ESD.33 Systems Engineering Lecture 1 Course Introduc8on: Instructors

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 52

ESD.

33 Systems Engineering 
Lecture 1 
Course Introduc8on 
Instructors: 
Dr. Qi Van Eikema Hommes 
Mr. Pat Hale 
Mr. David Erickson 

Teaching Assistants: 
Ellen Czaika 
Ipshita Deepak 

        
Agenda 
  Welcome and Introduc8on of Teaching Staff 
  Why are we here? 
  What are Systems? 
  What is Systems Engineering? 
  Why do we study Systems Engineering? 
  Course Schedule and Logis8cs 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 2


Dr. Qi Van Eikema Hommes 
•  ESD Research Associate and Lecturer 
•  8 years of work experiences in automo8ve 
companies (Ford and GM) 
–  Senior Research Scien8st at GM R&D 
–  Powertrain Systems Engineer at Ford 

MIT Ph.D. and M.S. in


Mechanical Engineering
University of B.S. in Mechanical
Engineering
Kentucky

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 3


Dr. Pat Hale 
•  SDM Director, ESD Senior Lecturer 
•  Military experience: 
- 20 years in U.S. Navy: submarines 
•  Industry experience: 
- Draper Labs (Director, Systems Engineering) 
- O8s Elevator (first Director, Systems & 
Controls Engineering) 
•  Past INCOSE president 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 4


Academic Background

B.S. Mechanical Engineering


University of Minnesota

M.S. Mechanical Engineering


Engineer’s Degree in Ocean Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MBA
Cornell University

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 5


About me: 
 Product designer/ manager, systems engineer, 
mobile tech enthusiast, a mother, vocal ar8st and a 
second year SDM student 

 
 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 6


About me: 
 SDM08  
 Former manager of systems engineering team 
 Ethnographer 
 Athlete (numerous sports: rowing, yoga, skiing/snowboarding, 
hiking, biking, sailing, surfing, etc.) 
 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 7


Why Are We in This Class? 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 8








Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.


© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes
9
Is This a System and Why? 

Power grid image removed due to copyright restrictions.


Image can be found at HowStuffWorks.com.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/power.htm/printable

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 10


Is This a System and Why? 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 11


Is This a System and Why? 
Corporate Name
Name
Headquarters

Name Name Name Name


Strategy Finance
IT Department Administration
Department Department

Name Name Name Name


Marketing Public Relations Legal Personnel
Department Department Department Department

Name Name Name Name


Sales Research Logistics
Production
Department Department Department

Name
Security
Department

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 12


Is This a System and Why? 
http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/WolfSheepStrideInheritance (ANIMATION)
Works in Firefox browser
Wolves eats sheep.
Sheep eat grass.
Wolves and sheep reproduce.
They move in random directions.

Try when there are more wolves than


sheep.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 13


What Types of Systems Have You 
Worked on? 

Why do you call them “systems?” 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 14


Defini8on of Systems 
•  A combina8on of interac8ng elements 
organized to achieve one more stated 
purposes. 
•  An integrated set of elements, subsystems, or 
assemblies that accomplish a defined 
objec8ve. These elements include products 
(hardware, sofware, firmware), processes, 
people, informa8on, techniques, facili8es, 
services, and other support element.   
Source: INCOSE SE Handbook, V3.2 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 15
Characteris8cs of Systems 
•  Interac8on 
•  Hierarchical 
•  Emergent 
•  Dynamic  
•  Interdisciplinary 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 16


Digital Photography 
EOS Digital Cameras
(with Direct Print)

Computers PictBridge Compatible


Printers (with Direct Print)
PC Card Adapter

EOS-1Ds Mark II

CF/SD Card PC Compatible


Reader Computer

EOS-1D Mark II

CF/SD Cards
Inkjet Photo Printer

EOS-20D Macintosh
USB Cable USB Cable
Computer
(FireWire IFC-200D4/
D44 or IFC-450D4/D44
cable for EOS 1Ds Mark II
and EOS 1D Mark II)
EOS
Digital Rebel XT
USB Cable
Interface Cable Compact Photo Printer
IFC-300PCU/IFC-400PCU
(EOS-1Ds Mark II, 1D Mark II,
20D, Digital Rebel XT, Digital Rebel)

EOS
Digital Rebel

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 17


System of Systems 
Large‐scale inter‐disciplinary problems involving 
mul8ple, heterogeneous, distributed systems. 
•  System elements operate independently. 
•  System elements have different life cycles. 
•  The iniAal requirements are likely to be ambiguous. 
•  Complexity is a major issue. 
•  Management can overshadow engineering. 
•  Fuzzy boundaries cause confusion. 
•  SoS engineering is never finished. 
Source: INCOSE SE Handbook V3.2 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 18
This Class’ Focus 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 19


Agenda 
  Welcome and Introduc8on of Teaching Staff 
  Why are we here? 
  What are Systems? 
  What is Systems Engineering? 
  Why do we study Systems Engineering? 
  Course Schedule and Logis8cs 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 20


What is Systems Engineering? 
•  Systems engineering is a discipline that concentrates on the 
design and applica8on of the whole (system) as dis8nct from 
the parts. It involves looking at a problem in its en8rety, taking 
into account all the facets and all the variables and rela8ng 
the social to the  technical aspect. 
•  Systems engineering is an itera8ve process of top‐down 
synthesis, development, and opera8on of a real‐world system 
that sa8sfies, in a near op8mal manner, the full range of 
requirements for the system. 
INCOSE SE Handbook V3.2 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 21


What is Systems Engineering? 
•  Systems engineering is an interdisciplinary approach and 
means to enable the realiza8on of successful systems. It 
focuses on defining customer needs and required 
func8onality early in the development cycle, documen8ng 
requirements, and then proceeding with design synthesis and 
system valida8on while considering the complete problem: 
opera8ons, cost and schedule, performance, training and 
support, test, manufacturing, and disposal. SE considers both 
the business and the technical needs of all customers with the 
goal of providing a quality product that meets the user needs. 
INCOSE SE Handbook V3.2 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 22


Applica8on Domains of Systems 
Engineering 
•  Aerospace 
•  Urban Infrastructure 
•  Communica8ons systems 
•  Data and informa8on systems 
•  Healthcare systems 
•  Electric power systems 
•  Produc8on/construc8on systems 
•  Waste disposal systems 
•  Transporta8on systems 
•  Financial systems 
•  Educa8on systems  Source: Blanchard, Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 5 th ed.

•  … 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 23
Waterfall Process Model 
Requirements
Introduced by Royce
Analysis
in 1970, initially for
Specifications
FE software
ED
Design BA
CK
development.
Implementation

Test

Maintenance

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Source: Blanchard, Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 5th ed.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 24


Spiral Process Model 
Imple
ment
ation Form
al De
Revie sign
w
•  Boehm, 1986. 
Test

•  Adapted from 
a
e
l
tai ents Revi nd
D em ew
ir

Op ototy
qu Conc
Re ept

Pr
era pe
t i on Revi ual
nc n ew

tio
Waterfall model 
Fu initio

Sy

nal
e f

nth
D m

Sy otype
ste nts Pro

esi
Sy eme on
ste

s
i r i t
nat
m
qu
Re ermi
t
De
Need
•  Itera8ve 
Fea

on
Req

Ana

fic m
sibi s

ati
Sp Syste
Allo
Com ign

uire

l y
lity

De ect
Com

si

n
eci

tion t
c
Des nents

sig

De ipmen
men

l
atio

Se

•  Prototyping 
pon
po

System
n
ts

fini
ent

Equ

Analysis

Trade-Off
Studies

Evaluation and
Optimization

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Source: Blanchard, Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 5th ed.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 25


System Engineering Implemented in FPDS

Customer Customer Focus Customer


Customer
Musts / Wants Customer Experience & Feedback Satisfaction
Satisfaction

Vehicle Customer
VehicleLevel
LevelInputs
Inputs
Purchase
Purchase / Owner//Operator
/ Owner Requirements Purchase,
Operator Purchase,Operate
Operate Disposal
Corporate Regulatory
Regulatory(FMVSS,
(FMVSS,EPA,
EPA,...)
...) & Disposal
Corporate Corporate &Maintain
Maintain
Knowledge
Knowledge Corporate (WCR, ABS,Manuf,
(WCR, ABS, Manuf,...)
...)

