Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

SQ-Mark Evaluation

(Rubber-Rubber Molding)

Supplier
Controlling Co.
HKMC Mgmt. Team
Assessor
Supporter
Eval. Date

Ver 7.1
Charge Team)Leaer
(Rubber-Rubber Molding) Evaluation Report

1. General Status ▣ Eval. Date : 2016. .


Supplier Name Supplier Code Company Registration No.
Controlling Co. Ctrl. Co. Code Transaction Dependency Rate (%) HMC : %, KMC : %, Other : %

Mgmt. Representative Tel. No.


Address Key Production Items
No. of Employees Total : , Office : ( %), Quality : ( %) Debt Rate (%) (Amt. of Debt / Net Worth)*100
Detailed Bus. Category ISO/TS16949 Certification
Major Customers Operation Rate (%)
Annual Sales ('16) Automotive Ind. Supply Rate (%)
Equipment Status
Test Equipment
(Measuring Instruments)

2. Evaluation Result
Ⅰ.Common Requirements 50.0 pts Ⅱ.Industry Requirements 50.0 pts Total 100.0 pts
Initial Certification Date and Score pts ( ) Ctrl. Co. Pre-Evaluation Score pts Final Score (Vaatz) pts

3. Opinion Summary & Key Issues


▣ Opinion Summary

▣ Key Issues

Assessor ▣ 1st Tier Supplier : (Sign)


Assessee ▣ 2nd Tier Supplier : (Sign)
Supporter ▣ HKMC : (Sign)
(Rubber molding) Evaluation Sheet ▣ Supplier :

Pt.
Classification No Evaluation Category Allote Result Evaluation Opinion
d
1-1 Status of Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement and Suitability Control of Inspection Standard 2 2.0 Item 1-1
Outsourcing 1-2 Income & Periodic Inspection Implementation Status for Outsourced Part / Raw Material 3 3.0 Item 1-2
Part Control
Outsourced Part / Raw Material Storage Condition (Contamination of Foreign Objects, Damage Prevention, FIFO,
1-3 Inventory Control, etc.) 3 3.0 Item 1-3

2-1 Standards (Control Plan, Inspection Standard, Work Standard) Preparation and Revision History Implementation Status 3 3.0 Item 2-1
Ⅰ.Common Requirements

2-2 Container Load Standard per Part and Handling Status, Part Container Control Status, Process 3P5C 3 3.0 Item 2-2
Process
Control 2-3 ★ Lot Traceability Control (Raw Material~Completed Part, Completed Part Shipping, etc.) 6 6.0 ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts
2-4 Key Process Quality Status Display Preparation/Display and Control Status 2 2.0 Item 2-4
2-5 Design Change and 4M Change History Management 4 4.0 Item 2-5
Equipment 3-1 Equipment Operation Status (Gauge/Status Light) and Daily Inspection 3 3.0 Item 3-1
Control 3-2 Periodic Inspection for Equipment Preventive Maintenance Activities and Spare Part Control Status 3 3.0 Item 3-2
4-1 1st Tier Supplier Inspection Agreement conclusion and implementation status of Periodic Inspection/Test 4 4.0 Item 4-1
Testing
4-2 Measuring Equipment Preparation/Control Status, Verification/Calibration Status (Including Gauge R&R) 4 4.0 Item 4-2

5-1 Organizational Status for Establishing / Maintaining Quality Management System and Job Assignment Control Status 2 2.0 Item 5-1
New/Transferred Team Member and Management Training (Including Special Characteristics Process and Foreign
5-2 Operator 2 2.0 Item 5-2
Quality
Management
5-3 Control Status of Vulnerable Time Period for Quality Control (Late Night, Before and After Shift Changes, etc.) 2 2.0 Item 5-3

5-4 Process / Customer Defect Correction and Countermeasure, Effectiveness Evaluation (Including Quality Target/Result) 4 4.0 Item 5-4
Sub Total 50 50.0
6-1 Are the rubber material tests (material, CMB,FMB) being followed after standards? 4 4.0 Item 6-1
Sub Material
6-2 Are the process of FIFO for parts/materials and setting of validity period followed after standards? 4 4.0 Item 6-2
7-1 ★ Are the aging facilities for rubber (CMB,FMB) and administration appropriate? 6 6.0 ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts
Aging
Ⅱ.Industry Requirements

7-2 Are setting up and managing standard of aging period by material compliant? 3 3.0 Item 7-2
Are weight cutting of FMB by product classes and management for specification/separation distinguishing/prevention of
8-1 foreign substances appropriate? 3 3.0 Item 8-1
★ Establishment and situation of compliance for molding operations (temperature/pressure/time) - (extrusion/second
8-2 vulcanization included) 5 5.0 ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4 pts
Molding
8-3 Are establishment and condition of management standard for surface temperature of molding appropriate? 5 5.0 Item 8-3
8-4 Is standard for self-reliance inspections established and are test and record management being conducted? 4 4.0 Item 8-4
8-5 Are handling procedure and situation of compliance for failed rubbers appropriate? 4 4.0 Item 8-5
Situation of reflecting customer requirements for quality management of establishing testing standards for parts/part
9-1 drawings 3 3.0 Item 9-1
Inspection
/ Test 9-2 ★ Are inspection management for parts and reliability (environment, durability) of products conducted appropriately? 6 6.0 ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts
9-3 Situation of establishing standards and reports for outgoing inspection of complete products 3 3.0 Item 9-3
Sub Total 50 50
Grand Total 100 100
Ⅲ. Evaluation Check Sheet
Ⅰ. Common Requirements (Outsourced Part Control)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Item Status of Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement and Suitability Control of Inspection Standard Item 1-1

