Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1344642-Business Ethics Discussion - Edited
1344642-Business Ethics Discussion - Edited
Business Ethics
Name
Institution affiliated
BUSINESS ETHICS 2
Business Ethics
Question 1
There are many ethical pitfalls associated with employing undocumented workers, and
one of them is the fact that they are prone to exploitation. Exploitation does not necessarily
search of jobs, and they are often desperate. Most of them work under deplorable conditions,
including accepting extremely lower rates than what the government permits. For example, John
pays up to 25% below the government’s minimum rates, meaning that he is exploiting his
workers. The government sets minimum wage rates to protect desperate job seekers, making sure
their employers pay them fairly. John’s actions are unethical because he is paying them way
below what most Americans would accept. He may be doing many of his workers a favor by
giving them jobs and the pay, but that does not take away the fact that he is underpaying them.
Under deontology, the morality of John's actions should be judged against the minimum wage
rates set by the government. The outcome might be noble, but the very act of employing
Question 2
teaches that a decision is morally justifiable as long as it produces the maximum benefits for the
highest number of people. In a free-market capitalist economy, however, only a few individuals
benefit at the expense of others. Business firms always want to maximize profits even when
doing so causes harm to people and the environment. Governments strive to create fairness in the
market by ensuring businesses remain socially responsible. They develop rules that govern
Governments also develop production and quality standards to make sure business
entities offer excellent-quality goods and services. It is also the responsibility of governments to
ensure firms do not pollute the environment, thereby making it unsafe for all the people. A free-
market capitalist economy is an unethical system since only a few individuals, especially those
with capital, benefit. Without the intervention of the government, companies will create
monopolies and set exceptionally high prices. Unscrupulous businessmen and women will also
emerge, and they will reduce the quality of goods and services to make more money. In a free-
market economy, the concept of the tragedy of the commons becomes even real, and it prevents
Question 3
John's practices are typical of a free-market capitalist economic system, where capital
owners want to exploit those without capital. A capitalistic society comprises the haves and the
have-nots, and the former always explore ways to use the latter to enrich themselves. A free-
market is all about every man for himself, and that explains why those who do not own capital
have it very rough. John has the option of hiring documented workers, both immigrants and
Americans. However, he wants to reduce his costs by getting cheap, illegal labor. The same thing
would happen in a free-market economy. Without the intervention of the government, many
employers would pay peanuts. They would even come together to set meager rates, as this would
allow them to make profits. It is because of people like John that the government's involvement
in the market is justified. If the government did not intervene, many people like John would
emerge, and many people would be on the receiving end of an utterly unethical market system.