A number of individuals and institutions are beginning to think that social performance should be considered in making investment decisions. There is no real evidence that capital markets will be materially affected by social performance. Socially sound investments need not be unsound financially. But the argument has been made that the socially aware corporation possesses the special sensitivity that will enable it to surpass competitors.
A number of individuals and institutions are beginning to think that social performance should be considered in making investment decisions. There is no real evidence that capital markets will be materially affected by social performance. Socially sound investments need not be unsound financially. But the argument has been made that the socially aware corporation possesses the special sensitivity that will enable it to surpass competitors.
A number of individuals and institutions are beginning to think that social performance should be considered in making investment decisions. There is no real evidence that capital markets will be materially affected by social performance. Socially sound investments need not be unsound financially. But the argument has been made that the socially aware corporation possesses the special sensitivity that will enable it to surpass competitors.
A number of individuals and institutions are beginning to think that social performance should be considered in making investment decisions. There is no real evidence that capital markets will be materially affected by social performance. Socially sound investments need not be unsound financially. But the argument has been made that the socially aware corporation possesses the special sensitivity that will enable it to surpass competitors.
There is a theory going around that the social performance of corporations
can be influenced by capital markets responding to pressures from investors
and customers who perceive new goals for their money.
Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks
HOULD SOCIAL ISSUES be considered in
making investment decisions? A number of
individuals and institutions are beginning to
think so. While corporations have long been
under a variety of pressures to meet their social
responsibilities, they are now faced with the
possibility that their publicly traded shares will be
bought or dumped on the basis of their actions
or inactions on this front
There is at this point no real evidence that
capital markets will be materially affected by
social performance, But a number of recent de~
velopments should give companies pause. The
nation’s two largest philanthropic institutions—
the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Founda-
tion—undertook studies of their investment port-
folios, using a social lens to examine the securi-
ties they held. The objective was very simple
to determine whether the socialimprovement
guidelines used in the grantmaking area were
being violated on the investment side.
‘At least two universities—Yale and Cotnel
also subjected their investment packages to s
analysis. And four new mutual funds have been
‘organized with the specific mandate to favor com-
panies which are alert to the social needs of the
From San Francisco, Milton Moskowitz edits 8usi-
ness and Society, a biweekly report on business and
social responsibility. He is a contributing editor to
Business and Society Review.
n
MILTON R. MOSKOWITZ
country. These are First Spectrum, Pax World
Fund, Social Dimensions, and Dreyfus Third Cen
tury. The Vantage Ten Ninety Fund, organized in.
1968, is under charter obligations to invest at
least 10 percent of its portfolio in new or expand.
ing firms in three social categories: pollution con~
trol, the inner city, and the war on hunger.
Socially sound investments need not, of course,
bbe unsound financially. To the contrary, the argu-
ment has been made that the socially aware cor.
poration possesses the special sensitivity that will
enable it to surpass competitors.
Assuming that social responsibility is a relevant
factor for a particular investor, how does he go
about finding socially acceptable stocks? It is ex-
tremely difficult to construct standards by which
a company’s social performance can be accurately
Company A racks up 2 20% annual growth in profit but it
won't hire blacks and’ ts factories polite the alt. Company
8 is growing only 15% annually but its reputation on social
problems 16 good. You manage Investments for 3 pension
Fund. 50, which stock do you buy?”
Charles N. Stabler, The Wall Street Journal,
May 1971
measured. And while a company may be sttong.
in one area, such as pollution control, it may be
laggard in another, such as minority hiring. After
four yeats of closely monitoring businesses’ social
involvement, however, | have observed a number
of company names cropping up time after timen BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW
with regard to positive and constructive responses
to social problems. Here, then, ate fourteen such
companies whose securities might well belong,
in the portfolio of any investor, large or small,
who feels that social responsibility is @ relevant
factor in the investment decision, This is just the
beginning of an attempt to assess corporate re-
sponsibility
The data here is inadequate for an investment
decision based on the usual financial considera-
tions. While many of these choices. probably
make good sense considered from a profit
oriented standpoint, and have been so recom-
mended by qualified analysis, the securities are
being suggested here on the basis of corporate
behavior that can be considered socially. re-
sponsive.
Chase Manhattan Corp.,
New York, N.Y.
