Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revolutionizing Wearables For 5G 5G Technologies R
Revolutionizing Wearables For 5G 5G Technologies R
Revolutionizing Wearables For 5G 5G Technologies R
net/publication/316316681
CITATIONS READS
14 1,365
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ping Jack Soh on 28 July 2019.
N. F. M. Aun, P. J. Soh, A. A. Al-Hadi and M. F. Jamlos are with the Advanced Communication Engineering (ACE) CoE,
School of Computer and Communication Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau,
Perlis, MALAYSIA.
P. J. Soh, G. A. E. Vandenbosch and D. Schreurs are with the ESAT-TELEMIC Research Div., KU Leuven, Kasteelpark
Arenberg 10 Box 2444, 3001 Leuven, BELGIUM.
Abstract— Wearable technologies are anticipated to be drastically improved by the development of Fifth Generation (5G) systems.
The improved capacity and throughput, reduced latency and network densification in 5G will enable their deployment in massive
numbers per macro- or picocell. This also enables improvements in wearable applications such as wireless health monitoring,
predictive health, ambient assisted living etc. To satisfy requirements in a wearable context, antennas for wearable devices must be
compact, low-profile, comfortable and offer mechanical robustness. Another important characteristic of such antennas is their
insensitivity to dielectric coupling and user movements, which is linked to physical factors such as deformations, varying mounting
locations and body morphologies. This paper will first present the relevance of wearable technologies towards 5G and future landscape
in telecommunication. This will be followed by an overview of the recent developments terms of materials and fabrication techniques,
followed by state-of-the-art wearable antennas and evaluation methods. A brief future perspective of wearable antennas is also
described in the concluding remarks.
Index Terms— Fifth generation (5G) networks, wearable devices, wearable antennas; Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN)
I. INTRODUCTION
W earable devices are becoming an attractive solution for various applications in the military, medical, and consumer
electronic sector. They are also expected to become an integral part of the upcoming Fifth Generation (5G) networks,
which are expected to operate with higher bit rates and lower outage probabilities in smaller micro- and pico-cells within a
larger coverage area. Besides that, beam-reconfigurability and beamforming are expected to facilitate spectral and energy
efficiencies at both the mobile device and base station. New features and capabilities envisioned in 5G networks are expected to
overcome the limitations of 4G or older technologies and radically change applications in transportation, healthcare, smart
homes, wireless robots, etc. [1-2]. Due to the limited existing spectrum and the need for high speed data rates, 5G is expected to
incorporate higher frequency spectra in the millimeter-wave (mm-wave) bands, such as 30 and 60 GHz [3]. This calls for a
distinct model for mm-wave propagation, communication architecture and design paradigm of components, including wearables
devices. Besides that, cells are expected to be organized in smaller macro- and pico-cells because of the larger propagation path
losses and blockages, with wearable and machine type devices joining tablets and smartphones. On the other hand, there are also
exciting developments in bandwidth allocation, the possibly major virtualization of the core network which may be extended to
the cell edges [4], and the development of the Internet of Things (IoT), a dense network of miscellaneous devices [4]. Despite
different studies proposing different solutions [3, 5-6], the major disruptive technologies can be categorized into several key
areas. Each of them is described in the following sub-sections within the context of wearable systems, wherever possible.
Device-centric architecture: There is a strong indication that the main architecture of the current 4G and legacy
technologies may shift to being more device-centric instead of architecture-based (for example, involving base stations)
[3]. While this requires a different paradigm in wireless data and traffic management, the ability to establish and exchange
information between peripheral nodes is one of its main features. The large number of communication and wearable
devices (in the order of 105) densely located in a smaller area is also expected to make such capability in 5G very relevant.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 2
Millimeter-wave band: As previously mentioned, the current limited spectrum calls for the use of available blocks of
spectrum in the higher mm-wave frequencies within 5G. However, the use of such frequencies results in larger
propagation losses for long distance communication, besides being more prone to blockage. Some 5G devices including
wearables operating in the mm-wave are expected to be highly directive with narrow beams and to avoid the
aforementioned issues. Wearable antennas within such bands are also expected to be in the form of reconfigurable beam
arrays to ensure energy efficiency at the device level.
Massive MIMO: This aspect of 5G technology has mainly revolved around having a large number of antennas at the base
station in comparison to those available on the node level. Single user MIMO systems are typically constrained by the
limited number of antennas that can fit into a mobile device, whereas the number of base station antennas can be very
large. In contrast, the human body features a relatively larger area for the deployment of more wearable antenna elements
compared to a mobile device. A simple interconnection can be made available between the antenna and the device to
facilitate the immediate deployment of on-body massive MIMO, especially when it is used for mm-wave frequencies.
Besides on-body, the use of conformal antenna arrays may also be envisioned on non-regular physical structures or
buildings for base stations.
Smart Devices and IoT: It is foreseen that 5G will enable high amounts of data sharing within devices located in close
proximity, in contrast to traditional long distance, architecture-based services. The excessive energy required for long
distance uplink/downlink transmission to a base station, for instance, can now be reduced to a fraction of it via hops to
nearby devices. Moreover, this saves co-located devices from interference due to higher power base station transmissions
towards the cell. Such aspect of energy and spectrum efficiency significantly appeals to wearable devices due to the
limited battery resources available.
