Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Climate Change Vulnerability and Disaster Risk Assessment: Annexes
Climate Change Vulnerability and Disaster Risk Assessment: Annexes
Annexes
Section Title
Annex A Severity of Consequence Matrix for Population
Annex B Severity of Consequence Matrix for Urban Areas: Residential
Annex C Severity of Consequence Matrix for Production Areas
Annex D Severity of Consequence Matrix for Urban Areas: Critical Point Facilities
Annex E Severity of Consequence Matrix for Urban Areas: Lifeline Utilities
Annex F Severity of Consequence Matrix for Urban Areas: Electrical Post
Annex G Severity of Consequence Matrix for Critical Point and Lifeline Utilities
Annex H Severity of Consequence Score Matrix
Annex J Indicative Likelihood of Occurrence Scores
Annex K Risk Rating Matrix
Annex L Suggested Indicators for CCVA/CDRA
Annex M Degree of Impact Score
Annex N Degree of Adaptive Capacity
Annex O Vulnerability Index Scores
SEVERITY OF CONSEQUENCE SCORE MATRIX (POPULATION)
9 Capacity and willingness ≥20% of the affected HHs >10 - <20% of the
to retrofit t or relocate have the Capacity and affected HHs have the >5%-10% of the
willingness to retrofit or Capacity and willingness affected HHs have the
relocate to retrofit or relocate Capacity and
willingness to retrofit
or relocate
10 Access to information ≥20% of the affected HHs >10 - <20% of the
have access to climate, affected HHs have access
climate change and to climate, climate >5%-10% of the
hazards-related change and hazards- affected HHs have
information affecting the related information access to climate,
area affecting the area climate change and
hazards-related
information affecting
the area
VERY HIGH 1 3 4
2
(4)
≥20% of the 4 4 4 4
population of the total
population are
affected
4 4 4 4 4
≥20% of the affected 4 4 4 4
HHs are informal
settlers
≥20% of the affected 4 4 4 4
HH are living in
dwelling units made
from light materials
≤ 5% of the affected 1 1 1 1
Population have access
to financial assistance
≤ 5% of the affected 1 1 1 1
HHs have the Capacity
and willingness to
retrofit or relocate
≤ 5% of the affected 3 2 3 2
HHs have access to
climate, climate
change and hazards-
related information
affecting the area
3 3 3 3
CRITERIA
2
VULNERABILITY (SENSITIVITY)
3
Date of construction
(Sensitivity
2
Structure employing hazard
resistant building design
(Percentage of structures
employing site preparation, hazard
resistant and/ or climate proofed
design standards)
4 Access to information
VULNERABILITY (Adaptive Capacity)
Government
investments
2
(1-1.99) (2-2.99) (3-3.99) (4)
≤10% of nonresidential >20 to <40% of non- ≥ 40% of
structures are affected residential structures nonresidential
or are affected structures
≤5% of residential or are affected
structures are affected >10 to 20% of non- >10-20% of residential or
residential structures are structures are affected ≥20% of residential
affected structures are affected
or
>5 to10% of residential
structures are affected
replacement value is
100,000-500,000 per
dwelling unit replacement value is replacement value is
>500,000 but less than >1m but less than 2m replacement value is
1m per dwelling unit per dwelling unit more than 2m
1 2 1
1 2 1 1.5
5 5 3
1 2 5
5 1 1
5 5 5
1 2 1
5 5 5
CRITERIA
-Crops
-Fishpond
-livestock and poultry
2
Application of sustainable
production techniques/methods by
dependent households
(Sensitivity
3 Alternative Livelihood
10
2
(1-1.99) (2-2.99) (3-3.99) (4)
≤5% of total production >10-20% of total ≥20% of total
areas are affected >5 to10% of total production areas are production areas are
production areas are affected affected
affected
≤5% of the total HHs are >10-20% of the total ≥20% of the total HHs 2
dependent in the affected HHs are dependent in are dependent in the
areas >5 to10% of the total the affected areas affected areas
HHs are dependent in
the affected areas
Exposure Average Score 2
≤5% of affected production >10-20% of affected ≥20% of affected
areas have access to >5 to10% of affected production areas have production areas have
irrigation production areas have access to irrigation access to irrigation
access to irrigation
≤5% of HHs are employing >10-20% of HHs are ≥20% of HHs are 5
sustainable production >5 to10% of HHs are employing sustainable employing sustainable
methods employing sustainable production methods production methods
production methods
1 2 1
1 2 1 1.5
5 5 3
3 3 3
5 5 5
1 2 1
5 5 5
CRITERIA
3
