Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study of Glutinous and Non-Glutinous Rice (Oryza Sativa) Varieties On Their Antioxidant Compounds
Study of Glutinous and Non-Glutinous Rice (Oryza Sativa) Varieties On Their Antioxidant Compounds
Study of Glutinous and Non-Glutinous Rice (Oryza Sativa) Varieties On Their Antioxidant Compounds
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0115068 27
International Conference on Plant, Marine and Environmental Sciences (PMES-2015) Jan. 1-2, 2015 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0115068 28
International Conference on Plant, Marine and Environmental Sciences (PMES-2015) Jan. 1-2, 2015 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
G. Determination of Amylose Content The precision of the method was evaluated by performing
Amylose content of the samples was determined by repeatability (intra-day) and intermediate precision (extra-
Iodometric method based on official methods of analysis of day). Repeatability was assessed by ten independent analyses
AOAC. In summary, 100 mg of sample were weighed and of the same samples on the same day while intermediate
mixed with 1 mL 95% ethanol and 9 mL of 1N NaOH. The precision was determined by five independent analyses on
samples were diluted and the iodine solution was added. After three consecutive days. Precision was expressed as coefficient
10 min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance at 625 of variance (CV) of retention time and peak signal. The CV
nm was analysed with a spectrophotometer and the amylose values for both repeatability and intermediate precision were
content was calculated based on the standard curve. The less than 6% showing that the methods have adequate
samples were analysed in triplicate. precisions.
The analytical properties for the determination of phenolic
H. Performance of the Method compounds and melatonin are listed in Table I.
The analytical procedures for the chromatographic methods
I. Data Analysis
for melatonin and phenolic compounds were carried out
according to the recommendations of ICH Guideline Q2 (R1) The experimental results in single- and two-factor
and suggestions in ISO 17025. Linearity, range, precision, experiments were analysed using Gnumeric. The Analysis of
detection and quantification limits of the method were Variance (ANOVA) and Least Significant Difference (LSD)
established. Linearity was evaluated in order to express the test were used to determine the significant differences (p <
ability of the method to obtain test results that are directly 0.05) between the means.
proportional to the concentration of melatonin in two different
ranges. Appropriate dilution from a stock solution of III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
melatonin was carried out to give concentrations ranging from
0.75 to 15 µg L–1 and 15 to 750 µg L–1. A series of dilution A. Phenolics in Glutinous and Non-glutinous Rice
from stock solution of phenolic compounds was carried out to In order to evaluate the phenolic levels and compositions on
give concentrations from 0.15 to 12 mg L-1. Gnumeric 1.12.17 glutinous and non-glutinous rice, two clusters of rice varieties
was used to generate the regression analysis. Calibration i.e. non-pigmented and black pigmented rice grains were
curves were obtained from these regression analyses and the extracted and analysed in duplicate (Table II). Result shows
melatonin and phenolic compounds in the extracts were that the content of phenolic compounds in rice samples with
quantified. The standard deviation (σ) obtained for the higher amylose content (non-glutinous) were higher than in
response and the slope (a) from the regression were then used the glutinous samples for both clusters. The highest
to calculate the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of concentration of phenolics presented in pigmented-rice was
quantification (LOQ). 211.94±18.65 µg g-1 owned by black non-glutinous rice then
followed by its glutinous type (209.00±18.39 µg g-1).