▷ Status of Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement


- Receive / Maintain a copy of 1st tier supplier inspection agreement for the customer supplied parts.
Requirements

- Substitute inspection agreement with inspection standard when difficult to implement inspection agreement
(Example: Raw material supplied by large corporations, plating industry, etc.) 2
▷ Suitability of Inspection Standard of Outsourced Part / Raw Material (Inspection Item, Inspection and Measurement Period,
Mesurement Method, etc.)
- Establishemt and implementation of inspection standard for the customer supplied parts
- Mill Sheet receiving status and periodic material property inspection status
1-1 ▷ Control plan implementation status for inspection items within the inspection agreement (including customer supplied items) 1. Incoming Inspection Standard.
2. AOI.
3. Control Plan and AOI to be same.
1) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement and Inspection Standard not established 0
2) Outsource Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement / Standard implemented, but some key items omitted causing quality issues 0.5
3) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement / Standard implemented, but some items do not correspond with control plans
1
Criteria

and other standards.


4) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Inspection Agreement has been implemented. Inspection Standard and other related standards have
been prepared and the details are satisfactory 1.5
5) Inspection Agreement has been implemented, and all details of Inspection standards and other related standards are satisfactory.
Excellent revision control implemented. 2
Item Income & Periodic Inspection Implementation Status for Outsourced Part / Raw Material Item 1-2

▷ Income Inspection Log List Control Status


▷ Daily Inspection, Periodic Inspection Standard / Procedure Preparation and Compliance Status 1.Receiving / Incoming Area & Inspection ( FMB & Child part )
Requirements

▷ Pre / Post Inspection Identification and FIFO Control 2..Receiving Inspection Procedure.
3
▷ Inspection Master (Master Sample) Control Status, Packaging Condition of Packaged Parts 3. Material Handling Procedure
▷ Measuring Instrument / Inspection Equipment Retention and Utilization Status 4. Inspection Report.
▷ Outsourced Part Inspection Result Control (Daily, Periodic, Reliability Inspection) and Assurance of Inspection Capability
▷ Non-conforming Part Handling Procedure and the Countermeasure Preparation Status (Non-conforming Part Containment Control) 5. Gauge RR for Employee
▷ Outsourced Part incoming Inspection/annual inspection Control (Mill sheet received/verify, self insepction report , 3rd part lab report) 6. Calibration of Testing Equipemnts
1-2 7. Master Sample
1) Outsourced Part / Raw Material receiving inspection standard and procedure not implemented, and any inspection is not being carried 8. FIFO control System
out for all parts 0 9. Supplier Test report.
2) Outsourced Part / Raw Material receiving inspection and periodic inspection requirements are insufficient, and inspection is not being 10. Storage area for OK / NOT OK
carried out for some of the parts 1 11. Bin card System ( Metal / Rubber ).
Criteria

3) Outsourced Part / Raw Material receiving inspection and periodic inspection requirements are satisfactory, but some of the inspection
12. Incoming Inspection certificate
have been omitted 1.5
4) Outsourced Part / Raw Material receiving inspection and periodic inspection requirements are satisfactory 2.5
5) Receiving Inspection and Periodic Inspection requirements are satisfactory. Excellent countermeasure preparation and its effectiveness
verification 3
Outsourced Part / Raw Material Storage Condition (Contamination of Foreign Objects, Damage Prevention, FIFO, Inventory
Item
Control, etc.) Item 1-3

▷ Warehouse Layout Status Map, FIFO Structure (Structural System, Receiving / Issuing Process Display)
Requirements

▷ Outsourced Part / Raw Material Management Condition (Damage, Corrosion, etc.) 3


▷ Outsourced Part / Raw Material Identification Control (Inspection Status, Material Grade, Material of Long-term disuse, etc.)
▷ Outsourced Part / Raw Material Storage Condition (Contamination of Foreign Object, packae damage,
Use of packaging material from the raw material manufacturer)
▷ Residual quantity control status after a process input (Storage condition / Identification Indication / expiration date, etc.)
1. ERP
1-3 2. Storage Management System.
1) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control / Identification / Storage Standard, etc. procedure not established 0
2) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control / Identification / Storage Standard have been established, but not properly controlled due to 3. Self Life compound procedure.
incompliance of standards 1 4. Self life Standard.
Criteria

3) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control / Identification / Storage Standard have been established, but some modifications to
requirements are necessary 1.5
4) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control / Identification / Storage Standard satisfy requirements 2.5
5) Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control / Identification / Storage Standard satisfy requirements, and controlled in conjunction with
computer system 3
Ⅲ. Evaluation Check Sheet
Ⅰ. Common Requirements (Process Control)
NO Questions Pts

Item Standards (Control Plan, Inspection Standard, Work Standard) Preparation and Revision History Implementation Status
Requirements

▷ Document Control Condition such as Control Plan / Work Standard Preparation and Revision Control
- Condition Control / Self Inspection Item, Specification, Period, Control Assignment, Record Control, Non-Conformance Handling 3
(Including Verification of Key Requirement/Necessity Item Omission Status)
▷ Conformity and Connection Status between Work Standards, Control Plans and Inspection Standards
▷ Process FMEA Preparation and Verify in connection with Quality Document Details (Recommandation)
2-1

1) Standards such as Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard, etc. not prepared 0
2) Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard have been prepared, but key inspection items / standards haven been ommitted 1
Criteria

3) Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard have been prepared / displayed, but not corresponding with the actual control conditions 1.5
4) Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard, Process FMEA, etc. satisfy requirements 2.5
5) Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard, Process FMES, etc. satisfy requirements. Excellent document revision history control 3

Item Container Load Standard per Part and Handling Status, Part Container Control Status, Process 3P5C

▷ Suitability of Display and Identification of Part Identification Tag / Process Transfer Tag for Prevention of Part Mixing
- Lot Control Status such as the Identification of Inspection Status of Completed Part, etc.
▷ Standardization of Completed Part Container per Part and Customer Approval Control (Load Quantity / Weight)
- Industries that are, realistically, hard to standardize and approve container shall establish own control standard (Verify control status)
(Verify Container Control and Handling Condition, ex: Surface Treatment, Heat Treatment,
Requirements

Same Container for Receiving / Shipping from Suppliers)


- Container Selection considering the characteristics of Part (Prevention of Inflow of Foreign Object, Contamination Prevention Cover, etc.) 3
- Multi-Level Loading and Plant Floor Storage Condition (Paper Box, Plastic Box, Designated Container, etc.)
▷ Periodic Inspection of Illumination Level in the work areas / inspection areas
- Illumination Level Control Standard Preparation / Implementation Status (Measuring area: Illuminatino Level of each Key Processes)
2-2 ▷ Periodic 3C5S checks to Improve Plant Floor
- Objective Evaluation through Utilization of Check Sheet and Point System (Recommendation)

※3P : Proper Items, Proper Quantity, Proper Place


5C :composition / coordination / cleaning / cleanliness / carriage of attitude

1) Standardization of Part Handling, Part Identification and Customer Approval Control not implemented 0
2) Standardization of Part Handling, Part Identification and Customer Approval control implemented but not complied appropriately 1
3) Some of the requirements for standardization of part handling, part identification, customer approval control, illumination level control, etc.
Criteria

are not satisfactory 1.5


4) The requirements for standardization of part handling, part identification, customer approval control, illumination level control, etc. are
satisfactory 2.5
Criteria
NO Questions Pts
5) All above requirements are satisfactory, and implemented excellent periodic checks and improvement activities for 3C5S 3
Item ★ Lot Traceability Control (Raw Material~Completed Part, Completed Part Shipping, etc.)
Requirements

▷ Preparation, Control and Record Condition for Lot Traceability of Outsourced Part / Raw Material, Subsidiary Part and Completed Part
- Suitability of Process Transfer Tag Utilization / Control and Record Condition 6
- Part / Press Die Lot No. Control Status, Part Container Identification Status, Long-Term In-Process Part, etc.
- Prevention of Residual Part Inflow and FIFO
- FIFO plan preparation and compliance status when Bar-Code system is Implemented
▷ For Security / Safety Part, Security / Safety Process shall be indicated to be identified on the Part (Lot Mark, Identification Mark, etc.)
2-3
1) Lot Traceability Control Standard not prepared, and Record Control not implemented 0
2) Lot Traceability Control Standard prepared, but Record Control not implemented 1.5
Criteria

3) Lot Traceability Control prepared and implemented, but traceability not verified due to partially omitted record control 3
4) Requirements for Lot Traceability Control Standard and Security / Safety Part are satisfactory 4.5
5) Requirements for Lot Traceability Control Standard and Security / Safety Part are satisfactory, and controlled in conjunction with computer
system such as the barcode system 6

Item Key Process Quality Status Display Preparation/Display and Control Status

▷ Key Process Quality Status Board Preparation Details and Display Locations
- Details : IQS Improvement, Field Claims, Advance Verification Part, Non-conforming Part found at Customer/HKMC location
Requirements

- Location : Display in Relevant Process 2


(Example: Receiving Inspection Process, Relevant Process of Quality Issue Occurrence, Completed Part Inspection Process)
▷ Prepare / Update the most updated quality status board with most recent quality issues(Verify update status: minimum 1 / month)
▷ Display Key Process Quality Status Board. Verify the information understanding level of team members and
managers for the relevant process
2-4 ▷ Identification of Critical Process and Key Control Process in Work standard, Inspection Standard

1) Critical Process and Key Control Process not identified, nor displayed, in Work Standard or Inspection Standard 0
2) Critical Process and Key Control Process identified, but Quality Status Board not prepared / displayed 0.5
3) Requirements for quality status preparation / display satisfactory, but not complied by the team members / managers due to lack of
Criteria

understanding for the requirements 1


4) Requirements for quality status preparation / display and the understanding of details by the team members are satisfactory 1.5
5) Requirements for qualtity status preparation / display and the understanding of details by the team members are satisfactory. The
information is updated periodically and well controlled. 2
Issues / Observation

Item 2-1

Item 2-2

1. Bin control System.


2. Root card
3. Lux Level
4. 3C / 5S. Check Sheet
5. Root Card System.
6. Bin Qty Stanardizing.
Issues / Observation

★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts

1. ERP
2. Bar Coading.
3. Product Audit

Item 2-4

1. Quality Display Area.


2. PHI Entrance.
Ⅲ. Evaluation Check Sheet
Ⅰ.Common Requirements (Equipment Control)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Item Equipment Operation Status (Gauge/Status Light) and Daily Inspection Item 3-1
Requirements

▷ Visualized Control of Daily Equipment Inspection Areas and Inspection Method


▷ Inspection Status of Equipment installed gauges and operation switches 3 1. Daily Machine Check sheet Visual .
▷ Measurement Gauge Inspection / Calibration Status (Internal and Comparison Inspection / Calibration Capability) 2. Machine Tower Lamp.
▷ Equipment Oil and Coolant Leak Control Status
▷ Prevent any random change of equipment settings by operators 3. Error Profing System.
4. Error Proffing Implementation system.
3-1 5. Display of oil Condition.
1) Equipment daily inspection control standard not established and the daily inspection not performed 0 6. Oil Coolant temp. to be monitor.
7. Process setting tobe secured with pass word.
2) Equipment daily inspection control standard established and the inspection being performed, but some inspection
items omitted 1 8. Safety sensor in all injection and Compression Machine.
9. Mould temperature measuring & Heater Temp to be error proofing.
Criteria

3) Equipment daily inspection and gauge verification / calibration being performed, but some of the requirements are
not satisfactory 1.5 10. Emergency switch in all machine.
4) Equipment daily inspection and gauge verification / calibration requirements are satisfactory 2.5
5) Equipment daily inspection and gauge verification / calibration requirements are satisfactory. Excellent
improvement activities 3

Item Periodic Inspection for Equipment Preventive Maintenance Activities and Spare Part Control Status Item 3-2
Requirements

▷ Equipment Periodic Inspection Plan Establishment and Implementation Status 3


▷ Key Equipment Periodic Inspection Standard Establishement and Utilization Status 1. Preventive maintenance plan.
▷ Consumable and Spare Part Control Status (Safety Stock Control) 2. Preventive maintenance Check Sheet.
▷ Improvement Activity Implementation Status according to the Equipment Maintenance Activity 3. Maintenance store and List. ( switch , oil , Heater Etc).
3-2 4. Key Equipment List.
1) Equipment Periodic Inspection Plan Not Established 0 5.Inspection standard for key equipments.
2) Equipment Periodic Inspection Plan established, but for some equipment, the plan not yet established for some 6. Consumable list and control
equipment 1 7. Critical spare list.
Criteria

3) Equipment Periodic Inspection being implemented as planned,m but maintenance / repair required for some 8. safety certificates.
equipment 1.5
9. Stamping in Weighing Machine.
4) Equipment Periodic Inspection and Spare Part Control requirements are satisfactory 2.5
5) Equipment Periodic Inspection and Spare Part Control requirements are satisfactory. Improvement activities to
prevent reoccurrence are continually performed 3
Ⅲ. Evaluation Check Sheet
Ⅰ. Common Requirements (Inspection / Testing)
NO Questions Pts
Item 1st Tier Supplier Inspection Agreement conclusion and implementation status of Periodic Inspection/Test
Requirements

▷ Inspection Agreement and Approved Copy Retention Status per Part


▷ Inspection Criteria / Period Implementation Status (Control Plan, Work Standard, Inspection Standard) 4
▷ Annual Periodic Inspection / Reliability Testing Performance and the Result Maintenance Status
▷ Environmental Restriction (Heavy Metal) Related Periodic Testing Performance Status: Request made to
1st tier supplier or Authorized / Approved Testing Institution

4-1 1) Inspection standard not prepared and implemented because the Inspection Agreement, per part, has not been concluded 0
2) Insufficient inspection standard preparation and implementation because the inspection agreement has not been concluded for some
parts 1
Criteria

3) Inspection agreement has been concluded, but some of the requirements for the completed part inspection standard and the periodic
inspection are omitted 2
4) Inspection agreement has been concluded and the requirements for the completed part inspection standard and the periodic inspection
are satisfactory 3.5
5) Inspection agreement has been concluded and the requirements for the completed part inspection standard and the periodic inspection
are satisfactory. Excellent revision history control 4

Item Measuring Equipment Preparation/Control Status, Verification/Calibration Status (Including Gauge R&R)

▷ Mesuring Equipment and Inspection Fixture Reliability Assurance Status


Requirements

(Verification/Calibration Period Set, Calibration Condition)


▷ Mesuring Equipment Verification/Calibration Schedule vs. Result Control Status 4
(Measuring Equipment Verification/Calibration Report, Tag Attachement Status, etc.)
▷ Periodic Gauge R&R Performance Status
▷ For High-Priced Measuring Equipment, Certification from the 1st Tier Supplier or Approved Testing Institution Required
(Example: CMM, Chemical Component Analyzer, etc.)
4-2
1) Necessary measuring equipment not prepared and verification/calibration not performed (including externally performed
verification/calibration) 0
2) Some necessary measuring equipments available, but verification/calibration not performed for the equipments 1
Criteria

3) Necessary measuring equipments available and verification/calibration performed for the equipment, but the gauge R&R not performed. 2
4) Necessary measuring equipments available, and the verification/calibration performance condition is satisfactory. Gauge R&R
performed 3.5
5) Necessary measuring equipments available. Excellent verification/calibration and gauge R&R performance status (Good Post-
Countermeasure and Countermeasure Implementation History) 4
Issues / Observation
Item 4-1

Item 4-2
Ⅲ. Evaluation Check Sheet
Ⅰ. Common Requirements (Quality Management)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Organizational Status for Establishing / Maintaining Quality Management System and Job Assignment Control
Item
Status Item 5-1
Requirements

▷ Internal Quality Management System Establishement and Implementation Status


- Quality Manual/Procedure/Instruction Availability and Implementation Status 2
- Team Organization Status for Set-Up / Stablization
- Detailed Job Assignment Preparation Status
▷ Basis for Quality Management System Implementation Target and Improvement Activities to Achieve the Target (Post-
action)
5-1
1) Team / Department for setting-up / implement QMS not organized 0
2) Team / Department for setting-up / implement QMS organized, but the job assignment not prepared 0.5
Criteria

3) Team organized for maintaining QMS and job assignment prepared, but the QMS target set only in formality 1
4) Team organized for maintaining QMS and job assignment prepared. The target / result control is satisfactory 1.5
5) Works are processed in accordance with the organization set-up / job assignment. Excellent improvement activities for
achieving targets 2
New/Transferred Team Member and Management Training (Including Special Characteristics Process and
Item
Foreign Operator Item 5-2

▷ Realization / Control of Processes with Special Characteristics


- Qualification Certification Standard Establishment and Qualification Granting and Renewing Status for Operators /
Requirements

Inspectors / Testers in Key Processes


⇒ Qualification Certification Standard: Training, Experience, Relevant Evaluation (Written/Skill Test) and Refresher 2
Training
▷ Documentation of Training Procedure
- for New/Transferred/Key and Special Characteristic Process Operator and Foreign Operator, etc.
5-2 ▷ When Quality Issue Occurs, Field Training, Reoccurrence Prevention Training performed for Operators
▷(Main Security/Special characteristics Process) (operator & inspector)'s real name register / contorl

1) No training performed because of no documentation of training procedure nor training plan establishment 0
2) Annual internal/external training plan established, but not implemented as planned 0.5
Criteria

3) Annual internal/external training plan established, but the training plan is insufficient and some trainings are not
performed 1
4) Annual internal/external training performed as planned, and the qualification certification control status is satisfactory 1.5
5) Excellent annual training performance, and the qualification certification control for the key process operators and
2
inspectors is satisfactory

Item Control Status of Vulnerable Time Period for Quality Control (Late Night, Before and After Shift Changes, etc.) Item 5-3

▷ Key Verification Item


Requirements

- Verify Cleanliness of Plant Floor, Outsourced Part / Raw Material Control, Equipment / Process Control,
Quality Control System 2
▷ Control Standard Establishment and Control Status
- Establishment and Control Status of Control Standard for Pre-Operation Daily Check Up (Day / Night Shift),
Self Inspection and Rounding Inspection.
5-3 - Non-Conformance Control Standard Establishment and Control Standard

1) Control Standard not established for Quality Control during vulnerable time period 0
2) Control Standard established, but the standards are insufficient and not well controlled 0.5
3) Control Standard is satisfactory, but countermeasures not implemented and insufficiently controlled when non-
Criteria

conformance occurs 1
4) Control Standard and Control Status satisfactory 1.5
5-3

Ⅰ. Common Requirements (Quality Management)


NO Criteria Questions Pts Issues / Observation
5) Control Standard and Control Status satisfactory. Excellnet analysis / improvement measure performed when
problems occur 2
Process / Customer Defect Correction and Countermeasure, Effectiveness Evaluation (Including Quality
Item
Target/Result) Item 5-4

▷ Establishment of Quality Targets and Detailed Implementation Plan. Notification of Daily Quality Result and Monthly
Comprehensive Result to 1st Tier Supplier
Requirements

- Result Control in comparison with the Targets from Previous Year (Input into VAATZ system lead by 1st Tier Supplier)
⇒ Process Defect (Production Quantity, Defect Quantity, PPM), Customer Defect (Delivery Quantity, Defect Quantity, 4
PPM), Outsourcing Defect (Receiving Quantity, Defect Quantity, PPM)
- Establish Improvement Measure and Continual Result Control for Target Shortfalls
▷ Periodic Process/Customer Defect Cause Analysis/Corrective Action/Effectiveness Verification/Horizontal Deployment
Implementation Status
5-4 ▷ Process defect part's storage box must be on the factory seperately(RED BOX)
- Daily cross check quantity between occured defect parts and actual confirm parts

1) Process/Customer/Outsourcing Defect Status Summary Control not performed 0


2) Process/Customer/Outsourcing Defect Status is controlled, but the basis for target setting is insufficient. Some result
control have been omitted. 1
Criteria

3) Process/Customer/Outsourcing defect Status is being summarized, but the quality issue improvement activity is
insufficient 2
4) Process/Customer/Outsourcing Defect Status summarization and Improvement activity satisfy requirements 3.5
5) Process/Customer/Outsourcing Defect summarization and Improvement activity satisfy requirements, and horizontal
deployment activity to other car models is excellent 4
Ⅲ. Evaluation
Ⅱ. Industry Requirements (Raw Materials)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Item Are the rubber material tests (material, CMB,FMB) being followed after standards? Item 6-1

▷ Purchasing of CMB,FMB and after purchasing CMB all formulations for FMB itself are included
▷ Condition of secureness of inspection equipment based on inspection standards for raw materials
▷ Secureness of managing inspection results of raw materials (routine, regular, reliable inspections) and test capabilities
Requirements

▷ Handling procedure of defective parts appearing in stock inspection and verification if improvement measures are established
▷ Eligibility for inspectors and inspection qualification 4
(Manually conducted partial inspection for samples by evaluator and verifying reliability of test results)
▷ [Computerized control] Performing the incoming inspection for Raw material's properties and reaction computerized record
- Incoming inspection FMB : Hardness, Curability(Rheometer), gravity, degree of dispersion
- Incoming inspection CMB : Hardness, Curability(Rheometer), gravity, degree of dispersion, pattern viscosity
6-1 - Sub material (finished part) regular inspection (at least 1time /6month )
: Elongation percentage, Permanent extrusion shrinkage rate. Tensile strength

1) Inspection standard is established, but inspections are not conducted 0


2) Inspection is being conducted after inspection standards, but no quality management for stock parts due to partly missing conduction 1
Criteria

3) Inspection is being conducted after inspection standards, but test results and some entries are substandard 2
4) Inspection is being conducted after inspection standards, test results and standard are satisfying, but supplement of analysis management is 3.5
needed

5) Inspection is being conducted after inspection standards, test results/analysis and connected improvement activities are excellent 4
Item Are the process of FIFO for parts/materials and setting of validity period followed after standards? Item 6-2
Requirements

▷ FIFO procedures and situation of compliance


▷ Identification distinguishing before and after inspection and management to prevent mixing 4
▷ Publication of raw material information board and management for setting validity periods by material
▷ [Computerized control] Computerized Data processing for incoming /outcoming log of raw material(CMB/FMB).
- Raw material intermix prevention, FIFO, Expiration date management

6-2
1) FIFO and effective date of change are set but missing administration 0
2) Lack of FIFO management procedures and management for publishing information board 1
Criteria

3) FIFO procedures are being followed, but no management for publishing information board and setting validity date 2
4) Compliance of FIFO procedure, information board have been published and are being administrated, but supplementation of validity date 3.5
5) Management for FIFO and publication of information board, validity date etc. and excellent quality management for income parts 4
Ⅲ. Evaluation
Ⅱ Industry Requirements (Ripening)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Item ★ Are the aging facilities for rubber (CMB,FMB) and administration appropriate? ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts

▷ Possession of a aging room and installation status of thermohygrostat


Requirements

▷ Setting of management standard and daily management/verifying record and actions of abnormal occurrences
▷ Possession of instruments and verifying of calibration 6
▷ Temperature/Humidity monitoring management (recommended -> Temperature: 20±5℃ / Humidity: less than 70%)
▷ [F/P] Automatic control and alarm for the temperature and humidity in the aging room/measurement room.
- Temp.: 20 ±5℃ / Humidity: 70% below
(if the self specification setting condition, it needs to provide basis evidence)
7-1
1) Keeping without possession of aging room, no concept for rubber aging/management 0
2) Possession of aging room, but no installation of spatial narrowness and thermohygrostat 1.5
Criteria

3) Possession of aging room, but change of properties on rubber CMB, FMB due to missing installation of spatial narrowness and thermohygrostat 3
4) Possession and management of aging room and spatial narrowness and thermohygrostat are satisfying, but missing warning system in case of abnormal 4.5
occurrence
5) Possession and management of aging room and spatial narrowness and thermohygrostat are excellent and F/Proof management is being controlled due to 6
an installation of external warning system

Item Are setting up and managing standard of aging period by material compliant? Item 7-2
Requirements

▷ Situation of setting aging periods by material (posting of storage standards)


▷ FIFO by material, inventory management and record management 3
▷ Management for marking validity period (based on the date of manufacture) and tagging for distinguishing for verification of mutation period
▷ Validity period (based on the date of manufacture) of using residual quantity of FMB and condition of managing inflow of foreign materials like dust etc.
▷ (Recommended by FMB Manufactory) Measurement and Management for moisture percentage of FMB(Recommended -> less than 0.5%) Compliance with
standards valid for the date of molding Manufacture and moisture percentage is controlled by inspection report of manufacturing company

7-2

1) aging time by material class is not set and not being complied 0
2) aging time by quality class of material is set, but present condition is not published and records are not being managed 1
Criteria

3) aging time by material quality class is set and being complied, but missing records of storing date etc. for some materials 1.5
4) Standard for aging time by material quality class is published and stocking/releasing is being managed, but management for foreign materials and dust is
needed 2.5
5) Standard for aging time by material quality class is published and stocking/releasing is being managed, management for foreign materials and dust is
excellent 3
Ⅲ. Evaluation
Ⅱ Industry Requirements (Molding)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Are weight cutting of FMB by product classes and management for specification/separation distinguishing/prevention of foreign
Item
substances appropriate? Item 8-1

3
Requirem

▷ Establishment and compliance of standards for weight and size of input material by product classes
ents

▷ Clarity of identification marks for prevention of process mixing


▷ Installation of container cover devices for prevention of foreign bodies/subs

8-1 1) No management for weight and size for FMB cutting by product classes due to missing establishment of standard 0
2) Standard for FMB cutting weight and size by product classes is established but there are molding concerns due to partly short falling of standard for weight 1
Criteria

3) Established standards for FMB cutting weight and dimensions etc. are being complied, but lack in prevention for mixing and inflow of foreign bodies/substances 1.5
4) Standards for FMB cutting weight and dimensions etc. are being complied, distinguishing management is satisfying, supplementation of validity period 2.5
5) Standards for FMB cutting weight and dimensions etc. are being complied, management for inflow of foreign bodies/substances, distinguishing and validity period
are excellent 3
★ Establishment and situation of compliance for molding operations (temperature/pressure/time) - (extrusion/second vulcanization
Item
included) ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4 pts

▷ Situation of publication of work standard and suitability of record content


- Possibility of distinguishing and becoming familiar with workers (foreigners included), standard for self-reliance inspections/topics
- notification and compliance of significant processes
- Specify matters of work time and self-reliance inspection period
- Verification methods and establishing standard for main working conditions
▷ Publishing history of main quality problems
▷ Marching and association of Work standards and control plan, inspection standard
▷ [F/P] Install the F/Proof for the injection rubber coating and missing prevention.
Requirements

- Alarm when the coating liquid quantity is under the normal level. 5
▷[Standard] Prevent System for 2nd curing missing.
- Barcode system/ process movement tracking sheet for all processes/ Identification standardization
Ex) inspection curing, electrical record automatically for hardness inspection result after 2nd curing
▷ [F/P] Automatic 2nd curing temperature, time control F/Proof
- 2nd curing Temp. time control automation and alarm machine(Temp/ time real time record)
8-2 [Timer operating when it reached the Standard temperature / Automatic blocking the heat source(electricity, steam) when the curing is completed]
▷ [Standard] Regularly actual check the temperature of 2nd curing oven in each area.
- Perform the Temp. profile [over 1 time/quarter]
▷ [Computerized control] Prevention of missing applying the adhesive for vibroisolating rubber and control the expiration date after applying.
- Prevent the missing process and FIFO, expiration date control
▷ [F/P] F/Proof for the injection rubber coating.
- Alarm when the coating liquid is under the normal level [coating liquid level gage /alarm machine when shortage]

1) No establishment of molding conditions and second vulcanization conditions (No standards for temperature, time) 0
2) Molding conditions and second vulcanization conditions are established, but management standards are missing 1.5
Criteria

2) Molding conditions and second vulcanization are established, but are not being complied (temperature, time) 2.5
4) Compliance situation of molding conditions and second vulcanization conditions (temperature/time/pressure) are satisfying, but F/Proof equipment supplement is
needed 4
5) Compliance situation of molding conditions and second vulcanization conditions (temperature/time/pressure) and F/Proof management situation is excellent 5
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation
Item Are establishment and condition of management standard for surface temperature of molding appropriate? Item 8-3

▷ Measure standard for molding temperature (3~4 point) is established


▷ [Standard] Standardization for temperature of each machine heating control temp. & mold surface temp.
Ex : Heating control temp. 205±10℃, Mold surface temp. 170±10℃
▷ [Standard] Standardization for mold open stand by time [Standard for mold open maintain time after molding]
Ex : Mold open time : If mold open over 3 min, machine stop & re-heat mold
▷ [F/P] Install F/PROOF for mold open time control
Requirements

Ex : If mold open over 2 min, automatically machine stop<Alarm> → Automatically switch pre-heating mode when it operate
→ After 3 min. pre-heating mode, machine operate 5
▷ [Computerized control] Log management for machine stop by mold open time over
Ex : If mold open over 2 min, automatically machine stop → Machine stop log registered<date, stop time, re-operating time>
→ Periodical check for F/PROOF system
▷ Limit inspection for molding surface of thermometer and calibration
8-3 ▷ Verifying molding temperature (management of reassured records on check sheet)
▷ Verify condition of mold storage standard and management for cleanliness
▷ [Standard] Mold cleaning machine management, Periodical cleaning
- Dry ice cleaner / Ultra sonic cleaner / Sand blast cleaner etc
[If cleaner cannot be used by environmental regulation, outsourcing possible]

1) Standard for mold surface temperature and measuring points are not established 0
2) Standard for mold surface temperature is established, but standard for measuring points is not established 1.5
Criteria

3) Standard for mold surface temperature and standard for measuring points is established, but temperature deviations are occurring 2.5
4) Standard for mold surface temperature and standard for measuring points is established and satisfying due to a good condition 4
5) F/Proof device is excellent in working only within the standard scope due to the automatic adjustment device for the mold surface temperature 5

Item Is standard for self-reliance inspections established and are test and record management being conducted? Item 8-4

▷ Verifying establishment of standard for self-reliance inspection


▷ Verification of results of self-reliance inspection and record management (measuring actual product samples and verifying satisfaction of specs)
Requirements

▷ Checking results of circuit inspection for verification of initial sample


▷ [Computerized control] Log management of Start, Mid, End product inspection. 4
- Computerized management of inspection result/log for Start, Mid, End product
[measurement <hardness/dimensions> → Store the electrical file(pictures, scan of report) → regularly evaluate Cpk and improvement]
▷ [Standard] Distribution control of injection rubber section dimension for start, mid, end.
- Dimensional distribution trend control, Computerized SPC.
8-4 ▷ Checking if educational training for workers is being conducted
▷ Linkage between for analysis of inspection results and improvement activities

1) No establishment of standard for self-reliance inspections and no conduction of inspections 0


2) Standard for self-reliance inspections is established, but some inspection records are missing 1
Criteria

3) Standard for self-reliance inspections is established and inspection is in procedure, but missing verification check of circuit tester 2
4) Standard for self-reliance inspections is established/verification check of inspection and circuit tester are in procedure, but no association to improvement
activities 3.5
5) Inspection of initial, mid and final sample and self-reliance inspections are in procedure, association to analysis and improvement activities is satisfying 4

Item Are handling procedure and situation of compliance for failed rubbers appropriate? Item 8-5
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation

▷ Publication of failed treatment procedures and state of identification of operators and inspectors
Requirements

▷ [Standard] Set the scrap shot standard for initial part and restart part after mold cold down. Do the scrap. 4
[Ex1: Standard for part scrap<first part scrap when the start of work, first part scrap after over opening time of mold.]
[Ex2: Control <Record the first part scrap, initial part keep box for preventing of inflow unexpected and scrap.]
▷ Initial scrap part quantity set and record result.
▷ Isolation and identification status of FMB and failed complete product
8-5 ▷ Establishment of management logs and state of management for handling the failed

1) No handling procedure for failed 0


2) Handling procedure of failed is established, but identification of operator/inspector is not possible 1
Criteria

3) Establishment of handling procedure for failed is procedure, but identification and isolation is partly missing 2
4) Handling procedure for failed is established and identification/ isolation is satisfying, but there's no management for records of nonconforming samples 3.5
5) Prevention of mixing, identification management and record management are satisfying due to compliance of standards for handling procedure of failed rubbers 4
Ⅲ. Evaluation
Ⅱ Industry Requirements (Inspection Test)
NO Questions Pts Issues / Observation

Item Situation of reflecting customer requirements for quality management of establishing testing standards for parts/part drawings Item 9-1
Requirements

▷ Conclusion of inspection agreement for complete products by item classes and situation of holding the approval of inspection agreement 3
▷ Reflecting of inspection standards in part drawings, customer requirements, and condition of periodic records for test items
▷ Verifying conformance of contents in quality document (control plan, work standard, inspection standard)
※ Measuring actual dimensions of complete products and verifying if matching to inspection results

9-1
1) Missing management entries in inspection standard etc. are not reflecting customer requirements 0
2) Inspection standard is reflecting drawing and customer requirements, but some management entries are missing 1
Criteria

3) Inspection standard is reflecting drawing and customer requirements and management entries, but some parts are not matching 1.5
4) Drawing, customer requirements and management entries are reflecting inspection standards and history management is satisfying 2.5
5) Drawing, customer requirements and management entries are reflecting inspection standards and are compliant, and history management is excellent 3

Item ★ Are inspection management for parts and reliability (environment, durability) of products conducted appropriately? ★ Evaluation Disqualification for score under 4.5 pts
Requirements

▷ Conduction of customer-requested final inspection of complete products and write of reports 6


▷ Verifying conformance of inspection standard to possession status of reliability testing machine (recognition of external requested high equipment)
▷ Situation of establishment and compliance of planning regular reliability tests
▷ Administrative status of quality assurance for testing machines

9-2
1) Customer-requested inspection contents are not established 0
2) Customer-requested inspection standard is established, but not conducted 1.5
Criteria

3) Customer-requested inspection standard is set but there are plans/result management is missing 3
4) Customer-requested inspections but regular reliability tests are being conducted 4.5
5) Customer-requested inspection is being conducted, results and analysis of regular reliability tests and improvement conjunction are excellent 6

Item Situation of establishing standards and reports for outgoing inspection of complete products Item 9-3
Requirements

▷ Establishment of standard for shipment inspection (establishment of exterior inspection and standard limit included) 3
▷ Establishment of Lot management for shipping parts and report of inspection results
▷ Condition of managing sample limit (compliance of set validity period) <-- appearance inspection for corresponding items
▷ Verifying shipment inspection of performance and process of inspectors and operators for significant items
9-3
1) Standard for shipment inspection and appearance inspection for sample limits are not established 0
2) Standard for shipment inspection is established, but inability in recognition of operators/inspectors 1
Criteria

3) Shipping inspection standard is established and inspection result report is in establishing procedure but Lot No. is missing 1.5
4) Shipping inspection standard is established and establishment of inspection result report is satisfying without missing Lot No. 2.5
5) Establishment of inspection results and management for regular verification of appearance limit samples is excellent 3
( ) SQ-Mark Certification Evaluation Improvement Recommendation
■ 2nd Tier Supplier : ■ 1st Tier Supplier : Evaluation Date:

No. Findings Improvement Measure Due Resp.

▣ Assessor & Assessee : 1st Tier (Sign). 2nd Tier (Sign).


Supporter : HKMC (Sign).
2nd Tier Co.
( ) 2nd Tier Supplier Findings
1st Tier Co.

Name
Name of
of Process
Process Name
Name of
of Process
Process
Classif. Classif.

Item Item

Detailed Item Detailed Item

※ Photo of Process and ※ Photo of Process and Diagram


Diagram
Findings

Findings

You might also like