2 , ..., N
a lot of aspiration Max () . While the
− y ( kindness ) +
base
¿
¿
principles of using modeling of behavior has to empower principles of legendary around trust in
p

selfish confidence ¿ behavior=exp ( ∫ key ( )∂tellg ()−

2
(
p ⋅log 1+
1+ p ⋅ ∫
tellg()
key ()∂ tellg ( ) ))
tellg ()
1− p
¿
¿
that can guarantee conformity or confirmation of “if stream tell get()”.
Duality’s recovery (genuine = something, unjust = something else or anything else) mapping pair does
look very useful across adjustment of transition traceability showing ability to determine whether
principles of “making choice or charging decision or pick up or select” are dependency show on what
trust in selfish confidence does aim to model signal complexity. Duality’s recovery is translation
1 ∫ key()

( e
)
tellg( )

∫ log 1+ p ⋅ ( 1− p)
∂p
terminology 0 2 that has to support principles useful concept can image that valid
( 1− 2⋅ p)
2

e
¿
¿
transformation of (genuine = something, unjust = something else or anything else) mapping pair that
can define a descriptive assumption (being assumed that count a day away to be aware can affect
principles of discrete event simulation). Therefore job scheduling is management of transition
θ
θ ⋅sin2 (θ )
traceability ∫
0
log
2
( 1+
1 − sin⋅ cos )
∂ θ scheduling is touching a lot of digital features around over away.
¿
Therefore the principles of valuation is going away while trust in selfish confidence is simply easy
purpose of job scheduling can interpret sequential interaction around across selectivity away. Liable
linguistic logic’s policy {(measurable::amount, utility::tools), (instill::node, infuse::edge),
(custom(event::happening), trust(time::count a day away to be aware))} settlement set . Thus it is
essential exploitation on what valid translation traceability does hold around over away. The principles
on what judgment of situation is charging to expose away. Thereupon liable linguistic logic’s policy
{(measurable::amount, utility::tools), (instill::node, infuse::edge), (custom(event), trust(time::count a
day away to be aware))} settlement set, which is involved within principles of trust of selfish
confidence does try to realize manipulation of piece string “neither guilty nor faulty and never to ruin
1 ∏
1 − p ⋅ ∫ key ( ) ∂ tellg( )
nor to destroy“. Therefore job scheduling is useful on what ∫
tellg () ( tellg ()
) ∂ pthat
0 1 − p ⋅ (1 − p)
¿
has to reserve complete mirroring images on what human commonly sense or reference does know
determine responsibility of descriptive dynamics would stand for formality of valuation and exploration
of iterative implementation std::map<key, std::queue<float>> :: iterator has to point to a beginning
directives (std::io::beg) and to test whether a reached end ( std::ios::end) that does define the principles
θ
θ ⋅ sin 2
of optimal influence on what job scheduling 0 2 ∫ log( 1+
1 − sin⋅ cos )
∂ θdoes return over away. The trust
¿
in selfish confidence is a resulting recommendation into complete point overview defines principles of
1+ p ⋅ ∫ key () 1+ ( 1 − p ) ⋅ ∫ key ( )

regularity
log
2
( 1− p ) (
⋅ log
2 p ) that can expose great impact on what
p 1−p
1+16 ⋅ ( 1+cos 2 ) ⋅e 1 − p ∨ e p
¿
probabilistic world purposes accomplishing around over away. Therefore transition traceability that can
reserve principles for exploitation of expertise of job scheduling. Transition traceability is appreciate
guidance ( guide me as it could, show me the right as it would) has express how job scheduling
(while(constraint conditions ) do { statements } ). Therefore instructive implementation does run
instruction expressing major main ideas worry away on what sensitivity synthesis doe engage to
comply with subjecting transition traceability. While intentional images of appreciate adjustment can
enforce conformity on what job scheduling. The principles of driven dynamics that has to deploy valid
1
1
∫ log
involvement 0 2 (
1+ p⋅ ∑
)
tellg() ∫ key ( ) ∂ tellg( )
tellg ()
¿
∂p
that would try to extract principles of regularity

