Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tales of Dmvwi
Tales of Dmvwi
prize
Long title[show]
the Philippines
Legislative history
Philippines Act
Status: Expired
Contents
1Background
2Legislative history
o 2.1Manila paper backlash
o 2.2Expiration and proposed extension
3Provisions
4Implementation
o 4.1NBI summons Mayor Sotto
o 4.2NBI investigates Senator Pimentel III
5See also
6References
Background[edit]
Main article: COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines
Following the sharp increase of confirmed cases, Congress to hold special sessions on
March 23 to enact the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act upon his request, which would
"authorize the President to exercise powers necessary to carry out urgent measures to
meet the current national emergency related to COVID-19 only for three months unless
extended by Congress." The act would allow President Duterte to "reallocate, realign,
and reprogram" a budget of almost ₱275 billion ($5.37 billion) from the estimated ₱438
billion ($8.55 billion) national budget approved for 2020, in response to the pandemic;
[3]
enable him to "temporarily take over or direct the operations" of public utilities and
privately owned health facilities and other necessary facilities "when the public interest
so requires" for quarantine, the accommodation of health professionals, and the
distribution and storage of medical relief; and "facilitate and streamline" the
accreditation of testing kits.[4]
Legislative history[edit]
Senators during a special session to tackle the passage of the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, March 23, 2020
In the House of Representatives, the bill was introduced as House Bill No. 6616 with
House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano of Pateros–Taguig as its principal sponsor and
was defended on the floor by Deputy Speaker Luis Raymund Villafuerte of Camarines
Sur's 2nd district. Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea addressed the session,
stressing that the president needed "standby powers" to address the emergency.
[5]
Some representatives questioned the nature, usage, and necessity of the "standby
powers", claiming its susceptibility to abuse and corruption. [6]
In the Senate of the Philippines, the bill was introduced as Senate Bill No. 1418 with
Senate President Tito Sotto and Senator Pia Cayetano as its principal sponsors. Under
the bill, Senator Cayetano said that over 18 million Filipino households living below the
poverty line would also receive financial incentives of around ₱5,000–8,000 ($97.45–
155.92) per month for two months.[7] Senators amended their version of the bill to
include financial compensation of around ₱100,000 ($1,965.33) to be given by
PhilHealth to health professionals who contracted the virus, as well as the provision of
around ₱1 million-worth ($19,653.27) of financial aid to their families. [8]
Both versions of the bill reportedly removed the usage of the term "emergency powers",
replacing it with "authority". It also removed the term "take over of public utilities and
private businesses", limiting President Duterte's abilities at most to "direct the
operations" of such enterprises.[9] The House version of the bill passed the House of
Representatives in a 284–9 vote without abstentions, [10] while its Senate version
unanimously passed the Senate.[11] President Duterte signed the bill into law the
following day on March 24, 2020.[12][2]
Manila paper backlash[edit]
At the start of the special session at the House of Representatives, House Speaker Alan
Peter Cayetano along with his fellow congresspeople, did a photo op showing Cayetano
and Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea holding up a board covered with Manila
paper with the message, "Together with doctors and frontliners, we went to work for
you, so please stay home for us."[13] This prompted an online backlash on social media
with citizens criticizing the lawmakers for comparing themselves with the pandemic
healthcare frontliners.[14] The photo also became fodder for memes with people replacing
the Manila paper message with various images. [15][16] Cayetano responded to the
backlash saying, "If you ask me to hold up a sign again, and even if the sign curses at
me but it gets people to read and gets people to stay home, I will do it again and again
and again."[17][18]
Expiration and proposed extension[edit]
The law expired on June 24, 2020 without a resolution of it being extended. Although
there were bills passed in Congress to extend the law until September 2020, the
president did not certify these as urgent, prompting the bills to lapse. [19][20][21]
The distribution of the social amelioration program (SAP) and other cash aids from the
Philippine government were not affected by the expiration of the law. [19]
Provisions[edit]
This section may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may
