Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electric Power Components and Systems
Electric Power Components and Systems
To cite this article: A. Jalilian & R. Roshanfekr (2009) Analysis of Three-phase Induction Motor Performance under Different
Voltage Unbalance Conditions Using Simulation and Experimental Results, Electric Power Components and Systems, 37:3,
300-319, DOI: 10.1080/15325000802454476
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Electric Power Components and Systems, 37:300–319, 2009
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1532-5008 print/1532-5016 online
DOI: 10.1080/15325000802454476
Tehran, Iran
2
Tarbiat Moallem University of Sabzevar, Sabzevar, Iran
Keywords three-phase induction motors, exact model, simple model, voltage unbal-
ance factor, current unbalance factor, derating factor
1. Introduction
Unbalanced voltage is one of the most frequent disturbances in electrical systems. Large
single-phase loads, unbalanced loads, system faults, etc. are some of the causes of voltage
300
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 301
unbalance [1]. Most of the standards only specify the percentage of voltage unbalance
without indicating the unbalance conditions. The reality is that there are many voltage
unbalance cases that have the same voltage unbalance factor (VUF) but have different
effects on loads [2–4].
A majority of industrial loads are three-phase induction motors [5]. Induction motors
are being used more than ever due to their versatility, dependability, and economical
advantages. Voltage unbalance causes the performance of motors to deviate from desirable
conditions. IEEE Std. 112 [6] allows 0.5% voltage unbalance when performing standard
tests on polyphase induction motors.
Studies concerning three-phase induction motor operation under unbalanced voltage
conditions have been conducted since the 1950s [1]. Under a voltage unbalance, the
amplitude of the line current deviations can be many times larger than the voltage
changes [7–9]. This can affect the motor protection system to be malfunctioned. Also,
pulsating torque can be created, which results in mechanical vibration and faster aging of
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
the machine [10]. The other undesirable effects of the voltage unbalance on performance
of induction motors are efficiency and power factor reduction [8], loss increase [11, 12],
mechanical speed loss [13, 14], insulation damage and thermal degradation [15], and loss
of useful life [16, 17].
According to the NEMA standard, operating a motor for any length of time at
voltage unbalance above 5% is not recommended. In order to minimize the undesirable
effects of the unbalance voltage, the motor should be derated [18–20]; for instance,
it is recommended that the motor loading level be decreased so that the largest stator
phase current becomes equal to the motor rated current [19]. Another criterion is to
reduce the motor loading to keep the maximum temperature of motor windings under
an allowable limit. Analysis of an induction motor operating under various unbalanced
voltage conditions using the simple model has been reported in [18], where motor derating
is also studied. With the aid of experimental tests, the motor derating factor (DF) under
different VUFs are derived and discussed in [20].
Different analytical methods are presented for analysis of three-phase induction
motors under voltage unbalance conditions. The simple model is used for motor simula-
tion using SABER [5] and EMTP (POWERSYS Co., Las Grandes Terres, France) [10]
softwares, respectively. The use of a simple model in the form of a conventional equivalent
circuit has also been reported for simulation purposes in the literature [19, 21–23].
Application of an optical fiber sensor for experimental tests on induction motors under
unbalanced and harmonic voltage conditions was reported in [9], where a new method
for detection of source voltage unbalance is presented. Symmetrical components [21, 24],
phase frame [22], and circle diagram [25] methods have been employed for analysis of
the steady-state performance of induction motors. The phase frame method eliminates
the necessity of transforming all quantities to symmetrical components. However, another
method employs the mathematical equations used for steady-state and transient perfor-
mance analysis of induction motors [23, 26]. Application of dynamic phasors in modeling
of unbalanced polyphase AC machines has been reported in [26], where a comparison
between experimental and simulation results using a simple equivalent model is presented.
Variations of stator currents and rotor speed were investigated in this study.
In this article, based on the mathematical equations related to three-phase induction
motors, an exact model has been provided for simulation purposes where core saturation,
core losses, and friction loss are considered. Different types of voltage unbalance have
been generated using Matlab/Simulink software (The Math Works, Inc.) and applied to
a 1.5-kW three-phase induction motor. Using an experimental setup, the same voltage
302 A. Jalilian and R. Roshanfekr
unbalance conditions have been produced using three single-phase autotransformers and
applied to the test motor. The motor performance is analyzed using exact and simple
model simulations and experimental tests under various VUFs. Variations of stator cur-
rents, motor efficiency, and power factors have been investigated and compared in this
article. Finally, different methods for determining the DF are presented for the test motor
operating under different unbalanced voltage conditions.
