Gloria Macapagal Arroyo vs People and Sandiganbayan

G.R. No. 220953

Facts:

Gloria Arroyo was accused of committing plunder. The case was dismissed by the court.

Issue:

Whether or not the court has erred in dismissing the case

Held:

No, the court was correct in its ruling. According to the Section 1 (d) of RA No 7080, Ill-gotten wealth
means any asset, prope1iy, business enterprise or material possession of any person within the purview
of Section Two (2) hereof, acquired by him directly or indirectly through dummies, nominees, agents,
subordinates and/or business associates by any combination or series of the following means or similar
schemes:

1) Through misappropriation, conversion, misuse, or malversation of public funds or raids on the public
treasury.

In applying the principle noscitur a sociis which is that the correct construction of a particular word or
phrase that is ambiguous in itself or is equally susceptible of various meanings may be made by
considering the company of the words in which the word or phrase is found or with which it is
associated, raids on the public treasury requires the raider to use the property taken impliedly for his
personal benefit.

As a result, the court was correct in its ruling as the not only did the Prosecution fail to show where the
money went but, more importantly, that GMA and Aguas had personally benefited from the same.
Hence, the Prosecution did not prove the predicate act of raids on the public treasury beyond
reasonable doubt.