Various wearable antenna types have been designed for specific frequency bands, for instance the Industrial Scientific Medical
(ISM) (2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz) band [7-8] and the Ultra-Wideband (UWB) (3.1 GHz – 10.6 GHz) [9-10]. Generally, degradation
of the antenna performance is inherent when it is placed in the proximity to the human body. Therefore, effective evaluation
methods must be implemented to ensure that the human body is protected from undesired electromagnetic radiation while aiming
to provide wearable antennas with flexibility and robustness. Besides being more ergonomic and comfortable compared to a rigid
structure, the usage of flexible materials such as textiles is an interesting option due to the very low dielectric constant when used
as a substrate, which consequently reduces surface wave losses. Besides that, all-textile antennas have been successfully
designed and evaluated in [9-11]. Such antennas made entirely of textiles or in combination with conformal materials enhance
the flexibility and comfort of the users, and are able to be manufactured with quite pragmatic methods.
A general overview of the relevance of wearable technologies for 5G was discussed recently in [2]. Several perspectives on
future features for wearable 5G were described, for example, scanning capability for antennas, energy autonomy and smart
machine-to-machine (M2M) and device-to-device (D2D) communication. Meanwhile, energy-related issues for 5G wearable
networks are also of concern. A work on the system-level assessment for mm-wave-based wearable networks was first presented
in [12], followed by a feasibility study of wireless-charging technologies for wearables [13]. Specific to wearable antennas, a
summary of available topologies, fabrication methods and required analyses were first discussed in [14]. However, this review
was limited to the several available antenna topologies and fabrication technologies at that time such as by using copper
tape/foils, conductive spray techniques and commercial-off-the-shelf conductive and non-conducting textiles. Basic evaluation
methods proposed include specific absorption rate (SAR), bending and on-body performance assessments. Meanwhile, a more
focused work on textile microstrip antennas presented in [15] described several methods for fabrication and evaluation. Next, a
more detailed review of wearable and implantable antennas was presented in [16]. This research mainly stresses the antenna
designs and structures made from textile and non-textile materials, and places less emphasis on the fabrication methods and
required evaluations. A comprehensive survey of wearable antennas for off-body radio links operating in the very high-
frequency (VHF) and ultrahigh frequency (UHF) bands was presented in [60]. Besides the state-of-the art, this paper also
discusses the challenges and future trends of these antennas for operation at frequencies below 1 GHz. Meanwhile, the design
and characterization of in-body RFID and on-body UHF RFID applications was presented in [59] for wireless brain machine
interfaces (BMI). Such a system, which consists of miniature implantable devices, neural sensor electrodes, integrated
electronics, and an antenna for telemetry is expected to be able to allow patients suffering from severe disability to communicate
and live their everyday lives more independently. Another specific study on the different types of textile materials and related
fabrication methods for wearable antennas was presented in [17]. The analyses required are however also limited. In contrast,
this paper attempts to provide a detailed review of current wearable antennas available in literature, materials used, methods of
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 3
fabrication and their specialized assessment techniques. Extending the study presented in [14] with recently developed antennas,
the perspectives of future wearables in the context of 5G is also discussed in this work.
This paper is structured as follows; the relevance of 5G towards wearable technologies has been introduced in the previous
paragraphs. This will be followed by an overview of the recent materials and methods used in realizing wearable antennas in
Section II, followed by a discussion on state-of-the-art wearable antennas in Section III. A summary of the essential evaluations
and assessment techniques will be presented in Section IV prior to the conclusions.
C. Adhesives
The use of adhesives is a very simple and important fabrication technique for wearable antennas. They are used because of the
need for interconnection between the antenna sub-components such as conducting elements, substrates, connectors, vias, walls,
cables, etc.. The two most important interconnections necessary in the fabrication of textile antennas are: (1) securing the
conductive/flexible metallic elements to the substrate; and (2) enabling a high frequency galvanic connection between the
radiator and the RF cable or connector. To facilitate the former, metallic tapes or textiles with rear adhesive are widely used.
They are easily fastened onto a substrate upon dimensioning [22-26]. Meanwhile, heat-activated adhesives readily-available on
the reverse sides of conductive fabrics have propelled the popularity of textiles such as ShieldIt Super. Such adhesives are
typically activated by ironing [9-10], [22], [24-27]. To maintain the geometrical dimensions during the attachment process, a
water-soluble foil can also be applied for temporary stiffening and mechanical stabilization [18].
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 4
E. Embroidery
Besides utilizing conductor-coated textile sheets, a direct implementation of conductive yarns onto specified substrates can
also be used to fabricate wearable antennas. This technique requires the use of a home-grade computerized embroidery machine
[21]. Meanwhile, hundreds of e-fibers may also be tightly bundled to form a textile surface [30]. To realize this, automatic
embroidery was employed with high-density stitching. The fabricated conductive textile surfaces were then used to form the
radiating elements, ground planes and transmission lines. On the contrary, antenna fabrication using such embroidered technique
may be implemented using only two strands of raw yarn plated with silver (Shieldex thread), as demonstrated in [31]. However,
it was also found in [32] that the stitch direction and stitch spacing of embroidered patch antennas are key parameters in ensuring
their functionality at higher frequencies.