Z
rs
qs D !b vqs C . mq qs / dt; (1)
xl s
Z
rs
ds D !b vds C . md ds / dt; (2)
xl s
rr0
Z
0 0 !r 0 0
qr D !b vqr C C . mq / dt; (3)
!b d r xlr0 qr
r0
Z
!r
0
dr D !b vd0 r 0
qr C 0r . md
0
dr / dt; (4)
!b xlr
0
mq D xm .iqs C iqr /; (5)
qs mq
iqs D ; (7)
xl s
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
ds md
ids D ; (8)
xl s
0
0 qr mq
iqr D 0 ; (9)
xlr
0
dr md
id0 r D 0 ; (10)
xlr
!
0
qs qr
mq D xM C 0 ; (11)
xl s xlr
0
ds dr
md D xM C 0 ; (12)
xl s xlr
3 P 0s 0s 0s 0s
Tem D . qr id r d r iqr /: (13)
2 2!b
In the above equations, , i , and x are the motor flux linkage, current, and reactance
related to the stator (s) and rotor (r ), respectively. The equation of motion of the rotor
is obtained by equating the inertia torque to the accelerating torque, that is,
2J !b d.!r =!b /
D Tem C Tmech Tdamp : (14)
P dt
and efficiency are considered as outputs of this model. In the exact model, core loss,
mechanical loss, and core saturation have been considered, while in the simple model,
these parameters are ignored. Figure A.2 in Appendix A shows the part of the induction
motor model for simulation of mutual flux saturation.
Vmax
Voltage Unbalance Percent D 100; (15)
Vavg
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
where Vavg is the average of the three-phase RMS voltages, and Vmax is the maximum
difference between each voltage and the average. Another definition is known as the
VUF, which is defined by IEC [5, 14] as
ˇ ˇ
ˇ Vn ˇ
VUF D ˇˇ ˇˇ 100; (16)
Vp
where Vn and Vp are negative and positive sequence voltage components, respectively.
This definition is an accurate analytical approach for the calculation of voltage unbalance
in various conditions.
It should be mentioned that voltage unbalance can also be created by changes in the
phase angle of three-phase voltages, which is not considered in this study.
The block diagram of Figure 2 is used for simulation of the three-phase unbalanced
voltage source in Matlab/Simulink software. As shown, different unbalanced voltage
conditions can be produced with changes in the amplitude of A-, B-, and C-phase
voltages. The outputs of this block are the amplitudes and the phases of positive and
negative sequence voltages and the calculated VUF in each condition. In order to make the
unbalance voltage conditions in the experimental test, three single-phase autotransformers
are used. With changes in the amplitude of each autotransformer by trial-and-error, the
exact state of unbalance voltage is achieved. Figure 3 shows the experimental setup
diagram that is used for experimental tests on an induction motor.
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 305
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
A 1.5-kW three-phase squirrel cage induction motor is used for simulation and exper-
imental tests in this investigation. Specifications of the test motor is given in Appendix B.
In the simulation stage, the amplitudes of three-phase voltages are calculated so that the
desired VUF can be achieved for different conditions. In experimental tests, the mag-
nitudes of three-phase voltages are adjusted using the autotransformers to achieve the
same conditions as in simulation stages. In experimental tests, all electrical quantities are
measured using a three-phase digital power multi-meter. A standard tachometer is also
employed for mechanical speed measurement. In order to compare the simulation and
experimental test results, the motor output power is considered to be the same in each
series of tests. Experimental tests and simulations are conducted in three cases related to
the aforementioned six states of voltage unbalance as:
cases with the same VUF but different unbalance voltages (see Tables 1 and 2),
cases with only one unbalanced voltage but different VUFs (see Table 3), and
cases with the same positive-sequence voltages but different negative-sequence
voltages (see Table 4).