The third largest bank in the country, in terms
of assets, and the second largest in terms of de
posits, Chase has compiled a superlative record
in many categories associated with corporate
social responsibility. The bank has increased its
minority employment to 30 percent of staff, it has
upgraded minorities into managerial positions,
and it has been a leader in the financing of
minority-owned enterprises. Chase was one of
the first corporations in the land to name a black
to its board—Thomas A. Wood—and it recently
added another black, Mrs. Patricia Roberts Harris.
‘The company was also one of the first to report
a “social budget” expenditure for its various ac-
tivities—§3.5 million a year. Ina recent poll (see
99), Chase outranked forty-four other corpora:
tions which were being rated on social per-
formance.
Dayton Hudson Corp.,
Minneapolis, Minn.
Result of a 1969 merger between Dayton of
Minneapolis and J.L. Hudson of Detroit, Dayton
Hudson ranks today as the twenty-second largest
retailer in the nation. In addition to its depart
tment store operations (Dayton’s in Minnesota and
Hudson in Michigan), the company runs the Tar-
get discount chain, the B. Dalton and Pickwick
bookstores, Lechmere hardware stores, and sev-
eral jewelty store chains. In its two principal
tities, Minneapolis and Detroit, the company has
been a bulwark of support for urban improve-
ment programs. To help the line companies carry
out their social responsibilities, Dayton Hudson
maintains a five-man environmental development
depariment headed by Wayne Thompson, former
city manager of Oakland, California. Mr. Thomp-
son reports directly to the chairman, Dayton
Hudson has long been famous for making it a
practice to take the full 5 percent deduction
allowed! for charitable contributions (the average
in US. industry is 1 percent). In its most recent
fiscal year, that amounted to $2 million (5 percent
of pretax profits
First Pennsylvania Corp.,
Philadelphia, Pa.
The nation’s twenty-second largest commercial
bank, First Pennsylvania has set a hot pace under
the aggressive leadership of its young president,
John R. Bunting, who told stockholders this year
‘Our involvement in the social problems of our
time is based on two premises... it is right
morally and ethically, and itis a necessity.” First
Pennsylvania has backed those words with perfor.
mance. It has actively rectuited minorities, and
it has opened its doors to community groups in
Philadelphia. It has also been an innovator in its
own industry. During 1970, it sold Earth Bonds
to back antipollution efforts, and it astounded the
banking world by going directly to the public
with the sale of mini-notes bearing interest of
7.25 percent and available in denominations as
low as $100. First Pennsylvania also expanded its
board to make room for a black, a woman, and
a student.
Jewel Companies, Melrose Park, Ill
From a social standpoint, Jewel is a standout.
When President Nixon announced his wage-price
freeze last summer, Jewel rolled back prices and
said it would keep them rolled back until the
‘end of the year, no matter what happened to the
freeze. The company has been quick to respond
to consumer interests, whether it's unit-pricing,
posting of detergent phosphate levels, or nutri
tional labeling. It recently placed two women on
its board of directors. Jewel is primarily 2 food
chain, but it also operates drug-and-variety stores,
department stores, and ice eream/sandwich shops.
Johnson Products, Chicago, Il.
This is the largest and most successful of the
black-owned companies whose shares are traded.CHOOSING SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE STOCKS a
publicly. A cosmetics and toiletries producer,
Johnson sells primarily to the black market. The
bulk of its sales comes from hair products, mar-
keted under the Ultra Sheen and Afro Sheen lab-
els. This company is included for those who feel
that “black capitalism” is an avenue for helping
to achieve racial equality and should be encour
aged from that standpoint alone.
Levi Strauss & Co., San Francisco, Cal.
‘An acknowledged leader in the social respon-
sibility area, this San Francisco-based jeans maker
went public early in 1971 in the largest new-issue
offering since Ford Motor went public. The com-
pany also made history by insisting that the under-
writers, Lehman Brothers and Dean Witter, single
‘out Levi's social commitment in the official SEC
prospectus. Thus, the three-paragraph descrip-
tion of “The Company” had one paragraph de-
voted entirely to this subject. (A thorough run-
down on Levi's exceptional social performance
can be found on page 94.)
Mutual Real Fstate Investment Trust,
New York, N.Y.