Fig. 3. Flow diagram of the inkjet-printed textile antenna fabrication process [35]
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 6
Fig. 4. a) Fabric used for the realization of the patch by means of conducting threads (the embroidery illustrated in the figure is the cross-stitch) b) Steps for the
realization of the conducting path on the fabric; the subscript „back‟ and „front‟ indicate the side (back or front ) of the fabric [22]
characteristics modes where the multimode behavior reduces attenuation and multipath propagation caused by the human body.
The next work [7] proposed a rectangular-ring textile antenna in the ISM band using Flectron material for the conducting
elements. This antenna allows the excitation of two modes with slightly different resonant frequencies due to its rectangular-ring-
based design. Another popular method to reduce the antenna form factor is to implement it in a meander, folded or spiral format.
This immediately saves on-body “real-estate” for the antenna placement, and is especially relevant for textile antennas operating
at lower frequencies, i.e. VHF or UHF. Two types of planar meander antennas were developed in [37] for operation at 868 MHz.
They are printed on a textile substrate using a single conductive layer. Both antennas have been modified to reduce the ground
plane area to save screen printing paste. However, this modification did not significantly change the electrical parameters
compared to the prototype with a large ground plane. Another work in [33] introduced a spiral antenna implemented on an
everyday denim substrate for smart clothing, operating at 13.56 MHz. The structure was initially composed of a highly resistive
silicone coating layer onto a denim substrate before the planar spiral inductor with five turns was printed into it using conductive
ink. Then, the same silicone fluid was applied to cover the printed structure.
Fig. 5. Prototype of the antenna based on the half-mode substrate-integrated resonant cavity [21]
Meanwhile, a textile integrated SIW cavity-backed slot antenna was proposed in [43]. This antenna operates in the 5.8 GHz ISM
band and is fully fabricated using textiles. The antenna consists of a SIW cavity feed and a circular ring slot. Conductive threads
were used to form the vias and featured a cavity backing to reduce coupling to the body.
This antenna is also incorporated with a loaded loop as shown in Fig. 6 to achieve impedance matching for multiband
frequencies. Besides monopoles, textile dipole antennas have also been considered in [24], [34] and [46] for various frequency
bands. For instance, a dual band textile antenna operating at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz has been designed in [24]. This dipole
antenna is made of denim material with a diamond structure to improve its bandwidth and efficiency.
circuit and antenna. The Interface Layer method is suitable for production of smart fabrics from any textile material using
manual screen printing. 0.3 mm thick PET film stencils are used for the screen printing. The PET stencil is placed on top of the
fabric textile and CM116-20 dielectric paste is poured onto the stencil. The resulting device was field tested and showed a
communication range of up to 55 meters and a localization accuracy of up to 8 meters while being worn on a body.
A single chip solution by means of component integration onto wearable devices is proposed using the 0.18 um CMOS RFIC-
on-chip antenna technology [64]. Using this technique, a printed meanderline loop antenna for 1.575 GHz and 2.4 GHz has been
realized for wireless communication in a wrist watch application. The antenna is sized at 970 x 750 μm2 and is integrated into a
chip of 1.21 mm2 (1.1mm x 1.1mm). A transmit/receive (T/R) switch is also connected to the low noise amplifier (LNA) and
power amplifier (PA), respectively. This solution indicated a linear measured phase distribution and a quasi-omnidirectional H-
plane pattern. Besides this, feed structure modifications for a patch antenna may also enable ease of integration with other
components within the communication system. One example of this is the integration of a magnetically-coupled antenna into
active circuitry using a transformer-based feeding topology [40], see Fig. 8. Its primary and secondary windings can be
implemented directly onto the wearable antenna while avoiding galvanic contacts between the antenna and the active circuitry.
Such design maximizes power transfer between the antenna and the load connected to the secondary winding.
Fig. 7. Main steps for the manufacturing of printed circuits and antennas on textiles in the V-band [53]
Fig. 8. Prototypes of the antenna-transformer: (a) front view (b) back view (c) top view (d) bottom view of Pyralux with secondary winding and UFL connector
(e) assembled prototype with bi-adhesive tape [40]
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 10
Despite potentially resulting in added fabrication complexity, multi-element antennas such as Yagi Uda and arrays are
envisioned for off-body communication in 5G, especially in the mm-wave bands. An instance of such arrays is the small textile
Yagi-Uda antenna proposed in [29] with an endfire pattern for 60 GHz band operation. Besides that, an end-fire wearable Yagi-
Uda antenna operating from 57 to 64 GHz was characterized in free space, on phantom and under bending conditions [50]. This
antenna consists of a driven dipole and 10 directors printed on the top of a cotton substrate. Its propagation is also studied in a
realistic communication scenario when this antenna was placed on a human hand and an off-body antenna, maintaining
satisfactory performance when placed under bending and in planar conditions. The antenna‟s reflection and radiation
performance have been measured in free space and on a skin-equivalent phantom. A slotted antenna array featuring switched
beam operation at 28.5 GHz was designed in [41]. This antenna consists of two main parts; the beam-forming network and the
planar array as shown in Fig. 9. The Butler matrix network was optimized in order to feed the antenna elements in series.
