(For Teachers I-III)

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: BIELYNDA C. DAELO Name of Rater: JOSEPH T. SANTOS
Position: TEACHER I Position: ESP/OIC-Principal
Review Period: JUNE -OCTOBER 2018 Date of Review: Oct. 15,2018
SCHOOL: JESUS DELA PEŇA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Division: MARIKINA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RATING
Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS SCORE
QET (4) Q E T Ave
(5) (3) (2) (1)
Quality 1. Content 1. Applied Knowledge of content within June 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge of
content and its integration
Showed knowledge of
content and its integration
Showed knowledge of
content and its integration
Showed knowledge of No acceptable evidence
content and its integration was shown 3 4 3.5 0.26
Basic 2017 to
Education Knowledge and across curriculum teaching areas. March
within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1
within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1
within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1
within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
and 2018
Pedagogy
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons using Submitted 2 lessons using Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence
lessons using MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by given MOV was shown
(22.5%) supported by any 1 of the
other given MOV
any 1 of the other given
MOV
any 1 of the other given
MOV

2. Used a range of teaching strategies
that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills
Timeliness
June 7.5% No acceptable evidence
was shown 2 3 2.5 0.19
2017 to Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different
March teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that
2018 Quality promote reading, writing
and/or numeracy skills as
promote reading, writing
and/or numeracy skills as
promote reading, writing
and/or numeracy skills as
promote reading, writing
and/or numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable evidence

learnercentered lessons as learnercentered lessons as learnercentered lessons as learnercentered lesson as was shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in any of
and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of the given MOV
the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness
3. Applied a range of teaching strategies June 7.5% Quality Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching
strategies that develop
No acceptable evidence
was shown 4 4 3.5 0.26
to develop critical and creative thinking, 2017 to critical and creative
thinking and/or other
critical and creative
thinking and/or other
critical and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS as
critical and creative
thinking and/or other
as well as other higher-order thinking March HOTS as shown in MOV 1 HOTS as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a HOTS as shown in MOV 1
skills. 2018 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4
lessons as evidenced by
MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other given
MOV
Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable evidence
evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by any 1 of the was shown
supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the given MOV
other given MOV other given MOV

Timeliness
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable evidence
2. Learning 4. Managed classroom structure to June 7.5% Quality
management strategies management strategies management strategies that management strategies was shown 3 3 3.3 0.24
2017 to
Environment engage learners, individually or in March
that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
and groups, in meaningful exploration, 2018
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4

Diversity of discovery and hands-on activities

Learners within a range of physical learning
environments
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable evidence
lessons supported by MOV supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by any of the was shown
(22.5%) 1 and any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 Timeliness
Quality 2. Learning 5. Managed learner behavior June 7.5% Quality Applied teacher
management strategies of
Applied teacher
management strategies of
Applied teacher
management strategies of
Applied teacher No acceptable evidence
management strategies of was shown 3 3 3.2 0.24
Basic 2017 to
Education Environment constructively by applying positive and March
learner behavior that
promote positive and non-
learner behavior that
promote positive and non-
learner behavior that
promote positive and non-
learner behavior that
promote positive and non-
non-violent discipline to ensure violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown
and learningfocused environment 2018 in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Diversity of
Learners

(22.5%)
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence
given strategies as given strategies as given strategies as observed given strategies as was shown
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons in 2 lessons observed in only 1 lesson
lessons

Timeliness
6. Used differentiated, developmentally June 7.5% Quality Applied differentiated
teaching strategies to
Applied differentiated
teaching strategies to
Applied differentiated
teaching strategies to
No acceptable evidence
shown
3.5 3 3.25 0.24
appropriate learning experiences to 2017 to address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as
March shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ gender, needs, rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
strengths, interests and experiences. 2018

Efficiency Submitted at least 4
differentiated teaching
strategies in at least 2
lessons as evidenced by
MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV
Submitted 3 differentiated
teaching strategies in at
least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the
other acceptable MOV
Submitted 2 differentiated
teaching strategies in 2
lessons as evidenced by
MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV
Submitted any 1 No acceptable evidence
differentiated teaching shown No acceptable
strategy in only 1 lesson as evidence was shown
evidently shown in any 1 of
the acceptable MOV

Timeliness

3. 7. Planned, managed and implemented June 7.5% Quality Planned and implemented
developmentally
Planned and implemented
developmentally
Planned and implemented
developmentally sequenced
Planned and implemented No acceptable evidence
developmentally was shown 4 3 3.6 0.27
2017 to
Curriculum developmentally sequenced teaching March
sequenced teaching and
learning process as shown
sequenced teaching and
learning process as shown
teaching and learning
process as shown in MOV 1
sequenced teaching and
learning process as shown
and Planning and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements 2018
in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 in MOV 1 with a rating of 4

(22.5%)
Efficiency Submitted at least 4
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV
Submitted 3
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV
Submitted 2
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process as evidently shown
in MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other given
MOV
Submitted 1 No acceptable evidence
developmentally was shown
sequenced teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in any 1 of
the given MOV

Timeliness

3. 8. Participated in collegial discussions June 7.5% Quality Consistently participated in

LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
Frequently participated in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
Occasionally participated in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
Rarely participated in
LAC/FGD/ meeting to
No acceptable evidence
was shown 4 3 3.5 0.26
Curriculum that use teacher and learner feedback to 2017 to discuss teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
discuss teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
discuss teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
discuss teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
enrich teaching practice. March
and Planning 2018
instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted
instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted
instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted
instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted

(22.5%)
Efficiency Participated in at least 4
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as
evidently shown in any 1 of
the given MOV
Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ No acceptable evidence
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meeting as evidently was shown
evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the given
the given MOV the given MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Quality 3. 9. Selected, developed, organized and June 7.5% Quality Developed and used varied
teaching and learning
Developed and used varied
teaching and learning
Developed and used varied
teaching and learning
Developed and used varied No acceptable evidence
teaching and learning was shown 3 4 3.7 0.27
Basic 2017 to
Education Curriculum used appropriate teaching and learning March
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as
and Planning resources, including ICT, to address
learning goals. 2018
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 6
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 5
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

(22.5%)
Submitted at least 4 varied
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, as
evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of
the acceptable MOV
Efficiency
Submitted 3 varied
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, as
evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of
the acceptable MOV
Submitted 2 varied teaching
and learning resources,
including ICT, as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Submitted any teaching No acceptable evidence
and learning resource, was show
including ICT, as evidently
shown in any of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

4. 10. Designed, selected, organized and June 7.5% Quality Designed, selected,
organized and used
Designed, selected,
organized and used 3 4 3.5 0.26
used diagnostic, formative and 2017 to diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and
Assessment March summative assessment summative assessment
summative assessment strategies
and consistent with curriculum requirements. 2018
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
Designed, selected,
organized and used
Designed, selected,
organized and used
Reporting shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 6
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment No acceptable evidence
strategies consistent with strategies consistent with was shown
curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
(22.5%) shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 5
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied

assessment tools as
evidently shown in any 1 of
the acceptable MOV
assessment tools as
evidently shown in any 1 of Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 assessment
the acceptable MOV assessment tools as No acceptable evidence
evidently shown in any 1 of tool as evidently shown in was shown
any of the acceptable MOV
the acceptable MOV

11. Monitored and evaluated learner
progress and achievement using learner 2017 to
attainment data
Timeliness
June 7.5% Quality Consistently monitored
and evaluated learner
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
Occasionally monitored
and evaluated learner
Rarely monitored and No acceptable evidence
evaluated learner progress was shown 3 4 2 3 0.23
progress and achievement
using learner attainment
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
progress and achievement
using learner attainment
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
March data as shown in the MOV shown in the MOV data as shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
2018 submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination

of at least 4 of the of 3 of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV Submitted a combination of Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable evidence
2 of the acceptable MOV MOV was shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 No acceptable evidence
quarters quarters was shown
quarters quarter

4. 12. Communicated promptly and clearly June 7.5% Quality Consistently showed
prompt and clear
Frequently showed prompt
and clear communication
Occasionally showed
prompt and clear
Rarely showed prompt and No acceptable evidence
clear communication of was shown 3 3 4 3.5 0.26
the learners’ needs, progress and 2017 to communication of the of the learners’ needs, communication of the the learners’ needs,
Assessment March learners’ needs, progress progress and achievement learners’ needs, progress progress and achievement
achievement to key stakeholders, and achievement to key to key stakeholders, and achievement to key to key stakeholders,
and including parents/guardians. 2018 stakeholders, including including parents/ stakeholders, including including parents/
Reporting parents/ guardians as
shown in the MOV
guardians as shown in the
MOV submitted
parents/ guardians as
shown in the MOV
guardians as shown in the
MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination

of at least 4 of the of 3 of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV Submitted a combination of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence
2 of the acceptable MOV given MOV was shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 No acceptable evidence
distributed across 2 completed in only 1 was shown
quarters quarters quarters quarter
Quality 5. Plus 13. Performed various related June 10% Quality Consistently performed
various related
Frequently performed
various related
Occasionally performed
various related
Rarely performed various
related work/activities that
No acceptable evidence
was shown 5 5 5 0.50
Basic works/activities that contribute to the 2017 to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the teaching
Education Factor March contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching learning process as shown
teaching-learning process
(10 *Committee or Program Chairman or 2018
learning process as shown learning process as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
learning process as shown
in the MOV submitted
in the MOV submitted

%) Coordinator with project/accomplishment

like Gender and Development or Adopt-A-
School
*Facilitator, documenters in SLAC or INSET
*Committee member – division,
district, regional level
*Guidance Teacher,Prefect of
Discipline *
ICT/LIS Coordinator
*Clinic Teacher
*Club or Organization Adviser such as SPA, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence
different kinds of of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown
SSG, etc acceptable MOV
* Librarian
* Officer in any Academic Timeliness
Organization *Winning
Coach or Trainer *
Resource Person *
Demonstration Teacher
* Research Focal Person (like CI team)
*Examiner/Proctor in any National
Examination
* Other special task such as E-
Writer/Designer , Test Constructor, MOOE
Assistant, SDRRM

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
3.49
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.
VERY SATISFACTORY

JOSEPH T. SANTOS BRIAN AURELIO JOEL E. TORRECAMPO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Schools Division Superintendent
Adjectival Rating Scale
4.5 - 5.0 Outstanding
3.5 -4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.5 -3.499 Satisfactory
1.5 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.0 - 1.499 Poor