TABLE I. ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MELATONIN AND PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
Intra-day, CV (%) Inter-day, CV (%),
Concentration n = 10 n=3×5
Compounds Linear equation R2 LOD LOQ
range
RT Peak RT Peak
* * *
PRO 0.15 – 12 y = 1.32x − 0.05 0.9997 0.23 0.77 0.00 0.33 0.26 2.33
* * *
PRA 0.15 – 12 y = 5.52x + 0.03 0.9999 0.17 0.56 0.00 0.33 0.21 2.22
y = 7.43x − 0.23
* * *
p-HBA 0.15 – 12 0.9997 0.22 0.74 0.00 0.38 0.21 2.22
y = 3.44x − 0.07
* * *
p-HB 0.15 – 12 0.9998 0.23 0.75 0.00 0.49 0.18 1.85
* * *
VAA 0.15 – 12 y = 1.34x + 0.06 0.9996 0.26 0.87 0.08 0.32 0.10 0.45
* * *
IVA 0.15 – 12 y = 1.37x + 0.08 0.9994 0.32 1.07 0.07 0.24 0.06 0.23
y = 1.85x − 0.02
* * *
VAN 0.15 – 12 0.9998 0.20 0.67 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.83
* * *
GUA 0.15 – 12 y = 0.35x + 0.03 0.9993 0.37 1.24 0.00 1.43 0.24 0.71
* * *
p-COU 0.15 – 12 y = 7.52x + 0.16 0.9998 0.18 0.61 0.04 0.36 0.16 2.19
y = 4.96x − 0.27
* * *
FER 0.15 – 12 0.9996 0.27 0.90 0.04 0.65 0.14 2.10
y = 3.74x – 1.05
* * *
CAF 0.15 – 12 0.9963 0.84 2.80 0.05 0.40 0.06 0.63
y = 10.56x – 3.85
* * *
CHL 0.15 – 12 0.9916 1.27 4.23 0.06 5.99 0.11 3.33
y = 4.72x – 0.29
* * *
SIN 0.15 – 12 0.9996 0.27 0.90 0.04 0.45 0.14 1.65
y = 24.87x – 1.95
* * *
HMF 0.15 – 12 0.9998 0.18 0.61 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.60
* * *
MF 0.15 – 12 y = 0.32x + 0.28 0.9954 0.94 3.12 0.06 0.42 0.48 1.36
* * *
ELL 0.15 – 10 y = 1.35x + 0.12 0.9827 1.59 4.83 0.05 3.32 0.15 5.49
Melatonin 0.75 to 15** y = 580.79x – 1806.8 0.9957 1.15
**
3.84
**
0.99 0.93 1.23 2.05
15 to 750** y = 615.11x − 961.13 0.9994
*
Range in the unit of mg/Kg-1
**
Range in the unit of µg/Kg-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0115068 29
International Conference on Plant, Marine and Environmental Sciences (PMES-2015) Jan. 1-2, 2015 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
The difference of phenolics content between black C. Phenolics and Melatonin in Medium-Amylose Rice
glutinous and black non-glutinous rice was not as impressive Three rice varieties from conventional farming were used
as if compared to the non-pigmented rice. Thus, in this in this study. In addition to being considered as aromatic rice,
particular case, phenolics concentration in rice appears to be together with umbul-umbul, pandan wangi represents the local
strongly related to the pigment of rice in their bran. Both rice varieties of Indonesia. IR64 is a rice variety that was
black pigmented glutinous and non-glutinous rice grains were developed in a major advance in rice production as it provided
produced without a bran removal process called polishing. higher yield potential, greater yield stability and more
Hence, as the phenolic compounds are mainly associated with efficient management practices. Amylose content in these
the pericarp in the grain, the milling process to produce tested rice varieties was determined (Fig. 2). Subsequently, in
polished grain reduces the level of these compounds in the order to study the effect of amylose content on the level of
grain. antioxidant compounds including phenolic and melatonin, a
In contrary, the levels of phenolics in non-pigmented single-factor ANOVA has been used (p.0.05). ANOVA
(polished) grains were prominently remarkable for different revealed that the amylose content has significant effect on the
amylose content: 35.58±3.13 µg g-1 for non-glutinous rice level of antioxidant compounds for both phenolics and
whilst 16.15±1.42 µg g-1 for glutinous rice. The level of melatonin. It is, therefore, Least Significant Differences
phenolics in non-glutinous was roughly two folds higher than (LSDs) for these factors were also estimated (Fig. 2).