Fig. 9. Complete Switched Beam mm-wave Antenna Array. The inset figure shows the top layer of the fabricated antenna array [41]
Besides that, a rectangular patch antenna with microstrip feed line is designed to operate in the mm-wave band of 38 GHz [44]
which is made from silver plated copper thread as its conductive parts and cotton fabric as its substrate. The antenna performance
was investigated on a body phantom with a thickness of 44 mm. A study on the effect of its substrate material property indicated
a proportional decrease in resonant frequency with increasing dielectric constant.
Another mm-wave wearable array based on the SIW operating in dual band mode (28 and 38 GHz) is proposed in [45]. The
SIW structure, which generally consists of a ground layer and radiating apertures, will create perturbations in the electromagnetic
field distribution, and thus in the radiation. A series of EBG structures are placed around the slotted-SIW dual-band antenna
array to mitigate this, while being fed fed by a 1x4 Wilkinson power divider as depicted in Fig. 10. Meanwhile, a compact of
MIMO antenna array for 5G cellular mobile communication was proposed in [54]. This overall antenna consists of two antenna
elements with rectangular and circular patch topologies. The combination of these patches resulted in a MIMO system
operational at 1.5 GHz, 2.2 GHz and 28 GHz. SAR simulations evaluated in the presence of a human head and hand phantoms
indicated low values below regulatory limits. Meanwhile, a recent work introduced a four-element antenna array built using a
modified 1-to-4 Wilkinson power divider [55]. EBG structures have been used to improve the antenna radiation characteristics
and reduce losses. The proposed antenna array operates in dual band mode for 5G applications in the 28 and 38 GHz bands.
Next, a millimeter-wave broadband circular reflectarray antenna implementing novel polarization insensitive multi-resonant unit
cells is proposed in [56] to operate at 30 GHz. The phasing cell element is used to enhance the bandwidth due to its ability to
significantly influence the overall reflectarray‟s bandwidth. The unit cell consists of two concentric rings combined with a
crossed loop and crossed strips.
The work in [65] introduced a reconfigurable mm-wave antenna for 5G networks operating between 20.7 and 36 GHz using
surface mount pin diode switches. This flexible antenna is designed on liquid crystal polymer (LCP) substrate and fabricated
using low-cost inkjet printing. It consists of a fork-shaped radiating patch and two stubs, fed by a 50 Ω matched coplanar
waveguide (CPW) line. The proposed antenna was demonstrated to operate from 20.7 to 33.2 GHz when both switches are ON
and both stubs functioned as part of the radiating element. Meanwhile, a 5G mm-wave phased array antenna for MIMO has been
proposed in [66]. The overall structure consists of two identical linear phased arrays, each with eight leaf-shaped bow-tie antenna
elements and placed on different sides of the mobile phone PCB. Low mutual coupling was observed from 25 to 40 GHz with
excellent radiation in both 5G candidate bands (at 28 and 38 GHz). A 3D tapered slot Vivaldi antenna was presented in [67] for
future mobile communication base stations. This antenna uses two sets of arrays, where a set placed on the top of the cylindrical
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 11
ground plane covers its operation in 4G frequencies, and the second set covers the mm-wave frequency bands at both 28 GHz
and 38 GHz. Each array consists of three tilted tapered slot antenna elements. It was validated that despite the mutual coupling
between two adjacent elements slightly changed its operational bandwidth, its performance in term of S-parameter, gain,
efficiency and beem steering characteristics remained acceptable.
This section will describe the evaluation methods that need to be assessed in the context of wearable devices and antennas.
Several common evaluations may also be applicable to conventional antennas and devices such as reflection coefficients,
radiation patterns, efficiency, specific absorption rate, etc.
A. Antenna Evaluation in Free Space
Stand-alone antenna measurement is an initial aspect to be assessed prior to its measurement in the presence of the human
body. In general, free space evaluation is assessed in terms of reflection coefficient, radiation pattern, gain and efficiency in most
literature. The influence of the body and other factors in the body-worn context are then further investigated. Depending on the
chosen antenna topology, such design and evaluation paradigm is mainly applicable for the conventional standalone antenna
design. This process starts with the simulations of the wearable antenna in free space prior to the on-body assessment, and is
suitable for topologies which are least affected by the coupling to the body. In contrast, an alternative design approach is to co-
design and simulate the intended antenna on a human simulating tissue where it is intended to be placed. Such method is
effective in predicting possible degradations caused when worn on-body. Despite the potential design accuracy, designing
wearable antennas using this method will incur additional time and computing resources due to the larger and more complex
simulation setups involving human tissues.
For experimental evaluations, a two-thirds muscle-equivalent semi-solid phantom [8], [23], [38] or skin-equivalent phantom
[29] may be used besides real human volunteers [10-11], [27], [38]. A cost-effective option is to utilize a human-size mannequin
with a 1 mm plastic shell filled with tissue-emulating liquid consisting of water, sugar, and salt [30]. The proposed textile
antenna is mounted on this phantom on its front, back and shoulder, see Fig. 11. Such on-body evaluation may also be extended
to this phantom wearing several types of common garments [38]. Another method to measure the influence of the human body
was proposed in [9], which is to evaluate its S 21 transfer function within a practical office environment. Its transmitting (Tx)
antenna was mounted on the human chest with different distances to the body, whereas the receiving (Rx) antenna was kept in
free space, 0.5 m away
Fig. 11. Photo of textile antenna mounted on the front, back and right shoulder of a phantom [30].