within importance of integrity. The valid concept of job scheduling ( C++ codes does look to
implement thinkable energy ( soul ) within exploitation of availability of composing components each
is designated to accomplish thread tasks::: void main(){ char a = ‘a’; char* ch =&a; char** pch =
&pch; while(**pch) { std ::cout << “value of char pointer = “ << *ch << std::endl; ++ch; return 0; }
which has to wait for instantiation around across trust in selfish confidence. Transition traceability is
responsible on what extensible exploration seeming have impact on what liable linguistic logic’s policy.
Thus job scheduling is driven dynamics on what clear bright context on the modeling schemes
{ AND( soul(thinkable energy) , triplet( wait (wait for or wait on or wait until), wavy( quietness across
alter-nance arrangement), thoughts( Early soul in boy <=> mastering purpose of manufacturing based
upon exploration of timing guided by “Early <=> not yet late”)}. This driven dynamics which has to
recognize principles of inserting greatness on useful thinkable energy around over away::

tellg () wait wait on wait until

Retrievals= ∫
prediction 2 ( (
log 1+ 1 soul ( thinkable ( energy ) ) ∧ wavy
logics

¿
thoughts purpose exploration))
altering frequently ∂ tellg()
Thus associate approach is quiet concern on what is great processing (if (processing == dropping) or
while(processing == dropping ) do { if (stream) (<=> possibility of exploitation of sensor effects allow
gathering of data all around valid of translation and transformation’s confirmation or conformity) then
tell (invest in manipulation of balance collectivity) get() = something does matter ). Therefore it is great
show looking for transition traceability that has to support logic’s policy around over away whereby
liable logic’s policy which would output something leaf like::

tellg () composite combination mixture

out ( 1 =
logic ' s ) ∫
impact 2 ( (
log 1+ 1
logics
Retrievals ( binary ) ∧

¿
tools
level
instrumentation
jump climb))
need ∂ tellg()

Thus it is valid concept for transition traceability that shall hold principles of human touch around
adjustment and arrangement. Thereupon educational behavior is expressing great image mirroring
rightly run around transition traceability. Therefore it is exploration of “Early soul in body” would
enforces the target of predictable thoughts has to push on manufacturing management would attain
principles of vital exploitation. Thus to use something like embodiment which has to stand around
beyond proper thread task jobs got in mirroring accomplishment of (O Lord Creator God please
English Schooling in English ) of what partly thought that any body is able to cooperate away inside
announcement of trust in selfish confidence. However “Early soul in body <=> required time to insert
a thinkable energy( soul ) in a body thought manufactured next after exploiting the ruling role of this
thinkable energy( soul ) has to interfere with appreciate association spread messaging signalization on
what intentional instrumentation would overload around behind a exerting example template<class T,
class V> Hold{ public: Hold<T, >(….) .. can express willing on what job scheduling has to define for
accomplishing ruling roles of valuation and exploration while transition traceability is useful acquiring
acquisition submits vivid dynamics in terms of thinkable energy( soul) enabling study of attainability.
Liable linguistic logic’s through it settlement’s set = {(measurable ::amount, utility::tools),
(instill::node, infuse::edge), (custom(event ::happening), trust(time::count a day away to be aware))},
1
p ⋅ (1 − p)
which works around evaluation token simulation 0 2
∫ log(1+
)
p ⋅ ( 1 − p ) + ( 1 −2 ⋅ p )
2
∂p
showing
¿
¿
dynamics on conformity. Therefore, probabilistic world is exposing measurable management across
transition tractability compiles the probabilistic world being reference for centric metrics management
1
1− 2⋅ p
∫ log
0 2
( 2+ )
1− p ⋅ ( 1 − p )
∂p
and scalability policy log ( 3 ) . Thus it is justification on what transition tractability
2
¿
¿
does look for aiming to reserve regularity on exploitation subject of existence (as Immanuel Kant
German Philosopher has mentioned light is symbol of dominance ). Therefore trust in selfish
confidence (because thinkable energy (soul) does request that the regularity on exploiting existence has
to intensify the meaningfulness of piece string = “neither guilty nor faulty” and piece string = “never to
ruin nor to destroy” exposes the challenge on what a progress has to signify if the trust in selfish
confidence is engaging to set principles (itemizing insight has to rule (each item is decorative of
governable rulers( diversity within challenging law roles around over away)). Therefore transition
 ∂2 progress
∂time 2
challenge=
tractability is assistance clear ⋅ behavior assistance does putout or conclude on
illusion∓
dynamics
¿
¿
what eventually environment works around empowering knowledge culture has associate affair with::
frame Fps Queue Size Time Bit-rate speed
size of(if stream) amount per 1s
std::queue<float> advance