Generic
GenericVDS
VDS& & Requirements Feasibility
SDS
SDS Cascades Feedback
Competitive
Competitive
Benchmark
Benchmark
Vehicle
VehicleLevel
LevelRequirements
Requirements DVM / DVP Vehicle
Data Vehicle Attributes
Vehicle Attributes Vehicle Production
Data Verification Production
Vehicle
VehicleSystem
SystemSpecification
Specification--VDS
VDS Verification
Reusability
Reusability
Constraints &
Constraints &
Data Requirements Feasibility
Data
Product Cascade Feedback
Knowledge
Product
Knowledge
Manufacturing System
System//Subsystem
SubsystemLevel
Level DVM / DVP
Knowledge & System & System
System
Manufacturing System &
Reusability Subsystem Design Specification- SDS
Subsystem Design Specification- SDS Verification
Verification
Knowledge &
Technology Feasibility
Reusability
Warranty Data Requirements Feedback
Technology
Models Cascade
Part
Part//Component
ComponentFabrication
Fabrication//
Warranty Data Verification
Verification
Part
Part//Component
ComponentDesign
Design
Models Component
ComponentDesign
DesignSpecification
Specification--CDS
CDS

Highly
HighlyIterative
Iterative Mostly
MostlySerial
Serial

KO
KO SI
SI SC
SC PA
PA PR
PR J1
J1

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 26


INCOSE VEE Model 

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 27


Is There a Winner? 
•  It is observed that preferences expressed by 
individuals and groups for one of the system 
models is subjec8ve. 
•  Research is needed to see which model fits 
what situa8on bemer. 
•  Class Discussion:  
–  What are common among these processes? 
–  Is Systems Engineering the same from Product 
Development? 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 28
Systems Engineering vs. Product Development 
Product Development Process (Ulrich and Eppinger)

Concept System-Level Detail Testing and Production


Planning Development Design Design Refinement Ramp-Up

Mission Concept System Spec Critical Design Production


Approval Review Review Review Approval

System Engineering Implemented in FPDS

Customer Customer Focus Customer


Customer
Musts / Wants Customer Experience & Feedback Satisfaction
Satisfaction

Vehicle Customer
VehicleLevel
LevelInputs
Inputs
Purchase
Purchase//Owner
Owner//Operator Requirements Purchase,
Operator Purchase,Operate
Operate Disposal
Corporate Regulatory
Regulatory(FMVSS,
(FMVSS,EPA,
EPA,...)
...) & Disposal
Corporate Corporate &Maintain
Maintain
Knowledge
Knowledge Corporate(WCR,
(WCR,ABS,
ABS,Manuf,
Manuf,...)
...)

Generic
GenericVDS
VDS& & Requirements Feasibility
SDS
SDS Cascades Feedback
Competitive
Competitive
Benchmark Vehicle
VehicleLevel
LevelRequirements
Requirements DVM / DVP
Benchmark Vehicle
Data Vehicle
VehicleAttributes
Attributes Vehicle Production
Data Verification Production
Vehicle
Vehicle System Specification--VDS
System Specification VDS Verification
Reusability
Reusability
Constraints &
Constraints &
Data Requirements Feasibility
Data
Product Cascade Feedback
Knowledge
Product
Knowledge
Manufacturing System
System//Subsystem
SubsystemLevel
Level DVM / DVP
Knowledge & System System
System
Manufacturing System& &
Reusability Subsystem
Subsystem Design Specification-SDS
Design Specification- SDS Verification
Verification
Knowledge &
Technology Feasibility
Reusability
Warranty Data Requirements Feedback
Technology
Models Cascade
Part
Part//Component
ComponentFabrication
Fabrication//
Warranty Data Verification
Verification
Part
Part//Component
ComponentDesign
Design
Models Component
ComponentDesign
DesignSpecification
Specification--CDS
CDS

Highly
HighlyIterative
Iterative Mostly
MostlySerial
Serial

KO
KO SI
SI SC
SC PA
PA PR
PR J1
J1

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.


 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 29
Agenda 
  Welcome and Introduc8on of Teaching Staff 
  Why are we here? 
  What are Systems? 
  What is Systems Engineering? 
  Why do we study Systems Engineering? 
  Course Schedule and Logis8cs 
 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 30


The Value of Systems Engineering 

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 31


The Value of Systems Engineering 
•  Systems engineering efforts reduce cost and 
schedule overrun. 
•  Class discussion:  Why?  Think back about the 
characteris8cs of systems. 
–  Interac8on 
–  Hierarchical 
–  Emergence 
–  Dynamic 
–  Interdisciplinary 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 32
History of Systems Engineering 

1940s 

The Machine  The Systems 
Age  Age 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 33


The Machine Age 
•  Reduc9onism—Everything can be reduced, decomposed, or 
disassembled to simple indivisible parts. 
•  Analy9cal way of thinking 
–  Take apart what is to be explained 
–  Explain the smaller parts. 
–  The whole is the sum of its parts. 
•  Mechanism 
–  Cause and effect, determinis8c thinking 
–  Closed System Thinking—ignore the environment a 
phenomenon is in. 
•  Mechaniza9on 
–  Industrial revolu8on (18‐19th century) 
–  Machine subs8tute people for physical work 
–  Dehumaniza8on of work 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 34
Examples of Machine Age Thinking 
•  Ancient roots 
–  Aristotle (Physics—fire, earth, air, water, aether ) 
–  Archimedes  
•  Biology 
–  Study of cells and organs  
•  Physics 
–  Study of atoms 
•  F. W. Taylor “Scien8fic Management” 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 35


Class Discussion Points 
•  Your examples? 
•  Strength and Weakness of Machine Age 
Thinking 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 36


The System Age 
•  Circa 1940s 
•  Supplemen8ng the Machine Age thinking 
•  Expansionism 
–  All objects and events, and all experience of them as parts of larger 
wholes. 
–  Stochas8c view of the systems. 
•  Synthe9c Thinking (Systems Thinking) 
–  Instead of focusing on explaining the whole but taking it apart, 
synthe8c thinking focuses on explaining something in terms of its role 
in the larger system. 
–  The whole is not equal to the sum of its parts—some8mes more, 
some8mes less. 
•  Teleologically oriented 
–  Systems have purposes 
–  More focuses on the human aspect of organiza8on design and 
management. 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 37
Machine Age vs. Systems Age 
Machine Age Thinking  Systems Age Thinking 
Reduc8onism  Expansionism 
Analy8cal thinking  Synthe8c thinking 
Mechaniza8on  Teleologically Oriented 

•  These two eras show continuous human inquiry to


understand the world.
•  They are complementary, not contradictory.
•  System Engineering is a more recent phenomenon.
•  Understanding the history helps us to think critically.

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 38


INCOSE 
•  The Interna8onal Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) is 
a not‐for‐profit membership organiza8on founded to develop 
and disseminate the interdisciplinary principles and prac8ces 
that enable the realiza8on of successful systems.  
•  Mission: Share, promote and advance the best of systems 
engineering from across the globe for the benefit of humanity 
and the planet. 
•  Vision: The world's authority on Systems Engineering. 
•  hmp://www.incose.org/ 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 39


Agenda 
  Welcome and Introduc8on of Teaching Staff 
  Why are we here? 
  What are Systems? 
  What is Systems Engineering? 
  Why do we study Systems Engineering? 
  Course Schedule and Logis8cs 
 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 42


Course Learning Objec8ves 
•  This course intends to help you develop the capability of systems thinking by 
introducing classical and advanced systems engineering theory, methods, and 
tools.  Afer taking this class, you should be able to: 
–  Develop a systems engineering plan for a realis8c project. 
–  Judge the applicability of any proposed process, strategy, or methodology for 
systems engineering using the fundamental concepts from disciplines such as 
of probability, economics, and cogni8ve science.  
–  Understand system engineers’ role and responsibili8es.  Understand the role 
of organiza8ons. 
–  Apply systems engineering tools (e.g., requirements development and 
management, robust design, Design Structure Matrix) to realis8c problems; 
–  Recognize the value and limita8ons of modeling and simula8on.  
–  Formulate an effec8ve plan for gathering and using data. 
–  Know how to proac8vely design for and manage system lifecycle targets. 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 43


