Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Obj To Report of No Distribution (Original As Filed)
Obj To Report of No Distribution (Original As Filed)
“Plaintiff”) as lawful assignee of Mobile Transport, Inc., TAT Logistics, Inc., Land Air Express,
Inc. and Forward Air, Inc., by and through Counsel Gavrilov & Brooks, and for its Objection to
1. On June 24, 2020, Trustee Alan S. Fukushima concluded Debtor KLS Air Express, Inc.’s
341 Meeting.
1
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
3. TRM, for and on behalf of its Assignors, objects to Trustee Fukushima’s Report of No
Distribution on the basis that Trustee Fukushima has failed to investigate the financial
5. TRM is the lawful assignee of Mobile Air Transport, Inc., TAT Logistics, Inc., Land Air
6. Mobile Air Transport, Inc., a New York corporation, is a federally licensed motor carrier
authority issued to it by the FMCSA whose principal place of business is 3601 Chicago
8. Land Air Express, Inc., a Kentucky corporation, is a federally licensed motor carrier
9. Forward Air, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, is a federally licensed property broker whose
37745.
10. KLS Air Express, Inc. was, at all times here relevant, a California corporation.
11. Defendant Lielanie Olive Steers was, at all times here relevant, the Chief Executive
12. Defendant Kenneth Steers was, at all times here relevant, the Secretary of KLS Air
Express, Inc.
2
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
13. Lielanie Steers and Kenneth Steers have filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in the Eastern
14. Amerisource Funding, Inc. is a commercial factor who factored KLS Air Express’
15. Debtor KLS’ schedules reflect that Amerisource is a secured creditor in the amount of
16. Debtor KLS’ schedules reflect outstanding receivables in the amount of $1,610,131.01
owed by various shipper and consignee customers. (See Schedule A/B Part 3, ¶10 and
¶11.)
17. At all times here relevant, without a property broker’s license and bond as required by
federal statute, KLS Air Express acted as a broker arranging for the transportation for
18. KLS contracted with Mobile Air for transportation services which were performed and
19. KLS contracted with TAT Logistics for transportation services which were performed
20. KLS contracted with Land Air Express for transportation services which were performed
21. KLS contracted with Forward Air for transportation services which were performed and
3
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
22. KLS Air Express misrepresented itself as a licensed broker to TRM’s Assignors and
other similarly situated transportation entities in violation of the Moving Ahead for
24. KLS was neither registered in compliance with 49 U.S.C. 13904 nor had they satisfied
25. At all times here relevant, KLS Air was operating as a property broker without a license.
See Appendix B.
26. If Debtor KLS Air was properly licensed, which it was not, KLS would be bound by the
federal statutes and regulations that apply to brokers under 49 U.S.C. 13904, 49 C.F.R.
27. If KLS Air was properly licensed as as property broker, which is was not, it would be
connection with each shipment or activity and the amount of freight charges collected by
the broker and the date the payment was made to the carrier. See 49 C.F.R. 371.3.
28. The general practice and custom in the motor freight industry regarding property broker
service dictates that if the property broker, in this case KLS Air Express, receives monies
from its shipper and consignee customers, it assumes the obligations of said shippers and
1
Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405.
4
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
consignees and must remit all freight charges to the underlying carriers, exclusive of any
commission fees due to the property broker for broker services performed. See 49 C.F.R.
§371.10.
29. TRM’s Assignors transported freight from various locations to various destinations for
30. Under the terms of the agreements between KLS Air Express and TRM’s Assignors, as
well as to common freight industry custom and practice, KLS Air Express was entrusted
to collect all freight charges owed for the transportation of freight transported by motor
carriers from shippers and after deducting any agreed upon commission due to KLS Air,
KLS Air Express was required by federal statute to pay Mobile Air Transport, TAT
Logistics, Inc., Land Air Express, Inc., and Forward Air, Inc.’s freight charges.
31. KLS Air Express was entrusted to have acted as the conduit, collecting monies from
shippers and/or consignees and to forward such monies to its intended recipients, Mobile
Air Transport, TAT Logistics, Inc., Land Air Express, Inc. and Forward Air, Inc.
32. All of TRM’s Assignors have performed all their required obligations and performed all
services.
33. The underlying motor carriers provided transportation services resulting in freight
charges in the amount of $1,042,329.50, to the extent said amounts have already been
collected by KLS Air Express from various shippers and consignees for whom motor
carriers provided transportation services those monies are not the property of the Estate.
5
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
34. Defendant KLS Air Express and Amerisource Funding do not hold any equitable interest
in the freight charges due and owing to Mobile Air Transport, TAT Logistics, Inc., Land
35. The freight charges are not property of KLS Air Express and Amerisource Funding, but
rather represent a res trust held by KLS Air Express and Amerisource Funding for the
36. The underlying motor carriers also provided transportation services resulting in freight
charges, which upon information and belief, have not been remitted to KLS Air Express
from shippers and consignees as set forth in KLS Air Express’ Schedules.