its glutinous type. This finding agrees the result revealed by The levels of both phenolics and melatonin for the three
Chi et al. [11] who conducted a research related to phenolics tested varieties were directly corresponded to the amount of
analysis of Korean rice grain varieties. These researchers amylose content wherein the higher the amylose content, the
confirmed that polished non-glutinous rice (Ilpumbye) extract higher the amount of antioxidant compounds. This finding is
has a higher level of phenolics than the glutinous type consistent with that reported by Li et al.[10], who found that
(Hwasunchalbyo). plant samples with high amylose contents exhibit better
B. Melatonin in Glutinous and Non-glutinous Rice antioxidant activity than their glutinous genotypes. Despite
significant research effort, the specific antioxidant enhanced
The level of melatonin in rice with different amount of
by amylose has not been investigated further and phenolics as
amylose content was studied on the same sample used in
well as melatonin are considered as a potential molecule that
previous experiment of phenolics. However, unlike the result
has a high antioxidant activity [13].
for phenolics, the difference in melatonin contents between
black glutinous (182.04±2.79 µg Kg–1) and non-glutinous rice
IV. CONCLUSION
(73.81±1.13µg Kg–1) was notably more significant. The level
of melatonin in black non-glutinous rice was more than Antioxidant compounds in glutinous and non-glutinous rice
double than in its glutinous type. were studied. The results suggest a positive correlation
This variation is reasonable when taking into consideration between the amylose content and the level of antioxidant
the specific type of carbohydrates in rice support the synthesis compounds i.e. melatonin and phenolic compounds. However,
of the neurotransmitter serotonin, which is later transformed particularly in pigmented variety, rice bran contributes greater
into melatonin [12]. Thus, the presence of lower amounts of effect on the level of phenolics in rice grain than the amylose
starch may not enhance the synthesis of melatonin. content.
Black
Non-glutinous 182.04 74.58 7.16± 2.81± 0.49± 59.56± 1.04± 2.79± 45.00± 1.38± 5.71± 2.53± 0.85± 0.48± 7.40± 0.16± 211.94
ND
(Medium Amylose ±2.79 ±1.97 0.20 0.12 0.01 6.94 0.16 0.07 2.67 0.04 0.34 0.13 0.05 0.01 0.49 0.01 ±18.65
Pigmented Content)
Rice
Black glutinous 73.81± 91.47 6.77± 3.34± 1.97± 34.50± 1.74± 1.96± 29.65± 4.74± 5.87± 1.55± 0.92± 24.35± 0.16± 209.00
(Low Amylose ND ND
1.13 ±2.42 0.19 0.15 0.05 4.02 0.28 0.05 1.76 0.14 0.35 0.08 0.06 1.62 0.01 ±18.39
Content)
White
Non-glutinous 1.65± 1.13± 3.64± 3.47± 1.29± 10.68± 0.98± 2.16± 0.96± 0.83± 0.17± 6.56± 0.17± 1.88± 35.58±
- ND ND
(Medium Amylose 0.04 0.03 0.16 0.10 0.03 0.63 0.03 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.08 3.131
Non- Content)
pigmented
Rice White
Glutinous 0.81± 0.70± 1.63± 4.10± 0.28± 0.97± 3.28± 0.31± 1.02± 0.84± 0.76± 1.29± 0.17± 16.15±
- ND ND ND
(Low Amylose 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.01 1.422
Content)
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0115068 30
International Conference on Plant, Marine and Environmental Sciences (PMES-2015) Jan. 1-2, 2015 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
[11] H.-Y. Chi, C.-H. Lee, K.-H. Kim, S.-L. Kim, I.-M. Chung, "Analysis
of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity with H4IIE cells of
three different rice grain varieties," Eur. Food Res. Technol., vol. 225,
pp. 887–893. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0498-3
[12] USA Rice® Federation, "Rice Nutrition Information,"
http://www.usarice.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article
&id=1727&Itemid=660 (accessed September 23, 2014).
[13] I. Gulcin, M.E. Buyukokuroglu, M. Oktay, I. Kufrevioglu, "On the in
vitro antioxidative properties of melatonin," J. Pineal Res.,vol. 33,pp.
167–171. 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-079X.2002.20920.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0115068 31