This approach is screening countable concept

sizeof ( ifstream) −tellg( )

p=log 1+
2
( sizeof ( ifstream )+ tellg( ) ⋅

¿
∫
tellg()
key ( )∂ tellg ( ) )
Thus the concept of trust in selfish confidence which does define principles of morality and the legacy
of compass moral. Therefore, timing simulation (Early soul in body <=> (equivalence) worthy walk
into neat networking (respect of eternal valuation (giving value for each running rally) of any type
corresponding to modeling or simulation or compilation or affair of being together or working together
or collectivism or similar show…). Thus this approach aims to weigh principles of “neither guilty nor
1+ p ⋅ ∫ key () 1+ ( 1 − p ) ⋅ ∫ key ( )

faulty and never to ruin nor to destroy”::

log
2
(1− p
⋅ log
2
) ( p
that struggle
)
p 1−p
1+16 ⋅ ( 1+cos 2 ) ⋅e 1 − p ∨ e p
¿
between being aside apart ( std::streamsize nbytes = size of(if stream ); ). Law legacy is update of
conformity insisting on mostly likely admittance that soul’s satisfaction is sensitive boundary barrier
1 ∏ ( 1 − p ⋅∫ key ( ) )
tellg
(looks for transparency and talent):: ∫ ∂ pexplains why it is subject of transition
0 1− p ⋅ ( 1 − p )
¿
traceability in great memorizing management of logic’s policy. Therefore, transition traceability has to
signify significance of digital descriptive draw design (illustration across images have to talk about
digital mirroring around over away). Thereupon it is systematic synchronization on what trust in selfish
confidence has to define around bright clear image of individualized comportment joins “thoughts
being thinkable or being clever enough” with great show of opportunity of manufacturing (performing
skeleton body around across away which has to carry a virtual image of open mind around over away).
The appreciate ownership is a meeting of eternal valuation ask for appreciate arrangement works on
rectifying images of innocence which imagine having impact on systematic regularity enforces
expertise around importance of trust in selfish confidence.
 1
1
log
Thus, ∫ 2
0 ( 1+ p⋅ ∑
)∂p
∫ key () assumption has to insist on what trust in selfish confidence would
¿
signify around over away while the principles of recognition and acknowledgment. Law legacy is
looking for piece string “O Lord Creator God English schooling in English:: it can exist a composite
being somehow in Relationship with Minus(among, basic) => (corresponding) among shininess there is
opportunity to manage selectivity and a process of pick up.

1 ∫ key()∂ tellg ()

( e
)
tellg

Although trust in selfish confidence to push on

∫ log
2
1+ ∂p
that does principles of liable
p ⋅ ( 1− p)
0 2
( 1− 2 ⋅ p)
e
¿
linguistic logic’s policy in a notion of trust in selfish confidence. In fact, the end file character is
somehow exploring of std::ios::end that has to work around principles of consciously concept must
understand the inertial innerness of “it can exist Composite being somehow in Relationship with
Minus(among, basic)” which would define images of harmony and strong cooperative coordination
around over away. Thus the appreciate arrangement does recognize the value of
1 ∫ key()∂ tellg ()

( e
)
tellg

∫ log
2
1+ ∂p
which would translate the reality of digital capitalization. Duality’s recovery
p ⋅ ( 1− p)
0 2
( 1− 2 ⋅ p)
e
¿
(genuine = something, unjust = something else or anything else) mapping pair has to unify dynamics on
what sensitive scheduling “Early soul in body” shall expose looking for human commonly sense to
determine whether the reality of proportionality (there is at least minimum percentage of soul’s
satisfaction). Regarding to the reality of digital principles , the maintaining management is to
1 ∫ key()∂ tellg ()

( e
)
tellg

∫ log
2
1+ ∂p
show would generate atmosphere for trust in selfish confidence would
p ⋅ ( 1− p)
0 2
( 1− 2 ⋅ p)
e
¿
evaluate the massive intensity of governable management does hope leading human commonly sense to
work around scalability (minimum percentage for soul’s satisfaction while the acceptance of appreciate
images mirroring oneness or inner innerness does still wait for more expertise on what great notion or
meaningfulness of collectivism has to master around over away.

Yeah for each person around the globe it is possible to assume having tasks or thread tasks to
accomplish and success to achieve meanwhile the choice charging on what something called “plan” or
“agenda plan” would reserve its weigh within suggestion usefulness.
The great conceptual show of collectivism while many people are looking to work together achieving
around trust of selfish confidence something genuine has to recognize the effects of educational
1 ∫ key()∂ tellg ()

( e
)
tellg

behavior
∫ log
2
1+ ∂p
reference to valuation of trust in selfish confidence meanwhile
p ⋅ ( 1− p)
0 2
( 1− 2 ⋅ p)
e
¿
attainable aims on what collectivism (yeah great soul being together wanna want accomplishing tasks
of scientific rules (each itemizing insight has to weigh something more useful for any sort kind stuff
while the significance of smartness has to stand beyond any measures are taken around away, ) and the
respect of massive gravity remain availability of adaptation-
In fact, duality’s recovery is dealing with (genuine = something, unjust = something else or anything
else) (genuine = something = light in the sky and, unjust = something else earth to exploit seed and
grains because trees and plants do absorb light from sky.) The transition traceability is around pushing
on mastering imagination world does tell tales about:

1. something making pressure on commonly human being.

2. cooperative collectivity (exposing the relationship between consciously concept and ownership).
3. exploration of (plan = compliance with “count a day away to be ware”, subject = something much
more likely being probably).
4. gain on experience (showing huge interest in gain skills if experiments have to return good results
around over away, for example a = log(1 + alpha); b = log2(2 – alpha); which would be used to
construct shininess at wavy behavior exploration show. Let diff( p ) = b( p ) - a( p ); and round( p ) =
a(p) * b(p); or it is possible to introduce the optimization show while the sx(p) = Min(a(p), b(p)); and
mx(p) = Max( a(p), b(p)); then using principles of
5. agreement to model periodicity( p ) = round( p ) * difference( p ). The trust that it can exist
round( p ) = p * ( 1 – p ) while p = proportionality (percentage %), difference( p ) = (1 – p) – p = 1 – 2
*p;
Appendix:

octave:12> for i = 1:999 sx( i ) = min( x(i), y( i )); mx( i ) = max( x( i ), y( i )); dh( i ) = sx( i ) + mx( i );
dl( i ) = mx( i ) - sx( i ); dr( i ) = mx( i ) * sx( i ); dp( i ) = dl( i ) * dr( i ); dw( i ) = dp( i ) / ( dh( i ) * dh(
i ) * dh( i )); endfor;
octave:13> plot( dw )
octave:22> for i = 1:999 sx( i ) = min( p(i), q( i )); mx( i ) = max( p( i ), q( i )); dh( i ) = sx( i ) + mx( i );
dl( i ) = mx( i ) - sx( i ); dr( i ) = mx( i ) * sx( i ); dp( i ) = dl( i ) * dr( i ); dw( i ) = dp( i ) / ( dh( i ) * dh(
i ) * dh( i )); endfor;
octave:23> plot( dw )

octave:1> p=1:999;
octave:2> p=p/1000;
octave:3> q=1-p;
octave:4> for i=1:999 r(i) = p(i)*q(i); endfor;
octave:5> plot(r);
octave:6> for i=1:999 d(i) =q(i) - p(i); v(i) = r(i) * d(i); endfor;
octave:7> plot(v);
octave:8>

octave:1> p=1:999;
octave:2> p=p/1000;
octave:3> q = 1 - p;
octave:4> for i=1:999; r(i)=p(i)*q(i); d(i)=q(i) - p(i); w(i)=r(i)*d(i); endfor;
octave:5> plot(w);
octave:6> for i=1:999 e(i) = w(i) * ( 1 - 3 * p( i )); endfor;
octave:7> plot( e );
octave:8> for i=1:999 h(i) = e(i) * ( 1 - 4 * p( i )); endfor;
octave:9> plot( h );
octave:10> plot( -h );
octave:11> for i=1:999 j(i) = -h(i) * ( 1 - 5 * p( i )); endfor;
octave:12> plot( j );
octave:13> plot( -j );
octave:14>