37. The outstanding freight charges give rise to certain stated accounts receivables as set
forth on KLS’ books and records and held in title only by KLS Air Express and/or
38. KLS Air Express/Amerisource Funding do not hold any equitable interest in the accounts
39. The accounts receivable and the underlying freight charges are not the property of KLS
Air Express and/or Amerisource Funding, but rather represent the res trust created and
proposed by federal law, as well as freight industry custom and practice and held by KLS
Air Express and Amerisource Funding for the benefit of the underlying motor carriers.
40. No trust instrument is or was required to create the aforesaid trust comprising the freight
6
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
(c) Trust Fund Comprised of Freight Charges Received by KLS Air Express and/or
the Steers and Transferred to Amerisource Funding, Inc.
41. The underlying TRM Assignors are the equitable owners of the trust res comprising the
freight charges.
42. To the extent that KLS Air Express and/or the Steers granted any security interest in the
accounts receivable, it was done with the knowledge of the holder of any security
interest, including Amerisource Funding, Inc., that KLS Air Express and the Steers held
no equitable interest in the accounts receivable and that the accounts receivable could
constitute the res trust held for the benefit of third parties, including without limitation,
Mobile Air Transport, TAT Logistics, Inc., Land Air Express, Inc. and Forward Air, Inc.
43. The outstanding freight charges do not represent an extension of credit of any kind to
44. Depriving TRM’s Assignors of their equitable interest in the aforesaid res trust will
45. The Ninth Circuit has held that shippers and consignees remain primarily liable to the
motor carrier for freight charges even in situations where the broker had a contract with
the underlying motor carrier, provided the motor carrier and not release the shipper
consignee from liability. See Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.,
46. The Ninth Circuit has found that the bill of lading is the basic transportation contract
between the shipper/consignor and the carrier. Its terms and conditions bind the shipper
and all connecting carriers. See Oak Harbor at 954 citing Southern Pacific Trans Co. v.
Commercial Metals, 456 U.S. 336, 342, 102 S.Ct. 1815, 72 L.Ed. 2nd 114 (1982)
(involving common carrier by rail); See Car Transportation Brokerage Co. v. Darden
7
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
Restaurants, 213 F. 3d 474, 478, 479 (9th Cir. 2000) (applying bill of lading contract
carriers where the parties adopted the terms of the Uniform Bill of Lading).
47. Amerisource Funding does not have any greater rights to the accounts receivable than
does its assignor KLS Air Express. See Minsa Corporation v. Almac System Transport,
Inc. et. al, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90840 (N.D. Tex 2011). Federal case law and federal
regulations provide that carriers be paid by the consignor or consignee if a third party
fails to meet its obligations to pay the carrier. See Id *17 citing Bestway v. Gulf Forge
Co., 100 F. 3d 31, 34 (5th Cir. 1996); Excel Transp. Serves. Inc. v. CSX Lines LLC, 280 F.
Supp. 2d 617, 619 (S.D. Tex. 2003)(regardless of lack of privity with carrier because of
intermediary independent contractor, carrier was still entitled to payment from consignor
because “[t]he bedrock rule of carriage is that, absent malfeasance, the carrier gets
paid.”).
48. Since TRM’s Assignors have an independent right and cause of action to Debtor KLS Air
Express accounts receivables and those receivables are not the property of the Debtor or
receivables. See In Re: Worldpoint Logistics, Inc., Debtor, Covenant Transport, Inc. et al.
Plaintiffs v. Deutsche Financial Services Corporation et al., 2003 WL 23162358 (Bkrtcy. W.D.
Wash. 2003).
49. KLS, in its Statement of Financial Affairs, transferred $103,923.90 to Lielanie Steers and/or
Kenneth Steers, as insiders of KLS Air Express, without explanation of such transfer. TRM
contends that Trustee Fukushima did not investigate these transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
704(a)(4) when he had an obligation and duty to do so. See Statement of Financial Affairs (Part 2,
¶¶4.2-4.11).
8
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
50. This case is so entangled with Lielanie Steers’ and Kenneth Steers’ bankruptcy case that
Air Transport, TAT Logistics, Inc., Land Air Express, Inc. and Forward Air, Inc., respectfully
requests that this Court (1) sustain its Objection to Trustee Alan S. Fukushima’s Report of No
Distribution; (2) require Trustee to further investigate the financial affairs or the Debtor; (3)
order that TRM’s Assignors be allowed to trace all accounts receivables for monies due and
owing; (4) that this case be consolidated with the Lielanie Steers and Kenneth Steers Case No.
2:2019-bk-27507; and (5) for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
proper.
Respectfully submitted,
9
Filed 07/06/20 Case 20-21616 Doc 22
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the ___ day of July, 2020, a true and correct copy of this
document was electronically served via CM/ECF to all parties entitled to such notice, and to all
others in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
10