Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Chabon, Michael – After the Apocalypse

Charlton Heston and a savagely coiffed vixen, wrapped in animal skins, riding horseback along a desolate
seashore, confronted by the spike-crowned ruin of the Statue of Liberty half buried in the sand:
everyone knows how the world ends. First radiation, plague, an asteroid, or some other cataclysm kills
most of humankind. The remnants mutate, lapse into feudalism, or revert to prehistoric brutality. Old
cults are revived with their knives and brutal gods, while tiny noble bands cling to the tatters of the lost
civilization, preserving knowledge of machinery, agriculture, and the missionary position against some
future renascence, and confronting their ancestors’ legacy of greatness and destruction.

Ambivalence toward technology is the underlying theme, and thus we are accustomed to thinking of
stories that depict the end of the world and its aftermath as essentially science fiction. These stories feel
like science fiction, too, because typically they deal with the changed nature of society in the wake of
cataclysm, the strange new priesthoods, the caste systems of the genetically stable, the worshipers of
techno-death, the rigid pastoral theocracies in which mutants and machinery are taboo, etc.; for
inevitably these new societies mirror and comment upon our own. Science fiction has always been a
powerful instrument of satire, and thus it is often the satirist’s finger that pushes the button, or releases
the killer bug.

This may help to explain why the post-apocalyptic mode has long attracted writers not generally
considered part of the science fiction tradition. It’s one of the few subgenres of science fiction, along
with stories of the near future (also friendly to satirists), that may be safely attempted by a mainstream
writer without incurring too much damage to his or her credentials for seriousness. The anti–science
fiction prejudice among some readers and writers is so strong that in reviewing a work of science fiction
by a mainstream author a charitable critic will often turn to words such as “parable” or “fable” to warm
the author’s bathwater a little, and it is an established fact that a preponderance of religious imagery or
an avowed religious intent can go a long way toward mitigating the science-fictional taint, which also
helps explain the appeal to mainstream writers such as Walker Percy of the post-apocalyptic story,
whose themes of annihilation and re-creation are so easily indexed both to the last book of the New
Testament and the first book of the Old. It’s hard to imagine the author of Love in the Ruins writing a
space opera.

There is also a strong current of conventional hard-edged naturalism at work in much post-apocalyptic
science fiction that may further serve to draw and to reassure the mainstream writer. If the destruction
is sufficiently great, life and its appurtenances are reduced to a finite set, mitigating the demand for
baroque inventiveness imposed by other kinds of science fiction, while the extreme state of the natural
world—global ice,

You might also like