Fig. 12. Measured S11 of the textile inkjet patch antenna Inset : SEM image [35]
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 13
D. Efficiency Evaluation
Efficiency evaluation on body is a rather complex and tedious process, besides requiring specialized equipment such as a
reverberation chamber. Nevertheless, many factors may affect antenna efficiency, including deformations. An example of this is
the work in [21] which demonstrated that the seam compression along embroidered wall resulted in a higher efficiency compared
to planar model. In terms of inkjet-printed antennas, researchers in [34] concluded that the implementation of an interface layer
offers better efficiency than without this interface layer, despite the fact that up to five inkjet layers were used for fabrication.
Besides that, backing the antenna with number of felt layers substrate will also improve the efficiency [38]. In this case, the
antenna is fixed using a physical phantom wrapped with Clingfilm™. Another work [40] also evaluated the radiation efficiency
of a wearable antenna fed using a transformer-based feeding topology by varying the distance between windings and the
misalignments between the windings. It was demonstrated that the efficiency does not change significantly when distance and
misalignment vary between the windings. Meanwhile, the efficiency results were seen to be robust with respect to the
misalignments. This, in turn, depends on the alignment tolerance of the mounting process.
Fig. 13. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient due to seam compression [21]
cotton fabric. The distance from the body is also varied and SAR values for different configurations were evaluated. Besides
detailed phantoms, SAR has also been calculated using a three layer human body model at a distance of 2 mm from the antenna
in [11].
Fig. 14. Reflection coefficient and efficiency measurements with one, three, and six washing cycles [36]
Fig. 15. Antenna and device operation with additional attenuators (left) and device operation a layer of densely packed snow on the antenna (right) [20].
Fig. 16. Different pulses used for excitation: (a) time domain waveforms; (b) spectra [9]
Fig. 17. Received pulses from different excitations (a) pulse 1 (b) pulse 2 (c) pulse 3 [9]
Fig. 20. Wearable textile antenna for body-worn cellular reception [30]
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a perspective of the future technology landscape in wearable antennas for future 5G networks is presented. The
improved capacity and throughput, reduced latency and network densification in 5G will enable the deployment of wearables in
massive numbers per macro- or picocell. Future wearables are expected to comply with new higher frequency spectrums, for
example in the mm-wave bands. This in turn requires a distinct model for mm-wave propagation, communication architecture
and design paradigm of components. Additional considerations related to antennas for wearables include materials, fabrication
methods and assessment techniques throughout their design and evaluation cycle. The state-of-the-art review on wearable
antennas operating across various frequencies indicated there is a significant shift from the use of basic topologies, materials and
fabrication technologies towards the use of scanning arrays in the mm-wave frequencies, the use of more robust materials and
sophisticated manufacturing methods, and possible consideration for energy-autonomy in preparation for 5G-centric applications
in dense cells. Next, various fabrication technologies and their corresponding flexible materials suited for wearable antennas are
presented. It is noted that the evolution of the antenna from simple microstrip- or planar monopole-based topologies to more
sophisticated arrays and metamaterial-based topologies has also resulted technological developments in the fabrication process.
Laser cutting, embroidery, metallized eyelets, inkjet printing, etc., are expected to enable accurate fabrication of the more
sophisticated structures required for higher frequency operation with tighter dimensional tolerances. Besides conventional
analyses required, evaluation for wearable antennas are more comprehensive considering SAR analysis, deformation study on
detailed human phantoms, reliability study, functionality tests and operation under various environmental conditions. It is
envisioned that future 5G antennas for wearable application is desired to be compact, low-profile, comfortable and feature
mechanical robustness, insensitivity to changes in user movements and robustness to deformations, varying mounting locations
and body morphologies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (Grant
no: 9003-00527) and the MyBrain Scholarship for Ms.Nur Farahiyah Mohamad Aun, both funded by the Malaysian Ministry of
Higher Education (MOHE). The technical support provided by Mr. Herwansyah Lago is also highly appreciated.
References
[1] P. J. Soh, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, M. Mercuri and D. M. M. P. Schreurs, "Wearable Wireless Health Monitoring: Current
Developments, Challenges, and Future Trends," in IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 55-70, May 2015.
[2] O. Boric-Lubecke, V. M. Lubecke, B. Jokanovic, A. Singh, E. Shahhaidar and B. Padasdao, "Microwave and wearable
technologies for 5G," Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2015 12th
International Conference on, Nis, 2015, pp. 183-188.
[3] F. Boccardi, R. W. Heath, A. Lozano, T. L. Marzetta and P. Popovski, "Five disruptive technology directions for 5G," in
IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 74-80, February 2014.
[4] J. G. Andrews, S. Buzzi, W. Choi, S. V. Hanly, A. Lozano, A. C. K. Soong, J. C. Zhang, "What Will 5G Be?," in IEEE
Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1065-1082, June 2014.