interest only a particular audience. Please help by spinning
off or relocating any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that
may be against Wikipedia's inclusion policy. (April 2020) (Learn how and when to
remove this template message)
This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please
consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or
adding subheadings. (May 2020)
The law provides the President of the Philippines the power to implement temporary
emergency measures to respond to the crisis brought about by COVID-19, such as: [2]
Implementation[edit]
NBI summons Mayor Sotto[edit]
See also: Vico Sotto
After the imposition of the enhanced community quarantine in Luzon and before the
enactment of the Bayanihan law, Pasig City Mayor Vico Sotto allowed temporarily the
limited operation of the city's tricycles for use of health care workers, government
personnel and patients despite the national government's ban on the operation of public
transportation. Sotto mentioned that banning all tricycles in the city would bring more
risk to the city's health situation.[22] After he aired the views and experiences of the local
government of Pasig, Sotto complied with the inclusion of tricycles in the public
transportation ban.[23]
The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), through its Deputy Director Ferdinand Lavin,
confirmed on April 1, 2020 that NBI sent an invitation letter to Sotto for violation of
Bayanihan to Heal as One Act. Lavin said that Sotto is scheduled to appear at the
bureau on April 7, 2020 at 10 am. Sotto responded by saying that he had already
complied with the national government's order to stop tricycle operations prior to the
implementation of the law.[24][25] Senate President Tito Sotto, an uncle of the mayor,
criticized the move in a tweet, stating "NBI will be well advised to be cautious in their
interpretation of the law I principally authored. Any so-called violation of RA 11469 can't
be retroactive!".[26] Liberal Party president and Senator Francis Pangilinan also
questioned the NBI's actions, stating the unconstitutionality of criminalizing an act
committed before the law was passed.
Social media responded heavily with criticism towards the NBI for allegedly singling out
the mayor, even comparing the situation to that of Senator Koko Pimentel's case, who
had violated quarantine protocols a few days prior at the Makati Medical Center, but
was given consideration by the government. [27]
NBI investigates Senator Pimentel III[edit]
See also: Koko Pimentel
The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) spokesperson Deputy Director Ferdinand
Lavin said that the bureau was also investigating Senator Aquilino Pimentel III for
alleged violation of the Bayanihan Heal as One Act. Director Eric Distor of the NBI
confirmed that Pimentel would also be invited to the bureau to explain. He would be
summoned when his self-quarantine ended. [28][29][30]
Pimentel had undergone testing for COVID-19 and was informed that he was positive
for the disease while he was at the Makati Medical Center, accompanying his pregnant
wife who was scheduled to give birth. [28]
See also[edit]
List of COVID-19 pandemic legislation
Philippine government response to the COVID-19
pandemic
References[edit]
1. ^ Patag, Kristine Joy (March 25, 2020). "During state of emergency,
'Bayanihan' Act allows imprisonment for 'false information'". The
Philippine Star. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e "Republic Act No. 11469 – An Act Declaring the
Existence of a National Emergency Arising from the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Situation and a National Policy in
Connection Therewith, and Authorizing the President of the Republic
of the Philippines for a Limited Period and Subject to Resctrictions, to
Exercise Powers Necessary and Proper to Carry Out the Declared
National Policy and for Other Purposes" (PDF). Official Gazette of the
Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
3. ^ Parrocha, Azer (March 22, 2020). "Duterte seeks 'more powers,'
urgent measures vs. Covid-19". Philippine News Agency. Philippine
News Agency. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
4. ^ Luci-Atienza, Charissa (March 24, 2020). "House approves
'Bayanihan' bill on 3rd reading in historic virtual special session; grants
PRRD 'necessary' powers to handle COVID-19 crisis". Manila Bulletin.
Retrieved March 24, 2020.
5. ^ Romero, Paolo; Porcalla, Delon (March 23, 2020). "Congress grants
Duterte covid standby powers". The Philippine Star. Retrieved March
24, 2020.
6. ^ Luci-Atienza, Charissa (March 24, 2020). "9 solons voted against
Bayanihan Act; say special powers prone to abuse, misuse". Manila
Bulletin. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
7. ^ Ager, Maila (March 24, 2020). "Poor families to get up to P8,000
cash subsidy from COVID-19 bill". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
Retrieved March 24, 2020.