Date of construction
4
Structure employing hazard
mitigation design
(Sens
Government
investments
Severity of Consequnce
ONSEQUENCE SCORE MATRIX (URBAN AREAS: Critical Point Facilities)
replacement value is
100,000-500,000 per replacement value is replacement value is >1m
dwelling unit >500,000 but less than 1m but less than 2m per replacement value is more
per dwelling unit dwelling unit than 2m
Constructed in 2000 constructed in 1990s & constructed in 1980s & constructed in 1970s &
onwards & employing employing hazard employing hazard employing hazard resistant
hazard resistant and/or resistant and/or climate resistant and/or climate and/or climate proofed
climate proofed design proofed design standards proofed design standards design standards
standards
1 3 4
2 1 2 1
2 1 2 1 1.5
5 5 5 3
4 1 2 5
4 5 1 1
5 5 5 5
2 5 5 5
CRITERIA
3
Date of construction
4
Structure employing hazard
mitigation design
(S
Government
investments
VULNER
Severity of Consequn
TY OF CONSEQUENCE SCORE MATRIX (URBAN AREAS: LIFELINE)
replacement value is
100,000-500,000 per replacement value is replacement value is >1m
dwelling unit >500,000 but less than 1m but less than 2m per replacement value is more
per dwelling unit dwelling unit than 2m
Constructed in 2000 constructed in 1990s & constructed in 1980s & constructed in 1970s &
onwards & employing employing hazard resistant employing hazard resistant employing hazard resistant
hazard resistant and/or and/or climate proofed and/or climate proofed and/or climate proofed
climate proofed design design standards design standards design standards
standards
2 1 2 1
2 1 2 1 1.5
5 5 5 3
4 1 2 5
4 5 1 1
5 5 5 5
2 5 5 5
CRITERIA
2 Attached Transformer
EXPOSURE
Classification by Construction
Materials
3
Date of construction
4
Structure employing hazard
mitigation design
(S
Government
investments
Severity of Consequn
OF CONSEQUENCE SCORE MATRIX (URBAN AREAS: Electrical Post)
≤10% of affected >10 to 20% of affected >20 to <40% of affected ≥ 40% of affected
EP has Transformer EP has Transformer EP has Transformer EP has Transformer
replacement value is
100,000-500,000 per replacement value is replacement value is >1m
dwelling unit >500,000 but less than 1m but less than 2m per replacement value is more
per dwelling unit dwelling unit than 2m
≤10% are made up of >20 to <40% are made up of ≥ 40% are made of
concrete materials concrete materials concerete materials
>10 to 20% of concrete
materials
Constructed in 2000 constructed in 1990s & constructed in 1980s & constructed in 1970s &
onwards & employing employing hazard resistant employing hazard resistant employing hazard resistant
hazard resistant and/or and/or climate proofed and/or climate proofed and/or climate proofed
climate proofed design design standards design standards design standards
standards
2 1 2 1
2 1 2 1 1.5
5 5 5 3
4 1 2 5
4 5 1 1
5 5 5 5
2 5 5 5
≥20% of the sturcture is More than 50% are 10% - 50% are
COMMUNICATION TOWERS affected
damaged damaged
AIRPORT/SEAPORT
EVACUATION CENTER
BHS
GOVERNMENT OFFICE
HOSPITALS
RHU
SCHOOLS Used for evacuation Used for evacuation
SENSITIVITY
MODERATE
LOW (1) HIGH (3) LOW (1)
(2)
Age of
10% and below Age of structure is
Age of structure
of the water structure is more than 15
is less than15
supply sources more than 25 years but less
years old
are cut years old than 25 years
old
Walls, roofing
and foundation Walls, roofing
are made up of and foundation
temporary/mak are made up of
eshift/ salvaged light materials
materials
Age of
Age of structure is
Age of structure
structure is more than 15
is less than15
more than 25 years but less
years old
years old than 25 years
old
Semi-
Temporary Permanent
permanent
infrastructure infrastructure
infrastructure
Table 2. Severity of consequence sc
Severity of Damage
Severity of Consequence
Score
Urban Areas
Description/Exposure Unit
Disruption of service by
approximately five days for
municipalities and less than 18
hour disrtuption for highly
urbanized areas
Disruption of service by
approximately three days for
municipalities and less than six
hour disrtuption for highly
urbanized areas
Disruption of service by
approximately one day for
municipalities and less than six
hour disrtuption for highly
urbanized areas
Table 3.16. Indicative Likelihood of Occurrence Scores
Measure of Likelihood Return Period in Years
Note:
If using a scenario based hazard maps with defined return period, there will only be one likelihood score for that matrix.
