Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLED Midterms
CLED Midterms
Christina Gaviola
Therese Lucila
Ivy D. Patdu
The inviolability of marriage as a social institution contemplates a marriage that is freely entered into by a
man and woman who commit themselves to the fulfillment of obligations attendant to a married life. It is a
special contract of permanent union vested with state interest. 1 If any one of the essential requisites of
marriage is absent, or if the marriage is contracted against public policy, the marriage will be considered
null and void from the beginning. The Family Code, in addition, recognizes that a person legally
capacitated to enter marriage may do so but because of psychological reasons will be unable to fulfill his or
her marital obligations. In this latter case, the marriage will also be void by reason of psychological
incapacity. It is important to note that the law itself does not define what constitutes psychological
incapacity. The Family Code Revision Committee intended that the existence of psychological incapacity
be determined on a case-to-case basis.2
In Republic v. Court of Appeals and Molina, the Court laid down guidelines for the interpretation of Article
36 of the Family Code:
1. the burden of proof to show the nullity of the marriage belongs to the plaintiff and any doubt should
be resolved in favor of the existence and continuation of the marriage and against its dissolution and
nullity;
2. the root cause of the psychological incapacity must be medically or clinically identified, alleged in the
complaint, sufficiently proven by experts and clearly explained in the decision;
3. the incapacity must be proven to be existing at the time of the celebration of the marriage;
4. such incapacity must also be shown to be medically or clinically permanent or incurable;
5. such illness must be grave enough to bring about the disability of the party to assume the essential
obligations of marriage;
6. the essential marital obligations must be those embraced by Articles 68 up to 71 of the Family Code as
regards the husband and wife as well as Articles 220, 221 and 225 of the same Code in regard to
parents and their children; and,
7. interpretations given by the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of the Catholic Church in the
Philippines, while not controlling or decisive, should be given great respect by our courts.3
The requirement that the root cause of psychological incapacity be sufficiently proven by experts has been
modified subsequently by a Supreme Court En Banc Resolution which provides that the complete facts
should allege the physical manifestations as are indicative of psychological incapacity but expert opinion
need not be alleged.4
DIRECT EXAMINATION OF PRIMARY WITNESS
This is a case brought against the husband [hereinafter, Carlos] by the wife [hereinafter,
Petitioner] for the nullity of marriage on the ground of psychological incapacity.
1
Family Code of the Philippines, Executive Order No. 209 (1988).
2
Salita v. Hon. Magtolis, 233 SCRA 100 (1994); Santos v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112019, January 4,
1995; Republic v. Court of Appeals and Molina, 268 SCRA 198 (1997).
3
Republic v. CA and Molina, 268 SCRA 198 (1997).
4
Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriage,
Supreme Court En Banc Resolution A.M. 02-11-10-SC, §2 (2003).
1
The Family Code provides:
Article 36. A marriage contracted by any party who, at the time of the celebration, was
psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations of
marriage, shall likewise be void even if such incapacity becomes manifest only after its
solemnization. (As amended by Executive Order 227)
Based on the foregoing discussion, Psychological Incapacity may be shown by proving the
following:
1. Physical manifestations as are indicative of psychological incapacity
2. Juridical Antecedence (existing at the time of the celebration of the marriage)
3. Incurability (Medically or clinically permanent or incurable)
4. Gravity, or must be grave enough to bring about the disability of the party to assume the
essential obligations of marriage
5. Essential marital obligations must be those embraced by Articles 68 up to 71 of the Family
Code as regards the husband and wife as well as Articles 220, 221 and 225 of the same Code
in regard to parents and their children
Petitioner must first establish the fact of marriage, and the property
regime governing the marriage
5
The property regime is important for purposes of determining property rights in case marriage is
dissolved. This direct examination is, however, limited to proving psychological incapacity.
2
b. Callous insensitivity or amusement in the psychological and physical
suffering of others
c. Lack of support, psychological coercion and failure to enjoy meaningful
recreation with petitioner
d. Self-destructive behavior of respondent
II. Incurability and Gravity of manifestations of Psychological Incapacity During the Marriage
including efforts of Petitioner to make marriage work
A. FAILURE TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS TO LOVE AND RESPECT PETITIONER
OR TO OBSERVE FIDELITY
1. Lack of Loving Relationship, including sexual intimacy
a. Abnormal Sexual Relations even prior to celebration of marriage
b. Cruel, Demeaning and Aggressive Behavior towards spouse, family and
others
c. Constant Emotional, Psychological and even Physical Abuse towards
Petitioner
2. Lack of Respect
a. Interpersonally exploitative and haughty behavior without regard to sense of
decency or morality
b. Lack of empathy shown by utter lack of respect towards petitioner and
failure to appreciate the responsibilities required by a committed relationship
3. Infidelity
a. Impulsive and reckless behavior
b. Pattern of lying and cheating
B. FAILURE TO RENDER MUTUAL HELP AND SUPPORT
1. Incapability of responsibly handling finances
2. Callous insensitivity and amusement in psychological and physical suffering of
petitioner or others
3. Lack of physical and emotional support, psychological coercion and failure to
enjoy meaningful recreation with petitioner
4. Self-destructive behavior
* The facts to be established would revolve around proving psychological incapacity based on its
manifestations prior to celebration of marriage, its incurability and gravity in the context of
marital obligations as provided for in the Family Code. The manifestations were group based on
personality traits that are among the diagnostic criteria (DSM-III and IV) used by psychiatrists to
establish personality disorders.6
PHYSICAL MANIFESTATIONS AS ARE INDICATIVE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL
INCAPACITY
I. JURIDICAL ANTECEDENCE
3
b. He preferred, demanded and engaged in what is deemed by petitioner to be abnormal sexual
behaviour
(1) There was lack of intimacy during sexual intercourse, there was no foreplay and Carlos would
drink before and even during intercourse; in fact, he would even ask petitioner to pour alcohol
for him during sex
(2) He preferred receiving oral sex, instead of having intercourse.
(3) He would also make unusual requests like asking petitioner to act like his slave or wear a
maid’s uniform and he would also call her “bitch” or “whore” and demand her to do
everything he wanted, including even more degrading acts.
(4) Carlos found the female sexual organ unappealing; he would refuse to perform cunillingus,
nor touch the female sexual organ
c. Sex life worsened through time, becoming less frequent and Carlos consistently unable to provide
for the intimacy that petitioner needed
d. When already married to Carlos, petitioner said that the sister of Carlos told her a shocking story
of what said sister experienced when she was only 9 years old and Carlos was about 14 years old.
The sister confided to petitioner that before the latter married Carlos, Carlos used to molest said
sister as a child by touching and kissing her sexual organ when he slept beside her. His sister
made petitioner promise not to tell Carlos, but the petitioner could not keep it to herself. She
confronted Carlos but he denied it and accused his sister of trying to ruin their marriage.
2. Cruel, Demeaning and Aggressive Behaviour towards spouse, family and others
a. Carlos easily loses temper especially when he wasdrinking; he would insult the waiters and offend
the waitress at the bars.
b. Carlos often shouted at everyone. He would shout at his mother, curding her often. He especially
did not hesitate to shout at the maids, his employees, and people who “served” him or which he
considered “low class” – waiters, waitresses, sales people, or security guards.
LACK OF RESPECT
1. Interpersonally exploitative and haughty behaviour without regard to sense of decency or morality
a. Carlos would tell petitioner of the parties (nights of carnal pleasures) with friends, who those
friends of his were, and what they did with the prostitutes.
b. Carlos would tell petitioner graphic stories about how he had sex with prostitutes
2. Lack of empathy shown by utter lack of respect towards petitioner and failure to appreciate the
responsibilities required by a committed relationship
a. Carlos seemed to have lewd comments about women. Even before petitioner and Carlos got
married, Carlos would refer to a group of girls and comments on how it would be nice to have sex
with all of them
b. While they were already in a relationship, Carlos would not do anything even if his friends would
tease him about other women in front of petitioner
c. On occasion, Carlos would grab petitioner’s breasts in front of everyone
INFIDELITY
4
a. Out of 100 or so women he had sex with, only three were not prostitutes
b. Carlos would also bring allow a pimp to bring prostitutes to his house; the pimp would bring
about two or three girls for Carlos to choose from, and Carlos would choose pretty girls with a
“more than enough” bust line. Sometimes, he chose two.
c. Carlos also threw frequent parties at home for his friends – both bachelors and married men.
They were invited to his house to enjoy a night of carnal pleasure--Alcohol, food, drugs (only
Marijuana, according to him), and women.
1. Incapable of responsible handling of finances – even prior to marriage, Carlos would already spend too
much; on average, Carlos would spend around P30,000 a month for alcohol.
4. Self-destructive behaviour
a. As mentioned, Carlos had a drinking problem. It was not immediately evident to petitioner
because she was unsure whether Carlos’ drinking rose to the level of a problem and the parents of
Carlos said that he did not really drink that much.
b. Carlos had sexual relationships with prostitutes or call girls and in fact showed a preference for
them even prior to celebration of marriage.
5
A. FAILURE TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS TO LOVE AND RESPECT PETITIONER OR TO
OBSERVE FIDELITY
2. Cruel, Demeaning and Aggressive Behaviour towards spouse, family and others
a. He would lose temper easily and verbally abuse other people, most especially the employees and
help
(1) Carlos had created an environment where shouting became part of his everyday life. Hearing
him shouting at home at the help or at someone over the phone became the norm that
petitioner had to live with throughout their married life. Carlos shouted at everyone: his
mother, sister, brothers, friends, help, employees, the petitioner.
(2) He especially did not seem to make an effort to control his temper when dealing with the
maids, the driver, his grooms, his secretary and to people who he just felt were “no smarter
nor better than dogs” as he put it. He loved to call his maids “stupida”, “tonta”, and “idiota”
and the driver “tanga”, “gago” and “stupido”. Aside from those degrading nicknames, he
often cursed at them saying, “Putang ina mo!” or “Punyeta ka talaga!”.
