To What Extent Do You Agree or Disagree?

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1. Some people feel that legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is considered by some that to marry there should not be any legal bindings, while there are
others who think that citizens should get marriage permission legally at a minimum age of 21. In
my opinion, I believe that a standard age should be there at which people should involve
marriage. There are multifarious reasons for supporting the statement including education,
maturity, financial ability, understanding responsibility and practical knowledge about real life.
The essay will discuss why it is entirely necessary to have a standardized age limit for marriage.
Firstly, Mental instability or immaturity and financial instability are two major factors which
impede understanding social responsibility. Moreover, children marriage can cause a variety of
social problems as well, such as education rate may decrease, the infant mortality rate may rise,
different health care obstacles also may create. Developing counties like, India, Bangladesh and
many others are having such problems for the last four decades and a significant number of
people are suffering serious social difficulties according to a report by the UN.
Secondly, education is mandatory for all people to become stable in every level of life. Early
marriage does not allow people to accomplish study and lacks behind to darkness. For instance, a
girl who got married at a little age could not complete her school because of family responsibility
also became a mom at the stage when she supposed to go to school. Furthermore, practical life
squeezed her potential in such a way that might not be possible to recover anymore.
In conclusion, I would like to restate my opinion that, younger should not be allowed to get
married at any age and there must have a regulatory system which will help them to shape a
future endeavor.

.
Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of
travelling to a workplace every day.
Do you think the advantage of work from home outweigh the disadvantage?

It is considered that it would be beneficial if most of the people work at home rather than
physically went to the workplace daily. This essay will firstly, discuss employee freedom as one
of the main advantages of this and secondly, outline decreasing levels of face to face interaction
with potential customers as one of the main disadvantages.
One of the main advantages of working at home is autonomy it provides employees. Employees
do not have to prepare themselves for travelling at very morning to reach to the office on time as
well as they do not have to bear the extra cost of transportation, which saves a considerable
amount of time and minimize the cost of travelling as well, such things lead employees to better
efficiency at their work. For instance, Google experimented by setting up home-based
workplaces among its 250 employees and as a result, they found a significant productivity rise.
On the other hand, the main disadvantages associated with working at home is one-to-one
interaction with customers. Customers did not find the actual responsible person at the workplace
when they visit for the necessary service therefore, they must contact the concerned person
through email or other modes of communications. 3G mobile has also practised the same notion
as Google did, but they lost a huge market as consequences.
In conclusion, the benefits home-based station brings to employees and employer, such as less
cost, more focus and productivity and flexibility outweighed drawbacks, such as face to face
contact. Overall, working from home have a multifarious impact on the entire society which
helps to save time, the most precious thing in the world.

You might also like