Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creative 2006 15 171 175
Creative 2006 15 171 175
A BSTRACT. In this paper we give some identities which are obtained by using the integral repre-
sentation for some well known means.
1. I NTRODUCTION
Let a, b be two positive numbers such that 0 < a < b. The arithmetic mean
1
of a and b is defined by A(a, b) = a+b 2 , the geometric mean G(a, b) = (ab) , the
2
b 1
2ab 1 b
harmonic mean H(a, b) = a+b , the identric mean I(a, b) = e · ( aa ) b−a , and the
logarithmic mean L(a, b) = ln b−a
b−ln a . We also use the power mean of order t for
t t 1t
the numbers a and b, that is At (a, b) = a +b 2 , for t > 0. These means are also
defined in [3] with some properties. We use the integral representations of some of
the means.
Z b
1
ln I(a, b) = ln xdx, (1)
b−a a
Z b
1 1 1
= dx, (2)
L(a, b) b−a a x
Z b
1
A(a, b) = xdx, (3)
b−a a
Z b
1 1 1
2
= dx, (4)
G(a, b) b−a a x2
! 1t
Z b
t 2t−1
At (a, b) = x dx , t > 0. (5)
b − at
t
a
Rb Rc Rb
Using the property of additivity to the interval for the integral, i.e. a = a + c ,
for a < c < b, (and c properly chosen) in (1) − (5), we obtain some identities for
means of two variables.
171
172 Zdravko F. Starc and Ovidiu Bagdasar
2. M AIN RESULTS
In this section we obtain some identities that are connecting the means pre-
sented above. The first theorem gives a relation between the geometrical and the
identric mean of two positive numbers.
Theorem 2.1. Consider the positive numbers a, b such that 0 < a < b. With the defi-
nitions mentioned above for the identric and for the logarithmic means, the next identity
holds:
√ Z √ab √ Z
1 ab − a 1 b − ab b
ln I(a, b) = ·√ ln xdx + · √ ln xdx,
b−a ab − a a b − a b − ab √ab
so √ √
ab − a √ b − ab √
ln I(a, b) = · ln I(a, ab) + · ln I( ab, b).
b−a b−a
This implies
√ √ √ √
(b − a) ln I(a, b) = ( ab − a) ln I(a, ab) + (b − ab) ln I(b − ab).
Finally this leads to
√ √ √ √
I(a, b)b−a = I(a, ab) ab−a · I( ab, b)b− ab
The following theorem gives a relation between the geometrical, arithmetical
and the identric mean of two positive numbers.
Theorem 2.2. Consider the positive numbers a, b such that 0 < a < b. Then with the
notations mentioned above, we have that the next identity holds:
I(a, b) = G (I(a, A(a, b)), I(A(a, b), b)) . (7)
a+b
Proof. From a < < b and (1) we obtain
2
a+b Z a+b
b − a+b
Z b Z b
1 2 −a 1 1
2
2
ln xdx = · a+b ln xdx + · ln xdx,
b−a a b−a 2 −a a
b−a b − a+b
2
a+b
2
so we have
a+b a+b a+b a+b
(b − a) ln I(a, b) = − a ln I a, + b− ln I ,b ,
2 2 2 2
which implies
b−a b−a
b−a a+b 2 a+b 2
I (a, b) = I a, ·I ,b .
2 2
On some identities for means in two variables 173
The proof follows easily by the induction and it is let to the reader as an exercise.
The following theorem gives a relation between the logarithmic, harmonic and the
arithmetical mean of two positive numbers.
Theorem 2.3. Considering the positive numbers a, b such that 0 < a < b, the next
identity holds:
Theorem 2.4. Consider the positive numbers a, b such that 0 < a < b. Then the next
identity holds:
G2 (a, b) = H −1 G2 (a, A(a, b)), G2 (A(a, b), b) .
(9)
The notations are the ones of the previous theorem.
a+b
Proof. From a < 2 < b and (4) we obtain
a+b Z a+b
b − a+b
Z b Z b
1 1 2 −a 1 1 1 1
2
2
dx = · a+b dx + · a+b
dx,
b − a a x2 b−a 2 −a a
x 2 b−a b− 2 a+b x2
2
The following theorem gives a kind of iteration for the power mean of a, b and
power t > 0.
Theorem 2.5. Consider the positive numbers a, b such that 0 < a < b. Then the next
identity holds:
At (a, b) = At (At (a, At (a, b)), At (At (a, b), b)) . (10)
Remark 2.1. For t = 1 we get A1 (a, b) = A(a, b). For t = 2 we get A2 (a, b) =
2 2 12
a +b
2 which is named the quadratic mean, another well known mean. It is well
known that for fixed positive numbers a, b and real t, the function t 7−→ At (a, b) is
increasing, with equality if an only if a = b ( see [1] or [2]).
Proof. Because a < At (a, b) < b and the relation (5), we obtain:
Z b
t
[At (a, b)]t = x2t−1 dx
b − at
t
a
At (a,b)
[At (a, b)]t − at
Z
t
= · x2t−1 dx+
bt − at [At (a, b)]t − at a
b
bt − [At (a, b)]t
Z
t
+ t t
· t x2t−1 dx.
b −a b − [At (a, b)]t At (a,b)
But this gives that
1
[At (a, b)]t = · At (a, At (a, b))t + At (At (a, b), b)t .
2
By the definition of At (a, b) if follows easily that
At (a, b) = At At (a, At (a, b)), At (A( a, b), b) .
This ends the proof.
On some identities for means in two variables 175
R EFERENCES
[1] Drâmbe M. O., Inequalities-ideas and methods, Editura Gil, Zalǎu, 2003 (in Romanian)
Z DRAVKO F. S TARC
Z ARKA Z REJANINA 93
26300 V RSAC
S ERBIA AND M ONTENEGRO
E-mail address: zdravkostarc@yahoo.com
O VIDIU B AGDASAR
C IUCAŞ , BL .12, AP.5
505800 Z ÂRNEŞTI
R OMANIA
E-mail address: bagdasar o@yahoo.com