[5] E. Hossain and M. Hasan, "5G cellular: key enabling technologies and research challenges," in IEEE Instrumentation &
Measurement Magazine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 11-21, June 2015.
[6] B. Bangerter, S. Talwar, R. Arefi and K. Stewart, "Networks and devices for the 5G era," in IEEE Communications
Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 90-96, February 2014.
[7] A. Tronquo, H. Rogier, C. Hertleer, and L. Van Langenhove, “Applying textile materials for the design of antennas for
wireless body area networks,” 2006 First Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag., vol. 2006, no. October, 2006.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 18
[8] J. Choi, J. Tak, and S. Lee, “All-textile higher order mode circular patch antenna for on-body to on-body
communications,” IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 576–584, 2015.
[9] M. Klemm and G. Troester, “Textile UWB Antennas for Wireless Body Area Networks,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3192–3197, 2006.
[10] P. B. Samal, P. J. Soh, and G. A E. Vandenbosch, “UWB All-Textile AntennaWith Full Ground Plane for Off-Body
WBAN Communications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 102–108, 2014.
[11] S. Agneessens, S. Lemey, T. Vervust, and H. Rogier, “Wearable, small, and robust: the circular Quarter-Mode Textile
Antenna,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 1225, pp. 1482–1485, 2015.
[12] O. Galinina, A. Pyattaev, K. Johnsson, A. Turlikov, S. Andreev and Y. Koucheryavy, "Assessing System-Level Energy
Efficiency of mmWave-Based Wearable Networks," in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no.
4, pp. 923-937, April 2016.
[13] O. Galinina, H. Tabassum, K. Mikhaylov, S. Andreev, E. Hossain and Y. Koucheryavy, "On feasibility of 5G-grade
dedicated RF charging technology for wireless-powered wearables," in IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 2,
pp. 28-37, April 2016.
[14] N. H. M. Rais, P. J. Soh, F. Malek, S. Ahmad, N. B. M. Hashim, and P. S. Hall, “A review of wearable antenna,”
Loughbrgh. Antennas Propag. Conf. LAPC 2009 - Conf. Proc., no. November, pp. 225–228, 2009.
[15] J. C. G. Matthews and G. Pettitt, “Development of flexible, wearable antennas,” 2009 3rd Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag.,
pp. 273–277, 2009.
[16] B.Gupt, “Development of Wearable and Implantable Antennas in the Last Decade: A Review,” Microwave Symposium
(MMS), 2010 Mediterranean, 25-27 Aug. 2010, pp. 251–267, 2010.
[17] S. Dhupkariya, V. K. Singh, and A. Shukla, “A Review of Textile Materials for Wearable Antenna,”, Journal of
Microwave Engineering & Technologies, ISSN: 2349-9001, Volume 1, Issue 3, no. October, 2015.
[18] I. Locher, M. Klemm, T. Kirstein, and G. Tröster, “Design and characterization of purely textile patch antennas,” IEEE
Trans. Adv. Packag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 777–788, 2006.
[19] Y. Ouyang and W. J. Chappell, “High frequency properties of electro-textiles for wearable antenna applications,” IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 381–389, 2008.
[20] J. Lilja, P. Salonen, T. Kaija, and P. De Maagt, “Design and manufacturing of robust textile antennas for harsh
environments,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4130–4140, 2012.
[21] T. Kaufmann and C. Fumeaux, “Wearable textile half-mode substrate-integrated cavity antenna using embroidered vias,”
IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 805–808, 2013.
[22] G. Monti, L. Corchia, and L. Tarricone, “Fabrication Techniques for Wearable Antennas,” Proceedings of the 43rd
European Microwave Conference., pp. 1747–1750, 2013.
[23] B. Iv, G. Golemac, and D. Bonefa, “Performance of Wearable Antenna Exposed to Adverse Environmental Conditions.”
Applied Electromagnetics and Communications (ICECom)., 14-16 Oct. 2013.
[24] M. E. Jalil, M. K. A Rahim, N. A Samsuri, N. A Murad, N. Othman, and H. A Majid, “On-body Investigation of Dual
Band Diamond Textile Antenna for Wearable Applications At 2 . 45 GHz and 5 . 8 GHz,” 2013 7th European Conference
on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)., pp. 414–417, 2013.
[26] H. S. Zhang, K. Xiao, L. Qiu, and S. L. Chai, “Wide Band E-Shape Wearable Antenna for Wireless Body Area
Network,” Wireless Symposium (IWS), 2014 IEEE International., pp. 14–17, 2014.
[27] P. J. Soh, G. A E. Vandenbosch, S. L. Ooi, and N. H. M. Rais, “Design of a broadband all-textile slotted PIFA,” IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 379–384, 2012.
[28] S. A. Holland, D. Baiya, E. Elkhouly, and A. E. Fathy, “Ultra wideband textile antenna development for indoor
localization,” IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., 2013.
[29] N. Chahat, M. Zhadobov, L. Le Coq, and R. Sauleau, “Wearable endfire textile antenna for on-body communications at
60 GHz,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 11, no. 10 m, pp. 799–802, 2012.
[30] Z. Wang, L. Z. Lee, D. Psychoudakis, and J. L. Volakis, “Embroidered multiband body-worn antenna for
GSM/PCS/WLAN communications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3321–3329, 2014.