M-REIT is a real estate investment trust orga-
nized in 1965 with the sole purpose of acquiring
apartment houses in white neighborhoods and
integrating them. And the concept has worked,
oth from an investment and social viewpoint
‘The trust currently has holdings of approximately
$34 million, encompassing some 3,000 apart-
ments in seven states, All have been integrated
without incident
The New York Times Co.
New York, N.Y.
Publisher of the finest newspaper in the world,
this company must, almost by necessity, have
acute sensitivity to social movements, and it has
in recent years demonstrated a flexibility that he-
lies its stodgy image. Many sections of the New
York Times have been redesigned and rejuve-
nated, and the paper has been making a strong
effort to correct a long-time failing: poor cover
age of community life in New York City, Under
Arthur O. Sulzberger, the Times has also been
making a determined effort to rectuit more mi=
nority employees, especially in the editorial de
partment.
Rouse Co., Columbia, Md.
Creator of the new town of Columbis—mid-
way between Baltimore and Washington, D.C—
Rouse has done an extraordinary job of urban
planning. When completed in 1980, Columbia
will have a population of 110,000. It’s already a
flourishing city integrated both racially and eco-
homically. A mortgage banker and the nation’s
largest builder of enclosed shopping malls, Rouse
brings great expertise to the urban-rural planning
problems facing the country. It has a subsidiary,
American City Corp., which tackles urban re-
rewal in a practical fashion (Hartford, Conn. is
now following @ Rouse blueprint). A subsidiary
‘of American City, the Urban Life Center, is func
tioning at Columbia as an “urban think tank.”
Standard Oil (Indiana), Chicago, Il
When Standard Oil was faced several years
ago with a decision to move its headquarters to
Tulsa, it elected to remain in Chicago. One factor
in this decision was a desire not to desert the city.
Now that it’s building a new headquarters on Chi-
cago’s lakefront, Indiana has coerced its con-
tractor into making the project a model of equal
‘employment opportunity. Actions of this kind are
typical of the social sense that Standard has
brought into play in many aspects of its opera-
tions under the pioneering leadership of urban
affaits director Phil Drotning, who reports directly
to the president. On this front, it’s the No. 1 per-
former in the petroleum industry
Syntex Corp,, Palo Alto, Cal.
Developer of the oral contraceptive, a major
factor in declining birth rates, Syntex is one of the
pharmaceutical “wunderkinds” of the postwar
world. The company has stated that the key to
its future growth is the maintenance of “an en-
vironment which fosters tree. inquiry.” Syntex
has also expressed a commitment to apply its
marketing and scientific expertise to. areas. 35.
sociated with improvement of the “quality of
life." For example, an afiiated company, Zoe-
con, is developing a new generation of pest-con
trol products which will be both effective and
devoid of harmful effects on the environment.
Spearheading the company’s social programs,
Frank Koch, director of corporate. public rela:
tions, states: “The greening of capitatism is al-
ready underway.74 BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW
Weyerhaeuser Co., Tacoma, Wash.
‘A major timber producer, also involved in
shelter and land development, Weyerhaeuser had
the outstanding pollution-control record in the
comprehensive study of the paper industry pub:
lished by the Council on Economic Priorities in
1970. A follow-up study by Joseph Bragdon and
John Marlin indicated that Weyerhaeuser's pollu-
tion-control investment had also paid off in su-
perior growth. Weyerhaeuser has been socially
sensitive in other ways also. Last year it pub-
lished, for the benefit of its managers, a back
ground paper summarizing the company’s in-
volvement in the “Thicd World.” This paper tied
the company’s investment in these areas to the
pressing need for economic development, noting,
for example, that Weyerhaeuser’s upgrading of
Bantu workers in South Africa is probably working
to undermine apartheid. This investment would
obviously not be appropriate for those who feel
that any involvement with South Africa is unde-
sirable.
Whirlpool Corp.
Benton Harbor, Mich.
‘This major appliance maker has been a social
galvanizer on many fronts. In its hometown, it
has been the leading force in rallying the business
Editor's Note:
After Milton Moskowitz completed this article,
we asked a small number of people in investment
firms and mutual funds to comment on the con-
cept of a socially responsive investment portolio.
Royce Flippin, President of First Spectrum Fund,
a new mutual fund which intends to "secure and
analyze information on corporate responsibility”
with regard to prospective investments, holds to
the assumption that 2 company’s economic inter-
est cannot be separated from the public interest.
Socially responsible companies, he says, are very
likely good investment vehicles in that their be-
havior reflects those qualities of management vi-
sion and statesmanship that also produce profits
Flippin is not as interested in corporate benev-
lence as he is in generating profits in a respon-
sible manner—always bearing in mind such fac
tors as consumer protection, pollution control,
and the protection of civil rights. Of the com-
panies suggested by Moskowitz, the First Spec-
trum portfolio already includes First Pennsylvania
community to rehabilitate blighted slums where
black families five, It has backed minority em-
ployment and minority entrepreneurship. On the
consumer front, it led the way with the establish-
ment of a toll-free number ta handle complaints
and service requests from Whirlpool appliance
owners. It is currently experimenting with an un:
conditional guarantee: Your money back if your
appliance doesn’t work within 60 days after pi
chase. Whirlpoo!’s chief executive officer, Elisha
Gray, was the No. 1 sparkplug in the recent reor-
ganization and. strengthening of the National
Council of Better Business Bureaus.
Xerox Corp., Stamford, Conn.
A company that needs little introduction, Xerox
is the dominant force in the copier business, owns,
a computer manufacturer, and has an education
division which now does more than $100 million
of business a year, Its reputation as a socially pro-
gressive force in American life is well deserved.
The two most recent examples were its program
to grant employees leaves of absence, with full
pay, to pursue social projects of their own choos-
ing and its move to deposit $3 million in minority-
owned banks. In the recent corporate-rating sur-
vey (see p. 981, Xerox received more writes
votes than any other company.
Corporation, Levi Strauss, Standard Oil of Indiana,
and Xerox. Asa result of Mr, Moskowitz’s recom-
mendations, the Fund's managers are now con-
sidering Jewel Companies, Mutual Real Estate In-
vestment Trust, and Rouse Company.
Harold W. Janeway, Research Director of
White, Weld and Company, made the following
observations:
(1) | believe social criteria do have a growing
relevance to investment decisions. However, |
think one must be careful that the social
pect does not dominate. Obviously, the fun-
damentals of the business, the trend of earn-
ings, the balance sheet, accounting. practices,
the stock price, etc., are still key. Losses in a
socially-oriented portfolio are no better than
losses on a selfishly-oriented portfolio,
(2) The more socially responsible companies
tend to be more profitable, but it is not at all
certain which comes first. One can also argue
that the more profitable companies can afford
to be more responsible.CHOOSING SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE STOCKS 7
(3) From a performance standpoint it might
make more sense to concentrate on avoiding
the ‘socially irresponsible’ companies than to
tty to profit from a portfolio of the most re-
sponsible companies. Social irresponsibility
may be only the tip of the corporate iceberg,
with many other problems lurking beneath the
surface. Milton Friedman’s belief that a cor-
poration’s highest goal is to achieve maximum
profitability may be stretching things too far in
this era but earnings per share are likely to con-
tinue to be the name of the game.
(4) The portfolio itself is certainly a mixed bag,
Johnson Products is a great success story but
otherwise irrelevant. A decision to include the
New York Times depends almost entirely upon.
one’s political views, an uncertain criterion.
Most of the other companies would appear to
qualify although | am sure a thorough search
would uncover many, many more companies
that in their own quiet fashion are accomplish-
ing a great deal. One company for which |
have a high regard whose work has brought
Feifter
ie ey Mp 3
laches “Mer
&
ee
benefits to millions is DEKALB AgResearch.
This company is the leader in the development
and production of hybrid com, which has re-
sisted the recent blight and brought great pro
ductivity gains to our farms. OF greater im-
portance, the company is well along in the
development of hybrid wheat which could
have favorable implications for the whole
world.”
Peter Bernstein, Chairman of the Board of
Bernstein-Macaulay, Inc., investment management
subsidiary of CBWLHayden, Stone Inc, men-
tioned the recent decision at Wesleyan University
to bring pressure on management of portfolio
companies for higher degrees of social responsi-
bility. Wesleyan’s president, Colin G. Campbell,
announced in October that the university would
“participate in proxy contests in the future, back-
ing proposals seeking to improve social condi-
tions which are directly related to a corporation's
activities.” The university's holdings exceed $150
million,
eee A i
NF HOWL he BE
|
3 st
78
It tle
fewamaton WAR ME
“>
i