2. Moderate flood susceptibility occurs in areas likely to experience flood heights of 0.50 to 1.00 meter and/or flood
duration of one (1) to three (3) days. These areas are subject to widespread inundation during prolonged and
extensive heavy rainfall or extreme weather condition. Fluvial terraces, alluvial fans, and infilled valleys are areas
moderately subjected to flooding
3. Low flood susceptibility occurs in areas likely to experience flood heights of less tha 0.50 meter and/or flood duration
of less than one (1) day. These also have sparse to moderate drainage density.
e Scores
Likelihood Score
n 1.00 meter and/or flood duration of more than three (3) days. These areas are
as active river channels, abandoned river channels and areas along riverbanks are also
Indicators Description
Population
Exposure
Residential area allocation per barangay in
Residential area
hectares
Barangay population Barangay population
Population density of the barangay derived by
Barangay population density dividing the total barangay population with the
estimated residential land area.
Sensitivity/Vulnerability
Adaptive Capacity
Percentage of areas with access to infrastructure
Access to infrastructure-related mitigation
related mitigation measures (i.e. seawalls, flood
measures
control measures)
Percentage of individuals with access to financial
assistance (i.e. Pag-Ibig, SSS, PhilHealth,credit
Access to financial assistance
cooperatives, micro- nancing institutions,
property and life insurance)
Capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate Percentage of households willing and have
existing capacities to retrofit or relocate
Local government capacity to invest in risk
Government investments management and climate change
adaptation/mitigation
Urban Use
Exposure
Natural Resources
Exposure
Allocation per resource
Major crop produced
Rice Area allocated in hectares
Corn Area allocated in hectares
Coconut Area allocated in hectares
… Area allocated in hectares
Major livestock raised
Hog Area allocated in hectares
Cattle Area allocated in hectares
Goat Area allocated in hectares
… Area allocated in hectares
Major poultry raised
Chicken Area allocated in hectares
Duck Area allocated in hectares
Quail Area allocated in hectares
… Area allocated in hectares
Major forest and mangrove areas Area allocated in hectares
Annual production output
Major crop produced
Rice Annual production output per hectare
Corn Annual production output per hectare
Coconut Annual production output per hectare
… Annual production output per hectare
Major livestock raised
Hog Annual production output per hectare
Cattle Annual production output per hectare
Goat Annual production output per hectare
… Annual production output per hectare
Major poultry raised
Chicken Annual production output per hectare
Duck Annual production output per hectare
Quail Annual production output per hectare
… Annual production output per hectare
Major forest produce
Timber Annual production output per hectare
Replacement cost
Major crop produced
Adaptive Capacity
Percentage of production areas not covered by
Access to financing post disaster economic protection (insurance,
micro-finance)
Percentage of population with access to
Alternative Livelihood alternative livelihood
Structure employing hazard mitigation design Structure/s employing site preparation, hazard
resistant and/or climate proofed design standards
Adaptive Capacity
Property owner/s with capacities and willingness to
Capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate
retro t or relocate
Lifeline Utilities
Exposure
The general classification or use of the lifeline (road,
Classification water distribution network, power)
Road length/distance in meters
Pavement type
concrete/asphalt lenghth in linear kilometer
gravel lenghth in linear kilometer
Bridge length/distance in meters
Water distribution network length/distance in meters
Power length/distance in meters
Construction/replacement cost
Road Estimated construction cost per linear kilometers
Bridge Estimated construction cost per linear meters
Water distribution network Estimated construction cost per linear kilometers
Power Estimated construction cost per linear kilometers
Qualitative assessment of the existing condition of the
Condition distribution/access network
Sensitivity/Vulnerability
Structure employing hazard Proportion of structures employing site preparation,
hazard resistant and/or climate
Adaptive Capacity
Insurance Coverage Proportion of structures covered by insurance
Local government capacity to invest in infrastructure
Government infrastructure related investment related projects (mitigation andconstruction of
redundant systems)
Available redundant systems Existing alternative routes/distribution networks
Table 1. Degree of Impact Score
Degree of Impact
Degree of Impact
Rating
High 3
Moderate 2
Low 1
Table 1. Degree of Impact Score
Description
Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible. Current qualities of the
exposed units can deal with the impacts with minimal intervention to return to
pre-impact levels. Exposed units can cope with the expected impacts using their
own resources.
Table 1. Degree of Adaptive Capacity
Low 3
Moderate 2
High 1
Table 1. Degree of Adaptive Capacity
Description
Addressing the impacts will require significant cost but it is still within the capacity
of system to adapt to potential impacts. It can accommodate within its resources
the cost for adapting and mitigating impacts.