[31] K. Koski, E. S. Lohan, L. Ukkonen, and A. E. P. Antenna, “Electro-Textile UHF RFID Patch Antennas for Positioning
and Localization Applications,” RFID Technology and Applications Conference (RFID-TA)., pp. 246–250, 2014.
[32] T. Dias, S. Zhang, T. Acti, R. Seager, Y. Vardaxoglou, W. Whittow, and A. Chauraya, “Effect of the fabrication
parameters on the performance of embroidered antennas,” IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag., vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 1174–
1181, 2013.
[33] M. Suh, K. E. Carroll, E. Grant, and W. Oxenham, “Investigation into the feasibility of inductively coupled antenna for
use in smart clothing,” Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 25–37, 2014.
[34] J. Tudor, J. C. Vardaxoglou, R. Torah, Y. Li, W. G. Whittow, A. Chauraya, S. Beeby, and K. Yang, “Inkjet printed
dipole antennas on textiles for wearable communications,” IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag., vol. 7, no. April, pp.
760–767, 2013.
[35] W. G. Whittow, A. Chauraya, J. C. Vardaxoglou, Y. Li, R. Torah, K. Yang, S. Beeby, and J. Tudor, “Inkjet-printed
microstrip patch antennas realized on textile for wearable applications,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 13, pp.
71–74, 2014.
[36] M. L. Scarpello, I. Kazani, C. Hertleer, H. Rogier, and D. Vande Ginste, “Stability and efficiency of screen-printed
wearable and washable antennas,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 838–841, 2012.
[37] T. Blecha, R. Linhart, J. Reboun, C. Republic, and C. Republic, “Screen Printed Antennas on Textile Substrate,”
Electronics System-Integration Technology Conference (ESTC)., pp. 14–17, 2014.
[38] D. L. Paul, H. Giddens, M. G. Paterson, G. S. Hilton, and J. P. McGeehan, “Impact of body and clothing on a wearable
textile dual band antenna at digital television and wireless communications bands,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
61, no. 4, pp. 2188–2194, 2013.
[39] N. H. Mohd Rais, P. J. Soh, M. F. A. Malek and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, "Dual-Band Suspended-Plate Wearable Textile
Antenna," in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 12, no. , pp. 583-586, 2013.
[40] M. Virili, H. Rogier, F. Alimenti, P. Mezzanotte, and L. Roselli, “Wearable Textile Antenna Magnetically Coupled to
Flexible Active Electronic Circuits,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 13, pp. 209–212, 2014.
[41] A. T. Alreshaid and O. Hammi, “A Millimeter Wave Switched Beam Planar Antenna Array,” 2015 IEEE International
Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting., July, 2015.
[42] S. Yan, P. J. Soh, and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, “Dual-Band Textile MIMO Antenna Based on Substrate-Integrated
Waveguide (SIW) Technology,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation., vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4640–4647,
2015.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 20
[43] Y. Hong; J. Tak; J. Choi, "An All Textile SIW Cavity-Backed Circular Ring Slot Antenna for WBAN Applications," in
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters., pp.1-1, 2016.
[44] X. Lin, B. Seet, and F. Joseph, “Fabric Antenna with Body Temperature Sensing for BAN Applications over 5G Wireless
Systems,” 2015 Ninth International Conference on Sensing Technology,. pp. 591–595, 2015.
[45] N. Ashraf, O. Haraz, M. A. Ashraf, and S. Alshebeili, “28/38-GHz Dual-Band Millimeter Wave SIW Array Antenna with
EBG Structures for 5G Applications,” Information and Communication Technology Research (ICTRC), 2015
International Conference., 17-19 May, 2015.
[46] N. A. Elias, N. A. Samsuri, M. K. A. Rahim, and N. Othman, “Investigation of Crumpling Effects on EM Absorption
and Antenna Performance at 2 . 4 GHz,”RF and Microwave Conference (RFM), 2013 IEEE International., pp. 395–399,
2013.
[47] S. J. Boyes, P J. Soh, S. J. Boyes, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, Y. Huang, “On-Body Characterization of Dual-Band All-
Textile PIFAs,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. vol. 129, 517–539, 2012, vol. 129, no. May, pp. 517–539, 2012.
[48] S. J. Chen, T. Kaufmann, and C. Fumeaux, “Shorting Strategies for a Wearable L-Slot Planar Inverted-F Antenna,” 2014
International Workshop on Antenna Technology., pp. 18–21, 2014.
[49] M. S. Khan, S. Bashir, M. A. K, and K. Asaf, “Design and Integration of Dual Band Textile Antenna with High
Impedance Surface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., pp. 7–12, 2013.
[50] A. R. Guraliuc, N. Chahat, C. Leduc, M. Zhadobov, and R. Sauleau, “End-Fire Antenna for BAN at 60 GHz: Impact of
Bending, On-Body Performances, and Study of an On to Off-Body Scenario,” Electronics ISSN 2079-9292., pp. 221–
233, 2014.