(3) He would shout at help, mother, sister, brothers or friends: When he lost his temper with
Petitioner, or with his mother, sister, brothers or friends, he cursed in English and Spanish.
His favorites were “Fuck you!”, “Bitch!”, “Coño!”, “Cabron!”, “Hoder!” and “Fuck”-this,
“Fuck”-that!
b. Petitioner witnessed how mother of Carlos treated the help in the same manner. Though her curses
to them were not as graphic, she too called them degrading names, and easily lost her patience
with them. Given the environment that Carlos grew up in and the environment he was now
creating, his disposition only seemed to get worse as time went buy and he would “raise hell” at
the slightest provocation. Eventually, even petitioner began to pick-up on the using of curse
words.
c. During the marriage, the aggressiveness of Carlos became even more evident and have increased
to the point that he would make a scene and act unreasonably. On one occasion, in the lobby of a
hotel, Carlos raised his voice and scolded waitress and mait re d’ because the cashier was taking a
while and couldn’t process the AMEX credit card that Carlos had already given earlier. Petitioner
paid for the bill in cash but she was humiliated and embarrassed when, after following Carlos to
the lobby, that there he still was yelling at the cashier. His voice was echoing all over the lobby
that everyone was looking at him. Finally, after about an hour, hotel security personnel began to
6
approach Carlos and tried talking him into leaving the hotel. Carlos all the more began to yell at
them. Petitioner got scared and the employees began asking her if she was okay. She got even
more embarrassed, and she walked out of the hotel to where car was parked.
d. Carlos, however, became mean and cruel only to those who would not stand up to him. On one
occasion, a security guard in the former Trellis Restaurant in Fort Bonifacio yelled back at Carlos
when he insisted to park in a reserved parking area. When Carlos started saying “Putang ina
naman!” the guard grabbed his gun and yelled at Carlos. Carlos got scared and just drove off.
Carlos did not respect other people. He was over-confident and he believed that most people were
below him. But once one of these people stood up to him, he would be the first to apologize or
back off. He was also a coward.
LACK OF RESPECT
1. Interpersonally exploitative and haughty behaviour without regard to sense of decency or morality
a. Carlos would flirt with other women in front of wife. When he drank, he became worse and really
loses all inhibitions.
b. The constant drinking of Carlos and his refusal to even just try to change has caused much
embarrassment to petitioner and has prevented the couple from enjoying nights out together.
(1) Petitioner would refuse to go out at night with Carlos to a bar or disco because the way he
acted in public when he got drunk was causing the former much shame and humiliation.
(2) Whenever they did go out, the evening mostly ended up with them fighting, or with petitioner
crying.
2. Lack of empathy shown by utter lack of respect towards petitioner and Failure to appreciate the
responsibilities required by a committed relationship
a. Despite all efforts such as trying to monitor Carlos’ “drinking”, diluting his drink, trying to be
cool and tolerant and even by trying to drink herself, Carlos refused to change. He would promise
that he would cut down but never did.
7
(1) On a quiet night at home, Carlos drank 3-4 “doubles” of scotch, regardless of how much he
drank during the day or after work. When his friends were visiting at home, he would drink
about an entire bottle of scotch all to himself or half a bottle of scotch and a couple of beers.
(2) Even when she reasoned with him on how alcohol was running his and their lives by stressing
on health issues and his drunken behavior, Carlos would never promise to fully quit drinking
by justifying that drinking was his only vice.
(3) Eventually, petitioner got tired and stopped pestering Carlos about his drinking.
b. Carlos continued to invite friends to his house to drink even if petitioner objected.
INFIDELITY
8
(1) On one occasion, petitioner tried to use reverse psychology to make Carlos stop drinking,
She tried drinking but because she was not used to drinking too much, she got drunk and
ended up vomiting for the whole night. She asked Carlos to bring her to the hospital but
Carlos only told her to go to sleep.
(2) The following day, petitioner kept on vomiting that she vomited stomach acid and some green
stuff but Carlos still would not take her to the hospital. and up to the next day. Carlos didn’t
help her nor brought her to the hospital.
(3) Petitioner called up her family doctor, Dra. Montalban, who hasn’t heard from me since I was
probably 10 years old, and told her the bitter truth. The doctor prescribed medicine and
advised that if she continued vomiting, tshe should go to the hospital. Fortunately she felt
better after taking the medicine although she still felt sick the rest of the day.
(4) Instead of feeling any concern, Carlos just found the entire incident amusing. He would
remind petitioner that it was a lesson for her to learn from. He even commented on how the
scotch bottle she drank was wasted.
c. Cruelty to Children
(1) On one incident, a couple of 4 year old kids loitered in the backyard of Carlos and petitioner.
At first, petitioner was impressed to see Carlos talking to them but she saw him handing over
the kids a couple of “sili labuyo” and encouraging them to eat the chilies claiming they were
sweet candy. Had petitioner not intervened, one of the kids would have eaten one. Petitioner
scolded Carlos but he only laughed, finding the incident funny.
