Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Dela Victoria vs.

Burgos
GR 111190, 27 June 1995
First Division, Bellosillo (J)

Facts: Raul Sesbreno filed a complaint for damages against Assistant City Fiscal Bienvenido Mabanto
before the RTC of Cebu City. After trial, judgment was rendered ordering Mabanto to pay Sesbreno
P11,000. The decision having become final and executory, the trial court ordered its execution upon
Sesbreno’s motion. The writ of execution was issued despite Mabanto’s objection. A notice of
garnishment was served upon Loreto de la Victoria as City Fiscal of Mandaue City where Mabanto was
then detailed. De la Victoria moved to quash the notice of garnishment claiming that he was not in
possession of any money, funds, etc. belonging to Mabanto until delivered to him, and as such are still
public funds which could not be subject of garnishment..

Issue: Whether the checks subject of garnishment belong to Mabanto or whether they still belong to the
government.

Held: Under Section 16 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, every contract on a negotiable instrument is
incomplete and revocable until delivery of the instrument for the purpose of giving effect thereto. As
ordinarily understood, delivery means the transfer of the possession of the instrument by the maker or
drawer with the intent to transfer title to the payee and recognize him as the holder thereof. Herein, the
salary check of a government officer or employee does not belong to him before it is physically delivered
to him. Inasmuch as said checks had not yet been delivered to Mabanto, they did not belong to him and
still had the character of public funds. As a necessary consequence of being public fund, the checks may
not be garnished to satisfy the judgment.

You might also like