[51] M. L. Scarpello, D. Vande Ginste, and H. Rogier, “Design of a low-cost steerable textile antenna array operating in
varying relative humidity conditions,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2012.
[52] M. A. A. Majid, M. K. A. Rahim, N. A. Murad, N. A. Samsuri, N. F. A. Elias, M. H. Mokhtar, A. T. Slot, L. Array, and
A. Design, “Fully Textile Slot Linear Array Antenna with Curvature and Crumple Analysis,” Proceedings of ISAP 2014,
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Dec.2-5, 2014., pp. 263–264, 2014.
[53] N. Chahat, S. Member, M. Zhadobov, S. A. Muhammad, L. Le Coq, R. Sauleau, and S. Member, “60-GHz Textile
Antenna Array for Body-Centric Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation., vol. 61, no. 4,
pp. 1816–1824, 2013.
[54] T. Thomast and G. Charishma, “MM Wave MIMO Antenna System for UE of 5G Mobile Communication: Design,” India
Conference (INDICON), 2015 Annual IEEE., 17-20 Dec 2015.
[55] O. Haraz, O. Haraz, M. M. M. Ali, A. Elboushi, and A. Sebak, “Four-Element Dual-Band Printed Slot Antenna Array for
the Future 5G Mobile Communication Networks,” 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation &
USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting., July, pp. 1–3, 2015.
[56] O. Haraz, O. M. Haraz, and M. M. M. Ali, “A Millimeter-Wave Circular Reflectarray Antenna for Future 5G Cellular
Networks,” Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, 2015 IEEE International
Symposium., July 2015.
[57] M. Koohestani, N. Pires, A. K. Skrivervik, and A. A. Moreira, “Performance study of a UWB antenna in proximity to a
human arm,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 555–558, 2013.
[58] P. J. Soh, G. Vandenbosch, F. H. Wee, A. van den Bosch, M. Martinez-Vazquez and D. Schreurs, "Specific Absorption
Rate (SAR) Evaluation of Textile Antennas," in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 229-240,
April 2015.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 21
[59] E. Moradi, K. Koski, T. Björninen, L. Sydänheimo, J. M. Rabaey, J. M. Carmena, Y. R. Samii; L. Ukkonen, “Miniature
Implantable and Wearable On-Body Antennas : Towards the New Era of Wireless Body-Centric Systems,” in IEEE
Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 271-291, 29 May 2014.
[60] P. Nepa and H. Rogier, “Wearable Antennas for Off-Body Radio Links at VHF and UHF Bands,” IEEE Antennas and
Propagation Magazine, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 30-52, October, 2015.
[61] F. Declercq, I. Couckuyt, H. Rogier, T. Dhaene, “Environmental High Frequency Characterization of Fabrics Based on a
Novel Surrogate Modelling Antenna Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 10, pp.
5200–5213, 2013.
[62] T. M. Nguyen, J. Chung, and B. Lee, “Radiation Characteristics of Woven Patch Antennas Composed of Conductive
Threads,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 663–666, 2015.
[63] B. Krykpayev, M. F. Farooqui, R. M. Bilal and A. Shamim, "A WiFi tracking device printed directly on textile for
wearable electronics applications," 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), San Francisco, CA,
2016, pp. 1-4.
[64] W. C. Lai and J. F. Huang, "Integrated RFIC on-chip and GPS antenna with human body for wrist and wearable
communication applications," 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and
Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Suzhou, 2015, pp. 1-7.
[65] S. F. Jilani, B. Greinke, Y. Hao, and A. Alomainy, “Flexible Millimetre-Wave Frequency Reconfigurable Antenna for
Wearable Applications in 5G Networks,” Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS), 2016 URSI International Symposium, pp.
10–12, 2016.
[66] N. O. Parchin, M. Shen, and G. F. Pedersen, “End-Fire Phased Array 5G Antenna Design Using Leaf-Shaped Bow-Tie
Elements for 28 / 38 GHz MIMO Applications,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless
Broadband (ICUWB), pp. 38–41, 2016.
[67] A. El-bacha, “Design of Tilted Taper Slot Antenna for 5G Base Station Antenna Circular Array,” 2016 IEEE Middle
East Conference on Antennas and Propagation (MECAP), pp. 5–8, 20-22 Sept 2016.
[68] P. Van Torre, L. Vallozzi, C. Hertleer, H. Rogier, M. Moeneclaey and J. Verhaevert, "Indoor Off-Body Wireless MIMO
Communication With Dual Polarized Textile Antennas," in IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59,
no. 2, pp. 631-642, Feb. 2011.
[69] A. S. M. Alqadami, M. F. Jamlos, P. J. Soh and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, "Assessment of PDMS Technology in a MIMO
Antenna Array," in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 15, no. , pp. 1939-1942, 2016.
[70] P. V. Torre, L. Vallozzi, L. Jacobs, H. Rogier, M. Moeneclaey and J. Verhaevert, "Characterization of Measured Indoor
Off-Body MIMO Channels with Correlated Fading, Correlated Shadowing and Constant Path Loss," in IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 712-721, February 2012.
[71] S. Wang, Y. Ji, D. Gibbins, X. Yin, "Impact of dynamic wideband MIMO body channel characteristics on healthcare
rehabilitation of walking," in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, accepted, to appear.