(2) The incident made petitioner really think thoroughly about Carlos’ capability of being a
father. She has experienced people who have short tempers who expressed it by shouting but
she has never experienced cruelty from anyone in my life the way Carlos made her experience
it whether it may have been directly done to me, or done to others.
(3) Even after trying really hard to make him understand how cruel he could be, he couldn’t
understand and merely insisted that petitioner was over-acting or imagining things.
d. Cruelty to Animals
(1) After a while, petitioner noticed that Carlos began doing weird things to the fan doves she
gave him. He would give them a bath and blow dried their feathers. They did not fly, so he
would take them out of their cage to walk around the lawn.
(2) Even if petitioner warned him and asked him not to do that to the doves especially because of
the hungry cats roaming around, Carlos did not care. The doves eventually got eaten up one
day.
(3) Rather than feeling remorse, Carlos did the same with the second batch of doves petitioner
gave him and they got ravaged too.
4. Self-destructive behavior
9
a. Carlos began showing signs of impulsive and reckless behavior even prior to marriage with
petitioner when he showed signs of a drinking problem. This became even more evident during
the marriage when the problem became worse.
b. He lied about continuing to see prostitutes. In fact, he used his AMEX card and frequented
massage parlors during the marriage while being unwilling or unable to share sexual intimacy with
wife.
c. Eventually, things got worse because Carlos started exhibiting unusual behavior and was
subsequently found to have started using metamphetamine regularly.
(1) A few months into the marriage petitioner I began to notice strange things in the behavior of
Carlos. He became a clean freak taking frequent showers and baths more than once a day
using very hot water. His bathroom time became unreasonable spending up to 4 hours and
merely attributing it to alleged constipation. After a while, he bought all these dental tools for
his teeth.
(2) He would have the maids clean the house until not a speck of dust was left. Sometimes, he
would wake up 4 am and wake up along with the maids to have a general cleaning.
(3) He started having irregular sleeping hours. He would sleep around 4 to 5 am and still wake
up at 7 am to go to work. Sometimes, he didn’t sleep at all, then the following days, he slept
throughout the entire day. According to him, his biological clock shifts because of stress from
work. Sometimes, he would be found working on some computation on his desk.
(4) His temper got worse but mostly directed to the maids and the driver. He fired his driver Juan
who was his drivers for years all because the latter was an El Shaddai fanatic. He would either
fire our maids or they would leave every two weeks to a month until the agency ran out of
maids to send to them already.
(5) Carlos habits became worse and suspicious as time went by. He would always go out at night
for an hour just wearing house clothes. He always claimed to be visiting his horses in Polo
Club but he wouldn’t want to take petitioner along. He played Polo and rode his horses less
and less.
(6) He also started urinating into the pots of petitioner’s plants. So after a while, her plants died.
(7) Carlos also began avoiding social and family functions.
(8) Carlos exhibited paranoid behavior. He would tell stories about people talking bad about
him, or about his enemies whom he couldn’t really name.
d. It was only later that petitioner discovered that Carlos was using shabu. She discovered it while
they were in Cebu to attend the wedding of friends. In the clutch bag of Carlos, he saw his
passport case containing a glass tube, a small alcohol burner, some folded sheets of aluminum
wrap, and small sachets of white tiny rocky crystals. At first, petitioner couldn’t believe that
Carlos would take drugs. She panicked and flushed all the Shabu down the toilet. She woke up
Carlos saying that someone must have planted the drugs in his passport case. Carlos, who was in
drunken stupor, told her to shut up because the Shabu were worth P20,000. The confrontation
ended with Carlos pulling her and slapping her. She eventually found another sachet of shabu and
tried it herself. Carlos got angry when he found out that she took shabu that they left immediately
leaving petitioner no choice. They ended up no longer attending the wedding.
e. Prior to discovering that Carlos was using shabu, petitioner noticed that Conching, one of the
maids, was acting suspiciously but that Carlos eventually dismissed said maid. A woman named
Ellen also started appearing in their home. Carlos told her that she was selling him black market
dollars and he would eventually entertain her in their basement. Carlos later admitted that
Conching used to buy shabu for Carlos and that Ellen was actually his pusher.
f. Upon arriving from Cebu, petitioner and Carlos constantly fought about the shabu. Carlos
claimed that he was merely experimenting with shabu and he swore to that he wasn’t an addict and
therefore would stop. Petitioner told him that if he didn’t stop, she would take it too. Carlos
promised he would stop. However, a few days later, petitioner walked in on Carlos taking his
Shabu again. They got into a violent fight. Carlos admitted that he used shabu occasionally before
he even went out with petitioner but that as time went by, his addiction to it grew. Apparently, the
“high” of his alcohol wasn’t enough anymore. He needed something else. The Shabu allowed him
to drink more than normal and still gave him energy for work. Carlos said that he spent about
P20,000 to 50,000 a month on it.
10
g. Petitioner earnestly asked him to stop but Carlos said that he couldn’t do it immediately.
Petitioner told the mother of Carlos and even tried staying with him in hopes that he would
change. After about two months, Carlos was not doing anything to stop his addiction. On the day
of his birthday, petitioner woke up to Carlos scolding the maids because they did not clean-up all
the flies in the dining area. When Carlos discovered a dead fly in the corner behind one of our
house plants, he grabbed the broom from their maid, Juliet, and gestured to hit her with it while his
other hand grabbed her by her hair at her nape. Petitioner was so shocked. Throughout the entire
day, she kept on seriously thinking about leaving Carlos. That early evening, Carlos made
conplainant get dressed because they were going to go out that night to celebrate his Birthday.
After she got dressed, he commented that he wanted petitioner to wear a headband. When
petitioner refused, he said that he wouldn’t take her with him. Petitioner told him to leave without
her. He pretended to leave her and drove around the Polo Club. When he came back after thirty
minutes, petitioner already packed and she told him that he was leaving him for good. All he did
was laughed and say, “Sure, you always say that but you never do!”, then he left.
h. At around 1:00 am, petitioner left with the maid. She went to the airport while the maid went on to
a relative’s house. By 7 am, petitioner was in Roxas City.
7
The scope of direct examination is limited to the testimony on psychological incapacity and excludes
division of property. The assumption is that the property division has been settled during pre-trial or is
reserved for another hearing date.
11
A: We were married only by civil rites in 1994. We were supposed to get married in church but I
guess our union was not meant to be blessed.
Q: What kind of property regime, if any, did you and respondent agree upon to govern your
marriage?
A: We did not agree on any specific kind of property regime.
Q: You said that you should have known what kind of man he was as early as then. What do you
mean?
A: Even before I married Carlos, I knew that he was different from the “norm” both positively
and negatively. I did not expect those negative traits, though, to get any worse.
Q: Different?
A: From our very first date, he already told me how much he loved to drink. I would say that
Johnny Walker was his bestfriend. Carlos always stacked up on bottles of Johnny Walker Red or
Black. He often also had some bottles of beer in the fridge. Occasionally, he would drink vodka,
gin, etc. But scotch was his favorite amongst all.
12
Q: Would you say that he had a drinking problem?
A: He insisted that he wasn’t an alcoholic like his brother, Mario. But he drank all the time. He
loved to go to bars at night to drink. He would even drink at work, discreetly thanks to his
drinking flask. When he came home, he would drink before, while and after the dinner, and
before bedtime. His friends would often drop by the house for some drinks. I would ask his
friends if Carlos was to be categorized as an alcoholic, since I wasn’t quite sure what an alcoholic
really was. Some would say that he wasn’t, some said that he was a “borderline alcoholic”. His
mother said that she worried often about his drinking, but still did not consider him an alcoholic.
So I thought that he just drank a little too much.
Q: You are saying that he frequently took alcoholic beverages. Is this a problem for you?
A: Many of our fights were caused by his love for the bottle. Carlos even told me that he would
spend around P30 thousand a month, just an alcohol. Also, I hated the way he acted. We even
fought often in public because of something nasty he said or did while he was drunk.
Q: Did he always force you to join him even if you did not want to?
A: 70% of our recreation time together was going out to bars, restaurants, discos, nightclubs and
parties in the evenings. Carlos really seemed to love the “night life”. He brought me with him
almost always, whether or not I was up to it. 30% of the time I could only strongly suspect that
while I was at home waiting for him, or while I was in Polo Club exercising, he was either
drinking away alone or with company.
Q: Based on what you just told us, did you consider, at that time, that his drinking was a serious
problem?
A: I believed that his problem was his attitude. I had no knowledge about the “technicalities”
behind alcoholism. I just blamed this vice of his on the fact that he was spoiled. He loved to
drink, he could afford to drink, therefore, nothing and no one got in the way of him and his bottle.
Because I did not take this vice too seriously, I thought that I would eventually be able to help
him stop or at least cut-down. What I didn’t know was that his alcoholism was just “the tip of the
iceberg”, as I later discovered during our marriage.
Q: My next question is a little bit personal. You talked about his sexual aggressiveness. And
that he did disgusting things when he was drunk. Do you think that his problem is all associated
with alcohol?
13
A: I think that it is more than the alcohol. I really did not at first believe that he had a drinking
problem. For one thing, apart from alcohol, he had such a “dirty” past.
Q: A dirty past?
A: Carlos admitted to me that out of 100 or so women he had sex with, only three, including me,
were not prostitutes. He would even tell me graphic stories about how he had sex with them.
Q: Those things you said are a little bit shocking. Why did you continue seeing him?
A: When I became Carlos girlfriend, he swore to me that he wasn’t seeing any of those girls
anymore, and that he never would again. He would always try to reassure me by saying “the past
is past”.
14
business”. But because I was ignorant and too trusting, I did not see. I was still living in Bel-Air
with my parents but I wanted to stay-over with Carlos that night. So I told my mother that I was
going to sleep over at a friend’s house. Carlos knew early that day that I was going to his house
around at a dinner time. Carlos supposed to be in his family farm in Lipa City that morning till
afternoon. He promised that he would be late cause of the traffic and that he would be coming
home around 9 p.m. By that time, he still wasn’t home. The hours passed, and I started getting
very worried for not only was he not calling me anymore, but my imagination started running
wild already. Kidnapping was all I could think of especially Carlos was using his Mercedes Benz
in a province with only his driver, Juan, as his companion. By 11 p.m., I panicked already and
called up Mario. He also got worried, so he immediately told his mom about my call. Carlos’
mom panicked too. Before long, she and her brothers were with me in Carlos’ house holding
vigil. They even called up Cong. Ralph Recto to look for Carlos in Lipa. We were all so frantic,
so Carlos’ uncles volunteered to go to Lipa to look for Carlos. I had lost track of exact time when
one of Carlos’ uncles and Mario called us to report what they discovered, but I remember it being
not so many hours from the time they left the house, maybe only one and a half hours. I even
remember commenting how fast they could’ve driven there. Apparently, according to Carlos’
uncle, they found Carlos and his driver inside the car parked in their farm asleep in drunkenness
“with gin bottles scattered all over the car floor”.
Q: Before you got married, do you think that he appreciated the importance of fidelity?
A: Though suspicious, most of the time I ended up believing in him. Carlos’ mother would
reassure me that he was loyal to me. According to her, she would hear good comments from her
friends that ever since Carlos started to “see” me, he stopped going out with these “call girls”. His
uncles, would tease Carlos, in my presence, that Carlos can’t “fool-around” because he has a
guard, “bantay” named Rita watching his every move.
15
Q: I know that this is hard for you. So far you’ve told us how Carlos seemed to have a problem
with women and alcohol. Can you tell us some more what he was like as a boyfriend or partner
as far as you can remember?
A: There were many other situations which I experienced with him that showed that he had a
problem, But as with all of them, I forgave him soon after. Carlos would have this remarkable
way of not only saying “sorry”, but also of making me believe that I deserved his treatment In
fact, after a while, I had become accustomed to his cruelty. I never forgot those incidents, though.
Q: Did you consider at that time that his shouting was a sign of a deeper problem?
A: No matter how much I tried to convince him to soften-up to others, he just continued raging
mad at them. Sometime, I would ask his mother why Carlos had such an uncontrollable temper.
According to her, he’s just a little deaf, and is used to the Spanish way of conversing in a very
loud and intimidating tone. The more and more I spent time with his uncles, I did see that
“Spanish way” was really the medium of conversion amongst themselves, but I noticed that
among Carlos’ cousins, he was only one who spoke like his uncles. His defense to that is because
he is the eldest in his generation, therefore considered by his uncles to be amongst them.
Q: I am sorry. Was this a single incident or were there other occasions when you were physically
abused by Carlos?
A: There was another incident which was what I call “Pizza Fight”. One evening Carlos and I
ordered for pizza from Shakey’s. Since I was on a diet at that time I ordered a simple Garlic and
Cheese small Thin Crust pizza. Carlos made me order for him an All-meat large Thin Curst pizza.
We bolth were eating our respective pizzas in my room while watching T.V. Halfway through
my pizza, I went to the bathroom. When I came out, I caught Carlos eating the second to the last
16
slice of my pizza. Apparently, he also ate one slice while I inside the bathroom. I scolded him,
stressing on how inconsiderate he was to eat my small pizza when he still had so many slices of
his. I was sensitive to what he did because there were many incidents when he would eat my diet
food along with his fatty foods, which he wouldn’t compensate me for when he gives me the
budget for the grocery; therefore, me having to eat the fatty foods which he demanded for, so
breaking my diet. Then as I was about to eat my last slice of pizza, I noticed that he earlier put too
much hot sauce on it. I remember saying in a depressed way, “Forget it, you can have this last
slice, I can’t eat it cause it has too much hot sauce”. All of a sudden he just threw the box with his
pizza against the wall causing a disgusting mess.
Q: When your eyes were hurting and your nose was bleeding, what did he do, if any?
A: Carlos refused to take me to the hospital. Instead, he drove away to supposedly visit his horses
in Polo Club. I couldn’t drive myself to the hospital because I could hardly see a thing.
Q: Other than the physical and psychological abuse, did you have any problems during the time
that you were living with Carlos?
A: My sexual relationship with Carlos was unsatisfying to me. Sex for me is very pleasurable,
intimate and a creative way for me to express my love and passion for another person. But our
sex life was not how I would have hoped it to be.
Q: I know that this might make you uncomfortable. But can you tell us why you think that your
sexual relationship was abnormal?
A: Carlos and I had sex on the night of our first date. I should have known from that experience
alone that there was something different about him. He refused to do cunnilingus because he
didn’t like the way the female sexual organ looked in general. As our sexual encounters went on,
I started to notice his other odd fetishes. As for the physical aspect of sex, he avoided even
touching my sexual organs with his own fingers, he preferred receiving oral sex from me rather
than intercourse. He was impatient during kissing and the only “foreplay” he did to me was
“breast-related”. On the psychological aspect of sex, I began to notice some peculiar things.
17
Q: Would you say that he enjoyed this physical aspect of your relationship?
A: As early as about three months in our relationship, I noticed that he did not want to have sex
very frequently with me. I could say that we only had a sex, on the average, once a week during
those three months. As the months went by, our sexual encounters became less and less.
Q: What did you do, if any, to try and resolve the problem?
A: I tried talking to him about it, but he would always make things come out that I am the one not
satisfying him. He would tell me that I should do “different things, like masturbate in front of
him, or give him oral sex more often. He also told me that he didn’t want to undress me, and that
I have to be undress already on the bed before we start. Another request he had was for me to be
on top of him most, if not all of the time. He also wanted me to let him treat me a little bit like a
prostitute in bed, by calling me a “bitch”, “whore”, and demanding me to do everything he
wanted, even more degrading acts. He even joked one time that he wanted me to act like his
slave, and wear a maid’s uniform. I knew he wasn’t joking but trying to give me hints. At first, I
did everything he wanted me to do all for the sake of our sex life, except for dressing like a maid.
Q: If these things uncomfortable, why did you agree with most his requests?
A: Carlos was hardly emotional and affectionate with me, therefore, I felt that sex was the only
way to become intimate with him. I did everything he wanted me to do, but our sexual
relationship even worsened. He not only refused to have sex often, but began feeling gross about
all those peculiar things he demanded of me in bed. So I stopped doing those “strange acts”, and
all the more he ignored my own sexual advances and preferences. My sexual preferences were
quite normal – to “make love” more than just to have sex at least twice a week, to be kissed
longer and experience some foreplay. But I had no weird request that would make me considered
a pervert. I didn’t even demand any more for “hand to sexual organ” contact or cunnilingus. Yet
in spite of all my attempts to try make our sex life more enjoyable for us both equally, it never
improved. In fact, it got worse when we got married.
Q: You told us about the problems you’ve had with Carlos, how he didn’t seem to respect you,
how he drank too much, how he hurt you psychologically and physically. Why did you marry
him?
A: Honestly, because I loved him. I didn’t consider what was happening as a problem until much
later. Carlos always blamed the problems we had on me. And I guess, most of the time, I
believed him.
If only I knew early as then that his promises were all empty and his friends’ and family’s
reassurance were all lies. I wouldn’t have married Carlos. I would have left him immediately. If
only someone cared to tell me the truth, or if only I wasn’t so “blind”to all his problems,, I would
have been spared a whole lot of pain and wasted love. I wasn’t sharp and mature enough to see
the truth, but I should not have trusted everyone, especially Carlos that easily. It’s so painful for
me to find out much later when we were already married. My pain doesn’t only stem from my
wounded pride and trust, but from the fact of knowing that my life could have been different if I
knew the truth earlier.
18
During the weekends, most of the time, we would just go to Polo Club and swim or ride horses. A
few times, we would go to his beach house in Tali or to Calatagan and stay in Punta Baluarte.
Q: You mentioned Carlos’ temper. Did this not change after you got married?
A: The longer I knew Carlos, the more I discovered what a terrible temper he had. Likewise, his
cruelty to others, including to me, would get worse as the days passed by. He would “lose his
top” very easily, and over the pettiest of things. He especially did not seem to make an effort to
control his temper when dealing with the maids, the driver, his grooms, his secretary and to
people who he just felt were “no smarter nor better than dogs” as he put it. He loved to call his
maids “stupida”, “tonta”, and “idiota” and the driver “tanga”, “gago” and “stupido”. Aside from
those degrading nicknames, he often cursed at them saying, “Putang ina mo!” or “Punyeta ka
talaga!”. When he lost his temper with me, or with his mother, sister, brothers or friends, he
cursed us in English and Spanish. His favorites were “Fuck you!”, “Bitch!”, “Coño!”, “Cabron!”,
“Hoder!” and “Fuck”-this, “Fuck”-that!
19
Q: What do you mean?
A: He would shout at security guards when they wouldn’t allow him to have his way. On one
occasion, a security guard in the former Trellis Restaurant in Fort Bonifacio yelled back at Carlos
when he insisted back to park in a reserved parking area. When Carlos started saying “Putang ina
naman!” the guard grabbed his gun and yelled at Carlos, “Anong Sinabi mo?!!” Carlos got scared
and just drove off. Another incident also happened in Hotel Sofitel.
20
Q: And then what happened?
A: When we got home, he just dropped me off and drove off to somewhere his horses were. I
don’t remember how we exactly settled things, but I do remember that this incident made me lose
a lot of respect for him.
Q: Did he only hit you when you were also being physical?
A: About three times, he slapped me without me even rasing a hand at him. But for me, that kind
of physical abuse didn’t hurt as much as the verbal and psychological abuse he inflicted on me.
21
from wholeheartedly trusting him. It was probably a combination of my insecurities,
observations, and simple female intuition.
Q: What happened?
A: I was driving in Makati Ave. when I decided to stop by Wendy’s to buy a snack. When I got
back in the car, it wouldn’t start. I was there for an hour panicking. By standers helped me by
charging my battery. As I was driving towards home, Carlos cut me by Buendia. In the middle of
the road, he scolded me. I pretended that I had absolutely no intentions to spy on him but that I
22
was really hungry. When we got home, after yelling at me a bit, he forgave. He just kept on
stressing how much he hated it when I would drive one of his Mercedes Benz out of the Forbes
area, especially at night since they didn’t have insurance.
Q: Do you think you were just as he called you, just being a “bored paranoid bitch”?
A: Even I could not understand all those sleepless paranoid nights I had for Carlos. In fact, I
would tell Carlos over and over that I swore to leave him the moment I found out he cheated on
me. He just kept on lying to me, reassuring me that he was loyal. So I just prayed that these
“women” only really existed in my nightmares. Unfortunately, or fortunately for me, I should
say, I chanced upon his American Express billings that reflected a lot of charges for a particular
massage parlor. When I confronted him, he admitted to me that he continued to see prostitutes
even while we were already married. The reason why he would sometimes disappear or come late
was he would go to the massage parlor.
Q: Are these copies of the credit card statements that showed charged for the massage parlor?
A: Yes. Although the other statements, I no longer kept.
Q: What did you do if any, to try and improve your sexual relationship?
A: I would try to have sex more than often than but he was either uninterested or impotent.
23
Q: Did you talk to anyone about your problem?
A: Once, with his sister.
Q: What happened?
A: When I told her of our problems, she told me a shocking story. According to her, Carlos used
to molest her as a child by touching and kissing her sexual organ when he slept beside him. She
was about 9 years old while Carlos was about 14 years old. His sister made me promise not to tell
Carlos, but I couldn’t keep it to myself. If this was the reason for our problems, then I thought
maybe we should talk about it.
24
A: I would always try to reason out with him how alcohol was running his and our life by
stressing on health issues and his drunken behavior.
Q: What happened?
A: On one occasion, Carlos was not yet home after midnight from what he claimed was a
business meeting, that I got drunk on his Johnny Walker red. Because there was no other kind of
alcohol at home to drink, I settled for scotch. But because I couldn’t stand the taste and smell of
scotch, I drank it very fast, straight from the bottle. By the time Carlos got home, I was sprawled
on the floor “dead drunk” with an empty JW (large) bottle in hand.
Q: Was there any other incident when Carlos would find suffering amusing?
A: Aside from my own pains, I also felt terrible when I would witness how cruel he was to
others. The more and more I saw him inflict cruelty on others, the more I started to doubt if I
wanted him to be the father of my future children. In fact, on one incident, a couple of 4 year old
kids of our neighbor loitered in our backyard. At first, I was impressed to see Carlos talking to
them.
Q: What happened?
25
A: I saw him handling over the kids a couple of chilies (sili labuyo) and encouraging then to eat
the chilies claiming they were sweet candy. As one of the kids was about to eat one, I rushed over
and tapped his hand. The kid was in shock but was lucky. I brought them back to their yayas who
were nearby.
Q: What other reasons did you have that made you decide to leave him?
A: A few months into our marriage I began to notice strange things Carlos would do. Carlos
started to become a clean freak. He always took very warm showers and baths more than once a
day. I myself couldn’t touch his bath water; it was just too hot! After a while, he bought all these
dental tools for his teeth. Then his bathroom time became unreasonable. He would stay in the
bathroom for more than an hour. Sometimes for even 4 hours.
26
Q: Was he always cruel or unreasonable to the help?
A: A maid that stayed with us for about a year was Conching. I hated her though. I was the one
who accepted her when Carlos and I were just “seeing” each other at around July 1993. But she
had all the loyalty to Carlos and none for me. I admit that she was smart but she was also sly and
ambitious.
27
really name. He wasn’t anti-social when it came to inviting his drinking friends over to our house,
even if I raised hell about it.
28
Q: Did you tell him about what you did?
A: Yes. He freaked out when I told him I took the Shabu. He immediately told me to pack my
things and call the front desk because we were leaving.
Q: What happened?
A: I was stunned. I was sitting at the foot of the dining table watching the entire incident as
though I were watching a violent movie. I went up to Carlos in a very spaced out way and just got
29
the broom from him and gestured to Juliet to go to the kitchen. He calmed down a little and ate
his breakfast. As I sat there and watched him, I kept on asking myself questions like, “What did I
saw in this monster?”, “Why did I marry him?”, “Why didn’t I leave him a long time ago?”, “why
I didn’t see the storm coming?”, and “Why was I still there?”. I went to my room still spaced out,
horrified and yet I remember feeling a certain kind of peace in me. I went shopping that afternoon
for the household, and did some errands. Throughout the entire day, I kept on seriously thinking
about leaving Carlos.
Q: What happened?
A: That early evening when I got home, Carlos made me get dressed because we were going to
go out that night to celebrate his Birthday. After I got dressed, when I went to him in his room, he
commented to me that he wanted me to wear a headband. I refused. He said that he wouldn’t take
me with him. I told him to leave without me. He thought he called my bluff and pretended he left.
He drove to Polo Club for a while.
30