Table 1
The results of motor operation under six voltage unbalance cases at
60% of the output power and VUF D 2%
Simulation
Experiment (exact model)
Balance 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 0.0 77.5 65.5 80.5 62.2
3 UV 206.2 211.3 204.4 207.3 4.2 77.4 70.7 80.5 67.8
2 UV 207.6 214.5 213.1 211.7 4.2 77.3 68.8 80.5 65.8
1 UV 213.5 220.0 213.5 215.6 4.3 77.2 66.9 80.3 64.5
1 OV 226.8 220.0 226.8 224.5 4.5 75.8 62.4 79.8 59.8
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Table 2
The results of motor operation under six voltage unbalance cases at
60% of the output power and VUF D 4%
Simulation
Experiment (exact model)
Balance 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 0.0 77.5 65.5 80.5 62.2
3 UV 192.9 205.9 203.6 200.7 8.0 77.3 73.7 80.3 70.7
2 UV 195.8 209.0 206.9 203.9 8.0 77.2 72.6 80.3 69.4
1 UV 207.4 220.0 207.4 211.5 8.4 76.9 69.6 79.7 66.4
1 OV 233.9 220.0 233.8 229.2 9.2 76.2 59.4 78.4 57.0
2 OV 264.1 229.8 236.5 237.4 9.5 75.3 53.6 76.4 51.9
3 OV 249.3 232.7 240.2 240.7 9.6 74.6 51.9 75.5 50.3
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 307
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Figure 4. Variation of motor efficiency with positive sequence voltage (VUF D 2%) at 60% of
the rated power.
Figure 5. Variation of motor efficiency with positive sequence voltage (VUF D 4%) at 60% of
the rated power.
308 A. Jalilian and R. Roshanfekr
variation of efficiency with the VUF is very small (almost constant) where the simple
model is employed for motor simulations. The reason is that the magnetic reactance in
the simple model is constant (Xm D 105 in this case), and therefore, the magnetizing
current and stator copper losses are also constant. The variation of input power is very
small, which is mainly due to the small changes in stator current due to the variation of
the VUF, resulting in slight changes in efficiency (i.e., less than 1% of the output power).
Also, the motor power factor is obtained using simulation and experimental results,
and their variations with a VUF of 2% and 4% are shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.
The results indicate that with the same VUF, the changes in positive sequence voltage
components are 25.4 V and 40 V for VUF D 2% and VUF D 4%, respectively. The
changes in negative sequence voltage components are 0.48 V and 1.63 V for VUF D 2%
and VUF D 4%, respectively. These figures show that with the same VUF, a higher
positive sequence voltage gives a lower efficiency and power factor when exact model
and experimental tests results are considered. The reason for decreasing the efficiency
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
can be justified as motor input power increases with the increase of a positive sequence
voltage component. This figure is contrary to the results obtained from simple modeling of
the motor, where slight changes are observed in motor efficiency as the positive sequence
component of the voltage increases. However, a decrease in motor power factor with an
increase of positive sequence voltage component is caused by motor core saturation. This
would decrease the magnetizing reactance and increase the magnetizing current, which,
in turn, results in an increase in motor reactive power.
It should be noted that in these tests, the input active power increases with the
positive sequence voltage component, but the increase in the reactive power is larger
than the increase in the active power. For example, in Table 1, the increase in active
Figure 6. Variation of motor power factor with positive sequence voltage (VUF D 2%) at 60% of
the rated power.
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 309
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Figure 7. Variation of motor power factor with positive sequence voltage (VUF D 4%) at 60% of
the rated power.
and reactive power from the three-phase under-voltage unbalance case to the three-phase
over-voltage unbalance case, which corresponds to the increase in the positive sequence
voltage component, is 41 W and 540 Var, respectively. Therefore, with an increase in the
positive sequence voltage component, the power factor has decreased.
Table 3
Experimental results of motor operation under different VUFs by decreasing
single-phase voltage at 60% of the output power
0 220.0 220 220.0 220.0 0.0 77.5 65.5 4.7 0.00 0.0
1 216.7 220 216.7 217.8 2.2 77.3 66.4 4.7 0.13 2.8
2 213.5 220 213.5 215.6 4.3 77.2 66.9 4.6 0.26 5.7
3 210.4 220 210.4 213.6 6.4 77.0 68.0 4.7 0.40 8.6
4 207.5 220 207.5 211.5 8.4 76.9 69.6 4.6 0.53 11.4
5 204.5 220 204.5 209.5 10.4 76.7 69.9 4.7 0.66 14.1
6 201.6 220 201.6 207.5 12.5 76.0 70.0 4.7 0.79 16.9
7 198.7 220 198.7 205.5 14.4 75.6 71.2 4.7 0.92 19.7
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
in constant load conditions, motor currents change so that the positive sequence current
component stays constant and the voltage unbalance affects only the negative sequence
current component. The simulation results and the circuit analysis of the motor in this
condition confirm this fact.
