1.

Evaluation:
The theory is supported by the observations of physical laws in the universe. It has
been independently checked over by scientists for over 75 years. The 2nd law of
thermodynamics supports the Big Bang theory. There is also a clear evidence of heat
which points to Big Bang( background radiation). Galaxies observed to be moving away
from each other, evidence of an explosion of some sort. A out of chemicals around
today tie in with amount left over from the Big Bang. Space probs are complex enough
to comfort many of these theories. To often assumed that the Big Bang is the only way
to explain origins of universe scientifically. Steady State theory was the for a while a
rival to BBT. This theory did away with the need for a beginning of the universe. In
1979 s there were problems for the BBT : first was the horizon problem, second was
the flatness problem, it would appear the universe has very little cover in it, in fact it is
almost flat. Third was the magnetic monopole problem. If there was a Big Bang there
should be a magnetic monopole, there are non. There is a belief scientists chance the
theory every time something does not work out. Funding for the research is poured
into Big Bang and not into other cosmologies. Questions about the age of sone star
cluster, these could be 15 billion years old this would cause BBT calculation to e
incorrect. Science has been wrong before with geocentric and helios models they could
be wrong again. BBT is full of assumptions e.g. that laws of nature are the same all over
the universe

2. Theory which does not agree with the Big Bang theory:
Bouncing Cosmology

In the Big Bang model, the universe expanded from a single point of magnitude and size
and infinity, and continued to grow. This is called the inflation model.

The Bouncing cosmology, or Big Bounce, model is in line with the rapid expansion of the
universe. However, the theory states that the universe has always been in a state of
maturity and spontaneity, one after the other in rotation, shrinking each time it
decreases in size. Some suggested that the atmosphere was only one time. In this
model, the Universe had been contracted before the cut, from the indefinite past, and
will expand indefinitely.

This idea was first analysed by Silva Neves in a paper published in the journal General
Relativity and Gravitation. Silva Neves is a researcher in the Mathematics, Statistics &
Science Science Compton Institute of the University of Campinas, Brazil.

3. The earth is not not talked about much when we discuss about the universe could be
because we already know about the planet we live on.