Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2014 - OECD Sample Policy Brief - India Innovation Policy Brief PDF
2014 - OECD Sample Policy Brief - India Innovation Policy Brief PDF
Innovation
ADDRESSING ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHALLENGES THROUGH INNOVATION
India identifies innovation as a priority and has committed to catalysing inclusive development.
Using innovation to upgrade in global value chains (GVCs) requires investment in a range of knowledge-
based assets, from R&D to intellectual property.
Policy action on education, and improving the conditions for entrepreneurship, is critical to spread the
benefits of innovation across Indian society.
What’s the issue? Five-Year Plan (2012-17) seeks to catalyse growth for inclusive
development. A National Innovation Foundation supports
India has identified innovation as a priority. Its national strategy
grassroots innovators, and an Inclusive Innovation Fund (IIF) is
“Decade of Innovations 2010-20” commits to strengthening
expected to mobilise finance to support enterprises developing
science, technology and innovation (STI) capacities, with an
innovative solutions for the “bottom 500 million”.
objective to increase gross expenditure on R&D to 2% of GDP
by 2020. The commitment to innovation is reflected in India’s However, inputs to innovation remain a challenge, not least
recently launched “Make in India” initiative, which aims to low business expenditure on R&D (see Figure). Low school
strengthen manufacturing. At the same time, India’s 12th attainment rates and the poor quality of the education system
Normalised index of performance relative to the median values in the OECD area (Index median = 100)
Top/Bottom 5 OECD values Middle range of OECD values OECD median India
a. Competences and capacity to innovate b. Interactions and skills for innovation
Universities and R&D and innovation Innovative ICT and Internet Networks, clusters Skills for
public research in firms entrepreneurship infrastructures and transfers innovation
200
Top 150
half
OECD
100
Bottom
half 50
OECD
0
Source: Adapted from OECD (2014 forthcoming), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. .
www.oecd.org/policy-briefs
India Policy Brief: Innovation NOVEMBER 2014
hamper the development of human resources for STI. What should policymakers do?
Relative to GDP, India has fewer world-class universities than
other economies such as Brazil, China and South Africa. Boost business expenditure on R&D by improving the
Furthermore, India’s output of patents and trademarks framework conditions for innovation and reducing
is small, and while the presence of the R&D centres of financing gaps for innovative firms (e.g. through
multinational enterprises has accelerated India’s integration public-private provision of seed financing).
in global R&D and innovation systems, it lags Brazil, China Ensure that framework conditions support investment
and Russia in its hosting of top corporate R&D investors. in the full range of knowledge-based assets – from
Meanwhile, barriers to entrepreneurship persist. R&D to skills and organisational processes – in
support of upgrading in GVCs.
Why is this important for India? Strengthen the skills base for innovation, so as
As a global hub of offshore knowledge-intensive IT services to expand the circle of individuals and firms that
and industry, India is a leading example of the economic successfully engage in innovation. This requires not
possibilities innovation can bring. But India’s growth rate has only improvements in school attainment, but also
slowed in recent years and poverty continues to be a major boosting the absorptive capacities of people in the
challenge. Investing in innovation and upgrading to higher workplace, via skills and management development.
value-added activities can boost productivity, create better-
paid jobs and strengthen growth. As such, addressing the
barriers to enhanced innovation performance is essential.
This paper is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and the www.oecd.org/policy-briefs
arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.