Figures 10 and 11 show the variation of rotor electromagnetic torque ripple from
startup under VUF D 2% and VUF D 7% and at 60% of the rated power using simulation
Figure 8. Variation of motor efficiency with VUF (Table 3) at 60% of the rated power.
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 311
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Figure 9. Variation of motor power factor with VUF (Table 3) at 60% of the rated power.
results. The peak-to-peak value of torque ripple is calculated to be 1.9 Nm and 6.4 Nm
with VUF D 2% and VUF D 7%, respectively. It means that by increasing the VUF, the
range of torque ripple increases in motor. Also, in this test (only decreasing single-phase
voltage), as VUF increases, the positive sequence voltage decreases, and hence, the first
swing amplitude in electromagnetic torque decreases.
The negative sequence component of the supply voltage produces an air gap flux that
rotates at the synchronous speed opposite to the direction of the rotor motion. Therefore,
under normal operating conditions (i.e., low slip conditions, where s 0), the frequency
of the rotor current due to the induced emf produced by the negative sequence component
is almost twice that of the supply frequency, i.e., .2 s/f . Therefore, the frequency of the
torque ripple is .2 s/f . In experimental tests, however, the motor sound (noise) increases
with the increase of VUF, indicating the increase of rotor electromagnetic torque ripple.
Table 4
Experimental results of motor operation under different VUFs with the same positive
sequence voltage component at 60% of the output power
0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220 0.0 77.5 65.5 4.7 0.00 0.0
1 221.9 218.1 220.0 220 2.2 77.3 65.5 4.7 0.13 2.9
2 223.8 216.2 220.0 220 4.4 77.0 65.5 4.7 0.26 5.6
3 225.7 214.3 220.0 220 6.6 76.7 65.4 4.7 0.40 8.4
4 227.6 212.4 220.1 220 8.8 76.3 65.4 4.8 0.53 11.1
5 229.6 210.5 220.2 220 11.0 75.9 65.4 4.8 0.65 13.6
6 231.5 208.6 220.4 220 13.2 75.6 65.4 4.8 0.78 16.1
7 233.4 206.8 220.5 220 15.4 75.2 65.5 4.9 0.90 18.4
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 313
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Figure 12. Variations of motor efficiency with negative sequence voltage at 60% of the rated
power (Table 4).
Figure 13. Variations of motor power factor with negative sequence voltage at 60% of the rated
power (Table 4).
314 A. Jalilian and R. Roshanfekr
sequence component of the supplied voltage using simulation and experimental results.
It can be seen that the changes in the negative sequence voltage component does not
significantly affect the motor power factor because of the fact that positive sequence
voltage component remained constant.
In fact, in this series of tests, the variation of the motor reactive power is low
(about 37 Var), and the variation of the active power from balanced voltage conditions
(VUF D 0) to the most unbalanced case (VUF D 7%) is about 32 W (2% of the rated
power). Thus, it can be expected that the motor power factor does not have significant
changes. It can be concluded that if the positive sequence voltage component is kept
constant, with an increase in the negative sequence voltage component, the motor losses
will increase, and therefore, the motor efficiency will decrease. In this experiment, as
shown in Table 4, with the constant load when the VUF increases, only the negative
sequence component of the stator current increases, while its positive component remains
almost constant. It can also be seen that the CUF is relatively large as compared to the
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
VUF supplied to the motor. This implies that the motor negative sequence impedance is
relatively small compared to its positive sequence impedance.
5. DF
The DF indicates the maximum motor loading level under unbalanced voltage conditions
in which no damage is imposed to the motor. In this section, different cases for calculating
the motor DF under unbalanced voltage conditions are considered. Case 1 is calculated
based on a curve presented by the NEMA standard. Case 2 is resulted by decreasing
the motor loading level so that the largest stator phase current reaches the rated value.
In Case 3, the DF is calculated while the motor loading level is decreased so that the
average of the three-phase stator currents is equal to the rated value. In Case 4, the
motor loading level is decreased so that the motor losses become equal to the rated
losses.
By means of simulations, the aforementioned cases have been applied to the test
induction motor, and the calculated DFs are given in Table 5. A graphical comparison
of the calculated DFs in different cases is also illustrated in Figure 14. It can be seen
that the calculated DF from Cases 1 and 2 are almost the same. However, the figures
imply that standard limits are too conservative in terms of applying unbalanced voltage
to induction motors where more than 26% of motor load should be reduced when a
VUF of 5% is applied to the motor. On the other hand, the results of Cases 3 and 4 are
Table 5
Comparison of DFs (in %) for 1.5-kW three-phase induction motor
using simulation results
almost the same, and they are very different from Cases 1 and 2. In both cases, motor
loading level is slightly reduced in the presence of unbalanced supply voltage, i.e., less
than 3% with a VUF of 5%. It can be said that in Case 3, motor total losses are almost
equal to the rated value (similar to Case 4), while the calculated DFs are larger than the
DFs from Cases 1 and 2. This figure implies less conservative limits for motor operating
under unbalanced voltage conditions where no significant derating is required. However,
in Cases 3 and 4, some of the stator currents are larger than the rated value and may result
in activation of protection devices. The given results can be used for reconsideration of
the standard limits for induction motors operating under unbalanced voltage conditions in
order to propose higher limits for induction motors operating under unbalanced voltage
conditions.
6. Conclusions
In this article, the performance of a three-phase induction motor under various voltage un-
balance conditions is studied. A 1.5-kW motor is selected for simulation and experimental
tests. Variation of motor current, power factor, efficiency and derating with the VUF, and
positive and negative sequence components of the supply voltage are investigated using
simulation and experimental results. Simulations are conducted using simple and exact
models, and the results are compared with each other and with the experimental test
results. It is confirmed that the results obtained from exact modeling of a motor are very
similar to experimental test results while very different from simulation results using
simple modeling of test motor.
316 A. Jalilian and R. Roshanfekr
It is shown that with the same VUF, motor power factor decreases with the increase
of positive sequence voltage component. In fact, the negative sequence voltage component
does not have any important role on motor power factor changes. One of the reasons can
be the motor core saturation, which causes a decrease in magnetizing reactance and an
increase in magnetizing current and motor reactive power.
It is also concluded that the motor efficiency cannot be calculated on the basis of
the positive sequence voltage component. Simulation and experimental results show that
both positive and negative voltage components affect the motor efficiency. However,
with the constant positive sequence voltage component and with the increase of negative
sequence voltage component, motor losses increase, and therefore, motor efficiency
decreases. In other words, in this particular case, motor efficiency decreases with the
increase of the VUF. The variation of efficiency in the simple model is very small, where
supply voltage with constant VUF is applied. It is noted that the magnetic reactance in
the simple model is constant, and therefore, the variation of input power is very small.
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
With the increase of the VUF under constant load conditions, the positive sequence
component of the stator current remains constant, while its negative sequence component
increases. Therefore, the stator CUF and motor losses are increased, resulting in decreased
efficiency.
According to the simulation results, the rotor torque ripple is twice the supply
frequency. It is shown that the magnitude of this ripple can be increased with the increase
of VUF. As a result, a high acoustic sound was experienced during the experimental tests
on the motor under unbalanced voltage conditions. It is also observed that the first swing
amplitude in simulated electromagnetic torque decreases as VUF increases. The reason
is seen to be the decrease in the positive sequence voltage component of the supplied
unbalanced voltage.
Finally, the DF is calculated for the induction motor operating under different
unbalanced voltage conditions. The results implied that most standard limits for VUFs
are too conservative to be applied to typical induction motors.
References
1. Lee, C. Y., “Effects of unbalanced voltage on operation performance of a three-phase induction
motor,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 202–208, June 1999.
2. Jeong, S. G., “Representing line voltage unbalance,” 37th Ind. Appl. Soc. Ann. Mtg., Vol. 3,
pp. 1724–1732, 2002.
3. Roshanfekr, R., and Jalilian, A., “Analysis of 3-phase induction motor performances under
different unbalance voltage conditions: Comparison of simulation and experimental results,”
19th International Power System Conference (PSC2004), Tehran, Iran, November 2004.
4. Siddique, M., and Yadava, G., “Effects of voltage unbalance on induction motors,” Conference
Record of the IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Indianapolis, IN, 19–22
September 2004.
5. Souto, C. N., “Power quality impact on performance and associated costs of three-phase
induction motors,” 8th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, Greece,
14–16 October 1998.
6. Electric Machinery Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering Society, Test Procedure for
Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators, IEEE Standards 112, 1991.
7. Kersting, W. H., “Causes and effects of unbalanced voltages serving an induction motor,” IEEE
Trans. Industry Appl., Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 165–170, January/February 2001.
8. Wallace, A. K., and Jouanne, A. R., “The measured effects of undervoltage, overvoltage and
unbalanced voltage on the efficiency and power factor of induction motors over wide range of
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 317
load,” 8th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Drives (EMD97), Cambridge,
1–3 September 1997.
