D.O. No.

___, series of 2016 ANNEX B

DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 23 of 45

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC OF WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
Manila

PROJECT DESIGN AUDIT REPORT

1. Project Information:

Name of Project:

Location:  
Contractor (if any):  
Project Cost:  
Implementing Office (if any):  
Design Engineer:  
Reviewed/Checked:  
Approved:  

2. Findings/Observations:

3. Recommendations:

4. Annexes

Prepared by:

   
Team Leader Member
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 24 of 45

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC OF WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
Manila

Checklists for Detailed Engineering Design (DED) Plan

for Highway Project
Regional Office No   Dist. Engineering Office No.  
Name of Project :
 

IV.1 Field Investigation Data (30%) Yes No N/A

1 Survey Data (Topographic/Hydrographic/Drainage) (15%)  
a.       Field data (Field book/Computer generated data)   
b.      Topographic Plan (To be incorporated in the design plan)  
·    Major Contour Interval with Label
Flat Terrain - 1.0 m
Rolling Terrain - 5.0 m
  
    Hilly/Mountainous Terrain - 10.0 m
·    GPS /BMs with Technical Descriptions *   
* Project Control Monuments (with PRS92 Technical Descriptions) **
GPS - 3 kms Interval
BM - 500 m Interval
IBM - 250 m Interval
·         North Arrow   
 
·         Azimuth & Distance   
·         Right-of-Way Limits   
·         Existing Structures   
·         Elements of curvature   
·         PI Reference   
c.       Profile of natural ground (centerline elevation) @ 20m interval   
d.      Cross-section sheets @ 20m interval  
·     Stationing   
·      Elevations   
·      Coordinates   
2 Geological/Geotechnical Data (15%) Yes No N/A
  a.  Soil Exploration Requirements  
  1. Test pit/Auger hole   
  Spacing  
  (New Construction)
  250m interval if traffic is > 300 vpd
  500m interval if traffic is < 300 vpd
  250m for road on swampy/marshy ground
  100m interval on cut section including
description of soil materials
   
  (Upgrading/Rehabilitation)
  500m interval left and right of edge of pavement,
staggered
  Note:  
  Complied as to prescribed spacing : 2.0%  
  Not complied as to prescribed spacing : 1.0%      
* Applicable for CY 2016 Design Audit only
** Applicable for CY 2017 and onwards Design Audit

     
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 25 of 45

  2. Depth
  (New Construction/Upgrading/Rehabilitation)   
  1.50m (min) Test pit and 2.0m Auger boring  
  Note:  
  Complied as to prescribed depth : 2.0%  
  Not complied as to prescribed depth : 1.0%      
  b.  Data Requirements  
  ·  Tests pits/Auger hole  
  Soil Profile   
  Soil Classification   
  .   Field/Laboratory Tests  
  California Bearing Ratio (CBR)   
  Atterberg limits   
  Natural Moisture Content   
  Other Tests   
  Borehole Data (for protection works)   
IV.2 Completeness of Drawings/Details (40%) Yes No N/A
IV.2.1 Detailed Engineering Design Drawings/Details (30%) Yes No N/A
1 Cover sheet/title sheet  
  ·         Name of project   
  ·         Road Section ID   
  ·         Section   
  ·         Location   
  ·         Station Limits   
  ·         Net Length   
2 Index of drawings   
3 Location plan/vicinity map   
4 General Notes  
  ·         Specifications   
·         Design criteria   
·         Construction requirements   
5 Summary of Quantities (items of works)   
6 Typical roadway sections  
  ·         Carriageway   
  ·         Shoulder   
  ·         Side-slopes   
  ·         Cross-fall   
  ·         Structures (lined ditch, slope protection)   
  ·         Pavement design parameters   
7 Geometric Design Standard drawings  
·         Super-elevation   
  ·         Widening   
·         Horizontal and vertical curve   
8 Drainage Schedule  
·         Stationing   
  ·         Size of structures   
·         Quantities   
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 26 of 45

9 Schedule listings of miscellaneous works  

  ·         Slope protection   
  ·         Guardrails   
  ·         Signages   
  ·         Pavement markings   
10 Plan & Profile  
  A. Horizontal alignment      
  ·      Center alignment   
  ·      Stationing at 100 meters interval   
  ·      Edge limits of carriageway width   
  ·      Shoulder limits   
  ·      Right-of-Way limits   
  ·      Azimuth and Distance   
  ·      Contours   
  ·      Benchmark/GPS (Coordinates)   
  ·      North arrow indicator   
  ·      Elements of Horizontal Curve   
  ·      P.I. Reference   
  ·      Legends/Symbols required for      
  ·   Excavation   
  ·   Embankment   
  ·   Drainage Structures   
  ·   Slope Protection Structures   
  ·    Match Line Station   
   B. Vertical alignment      
  ·    Slope gradient in Percent (%)   
  ·    Elements of Vertical Alignment   
  ·   Match Line Station   
  ·    Finished Grade Line   
  ·    Existing Ground Line   
  ·    Drainage Structures      
  ·   Type and Size   
  ·   Length   
  ·   Slope   
  ·   Invert elevations   
  ·   Scope of Work (i.e. intall, construct)   
  ·   Inlet and Outlet Structure Type   
   C. Others      
  ·    Stationings   
  ·    Elevation at 20 meters interval      
  ·   Finished Elevation   
  ·   Natural Ground Elevation   
  ·   Super Elevation Diagram   
  ·    Widening Diagram   
11 Typical drainage details  
  ·     Ditches   
  ·     Canals   
  ·     Reinforced concrete pipe culverts (RCPC)   
  ·     Reinforced concrete box culverts (RCBC)   
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 27 of 45

12 Typical Pavement details   

13 Typical slope protection      
·    Details   
 
·    Design Parameters   
14 Detailed cross-sections at 20 meter interval showing the following:  
  ·    Coordinates   
  ·    Quantities   
  ·    Structures (i.e. guardrails, slope protection)   
·    Elevation (i.e. road finished grade, drainage invert
 
elevation, side ditches)
  
  ·     Finished Road Template      
  ·   Carriageway Width   
  ·   Shoulder Width   
  ·   Pavement Structure   
  ·   Carriageway Slope   
  ·   Shoulder Slope   
  ·   Side Slope and Slope Rounding   
  ·   Superelevation Requirement   
15 Detailed Drainage Cross-Section Showing the Following:  
·   Elevation (i.e. road finished grade, drainage invert
 
elevation)
  
  ·   Coordinates   
  ·   Quantities   
  ·   Structure Section   
  ·   Inlet and Outlet Structures   
  ·   Finished Road Template
  ·   Carriageway Width   
  ·   Shoulder Width   
  ·   Pavement Structure   
  ·   Carriageway Slope   
  ·   Shoulder Slope   
  ·   Side Slope and Slope Rounding   
  ·   Superelevation Requirement   
16 Roadway Lighting  
  ·    Plans signed by a Professional Electrical Engineer   
  ·    General Information/Drawings   
  ·    Plan for Street lighting   
  ·    Schedule of Loads   
  ·    One Line Diagram/Electrical Riser Diagram   
IV.2.2 Road Safety (10%) Yes No N/A
1 Drainage  
a. Are the following design elements adequate for satisfactory
   
drainage and to reduce the risk of hydroplaning?
  ·       crossfall (1.5%-2.0%)   
  ·       superelevation (max e=8.0%)   
·       road grades
* (min. of 0.50% on cut section)
 
* (min. of 0.35% on high type pavement with concrete curb/
  
gutter and sidewalk)
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 28 of 45

b. Is the design of drainage steel grating safe for pedal cycles (i.e
 
gaps not parallel with wheel trucks)
  

c. Are paved shoulder provided along longitudinal drainage lined

 
canal/ditch.
  
2 Slope Stability  
a. Is the probability of the road of being exposed to the following road
  hazards been adequately addressed and provided with warning  
signs?
  ·   landslide   
  ·    rock fall   
  ·    loose rock   
  ·    road slip   
  b. Are the cut and fill slope suitable to the stability of materials?   
  c. Has appropriate slope rounding provided on the hinge point of cut slope   
3 Climate Conditions      
  a. Are warning signs in identified flooded areas provided?   
4 Landscaping  
Are existing obstructions (e.g. trees, houses, structures, utilities, etc.) located along the side
 
of the highway provided with appropriate barrier?
  
5 Road Safety Facilities      
a. Are guardrails provided along ravines or at sections with identified roadside hazards along
 
the highway?
  
  b. Are white edge lines provided at the intended location?   
  c. Are center lines provided to separate different direction of traffic?   
  d. Are yellow pavement markings provided along horizontal and vertical curves?   
  e. Are regulatory signs to control traffic speed limits provided?   
  f. Are warning signs with identified hazards along the highway provided?   
  g. Are informatory road signs provided?   
  h. Are stop signs provided at sections with high volume of traffic?   
  i. Are possible locations for lay-by turnout indicated/provided?   
6 Road Works      
Are the proposed roadwork safety facilities in connection with traffic management plan
 
provided?
  
7 Provision for PWD      

  Are Accessibility for PWD (e.g. ramps, handrail, signage) provisions provided?   

IV.3 Completeness of Design Analysis & Calculations (15%) Yes No N/A

1 Pavement   
2 Drainage Structures  
·     Hydrologic Analysis and Hydraulics Calculation using
standard form
  
 
·     Structural   
3 Slope Protection Structures (i.e.. Retaining Walls, Stone Masonry)   
4 Detailed Quantity Calculations   
5 Roadway Lighting  
a.   Design Analysis  
·      Overcurrent protection   
  ·      Voltage drop   
b. Structural design analysis for street lighting support   
c. Illumination level calculation   
 D.O. No. ___, series of 2016 ANNEX B
DA-BOD Form No. 4
Date: September 21, 2016, Issue No. 1
Page 29 of 45

6 High embankment (Settlement Analysis)   

7 Slope Stability Analysis   
8 Settlement Analysis   

_______Name_______ _______Name_______ _______Name_______

MM/DD/YYYY
Designation Designation Designation

Team Leader Team Member Regional Team Leader Date

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC OF WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
Manila

Checklists for Compliance to D.O. No. 56, s. 1995

Regional Office No   Dist. Engineering Office No.  

Name of Project :

I. COMPLIANCE TO D.O. No. 56, SERIES of 1995 (5%) Yes No N/A

1 All sheets of plan are in uniform and of standard size  

a. For building and other related structures, (508mm x 762mm)   

  b. For bridge, highways, flood control and drainage water supper
and   
other related projects, 600mm x 910mm
2 Drafting and lettering works are done in AutoCAD or with the use of
technical pens and leroy or similar templates   

3 All plans are properly signed by DPWH Officials concerned

a. Designer   
b. Checker / Reviewer   
c. Division Chief / Section Chief (Submitted)   
 
d. Assistant Regional Director / Assistant District Engineer
  
(Recommending Approval)
e. Regional Director / District Engineer (Approved)   
4 All plans are prepared using Mylar or other high quality tracing paper   
5 The title block were made an integral part of the sheet of plan and not
merely patched-up thereon   

________Name________ ________Name________ ________Name________

MM/DD/YYYY
Designation Designation Designation

Team Leader Team Member Regional Team Leader Date