Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Management and IHRM PDF
Performance Management and IHRM PDF
Performance Management and IHRM PDF
and IHRM
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3
5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 11
References ................................................................................................................................ 13
Page | 2
Chenoy Ceil
1. Introduction
expand all over the world. However, with the growth in industries, there is also need of
human resources to manage such industries and global conglomerates. International Human
defined rules often leads to employee discomfort. Under such circumstances, performance
management and performance appraisal plays crucial role in defining the strategic approach
capabilities of employees through various processes that would ultimately lead to growth of
rather than concentrating on all the various factors and environment interacting with such
employees.
This study focuses on the paper written by Woods (2003), to understand why
performance appraisal of expatriate managers and employees have failed to truly evaluate the
performance rate of such population. The cross-cultural challenges that managers face in
international environment is often unnoticed and this should not be the case while designing
From this paper it can be assessed that performance rating criteria, number of
performance raters and the overall cultural diversity should be taken into consideration by
Human Resources department while designing the performance appraisal for expatriate
Page | 3
Chenoy Ceil
managers. Research conducted by Woods (2003) and Hempel (2001) showcases why
expatriate managers from foreign nations struggle to perform in host nations. The
employment and firm regulations also differ from one country to another and the same
criteria cannot be utilized to judge all managers operating within different socio-cultural
2. Performance Management
Performance management must first take into consideration the definition of
performance. In Western research, performance is often defined in terms of the trait and
based on the performance and not on the qualities exhibited by the person. It is believed that
outcome (Hempel 2001). However, it is necessary to understand the context in which the
performance evaluation. For example, in West for performance evaluation, employees should
always work towards growth of the company. However, in Chinese companies, human values
and morality plays a critical role in defining employee actions. It is seen, that performance
appraisal in China is often based on upholding family traditions and organizations support
corporate performance, such time, cost and quality (Moller 2010). However, performance
management of employees by HRM should take into account the individual values of the
employees as well as the cultural factors that regulate organizational transactions within that
Page | 4
Chenoy Ceil
organisation.
importance because their duty is not only to follow the instructions provided by the company
owners but they also have to manage cultural factors and government regulations that are
companies, away from home, often have to adapt to the cultural changes and environmental
approach where the diverse conditions of expatriate managers with respect to local nationals
should be taken into consideration while evaluating them (Audia and Tams 2002). It has been
seen that if performance appraisal of expatriates are conducted by taking into consideration
the local cultural factors then the overall performance level of managers significantly
increased which in turn increases the overall growth of company (Moller 2010).
performance appraisal based on the success rate of overseas subsidiary companies in which
the expatriates are posted (Brewster 1991). However, Armstrong (1994) argues that
performance appraisal of managers should focus on the achievements and behaviour of the
managers. The day to day behaviour of managers can significantly alter while working in
foreign nations. These factors should be taken into consideration while designing the
performance evaluation. Finally, the feedback from such reports should be utilized to work
countries.
Page | 5
Chenoy Ceil
3. Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal is a form of measurement of performance. It is utilized to
understand how well employees are doing their work and the kind of motivation that is
appraisal is key to the success of an organisation, although overall team performance also
plays a major role in deciding the success or failure rate of multinational organisations (Black
et al. 1999).
performance appraisal is task oriented and it fails to take into account the contextual issues
such as cultural, social and economic considerations prevalent in the subsidiary country.