8. ^ "Senators seek ₱1-M death benefit; ₱100K aid for COVID-infected
health workers". CNN Philippines. March 24, 2020. Retrieved March
24, 2020.
9. ^ Navallo, Mike (March 24, 2020). "COVID-19 CRISIS: How President
Duterte's emergency powers bill morphed in 36 hours". ABS-CBN
News. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
10. ^ Mercado, Neil Arwin (March 24, 2020). "House OKs bill granting
Duterte 'necessary' powers due to COVID-19 crisis". Philippine Daily
Inquirer. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
11. ^ Ramos, Christia Marie; Lalu, Gabriel Palico (March 24,
2020). "Senate OKs bill granting Duterte special powers to fight
COVID-19". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved March 24,2020.
12. ^ Valente, Catherine (March 25, 2020). "Duterte signs measure on
special powers into law". The Manila Times. Retrieved March
25, 2020.
13. ^ Mercado, Neil Arwin (March 23, 2020). "House special session
photo op: 'We went to work for you, so please stay home for
us'". Inquirer News. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
14. ^ Cepeda, Mara (March 23, 2020). "Pinoys online livid over 'Stay at
home for us' gimmick in House". Rappler. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
15. ^ Merez, Arianne (March 23, 2020). "'We went to work for you': Gov't
officials call to Filipinos to stay at home earns backlash". ABS-CBN
News. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
16. ^ Aguilera, John Paulo (March 24, 2020). "These 'stay home for us'
memes should serve as lesson for House not to use Manila
paper". SPIN.ph. Sports Interactive Network Philippines.
Retrieved April 2, 2020.
17. ^ Cepeda, Mara (March 24, 2020). "Cayetano lashes out: 'If holding
up sign gets people to stay home, I will do it again'". Rappler.
Retrieved April 2, 2020.
18. ^ "'I will do it again': Cayetano defends 'stay at home' sign amid online
backlash". CNN Philippines. March 24, 2020. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
19. ^ Jump up to:a b "Roque says expiration of Bayanihan Act will not affect the
disbursement of SAP". CNN Philippines. June 25, 2020.
Retrieved June 26, 2020.
20. ^ Punzalan, Jamaine (June 24, 2020). "Philippines 'in good shape'
ahead of Bayanihan Act expiration, says Duterte spokesman". ABS-
CBN News. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
21. ^ "Duterte may still need Bayanihan 2 – Palace". The Philippine Star.
June 26, 2020. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
22. ^ Nievera, Allysa (March 18, 2020). "Mayor Sotto says total ban on
tricycles in Pasig adds risk to health situation". Manila Bulletin.
23. ^ "Vico Sotto: Pasig to follow nat'l gov't on tricycles ban". GMA News.
Retrieved April 1,2020.
24. ^ "NBI asks Vico Sotto to explain 'violation' of quarantine policy". CNN
Philippines. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
25. ^ "NBI summons Vico Sotto for 'violating' Bayanihan Law". Rappler.
Retrieved April 7,2020.
26. ^ Rey, Aika. "Tito Sotto 'defends' Vico: 'Violation of Bayanihan law
can't be retroactive'". Rappler. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
27. ^ Isinika, Alois. "#ProtectVico trends worldwide after NBI summons
Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto". Rappler. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
28. ^ Jump up to:a b "NBI: Koko Pimentel also under probe for violation of
COVID-19 rules". GMA News. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
29. ^ "NBI to summon gov't execs over breach of quarantine
rules". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
30. ^ "NBI probes Koko Pimentel over possible quarantine breach". cnn.
Retrieved April 1,2020.
show
show
Rodrigo Duterte
Categories:
COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines
Philippine law
Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte
Law associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Search
Search Go
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
Contribute
Help
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Wikidata item
Print/export
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikisource
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 24 July 2020, at 11:03 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation,
Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Statistics
Cookie statement
Mobile view