9. Jesus, M., and Francisco, J., “Unbalance and harmonics detection in induction motors using
an optical fiber sensor,” IEEE Sensors J., Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 605–612, June 2006.
10. Wang, L., “Analysis of unbalanced voltage on startup transients of a three-phase induc-
tion motor using EMTP models,” IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Mtg., Vol. 1, pp. 308–312,
2000.
11. Jalilian, A., Gosbell, V. J., and Perera, S., “Three phase induction motor performance under
unbalanced voltage conditions,” 16th International Power System Conference (PSC2001),
Tehran, Iran, 21–23 October 2001.
12. Jouanne, A., “Assessment of voltage unbalance,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 16, No. 4,
pp. 782–790, October 2001.
13. Jalilian, A., Farahbakhsh, A., and Roshanfekr, R., “Effects of different voltage sags on per-
formance of induction motors,” 8th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and
Utilization (EPQU), Cracow, Poland, 21–23 September 2005.
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
14. Farahbakhsh, A., and Jalilian, A., “Induction motor behavior under different voltage sag
conditions,” 8th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilization (EPQU),
Cracow, Poland, 21–23 September 2005.
15. Fernandez, X. M. L., “Thermal analysis of an induction motor fed by unbalanced power
supply using a combined finite element-symmetrical components formulation,” International
Conference on Power System Technology (PowerCon 98), Vol. 1, pp. 620–624, August 1998.
16. Policarpo, J., and Emanuel, A., “Induction motor thermal aging caused by voltage distortion
and imbalance: Loss of life and its estimated cost,” IEEE Trans. Industry Appl., Vol. 38, No. 1,
pp. 12–20, January/February 2002.
17. Olivio, C. N., and Joes, C., “Induction motor thermal behavior and life expectancy under non-
ideal supply conditions,” Ninth International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power,
Vol. 3, pp. 899–904, 1–4 October 2000.
18. Faiz, J., and Ebrahimpour, H., “Effect of complex voltage unbalance factor on the derating of
a three-phase induction motor,” 6th International Power Engineering Conference, Singapore,
November 2003.
19. Wang, Y. J., “Analysis of effects of three-phase voltage unbalance on induction motors with
emphasis on the angle of the complex voltage unbalance factor,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conver-
sion, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 270–275, September 2001.
20. Pillay, P., “Derating of induction motors operating with a combination of unbalanced voltages
and over or undervoltages,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 485–491,
December 2002.
21. Wang, Y. J., “An analytical study on steady-state performance of an induction motor connected
to unbalanced three-phase voltage,” IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Mtg., Vol. 1, pp. 159–164,
2000.
22. Kersting, W. H., “Phase frame analysis of the effects of voltage unbalance on induction
machines,” IEEE Trans. Industry Appl., Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 415–420, 1997.
23. Guasch, L., and Corcoles, F., “Effects of unsymmetrical voltage sag types E, F and G on
induction motors,” 9th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, Vol. 3,
pp. 796–803, October 2000.
24. Faiz, J., Ebrahimpour, H., and Pillay, P., “Influence of unbalanced voltage on the steady-state
performance of a three-phase squirrel-cage induction motor,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion,
Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 657–662, December 2004.
25. Huang, S. Y., and Wang, Y. J., “Analysis of a three-phase induction motor under voltage unbal-
ance using the circle diagram method,” International Conference on Power System Technology,
pp. 165–170, Singapore, 21–24 November 2004.
26. Stankovic, M., “Dynamic phasors in modeling and analysis of unbalanced polyphase AC
machines,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 107–113, March 2002.
27. Ong, C.-M., Dynamic Simulation of Electric Machinery, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.
318 A. Jalilian and R. Roshanfekr
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 10:27 05 May 2014
Figure A.1. Matlab/Simulink block diagram of three-phase induction motor for simulation under
different voltage unbalance conditions.
Figure A.2. Matlab/Simulink block diagram for simulation of mutual flux saturation.
Induction Motor Performance under Voltage Unbalance 319
Appendix A
Figure A.1 shows the general block diagram of three-phase induction motor model for
simulation in Matlab/Simulink software. As shown, the model includes some subsystems
such as positive and negative sequence models for induction motor, output parameter
measurement system, and the mechanical load. Figure A.2 shows the block diagram for
simulation of mutual flux saturation of motor core, which is used in exact model.
Appendix B
The parameters of the selected three-phase induction motor for experimental and simu-
lation tests are: