Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Latin American Philosophy. SEP
Latin American Philosophy. SEP
First published Wed Aug 14, 2013; substantive revision Mon Apr 2, 2018
In its most expansive sense, Latin American philosophy is philosophy produced in
Latin America or philosophy produced by persons of Latin American ancestry who
reside outside of Latin America. It is typically taken to exclude philosophy produced
in non-Iberian former colonies, with the occasional exception of former French
colonies in the Caribbean. Other names have also been used to refer to the whole or
part of Latin American philosophy, including Spanish American, Hispanic
American, Iberoamerican, and Latino/a philosophy. The first two refer specifically
to the philosophy of former Spanish colonies, the third to that of former Iberian
colonies, and the fourth to the philosophy produced in the United States by
descendants of Latin Americans.
Latin American philosophy is usually taken to have originated around 1550, when
Spanish conquerors founded the first schools in Latin America and began to teach
and publish philosophical treatises. Recently, there has been an effort on the part of
historians to include pre-Columbian thought in Latin American philosophy,
although the pre-Columbian texts cited are often fragmentary and religious in tone
and intention. In terms of traditions, style, and influence, post-Columbian Latin
American philosophy is part of the Western philosophical tradition. Indeed,
philosophical discussions in Latin America have and continue to be dominated by
European philosophical influences. Even those Latin American philosophers who
have endeavored to develop original theories have frequently framed their own
contributions in the terms of European thinkers. Partly in response to this
phenomenon, there has arisen a large body of literature concerned with the identity,
authenticity, and originality of Latin American philosophy.
Latin American philosophy has been both original and derivative. Much of its
history involves work that is derivative of European philosophical figures and
movements. At the same, time Latin American philosophy has produced important
philosophers, original approaches to old philosophical problems, and formulations
of new problems not already within the European philosophical tradition. Moreover,
virtually all historical European philosophical traditions have been present in Latin
America, as are most contemporary movements in the United States and Europe.
Finally, there has been a significant interest in social concerns among Latin
American philosophers, partly as a reaction to the social and economic
circumstances of Latin America. This has led Latin American philosophical work to
be comparatively more concerned with social issues than philosophy in, for
example, the United States.
The influence of Latin American philosophy outside of Latin America has thus far
been relatively small. Although the situation has been improving, very few Latin
American philosophers are currently read outside of Latin America. This situation is
made worse by the paucity of English-language translations of Latin American
philosophical works. Moreover, internal to Latin America, philosophers read and
respond to each other with less frequency than one might expect or wish. However,
the philosophy of liberation has had some impact both in North America and in
developing countries in Africa, and Latinos/as have participated actively in the
discussion of a variety of topics, especially those having to do with race, ethnicity,
and social identities in the United States. In the past few years, some of these
philosophers have occupied positions of leadership in the philosophical
establishment and their work has been the subject of discussion by prominent non-
Latino/a philosophers.
This article is divided into three main parts: history, the contemporary period, and
problems and topics. We begin with a sketch of the history of Latin American
philosophy.
• 1. History
• 2. The Contemporary Period
o 2.1 Rebellion and the Generation of Founders (1910–1940)
o 2.2 Normalcy and the Generation of 1910 (1940–1960)
o 2.3 Maturity (1960–present)
• 3. Problems and Topics
o 3.1 The Rights of Amerindians
o 3.2 The Identity of the People
o 3.3 Philosophical Anthropology
o 3.4 Latin America’s Philosophical Identity
o 3.5 Feminist Philosophy
• Bibliography
• Academic Tools
• Other Internet Resources
• Related Entries
1. History
The history of Latin American philosophy is usefully divided into five periods: Pre-
Columbian, Colonial, Independentist, Nationalist, and Contemporary (that is, the
twentieth century to the present). Most periods are characterized by the dominance
of a particular tradition: the Pre-Columbian by Amerindian religious cosmologies,
the Colonial by scholasticism, the Independentist by Early Modern philosophy and
Enlightenment thought, and the Nationalist by positivism. However, the
contemporary situation is more complex and varied. For that reason, it is discussed
in a separate and subsequent section, apart from the other historical periods that are
the focus of this section.
There is good evidence that in at least the major pre-Columbian civilizations there
were attempts to explore questions about the nature of reality, the limits of
knowledge, and the basis of right action. Moreover, such work persisted in various
forms for some time after the Conquest (Restrepo 2010; Maffie 2014). Whether this
body of work is rightly characterized as philosophy or something else is a disputed
matter, with scholars disagreeing about how best to characterize it (see Nuccetelli,
2001, ch. 3; Mignolo, 2003). It is clear that the reflective and speculative work of
pre-Columbian Amerindian peoples was undertaken without any familiarity with the
Western philosophical tradition. Those inquiries were also generally undertaken
within the religious frameworks of their places and times and the literary or
presentational modes in which such questions were entertained were typically
removed from traditional forms of European philosophical production.
Despite these differences with European philosophy, and despite the often
fragmentary and frequently second-hand information that survives concerning pre-
Columbian thought, extant works have nevertheless supported a variety of intriguing
and subtle accounts of those philosophical or proto-philosophical reflections.[1] Still,
the conventional view about the pre-Columbian period is that its reflections had little
to no impact on the indisputably philosophical intellectual production in the period
that immediately followed the Conquest.[2]
European-derived philosophy began in Latin America in the sixteenth century.
Among the most notable figures of this period is Bartolomé de Las Casas (1484–
1566), whose work on the rights of conquered Amerindians has had a particularly
important and long-lasting legacy. Scholasticism, introduced by the Spanish and
Portuguese clergy that arrived with the conquistadores, was the dominant
philosophical perspective. Most of the work produced during the first two centuries
in the colonies was cast in the framework used in the Iberian peninsula. It was
particularly indebted to the thought of both sixteenth-century Iberians and their
medieval predecessors. Important figures included Francisco Suárez (1548–1617)
and Francisco de Vitoria (1492–1546), and earlier medieval philosopher-
theologians, such as Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) and John Duns Scotus (1265/6–
1308). Most of these authors were born in the Iberian peninsula, but many of them
had settled in the colonies. Among the most important, apart from Las Casas, are
Alonso de la Vera Cruz (ca. 1504–84), who composed the first fully philosophical
treatises in Latin America, Tomás de Mercado (ca. 1530–1575), and Antonio Rubio
(1548–1615). Some of the works of these authors, such as Rubio’s Logica
mexicana, were known and used in Europe.
Humanism also had some influence, as is clear from the work of Juan de Zumárraga
(ca.1468–1548) and Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (1651–1695), among others. Sor
Juana has the distinction of being the first Latin American thinker to raise questions
concerning the status of women in Latin American society. She is also
retrospectively regarded as the first Latin American feminist writer and philosopher
(see also the section on feminist philosophy, below.)
The eighteenth century, under the influence of modern philosophy and the
Enlightenment, helped prepare the way for the revolutionary wars of independence.
Philosophical discussions of the time were dominated by political thought. Even so,
scholasticism continued to influence the intellectual class and stoked an ongoing
interest in traditional metaphysical questions. Authors such as Juan Benito Díaz de
Gamarra y Dávalos (1745–1783) and Francisco Javier Clavijero (1731–1787), both
from Mexico, were influenced by early modern philosophers such as René Descartes
(1596–1650). However, the wave of independentist thought found its greatest
inspiration in Enlightenment political philosophy. In particular, liberal political
ideals based on the thought of the French philosophes helped to consolidate
independentist views throughout Latin America. Among the significant Latin
American inheritors of that tradition were Simón Bolívar (1783–1830) in Venezuela
and Colombia, Miguel Hidalgo (1753–1811) and José María Morelos (1765–1815)
in Mexico, and much later, José Martí (1854–1895) in Cuba.
In the early 19th century, many Latin American countries secured independence
from European colonial powers. In the wake of independence, the newly liberated
peoples faced the challenge of forming stable, enduring nations out of the remnants
of the Spanish and Portuguese empires. The predominant political concerns of that
era included the organization and consolidation of the new nations, along with
aspirations for social stability, national integration of largely diverse peoples. The
overarching ambition in many nations was to achieve the same economic and social
progress enjoyed by other nations in Europe and North America.
In this context, the ideology of choice was a version of positivism. The positivist
motto, “order and progress,” which graces the Brazilian flag, suggests why
positivism was especially appealing in the context of nation building. Positivism’s
emphasis on both empirical science and pragmatic solutions appeared to provide a
practical foundation for attaining the diverse ends of the new nations. Indeed,
positivism became so influential and widely accepted by intellectuals that it became
the official state philosophy of several nations. It was even used to justify dictatorial
regimes, as in the case of Mexico.
Positivism of the Latin American variety was derived from a peculiar mix of
European ideas primarily originating in the thought of Auguste Comte (1798–1857),
Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919). The period of
positivist hegemony, in which it was the dominant philosophical perspective in
Latin America, extended roughly from the middle of the nineteenth century to the
first decade of the twentieth. Among the most famous positivists were Gabino
Barreda (1818–1881) and Justo Sierra (1848–1912) in Mexico, José Victorino
Lastarria (1817–1888) in Chile, and Domingo Faustino Sarmiento (1811–1888) in
Argentina. Andrés Bello (1781–1865), from both Venezuela and Chile, and Juan
Bautista Alberdi (1810–1884) and Esteban Echevarría (1805–1851), from
Argentina, were transitional figures between independentist liberal thought and
positivism. Later, José Ingenieros (1877–1925), from Argentina, and Enrique José
Varona (1849–1933), from Cuba, prepared the way for the revolt against positivism,
although their thought arose in a positivist context and maintained an alliance with
positivist ideas.
Bibliography
• Abellán, José Luis, 1967, Filosofía Española en América, Madrid: Guadarrama.
• Alchourrón, C.E., P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson, 1985, “On the Logic of Theory
Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions”, Journal of Symbolic
Logic, 50: 510-530.
• Alcoff, Linda, 2000, “Power/Knowledges in the Colonial Unconscious: A Dialogue
Between Dussel and Foucault”, in Thinking From the Underside of History: Enrique
Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation, edited by Linda Alcoff, and Eduardo Mendieta,
249–67. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• –––, 2006, Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self, New York: Oxford
University Press.
• Alcoff, Linda, and Eduardo Mendieta (eds.), 2000, Thinking from the Underside of
History: Enrique Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation, Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers.
• Berndston, C.A.E. (ed.), 1949, Readings in Latin American Philosophy, Columbia,
MO: University of Missouri Press.
• Bonfil Batalla, Guillermo, 1996, México Profundo: Reclaiming a Civilization, Philip
Adams Dennis (trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Canteñs, Bernardo J., 2010, “The Rights of the American Indians”, in Nuccetelli,
Schutte, and Bueno (eds.) 2010, pp. 23–35.
• Cerutti Guldberg, Horacio, 1983, Filosofía de la liberación latinoamericana,
Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Crawford, William Rex, 1944, A Century of Latin American Thought, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
• da Costa, Newton C.A. and Otávio Bueno, 2010, “Paraconsistent Logic”, in
Nuccetelli, Schutte & Bueno (eds.) 2010, pp. 217–229.
• Dussel, Enrique D., 1995, The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other”
and the Myth of Modernity, New York: Continuum.
• Femenías, María Luisa and Amy Oliver, 2007, Feminist Philosophy in Latin
America and Spain, New York, NY: Rodopi.
• Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl, 2009, Mujer y filosofía en el pensamiento iberoamericano:
Momentos de una relación difícil. Barcelona: Anthropos.
• Frondizi, Risieri, 1948–49, “Is There an Ibero–American Philosophy?” Philosophy
and Phenomenological Research 9:345–55.
• Gracia, Jorge J. E., 2000, Hispanic/Latino Identity: A Philosophical Perspective,
Oxford: Blackwell.
• –––, 2008, Latinos in America: Philosophy and Social Identity, Malden, MA:
Blackwell.
• Gracia, Jorge J. E. (ed.), 1986, Latin American Philosophy in the Twentieth Century,
Buffalo: Prometheus.
• ––– (ed.), 1988–89, Latin American Philosophy Today. A Special Double Issue
of The Philosophical Forum, XX (1–2).
• ––– (ed.), 2007, Race or Ethnicity? On Black and Latino Identity, Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
• ––– (ed.), 2011, Forging People: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in Hispanic
American and Latino/a Thought, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
• Gracia, Jorge J. E., Eduardo Rabossi, Enrique Villanueva, and Marcelo Dascal
(eds.), 1984, Philosophical Analysis in Latin America, Dordrecht: Reidel. Abridged
version of El análisis filosófico en América Latina, Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura
Económica, 1985.
• Gracia, Jorge J. E., and Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert (eds.), 2004, Latin American
Philosophy for the 21st Century: The Human Condition, Values, and the Search for
Identity, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
• Gracia, Jorge J. E. and Iván Jaksić (eds.), 1988, Filosofía e identidad cultural en
América Latina, Caracas: Monte Avila Editores.
• Gracia, Jorge. J. E and Mireya Camurati (eds.), 1989, Philosophy and Literature in
Latin America: A Critical Assessment of the Current Situation, Albany, NY: State
University of New York Press.
• Hierro, Graciela, 1985, Etica y feminismo, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México.
• –––, 2001, La ética del placer, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México.
• Jacobini, H. B., 1954, A Study of the Philosophy of International Law as Seen in the
Works of Latin American Writers, The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Kunz, Joseph L., 1950, Latin American Philosophy of Law in the Twentieth Century,
New York: Inter American Law Institute, NYU School of Law.
• Lassalle, Edmundo, 1941, Philosophic Thought in Latin America: A Partial
Bibliography, Washington, DC: Pan American Union Division of Intellectual
Cooperation.
• León Portilla, Miguel, 1963, Aztec Thought and Culture: A Study of the Ancient
Nahuatl Mind, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
• Liebman, Seymour, 1976, Exploring the Latin American Mind, Chicago, IL: Nelson
Hall.
• Maffie, James, 2014, Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion,
Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado.
• Mariátegui, José Carlos, 1971, Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality,
Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Márquez, Ivan (ed.), 2008, Contemporary Latin American Social and Political
Thought: An Anthology, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Mendieta, Eduardo, 1999, “Is There Latin American Philosophy?” Philosophy
Today, 43 (Supplement): 50–61.
• ––– (ed.), 2003, Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, and Debates,
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Mignolo, Walter, 2003, “Philosophy and the Colonial Difference”, in Latin
American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates, edited by Eduardo Mendieta, 80–
86. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Nuccetelli, Susana, 2001, Latin American Thought: Philosophical Problems and
Arguments, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• –––, 2003, “Is ‘Latin American Thought’ Philosophy?” Metaphilosophy, 34(4):
524–36.
• Nuccetelli Susana, Ofelia Schutte, and Otávio Bueno (eds.), 2010, A Companion to
Latin American Philosophy, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Nuccetelli, Susana, and Gary Seay (eds.), 2003, Latin American Philosophy and
Introduction with Readings, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Oliver, Amy, 2007, “Latin American Feminist Philosophy: Early Twentieth-Century
Uruguay”, in Feminist Philosophy in Latin America and Spain, edited by María
Luisa Femenías and Amy Oliver, 31–42. New York: Rodopi.
• Recaséns Siches, Luis, et al., 1948, Latin American Legal Philosophy (20th Century
Legal Philosophy Series: Volume 3), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Redmond, Walter Bernard, 1972, Bibliography of the Philosophy in the Iberian
Colonies of America, The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
• Restrepo, Luis Fernando, 2010, “Colonial Thought”, in Nuccetelli, Schutte, and
Bueno (eds.) 2010, pp. 42–45.
• Salles, Arlene and Elizabeth Millán (eds.), 2005, The Role of History in Latin
American Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Sánchez, Carlos, 2013, The Suspension of Seriousness: On the Phenomenology of
Jorge Portilla, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• –––, 2016, Contingency and Commitment: Mexican Existentialism and the Place of
Philosophy, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Sánchez, Carlos, and Robert Sanchez (eds.), 2017, Mexican Philosophy in the 20th
Century: Essential Readings, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Sánchez Reulet, Aníbal (ed.), 1954, Contemporary Latin American Philosophy: A
Selection with Introduction and Notes, Willard R. Trask (trans.), Albuquerque, NM:
University of New Mexico Press.
• Schutte, Ofelia, 1993, Cultural Identity and Social Liberation in Latin American
Thought, Albany, NY: State University of New YorkPress.
• –––, 2011, “Engaging Latin American Feminisms Today: Methods, Theory,
Practice”, Hypatia, 26(4): 783–803.
• Schutte, Ofelia, and María Luisa. Femenías, 2010, “Feminist Philosophy”, in
Nuccetelli, Schutte, and Bueno, pp. 343–56.
• Vallega, Alejandro, 2014, Latin American Philosophy From Identity to Radical
Exteriority, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Vargas, Manuel, 2004, “Biología y la filosofía de la raza en México: Bulnes y
Vasconcelos”, in Construcción de las identidades latinoamericanas: Ensayos de
historia intelectual, edited by Aimer Granados, and Carlos Marichal. Mexico City:
Colegio de México.
• –––, 2005, “Eurocentrism and the Philosophy of Liberation”, APA Newsletter on
Hispanic/Latino Issues, 4(2): 8–17.
• –––, 2007, “Real Philosophy, Metaphilosophy, and Metametaphilosophy”, CR: The
New Centennial Review, 7(3): 51–78.
• Vasconcelos, José, 1997, The Cosmic Race: A Bilingual Edition, Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Vasconcelos, José, and Manuel Gamio, 1926, Aspects of Mexican Civilization,
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
• von Vacano, Diego A., 2012, The Color of Citizenship: Race, Modernity and Latin
American/Hispanic Political Thought, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Zea, Leopoldo, 1963, The Latin American Mind, Norman, OK: University of
Oklahoma Press.
• –––, 1988–89, “Identity: A Latin American Philosophical Problem”, The
Philosophical Forum, XX (1–2): 33–42.
Academic Tools
How to cite this entry.
Preview the PDF version of this entry at the Friends of the SEP Society.
Look up this entry topic at the Internet Philosophy Ontology Project (InPhO).
Enhanced bibliography for this entry at PhilPapers, with links to its database.
Related Entries
Chile: philosophy in | Comte, Auguste | Enlightenment | Latin American Philosophy:
metaphilosophical foundations | liberalism: in Latin America | Marxism,
analytical | Mexico: philosophy in | Ortega y Gasset,
José | phenomenology | philosophy of science: in Latin America | race | skepticism:
in Latin America
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the thoughtful advice of an anonymous
reviewer, and feedback from Liam Kofi Bright.
Copyright © 2018 by
Jorge Gracia <gracia@acsu.buffalo.edu>
Manuel Vargas <mrvargas@ucsd.edu>