through different nations. For expatriate managers to operate effectively in global companies,
ethnocentric approach, the parent company dictates the IHRM practises in the host country
according to the prevalent rules and regulations in the parent country, but in the adaptive
integrative approach, the IHRM policies are open to adopting and localising the HRM
research suggests that adoption of divergent approach is the best method of performance
management as it fair to both host country nationals and expatriates working together in
Research conducted by Black et al. (1992) identifies that invalid performance criteria,
rater incompetence and rater bias are the three most critical factors that create challenges in
several nations where the languages are different, the culture is different and in fact the
Page | 6
Chenoy Ceil
business practices are also different. For example, in China, business organisations try to
maintain the hereditary structure in businesses and keep the family running the same business
One of the most prominent performance appraisal system that has been utilized in
several multinational setting is the 360 degree evaluation that has been made popular by
Black and others (Woods 2003). However, the system may create bias when the performance
rater is aligned to a particular national culture. Woods (2002) suggest that performance
appraisal should be conducted by multiple raters to avoid any occurrence of bias. Research
conducted by Dawkins et al. (1995) showcases that Australian expatriate managers working
in Asian businesses have often be found to be lacking in understanding of the business and
has revealed that most managers were even unwilling to adapt the local culture of Asian
businesses which significantly impacted the overall growth of the Australian companies
operating in Asia. However Woods (2003) research also showcases that Singaporean
expatriate managers working in Australia often perform better than their Australian counter-
parts in China because they receive a lot of support from their home country. Performance
appraisal should always take into account all these different factors to better manage the
approach and adopt the cultural diversity and economic practices prevalent in the host
country to effectively measure expatriate managerial performance. It has been found that
cultural factors can significantly alter the performance of a managers when made to work in
diverse situations. Performance appraisal should create a unique criteria for the expatriate
Page | 7
Chenoy Ceil
managers to take into account their relation with cross-cultural activities, relationship with
parent nation and adaptability in diversified global environment (Audia and Tams 2002).
Research conducted by Woods (2003) also showcases that Asian nations often allow
subordinates to negotiate the performance appraisal criteria and the parent company engages
in continued discussion with their expatriate managers working abroad. However, Australian
expatriate managers are often left out of sight out of mind to operate in diverse cultural
settings without any backing or help from their parent Australian company (Woods 2003).
This again shows how cultural factors significantly define the performance of managers.
Different nations have different cultural values and it is the adaptability and cross-
cultural interpersonal skills that defines the performance of an expatriate manager (Moller
2010). However, modern research suggests that individual performance evaluation may not
work in a team setting. In 2002, research conducted by Suutari and Tahavanainen (2002)
suggested that Finnish expatriate engineers were found to be more effective when they
followed team goals rather than focusing on improving their individual performance.
Managers can perform effectively when they integrate the local culture and work as a team
also performance evaluation and utilization of the same for the development of the
organisation. It has often been found that most performance appraisal criteria or methods has
been criticised for lacking in important considerations. The survey of 209 expatriate Chinese
managers by Entrekin and Chung in 2001 showcased that most managers wanted multi-
Page | 8
Chenoy Ceil
paternalistic culture. These cultural differences should also be taken into account while
employee compensation (Moller 2010). It has been found that when expatriates work with
host employees and receive different compensation compared to host employees and
managers, a sense of discomfort often arises within the organisation that may lead to poor
the compensation system and multinational companies often fail to bring uniformity in the
Compensation varies in countries where expatriate managers are sent to work. It has
been found that employee compensation can be significantly impacted based on the host
country’s standard of living (Nazir, Shah and Zaman 2014). Expatriate performance is
directly related with expatriate performance and if their expectations are not met by the
employer then there can be significant change in the performance. Further, companies and
IHRM must consider several factors that can create a positive impact on employee
performance. It has been found that if the company is willing to pay for the housing of the
expatriate managers then it can significantly improve the relationship of the company with
their employees (Nazir, Shah and Zaman 2014). This in turn will boost the performance of
the expatriate managers. However, if such considerations are not taken into account as pay
rate significantly differs from one country to another and also depends on the prevalent
exchange rate of money then it will definitely impact the performance of the expatriate
There are significant other considerations too when expatriate managers are forced to
leave their country and relocate for work. Employees not only look at the overall pay but also
Page | 9
Chenoy Ceil
allowance for their children, and tax equalization benefits (Nazir, Shah and Zaman 2014).
HRM must design global reward programs for expatriate managers to avoid disparities
between home country employees and expatriate employees. There must be a sense of
managers should be considerate of these factors to design appraisal forms that taken into
for the employees. For example, in China, employees are treated equally and often their
compensation rate is similar. However, if an expatriate worker comes from Australia to work
in China then that person’s expectations are more according to the standard of wage prevalent
in Australia. However, the Chinese counterpart would be providing less amount of wage and
this would create dissatisfaction and lowered performance. Again, research indicates that
Chinese workers are prone to blame their own problems upon externalities and this is why
sometimes their performance may not be optimum (Hempel 2001). Cultural changes can
significantly impact performance for expatriate managers because the Western values are
different from the Eastern values. Given the differences in culture between Western and other
countries, expatriate managers should not be evaluated under the same guidelines that is
applicable for others. It is believed that due to difference in culture, expatriate managers have
differences in their cognitive constructs and they perform differently under given situations
(Hempel 2001).
All the above cross-cultural factors significantly impacts the employee performance
appraisal and it is advised that specific factors must be taken into account while designing the
performance appraisals.
Page | 10
Chenoy Ceil
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that multinational companies need to come up with
unique performance evaluation systems that takes into consideration several factors that are
relevant to the environment and business setting within which the expatriates operate.
Expatriation will continue to increase in future due to globalisation and the importance of
managers with global and cross-cultural knowledge will significantly increase. However,
standards as there are several considerations that impact the performance of an individual in a
foreign setting.
is utilized to identify the low performers and dismiss them from the organisation. In spite of
From this research study it is advised that performance evaluation criteria should be
broadened to take into account the individual family attributes of the managers, job
characteristics and complexity, degree of cultural difference between home and host country,
business practices prevalent in host country and the manger’s previous exposure to cross-
cultural setting (Woods 2003). Evaluation of performance should also take into account the
compensation package of expatriate managers and the organizational justice that is provided
to host country employees and expatriate employees. A global rewards program must be
employees does not only imply appraisal of employees to eliminate ill-performing employees
but also to provide rewards to those who are performing well so that it motivates them to
Page | 11
Chenoy Ceil
In fact, there might be several other factors that can be taken into consideration while
management is to conduct performance appraisal with multiple raters to avoid any form of
discrimination. Some of the best practices for performance appraisals in global companies is
to utilize multiple raters who will take into account the different stakeholders, global setting
and cultural differences. Not only higher level officials should be allowed to evaluate the
performance but also lower level workers and co-workers must be given an opportunity to
Performance management in global companies can only improve if the expatriates are
happy with the performance evaluation and performance appraisal method. Expatriate
managers are often concerned about the appraisal method because there is no clear
methodology for the same. It has been found that managers often fail to perform in foreign
states because they are so closely connected with home country values and business practices
is not really developed and suffers from several faults because most countries follow different
set of rules and regulations. For all these reasons, it is best advisable for multinational
companies to work on their performance appraisal forms so that they can develop something
develop a performance evaluation method that does not seem biased or untrustworthy.
Besides, the organisation must work upon evaluating the overall performance appraisal and
utilizing the results obtained from such tests for performance management practices.
Page | 12
Chenoy Ceil
References
Audia, P.G. and Tams, S. (2002) Goal Setting, Performance Appraisal, and Feedback Across
Cultures. In M.J. Gannon, Newman, K.L. (ed.), The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural
Black, J.S., Gregersen, H.B. and Mendenhall, M.E. (1992) Global Assignment: Successfully
Black, J., Gregersen, H., Mendenhall, M. and Stroh, L. (1999) Globalizing People Through
Budhwar, P.S. and Sparrow, P.R. (2002) ‘An integrative framework for understanding croos-
national human resource management practices’, Human Resource Management Review, 12,
377-403.
Dawkins, P., Savery, L. and Mazzarol, T. (1995) ‘Enterprising nation: renewing Australia’s
managers to meet the challenges of the Asia-Pacific century: customer views of Australian
12(2), 1-14.
Harvey, M., Speier, C. and Novecevic, M. (2001) ‘A Theory Based Framework for Strategic
Global Human Resource Staffing Policies and Practices’, International Journal of Human
Hempel, P.S. (2001) ‘Differences between Chinese and Western Managerial Views of
Page | 13
Chenoy Ceil
Nazir, T., Shah, S.F. and Zaman, K. (2014) ‘Review of Literature on Expatriate
Compensation and its Implication for Offshore Workforce,’ Iranian Journal of Management
55-75.
Page | 14