Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enzymatic Saccharification of Sodium Hypochlorite Treated Bagasse and Cotton Stalks
Enzymatic Saccharification of Sodium Hypochlorite Treated Bagasse and Cotton Stalks
A BSTRA ('T
Attention was devoted to the delign(fication of the eru&, bagasse ( CB) and
cotton stalks (CS) by cheap commercial sodium hypochlorite solution.
Optimum delign(fieation o/'these suhstrates was achieved by treatment
with O"7 g Cl g - ~ suhstrate (pH 7.0)Jbr 20 h at room temperature, with a
solid.'liquid (S:L) ratio 1.20.
The delign(fied CB and CS were sacehar(lied with an enzyme prepara-
lion j)*om a potent local mutant of Trichoderma viride (253 M16). ,4
sati.~'/aetory saechar(fication was obtained with most of the treatments
used. The highest conversion yield (93%) was recorded with CB treated
with sodium hypoehlorite solution (S:L ratio 1.20),/ollowed hv N a O H
(o.05 M).
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Microorganism
Cellulose substrates
The crude sugar-cane bagasse (CB) and the cotton stalks (CS) were air
dried and ground to 149-250/tin. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOC1)-treated
CB or CS were used as cellulosic substrates.
Chemical analysis
E?IZyHIC sourc( ~
Crude enzyme preparations were obtained from culture of T. viride 253
MI6 grown in 250ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50ml portions of
medium containing (g litre-~): (NH,)2SO 4, 2.4: KH2PO4, 2-0; calcium
citrate, 2.0; glucose, 0-5; peptone, 0.1; CB, 20.0; initial pH value, 5-5. The
inoculated flasks were shaken for 7 days at 3 0 C on a rotary shaker
(150rev min-1). Cultures were harvested, centrifuged and the clear
supernatant liquid was then treated with 70% saturated ammonium sul,-
phate followed by separation and dialysis of the protein precipitate. A
known concentration of this protein was then used as source of the
enzyme.
Saccharification
Eighteen milligrams (on holocellulose basis) of each dry, delignified
sample (CB or CS) were soaked in 1 ml of distilled water overnight:
2.5ml of the enzyme preparation (0-48mg protein ml ~) to give an
enzyme:substrate ratio of 1:15, and 2"5 ml of 0.2 m acetate buffer, pH 5-0,
were added and 0-1 ml of 0"05 M NaN 3 was added to the mixture as pre-
servative. The saccharification was carried out in 25 ml conical flasks,
under shaken conditions at 45 C for 4 days. A similar reaction mixture,
using heat inactivated enzyme solution, was prepared as control.
The reaction mixture was filtered through G-3 sintered glass and
diluted to 10ml. The reducing sugars released m the saccharification
medium were determined as glucose plus xylose by the methods of
Sornogyi (1945) and Nelson (1944). The saccharification percentage was
calculated from the weight of reducing sugars formed and the weight of
holocellulose in the substrate.
The results (Table 1) show that holocellulose was the major constituent
in both CB and CS samples. Lignin was detected in relatively higher con-
centration in CS.
106 Nadia Naim et al.
TABLE 1
Some Constituents of Crude Bagasse (CB) and Cotton Stalks (CS)
(% to dry weight)
TABLE 2
The Percentage Loss of Dry Weight and Lignin Contents of CB and CS
Due to Treatment with NaOCI of Different Chlorine Concentrations
TABLE 3
The Percentage Loss of Dry Weight and Lignin Con-
tents of CB and CS Due to Treatment with NaOC1 for
Different Times ~
5 CB I 15 588
CS 18.4 63.6
10 CB 24-4 86-1
CS 24-5 897
15 CB 30.1 966
CS 25"0 91 8
20 CB 31-8 100.0
CS 26.9 100-0
The loss in sample weight may be due to the formation of soluble oxi-
dation products and the initial products of oxidation may be also further
oxidized or hydrolysed (Marsh, 1956; Epstein & Lewin, 1961).
The delignification process was affected by the time of exposure of the
substrates to the added hypochlorite (Table 3), and 15-20 h was suffi-
cient to delignify CB and CS almost completely. However, there was
greater loss of the CB than of the CS weight.
To determine the optimum ratio of the substrate to sodium hypo-
chlorite (solid:liquid (S:L) ratio). Certain amounts of the substrates were
treated with different volumes of NaOC1 solution having varied chlorine
concentrations. The data given in Table 4 showed that complete deligni-
fication of the substrates was attained with the different volumes of
NaOC1 solutions of 0.7 and 0.9 g CI g- 1 substrate. However, the treat-
ment with 0-7 g C1 in a total volume of 10 or 20 ml of the treatment mix-
ture represented optimal conditions, since it provided the utilization of
minimal solution volume and allowed complete removal of lignin with
no extra loss in the substrate weight. With the highest hypochlorite level.
a loss in weight of about 45% was recorded on conducting the treatment
process of CB in 10 ml total volume. The over-oxidation of cellulose with
higher chlorine levels has been previously recorded by Marsh (1956) and
Davidson & Nevell (1957).
108 Nadia Naim et ai.
TABLE 4
The Percentage Loss of Dry Weight and Lignin Contents of CB and CS Due to Treat-
ment with NaOCI of Different Chlorine Concentrations at Different Solid:Liquid (S:L)
Ratios
1: 10 CB 20.8 100"0
CS 26.1 100"0
1:20 CB 22-0 100"0
CS 23.6 100"0
0'7 1:30 CB 22.2 100"0
CS 22.5 100"0
1:50 CB 22"8 100-0
CS 22'0 100-0
1:100 CB 21.6 100"0
CS 25"6 100"0
TABLE 5
Saccharification of CB and CS and NaOCl-treated CB and CS with an Enzyme Fraction
from T. viride 253 M 16
the treated bagasse. The highest conversion (66.7%) was achieved with
the bagasse sample pretreated with NaOC1 solution of 0.7 g C1 level. On
the contrary, relatively limited enzymatic hydrolysis (29% saccharifica-
tion yield) was observed with CS treated under identical conditions.
Such variations of the enzymatic activity with the different substrates
might be correlated with a probable difference in the physicochemical
structures of their cellulosic constituents and enzymic substrate speci-
ficity (Rautela, 1967; Mansour & Seif E1-Dien, 1972).
A remarkable improvement in conversion (93.5 %) was found with the
CB sample pretreated with NaOC1 followed by NaOH. The stimulatory
effect of NaOH may be explained by its role as a swelling agent loosening
the crystalline region of cellulose and increasing the initial specific sur-
face areas, thus increasing the enzymatic activity (Schurz, 1978; Fan et
al., 1980, 1981, 1982).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES