Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intelligence - Verbal Intelligence
Intelligence - Verbal Intelligence
ABSTRACT
This test measures verbal intelligence in terms of the lexical decision on semantics, phonology,
syntax, and pragmatics. In 1993, Howard Gardner termed multiple intelligence which consists
communicate is a skill that comes from the temporal cortex on the left side of the brain. This
region of the brain is named Broca’s area which controls language expression- it is the area in
the dominant hemisphere. It serves a vital role in the generation and articulation of speech and
even directs muscle movements involved in speech. Broca’s area has four areas of sensitivity
that is Semantics, Phonology, Syntax, and Pragmatics. The test aims at measuring the four
sensitive areas of the Broca’s area contributing to verbal intelligence. Semantics involves the
analysis of word meanings and relations between them. Phonology is the smallest unit of
sounds that makes a meaningful difference and the meter of words. Syntax involves the correct
choice of words, tenses, and proper arrangement of words and phrases. And the Pragmatics is
the alternate way the words can be used in the sentence to invoke different meanings.
INTRODUCTION
“Howard Gardner 1983” he argued that it would be evolutionarily functional for different
people to have different talents and skills and proposed that there are eight modalities of
intelligence that can be differentiated from each other. He proposed the idea of multiple
intelligences. Gardner noted that some evidence for multiple intelligences comes from the
abilities of autistic savants. The people who score low on intelligence tests overall but who may
nevertheless have exceptional skills in each domain. The eight intelligence are verbal-linguistic,
naturalistic.
Verbal linguistic intelligence is a skill that is developed and formed in the temporal cortex. The
brain region has been named Broca’s area. Broca’s area controls language expression- that
directs muscle movements in speech. Broca’s area is sensitive towards four areas namely
semantics, phonology, syntax, and pragmatics. Broca’s area seems important for the perception
and production of sentences. Wernicke’s area is another area of the brain involved in Verbal
intelligence that reflects latent general abilities. A person’s verbal intelligence is assessed
through performance on one or more specific tests involving receptive or expressive spoken
language and even written tests. Verbal-linguistic intelligence uses both written and spoken
individual may lack or not be proficient in some of the intelligence although, having extremely
aspects of intelligence rather than just one intelligence or general intelligence. Individuals
possessing high verbal intelligence may not be scoring well on some other parts of the
intelligence. Individuals who are strong in verbal-linguistic intelligence are able to use words
accurately, both when writing and speaking. These individuals are extremely well at writing
stories, memorizing information, and reading. An individual who might struggle with writing
and understanding the basics can perform well when the same material would be presented in
some different way such as graphics or some real-life experiences. This suggests that it is
Verbal intelligence is majorly associated with Broca’s area in the frontal lobe of the dominant
hemisphere. Broca’s area is sensitive towards verbal intelligence as it controls language and
speech. It was found that Broca’s area not only also plays an important role in language
individual uses and language comprehension is what an individual understands about words
and word combinations. Research states that when there are lesions near Broca’s area usually
specific brain regions. Broca’s area is sensitive towards majorly four areas: Semantics,
Phonology, Syntax, and Pragmatics. Verbal intelligence is majorly controlled by these four
areas in Broca's area. Each of them has unique functions and is completely not dependent on
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence 4
each other. Semantics is the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with the meanings of the
words. The semantics is further divided into two logical semantics and lexical semantics.
Logical semantics concerns sense, reference, presumption, and implication of the word or
sentence, and lexical semantics concern the analysis of word meanings and relations between
them.
Phonology is the branch of linguistics that deals with systems of sounds including or excluding
phonetics- with the sounds and meter of words. Phonemes refer to the smallest unit of sound
that makes a meaningful difference in a given language. Phonology is concerned with the
mental aspect of the sound in a language. The syntax is another variable in verbal intelligence
where it deals with the order of words and phrases to create a well-formed language. It is the
rules to be followed when forming the sentences of words, clauses, and phrases. Syntax
involves the correct choice of words, tenses, and proper arrangement of words and phrases. It
involves abiding by the rules in formal writing. Pragmatics is the alternate way the words can
be used in the sentence to invoke different meanings. It deals with understanding the context
and the purpose of the utterance. Semantics blend into pragmatics recognizing that people
involved in the conversation manipulate, qualify in what they say, and even rely on the
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Sue Ramsden, Fiona M. Richardson, et. al (2011) conducted research studying verbal and
imaging merely showed that verbal IQ changed with the lifeless matter in an equatorial region
changed with the grey matter in a distinct region that was typically activated by finger
movements. The further longitudinal assessment allowed them to dissociate neural markers for
the two distinct types of IQ. The study focused on three quotients of intelligence that are verbal,
performance, and full-scale IQ. The changes in the brain structure can also cause a difference in
the motor speech area. The change in the local brain structure, the grey matter density in the left
motor cortex resulted in the articulation of speech. Thus, as the local brain structure changes in
the teenager’s it impacts the VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ are subject to change. Verbal IQ will be more
affected by tasks such as reading, writing, and speaking. Verbal IQ changes with the change in
Alan Baddeley, et. al (1993) studied premorbid intelligence on the basis of lexical-semantics for
verbal intelligence. Semantics is one of the important functions of Broca’s area for language
processing and comprehension. It deals with linguistics and logic concerned with meaning.
Lexical semantics focuses on the analysis of words and relations between them. Baddeley
(1993) studied lexical semantics through “Spot The Word Technique”. Baddeley rejected the
NART (National Adult Reading Test) and tested premorbid intelligence on the basis of lexical
semantics as that could be easier to make a decision. Although testing verbal premorbid
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence 6
intelligence on the basis of just lexical semantics is not sufficient, other brain regions that can
be affected is directly related to verbal intelligence such as phonology, syntax, and pragmatics.
Gabor Recski, et. al (2016) studied measuring semantic similarity of words using concept
networks” the study aimed at measuring semantic similarity using word pairs of similar
embeddings. Worldnet and concept dictionary of four languages. The study focused on lexical
semantics and how an individual can differentiate words of different languages based on lexical
decisions. The above study is to know the ability of an individual to judge semantic similarities
(meaning) of two linguistic structures. Thus, from the study, we can conclude that the
semantics, one of the important structures of verbal intelligence, can be measured through
lexical decision making and results can be highly reliable as lexical decisions considered as an
Semantics works by understanding the underlying meaning of the sentence or words and
making the decision on the basis of lexical decision.One of the methods that individuals use to
process verbal information by using verbal intelligence is to use semantic similarities to process
the information presented to understand, process and use the information presented verbally.
Semantics assist the individual to process the verbal information presented in different ways.
Kseniya Zablotskaya, et. al (2010) studied Speech Data Corpus for Verbal Intelligence
Estimation. The purpose of the study was to measure the level of verbal cognitive processes -
based on the analysis of transcribed spoken utterances. That is to understand the development of
algorithms for the automatic estimation of a person’s verbal intelligence. The study aimed at
estimating verbal intelligence on the basis of the corpus that is the monologue from different
speakers. The study aimed at how the spontaneous vocabulary of an individual reflects their
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence 7
verbal intelligence. The research measured Information, digit span, comprehension, arithmetic,
the similarity in dissimilar objects, and vocabulary. Estimating verbal intelligence on the basis
of arithmetic and digit span would be vague. Testing the understanding of numerical by solving
arithmetic on a verbal test. Comprehension was measured to test if the individual focuses on the
social sense and the conception of cultural values. This can also be stated as pragmatics,
according to the theory mentioned above. Measurement of vocabulary by asking the subjects to
explain different meanings of the word given. This can be attributed to logical semantics i.e.
using on the basis of information one has. This research sheds light on some aspect of the test
Edgar Miller (1984) conducted research on Verbal fluency as a function of a measure of verbal
intelligence and in relation to different types of cerebral pathology. Subjects were tested for
verbal fluency. The subjects were going through frontal lobe lesions and dementia were tested
along with the normal control subjects. The participants were given a single letter and they had
to make words on names or animals starting from that letter. Rosen used the same task on
demented subjects. The participants in this test who had lesion or dementia performed badly as
compared to normal subjects. There has also been evidence that subjects with diffuse brain
pathology might produce low scores on word fluency tests. It was found that left posterior and
right posterior subjects also scored low on verbal fluency tests. The subject with frontal lobe
lesion performed badly on the verbal fluency that is because the verbal fluency and the verbal
tasks are controlled by the frontal lobe in Broca’s area and any damage or lesion over this area
causes impaired verbal fluency. Thus, any damage or lesion in the frontal lobe region can cause
affected in cerebellar patients: a verbal fluency study. The aim was to investigate the influence
of cerebellar lesions on verbal fluency abilities with a specific focus on the verbal searching
strategies employed by patients with cerebellar damage. Two verbal fluency task was
administered, one to state the names of animals and birds and the other to test the phonology of
the subjects, that is by recording the names written one after the other with the same letter.
Phonology is the smallest unit sound that makes a meaningful difference. Phonology can even
be tested through several other ways such as state the rhyme of the given word. The results of
the study stated that cerebellar damage also affects verbal fluency which includes semantics and
phonology. This study parts light on the importance of the cerebellar area, which affects the
Kevin M. Beaver, et. al (2014) conducted a research on the role of parenting-related influences
on verbal intelligence over the life course: Results from an adoption-based research design. The
study claims that insufficient influence of parents during childhood and adolescence does not
affect the verbal IQ of the child. Although parenting styles may affect the verbal IQ during
adolescence and young adulthood. Thus genetic confounding does not influence the verbal
intelligence of an individual, but the environment and exposure can affect the verbal
intelligence.
people with schizophrenia displaying poor verbal fluency and reduced Broca’s area volume.
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence 9
They studied schizophrenic patients with elevated cytokines, genetic abnormalities and
inflammation in both cognitive deficits and brain volume which contributed to lesser scores on
verbal fluency. This is due to high levels of inflammation near the region of the frontal lobe in
the brain that is sensitive to verbal fluency and language in the Broca’s area and Wernicke’s
area impairs verbal intelligence. This concludes that patients suffering through schizophrenia
have lower verbal intelligence due to cytokines, and elevated brain volumes as compared to
Delphine Raucher-Chéné et. al (2016) researched about Verbal fluency in bipolar disorders: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. The study aims to study that the patients suffering through
bipolar disorder have lower verbal fluency as compared to normally functioning individuals.
The results were discrepant although individuals with BD and other depressive disorders will
have impairment in verbal fluency as the frontal lobe in the brain seems to be affected due to the
existing disease or mood states. The study measured verbal intelligence by phonological and
semantic processes. The study could have also measured verbal fluency through pragmatics,
Nikolaev, Boris, and McGee, et. al (2016) studied Relative Verbal Intelligence and Happiness.
The study focuses on how verbal intelligence correlates with happiness. High IQ scores do not
guarantee that the individual is leading a happy life i.e. high IQ does not correlate with
happiness. Although the study has found that individuals with high verbal intelligence and
verbal fluency are relatively happier because they can portray their ideas and viewpoints clearly.
Thus, verbal intelligence correlates with emotions i.e happiness. And verbal intelligence has a
fluency in primary progressive aphasia”. The frontal aslant tract is a direct pathway connecting
Broca’s region that is stated in the above theories that how Broca’s area is related to verbal
intelligence. The study claims that there are several other damages too that affect or hinder
verbal intelligence i.e. damage to the frontal aslant tract correlated with performance in verbal
fluency hindrance. Thus, this study states that damage or lesion in the frontal lobe tract where
Chris Cherpas (1992) studied Natural language processing, pragmatics, and verbal behavior.
The study focuses on NLP and verbal behavior. Pragmatics is the support for semantics and
syntax about what is the utterance for. That is the purpose of the sentence or the word. In the
current study, pragmatics is evaluated through the noun phrase problem. Pragmatics in verbal
intelligence helps an individual to understand the purpose of the statement. In the study,
researchers claim that Pragmatics can also be measured through the interpretation of utterances
and stating what does the sentence state is it declarative, request, command, or question, etc.
Thus, we state this as modal auxiliaries and the current test is based on the theory stated by
Danish-speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The study focused on the delays in
syntax, vocabulary, and morphology (semantics) caused to children with ASD. The syntax is
described as the ability to use words and phrases for a well-formed language. It was found the
preschoolers and other children who were diagnosed with ASD have delayed syntax, semantics,
and vocabulary. The research conducted measured syntax on the basis of word formation,
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
11
sentence structure, and word structure. The results state that ASD hinders the development of
ASD.
Rosanna Francis, et. al (2018) conducted research on Cognitive mechanisms for worry in early
adolescence: Re-examining the role of high verbal intelligence. The following study focuses on
worry, intolerance, and uncertainty in relation to verbal intelligence. As stated earlier verbal
intelligence helps an individual to express themselves, and share the knowledge which can, in
turn, help an individual to express their worry, intolerance, and uncertainty when they have a
high command of language. Thus, verbal intelligence helps the individual to reduce worry,
Daniel E. Gustavson, et. al (2018) studied Genetic and Environmental Influences on Verbal
Fluency in Middle Age: A Longitudinal Twin Study. The research measured verbal fluency on
the basis of two dimensions of verbal intelligence that is semantics and phonology. The study
measured verbal fluency by subjects first performing the phonemic fluency subtests, followed
by two semantic fluency subtests (Animals and Boys’ Names). Finally, subjects performed a
category switching subtest. There are also genetic factors that influence intelligence. The
studies claim that verbal fluency deteriorates with the age that is by middle adulthood the scores
a better way by using higher vocabulary and communicating in an effective way. An individual
scoring higher on verbal intelligence has higher activities in Broca’s area that is the brain region
that controls verbal intelligence, as this was also observed in a study conducted by (Marco
RATIONALE
The study is conducted to understand how individuals use verbal intelligence in their day to day
life in the form of language, to understand which brain regions regulate the verbal intelligence.
Verbal intelligence is mainly regulated by Broca’s area and Wernike’s area. In the current
study, we look at the function of broca’s area which mainly regulate semantics, phonology,
syntax, and pragmatics. These dimensions are measured on the basis of lexical decisions.
HYPOTHESIS
To study verbal intelligence on the basis of four core areas controlling verbal intelligence that
are semantics, phonology, syntax, and pragmatics. Higher score indicates higher level of verbal
intelligence.
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
13
METHOD
Participants: The population targeted for the test would be adolescents i.e 15 to 25 years of age
and who have an understanding of English language can take the test.
Operational definitions:
Verbal Intelligence- It is a specific human language-based skill for reasoning and expressing
knowledge by words and phrases controlled by the frontal lobe in Broca’s area.
Phonology- The way in which speech sounds and which makes a meaningful difference in a
language.
Semantics refers to the word meaning and analysis of the word. For testing semantics, subjects
will be presented with the description of the object (a definite description) and the subject has to
Phonology is the study of systematic ways in which speech sounds are combined and altered.
For testing phonology, the subjects will be presented with the two words that rhyme to each
other or not, the participants have to select if the words presented to them rhyme or not and
the language and not illegal. For testing syntax, the subjects will have to select the appropriate
Pragmatics is the alternate way the words can be used in the sentence to invoke different
meanings, the subject will be presented with the sentence and their task will be to select the
correct utterance i.e if the sentence is a question, request, command, advice, order or
permission,
DESIGN The test measuring verbal intelligence having four dimensions semantics, phonology,
The subject will have to select the correct option from the given alternatives. The test will
consist of approximately 15 items in each subscale` . The correct response will be scored 1.
PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Inferential Statistics: Reliability- Test-retest reliability measure to be applied for testing the
reliability. To test the same subjects after a period of time and the mean of correct items to be
ITEM POOL
1.A piece of furniture with a flat surface having four legs and a back.
2. A set of blank sheets for writing sewn together along one side and bound in covers.3. A
4. A piece of furniture with a flat top with one or more legs, used for eating, writing, working,
etc.
5. A shallow oval or round bowl on a long handle, used for eating, stirring and serving food.
8. A road vehicle, typically with four wheels, and able to carry a small number of people.
9. A pair of lenses set in a frame resting on the nose and ears used to correct or assist defective
eyesight.
10. a pocket-sized flat folding case for holding money and plastic cards.
15. a system for transmitting voices over a distance using wire or signals.
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
16
Select true if the words rhyme and if the words don’t rhyme select false.
1. cat - bat
a) true
b) false
2. ball – tall
a) true
b) false
3. pick – jump
a) true
b) false
4. Chalk- hawk
a) true
b) false
5. feed- hook
a) true
b) false
6. cake- bake
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
17
a) true
b) false
7. bridge- fridge
a) true
b) false
8. wish- dish
a) true
b) false
9. hill- sing
a) true
b) false
a) true
b) false
a) true
b) false
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
18
12. harp - sharp
a) true
b) false
a) true
b) false
a) true
b) false
a) true
b) false
a) holiday
b) wallet
b) studies
3. Paul is popular among his friends, yet he feels _____ in front of strangers
a) shy
b) kitchen
4. The dog barked all night long, I had to _____ the windows.
a) door
b) shut
a) happily
b) food
a) disobey
b) laptop
a) room
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
20
b) solution
a) dresses
b) mother
a) computer
b) team
a) favorite
b) bath
a) book
b) train
a) store
b) sky
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
21
13. The children were playing in the _______ with their friends.
a) playground
b) keyboard
14. Many people enjoyed the ______, yet Alex did not like it
a) key
b) play
a) home
b) route
Select a suitable option for the given statements about what the sentence means.
a) Permission
b) Order
a) Command
b) Request
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
22
3. You should not lie.
a) Question
b) Advice
a) Request
b) Command
a) Question
b) Order
a) Order
b) Request
a) Command
b) Question
b) Advice
a) Permission
b) Order
a) Request
b) Order
a) Advice
b) Command
a) Order
b) Question
a) Advice
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
24
b) Permission
a) Request
b) Command
a) Order
b) Request
REFERENCES
Intelligence: Verbal Intelligence
25
Baddeley, A., Emslie, H., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). The Spot-the-Word test: A robust
estimate of verbal intelligence based on lexical decision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology,
32(1), 55-65.
Beaver, K. M., Schwartz, J. A., Al-Ghamdi, M. S., Kobeisy, A. N., Dunkel, C. S., & van der
intelligence over the life course: Results from adoption-based research design. Intelligence, 46,
179-187.Fillman, S. G., Weickert, T. W., Lenroot, R. K., Catts, S. V., Bruggemann, J. M., Catts,
Brynskov, C., Eigsti, I. M., Jørgensen, M., Lemcke, S., Bohn, O. S., & Krøjgaard, P. (2017).
Syntax and morphology in Danish-speaking children with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal
Catani, M., Mesulam, M. M., Jakobsen, E., Malik, F., Martersteck, A., Wieneke, C., ... &
Rogalski, E. (2013). A novel frontal pathway underlies verbal fluency in primary progressive
Cherpas, C. (1992). Natural language processing, pragmatics, and verbal behavior. The
C. J. (2011). Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain. Nature,
479(7371), 113-116.
Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., Abbott, M. J., & Costa, D. S. (2018). Cognitive mechanisms for
worry in early adolescence: Re-examining the role of high verbal intelligence. Personality and
Kremen, W. S. (2018). Genetic and environmental influences on verbal fluency in middle age:
Leggio, M. G., Silveri, M. C., Petrosini, L., & Molinari, M. (2000). Phonological grouping is
relation to different types of cerebral pathology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(1),
53-57.
Nikolaev, B., & McGee, J. J. (2016). Relative verbal intelligence and happiness. Intelligence,
59, 1-7.
Ramsden, S., Richardson, F. M., Josse, G., Thomas, M. S., Ellis, C., Shakeshaft, C., ... & Price,
Raucher-Chéné, D., Achim, A. M., Kaladjian, A., & Besche-Richard, C. (2017). Verbal fluency
in bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 207,
359-366.
Recski, G. A., Iklódi, E., Pajkossy, K. A., & Kornai, A. (2016). Measuring semantic similarity
people with schizophrenia displaying poor verbal fluency and reduced Broca’s area volume.
Zablotskaya, K., Walter, S., & Minker, W. (2010, May). Speech Data Corpus for Verbal
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1h9TiuAOlKzAa1Kjbvhp7nZZBMroWSNen?usp=sharin