Course Layout 
Lecture 4  Lecture 13 
Stakeholder Analysis and  Lecture 2 
Systems Engineering  Design Verifica8on 
Requirements Defini8on 
As Human Ac8vity  and 
Valida8on, Lifecycle  
Lecture 5  innova8on in 
Management 
Systems Engineering 
Lecture 6  Axioma8c 
Design and DM‐DSM 
Method 

 

Lecture 8 
Trade Space Explora8on 
Concept Selec8on 
Lecture 10 : Experiments 
Lecture 11 : Robust Design I 
Lecture 12:  Robust Design II 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes
44
Course Materials 
•  Textbooks: 
–   INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, V3.2.   
–  “40 Principles” 
–  QBQ 
•  Reference books: 
–  Strongly recommended: Blanchard, B. S., and 
Fabrycky, W. J., Systems Engineering and Analysis, 
5th edi8on, Pren8ce Hall, 2010. 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 45


Course Policies 
•  Reading –please be prepared for class 
discussions 
•  Class sessions 
– 2 sessions/week, 2 hours/session
– Session 3, 3 hours, project proposal 
– Sessions 19 and 20, 4 hours, final 
presenta8ons. 
•  Amendance and class par8cipa8on 
–  Instructor will randomly pick student names for 
class discussion 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 46
Class Time Commitment 
•  Course is H 3‐0‐6  
•  This is a 9 units class in a normal semester (14 
weeks). 
•  Summer is 10 weeks, which means this course 
requires 12.6 hours of work per week. 
•  12.6 hours = 4 hours in class + 8.6 hours 
outside 
•  8.6 hours include reading, homework 
assignments, and project work. 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 47
Grading 
•  Project (presenta8ons and reports): 
–  Individual Project proposal (presenta8on and 1‐page) 10% 
–  Mid‐term (group presenta8on) 10% 
–  Final (group presenta8on) 20% 
•  Homework Assignments 10% x 5 
–  The first four are individual assignments 10% x 4 
–  The fifh is a group presenta8on 10% 
•  Amendance and class par8cipa8on 10% 
–  Each class unamended without instructors’ permission 
reduces 1% of the grade 
–  Please let the instructor know if you are unable to amend 
the class. 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 48


Term Project 
•  The goal is to apply the systems engineering 
methods and tools to a topic that fits your interest / 
your industry. 
•  Acceptable topic examples: 
–  Design of a new system (technical, organiza8onal, 
enterprise level, etc.).  The project must have 
enough detail so that it can demonstrate the use 
of the methods and tools taught in the class. 
–  In‐depth inves8ga8on of a successful or failed 
project 
•  Choose a project that you have access to informa8on 
and data. 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 49
Term Project Deliverables 
•  Proposal (Session 3) 
– Individual students propose project topics 
– Voluntarily form teams of 3‐5.  Four‐
member teams are strongly encouraged. 
– Submit team forma8on report by Session 5.

•  Mid‐term presenta8on (Session 9) 
•  Final presenta8on (Sessions 19 and 20) 
© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 50
Homework Assignments 
•  What if you were called to help NHSTA inves8gate 
the Toyota sudden accelera8on safety recall? 
•  Most of the homework assignments will be centered 
around the ques8on: What could have been done to 
prevent the problem?  
•   Your study should not be focused only on Toyota, 
but automobiles in general. 
•  More about the case study in a few slides. 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 51


Homework Requirements 
•  Homework is individual‐based.  Collabora8on is 
encouraged, but work must be turned in by 
individuals. 
•  Acknowledge all help received. 
•  Provide references to data and informa8on sources. 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 52


Agenda 
  Welcome and Introduc8on of Teaching Staff 
  Why are we here? 
  What are Systems? 
  What is Systems Engineering? 
  Why do we study Systems Engineering? 
  Course Schedule and Logis8cs 
 

© June 8, 2010 Qi Van Eikema Hommes 53


MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu

ESD.33 Systems Engineering


Summer 2010

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

You might also like