BUKU2 EKONOMI TERAPAN

Lee, Frederic S. (2007), The Research Assessment Exercise,

the state and the dominance of mainstream
economics in British universities, Cambridge Journal of
Economics 31: 309-325.
Lee, Frederic S. (2008), A case for ranking heterodox journals
and departments, On the Horizon 16:
241-251.
Liebowitz, Stan J., and John P. Palmer (1984), Assessing the
relative impacts of economics journals,
Journal of Economic Literature 22: 77-88.
Lo, Melody, M.C. Sunny Wong, and Franklin G. Mixon
(2008), Ranking economics journals, economics
departments, and economists using teaching-focused research
productivity, Southern Economic
Journal 74: 894-906.
Luwel, Marc, Henk F. Moed, Anton J. Nederhof, V. De
Samblanx, K. Verbrugghen, and L. J. Van Der
Wurff (1999), Towards indicators of research performance in
the social sciences and humanities,
Leiden, CWTS.
Meho, Lokman I. (2007), The rise and rise of citation
analysis, Physics World 20: 32–36.
Meho, Lokman I., and Yvonne Rogers (2008), Citation
counting, citation ranking, and h-index of humancomputer
interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of
Science, Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology 59:
1711–1726.
Merton, Robert K. (1968), The Matthew Effect in science,
Science 159: 56-63.
Merton, Robert K. (1973), The sociology of science:
theoretical and empirical investigation, Chicago,
IL, University of Chicago Press.
Metcalf, Charles E. (2008), Can government-sponsered
evaluations be independent?, Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management 27: 926–942.
Moed, Henk F. (2005), Citation analysis in research
evaluation, Dordrecht, Springer.
Moed, Henk F. (2008), UK research assessment exercises:
Informed judgments on research quality or
quantity?, Scientometrics 74: 153–161.
Moed, Henk F., W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort, and
Anthony F.J. Van Raan (1985), The use of bibliometric
data for the measurement of university research performance,
Research Policy 14: 131-149.
Moxham, H., and J. Anderson (1992), Peer review. A view
from the inside, Science and Technology
Policy 5: 7-15