Belkund Diversion Project: Design of Spill Channel

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

BELKUND DIVERSION PROJECT

DESIGN OF SPILL CHANNEL


DESIGN DATA
1 Catchment Area :- 322.56 Sq.Km. or 124.54 Sq. mile
2 Designed Flood discharge :- 1478.13 Cumecs or 52199.81 Cusec
3 Revised Flood discharge :- 1478.13 Cumecs or 52199.81 Cusec
C 1400
4 Safe permissible velocity :- 1.8 M/sec.
5 Head due to velocity :- V 2 /2g
0.64 M
6 T.B.L. :- 396 M
7 Revised T.B.L. :- 396 M
8 M.W.L. :- 394 M
9 Revised M.W.L. :- 394 M
10 F.T.L. :- 387.2 M
11 L.S.L. :- .--- M
12 Depth of water :- 6.8 M
13 Revised Depth of water :- 6.8 M or 22.31 Feet
14 Free board above MWL :- 2 M
15 Revised Free board above MWL :- 2.00 M

Avilable Free board between exisring


T.B.L. AND revised MWL
16 :- 2 M
Height of parapet wall provide due to
17 revised MWL :- M
18 Side slope n :- 2
Provided width of waste weir 48 M
Q= 52192.86 or 1478.133
Safe permissible velocity of approch (i)for hard moorum 1.83 to 2.43 m/sec (ii) for
hard rock 3.05 m to4.57 m/sec
DESIGN OF SPILL CHANNEL

DISCHARGE 1478.133
1
2 WIDTH OF WAIST WEIR 48
3 FLOOD LIFT 6.8
4 F.T.L. 387.2

5 VELOCITY 3.53 M/SEC

6 Ha v^2/2g 0.21
R.D.0.0M TO R.D.15 M
Actual water way "A" Bd+nd2
418.88 Sq.M
Velocity over Crest "V" Q/A
3.53 M/second
Wetted perameter "P" B+2d√(1.5)2+1
78.41 M
R2/3 (A/P)2/3
3.07
Applying Manning's formula for Hudrolic slope
"V" ¾ 1/n x R 2/3 x S 1/2
where
"V" Velocity of floow in virgin stream in
m/second
"S" Water surface slope
"R" A/P
"P" Wetted perameter
"A" Actual water way
"n" Rugocity constant or 0.025
manning's constant.
"S" ¾ 0.0008 or 1250
Provided 1m : 1500 m

Waste weir is provided with Flush Bar


T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M U/S F.T.L. + flood lift +Head due to velocity
394.64 M
Bed level at R.D. 0.00M U/S T.E.L. - ( flood lift +Head due to velocity)
387.20 M
T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M D/S T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M U/S - Drop of fall
394.00 M
Bed level at R.D. 0.00M D/S T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M D/S - ( flood lift +Head due to velocity)

386.57 M
SECTION PROPOSED STRAIGHT FROM R.D.0.00M TO 315 M
T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M T.E.L. at R.D. 0.00M - ( Distance/water surface slope)
393.79 M
Bed level at R.D.315.00M T.E.L. at R.D. 315.00M - (flood lift +Head due to velocity )
386.35
[C] Scour Depth :
For the quasi-alluvial streams, the Scour depth (the span less than waterway) will be -
Ds= 0.473(Q/f)1/3
Where -
Qmax = 1478.13 Cumecs
f= 1 Silting factor,assuming f = 1.00 (Appendix-1 as per Irr. Tech. manual page-833)
[Ref. - Roads, Railways, Bridges and Tunnel Engineering by TD Ahuja & GS Birdi, p-395]
Ds= 0.473x(550/1.00) 1/3

Ds= 5.37 M
Max. Scour depth - 1.5 x Ds
Ds= 1.50 X 5.37
Ds= 8.06 M
R.L.= H.F.L. - Max. Scour depth
R.L.= 394.64 - 8.06
LOWEST FOUNDATION LEVELS
FROM HFL
R.L. 386.58 M
[D] H.F.L. FIXATION : A = 418.88
Observed H.F.L. = 394.00 S = 1500
386.125 n = 0.025
River Bed Level =
Hydraluice mean depth as per 7.88
Observed H.F.L

"V" = 1/n x R 2/3 x S 1/2

4.09
"V" =

Qr = A*V
Qr = 1712.40

Hence Qr > Qd 1478.133

Hence Discharge Calculated as per Observed HFL is greater than the Calculated Discharge
Therefore Observed HFL is adopted for design

Sub Engineer Sub Divisional Officer

You might also like