Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Identification Form (Pif)
Project Identification Form (Pif)
A. PROJECT FRAMEWORK
Project Objective: Enhanced protection and conservation of biodiversity (BD) in the Amboro-Madidi Corridor through sustainable forest management
(SFM) practices enabled by fostering markets for certified forest products and increased local incomes
Indicate Indicative Indicative
whether GEF Co- Total ($)
Project Investme c=a+b
Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs Financing a
Financing a
Components nt, TA,
or STAb ($) a % ($) b %
1
Project ID number will be assigned by GEFSEC.
2
Select only those focal areas from which GEF financing is requested.
3. Economic TA - 30% increase (90,000 m3 over - Local forestry operations garner 1,660,000 41 2,400,000 59 4,060,000
incentives are in an assumed baseline of 270,000 increased incomes through certified
place to attract and m3†) of certified or verified forestry
keep community wood sold in natl. and intl. - Producers achieve lower
forestry operations markets production costs, higher production
committed to quality, improved marketing skills
sustainable forestry - Increase in local forestry and access to preferred markets
and BD management operation competitiveness in the
practices marketplace as a result of - Increase in demand for certified
certified forestry and enhanced wood products among national and
business skills, enabling greater international buyers
BD management practices -Increase in demand and supply
chain capacity to process and trade
- 10 new alliances established in certified wood
between producers and national
- Implementation of a mechanism to
or international buyers with
channel resources from the National
procurement commitments
Forest Fund (FONABOSQUE) and
other sources towards BD friendly
- 10 new chain-of-custody
forest management and certification
certifications (baseline of 28 as
of 31 Dec 08)
B. INDICATIVE CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT BY SOURCE and by NAME (in parenthesis) if available, ($)
Sources of Co-financing Type of Co- Project
financing
Project Government Contribution In Kind 500,000
FONABOSQUE Cash 1,000,000
Bilateral Aid Agency(ies) Cash and In Kind 6,000,000
(Sweden, the Netherlands)
Multilateral Agency(ies) Cash and In Kind 3,000,000
(European Union)
Total Co-financing 10,500,000
Biosphere Reserve. Rainforest Alliance: New York. (ii) Bray, D.B., Durán, E., Ramos, V.H., Mas, J.F., Velázquez, A., McNab, R.B., Barry, D. and J. Radachowsky. In
press. Tropical deforestation, community forests and protected areas in the Maya Forest. Ecology and Society. (iii) Duran, E., J. F. Mas, and A. Velazquez. Land
use/cover change in community-based forest management regions and protected areas in Mexico. In: The community forests of Mexico: Managing for sustainable
landscapes, ed. D. B. Bray, L. Merino-Perez, and D. Barry, 215-238. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7
The forest sector represents only 3% of Bolivia’s GDP but accounts for 11% of foreign exports; about 50% of forest production is export-oriented. In 2002 forest
product exports were valued at USD 68 million. A total of 45 species were exported, mainly to the US (42.6 million) and UK (15.6 million). This heavy dependence on
exports to Northern markets has contributed to the growth of certification in Bolivia.
8
The new constitution, approved in January 2009, states that “indigenous and farmer communities living in forest areas are the owners of the resources and responsible
for their sound use.” As such, community rights in forestry planning, management and benefit sharing have been given new legal affirmation.
9
Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, http://www.planificacion.gov.bo/BANNER/PARA%20PAG%20WEB/pdf/5-3-4.pdf
10
Plan Nacional para el Manejo Integral del Bosque, Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural, Agropecuario y Medio-Ambiente, Viceministerio de Biodiversidad, Recursos
Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Bolivia, Mayo del 2008.
17. In the absence of a GEF intervention, community forests in the AMC will continue to be deforested and degraded
due to lack of management planning and sustainable operations, resulting in significant BD losses and a further
fragmentation of the forest landscape. The premise of this project – based on demonstrated results in other countries in the
region – is that this baseline scenario can be avoided by unleashing green market-based forces through a series of targeted
barrier removal activities. The alternative approach proposed herein would generate significant global benefits in BD-
important forest in the AMC, creating enabling conditions and demonstrating ways to reap a sustainable flow of economic
and environmental benefits from the production of certified forest products. The systemic, institutional capacities needed
to replicate good practices on a large scale will be developed in the process. Conformity to a third-party standard such as
the FSC, which has specific BD criteria, provides the most expedient means to conserve biodiversity over the large area
covered by the community forest estates. The strategy is thus to change the relative price of conservation compatible land
use (i.e. FSC certified BD-friendly forest resource harvests) vis-à-vis contra-conservation land uses (i.e. conversion to
agriculture or pasture). GEF support to FSC certification of community forest is incremental and fundamental to BD
conservation because certification: (i) reduces the likelihood of land conversion as it increases the economic viability of
the forests through improved yield, diversified income, access to markets and on occasion premiums; (ii) promotes better
governance standards which increase group management, reducing individual propensity to sell or permit private land
conversion; (iii) creates increased transparency in forest management, reducing illegal logging; (iv) enforces standards on
forest fire prevention and control, reducing deforestation and degradation, and; (v) requires specific interventions
fundamental to BD conservation, including mimicking natural forest stand dynamics, creating set-a-sides, and taking
action to protected species of concern. The end result of the project will be conservation of community forests in the AMC
that are critical for BD through SFM and BD management practices enabled by market-based instruments.
G. Indicate risks, including climate change risks, that might prevent the project objective(s) from being
achieved, and if possible including risk measures that will be taken:
Risks Level Measures
Institutional instability, High The project, alone, will not eliminate institutional instability and regional tensions. Nevertheless, by
mobility in public focusing most of its activities at the local level, which is in charge of the direct management of forest
positions, regional tensions resources – and primarily responsible for most of the threats to BD – the project will strengthen the
capacities of local communities and their partners at the local level to manage, organize, trade and
control forest resources in a sustainable manner. This, in turn, will contribute to improving local-level
stability and environmental governance by shifting from short-term exploitation to long-term
management of forest resources. The generation of replicable models will catalyze similar actions on
a regional and national scale. Due to institutional instability and political conflict, the project is high
risk. However it has great potential as a high-reward project, particularly given the large area of
Bolivia’s forest managed by communities and the chances for replication.
Local populations resist High A strong process of land use change is underway in the AMC, as locals convert forest for other uses
national policy and forest in order to achieve livelihood benefits. The project will reduce the prevalence of this trend by
laws demonstrating to all players along the supply chain the broad socio-economic benefits resulting from
certified SFM and BD conservation, using a market-driven approach, improving competitiveness and
investment and creating strong market incentives.
Climate change Medium Climate scenarios for Bolivia predict modifications in rainfall patterns that will likely exacerbate the
risk of droughts and flooding in both the highlands and lowlands. Certified SFM will result in
healthier, more productive forests that are more resilient to climate fluctuations by maintaining a
higher level of age-class diversity and BD in general, regeneration vigor, intact forest cover to protect
soils and hydrological functions, and high-value ecological set-sides protected from human activities.
Weak management Medium Institutional capacity to manage the tasks at hand will be taken into account during the PPG phase
capacity while working to identify the specific communities in the AMC the project will partner with. The
project will strengthen the capacities of all actors involved in forest management after a detailed
diagnosis of needs and assessment of potentials.