Nanyang Technological University
Nanyang Business School
Name: __________________________
Traits
1. Fluency
The ability to brainstorm and generate
ideas.
2. Originality
The ability to produce novel, original
and unique ideas.
3. Elaboration
The ability to develop and expand
ideas with sufficient details.
4. Flexibility
The ability to embrace contradictions
/alternative perspectives and
demonstrate adaptability in thought.
5. Synthesis
The ability to connect, synthesize and
transform ideas in appropriate and
novel way.
Overall
Scoring: 3 – 10: Below expectation
AC2101 – Accounting Recognition and Measurement
Semester 1, 2017-18
Feedback on Mid-Term Quiz Individual Creative Thinking Skills
Seminar Group: ________
1-3 4-6 Other Comments
Scant Substantially Developed
Lists and brainstorms limited number of ideas or Lists and brainstorms numerous ideas and points of
responses. views.
Ideas are not developed in original and unique Ideas developed are original. Able to extend a novel
ways. Reformulates a collection of available ideas. idea to create new knowledge that crosses boundaries.
Unable to develop ideas by providing details. Able to expand and develop ideas by adding details and
making changes.
Does not acknowledge alternate, divergent or Utilizes alternative, divergent or contradictory
contradictory perspectives or ideas. Lacks flexibility, perspectives or ideas fully. Able to perceive multiple
maintains positions and points of view in spite of ways in reacting to change and respond accordingly.
new changing conditions.
Recognizes connections among ideas or solutions Able to transform ideas or solutions into entirely new
but not able to connect ideas or solutions in novel forms.
ways.
Below expectation / Met expectation / Above expectation
11 – 20: Met expectation 21 – 30: Above expectation
 Nanyang Technological University
Nanyang Business School

AC2101 – Accounting Recognition and Measurement

Semester 1, 2017-18

Feedback on Mid-Term Quiz Individual Critical Thinking Skills

Name: ______________________ Seminar Group: ________

1-3 4-6 Other Comments

Traits
Scant Substantially Developed

1. Identifies and summarizes the Does not identify and summarize the issue, is Identifies the main issue and its implicit aspects,
issue at hand confused or represents the issue inaccurately. addresses their relationships to each other and
recognizes nuances of the issue.

2. Identifies and considers other Deals only with a single perspective and fails to Addresses perspectives noted previously, and
theoretical perspectives that are discuss other possible perspectives, especially additional diverse perspectives drawn from outside
important to the analysis of the those salient to the issue. Fails to identify or hastily information. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons
issue dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments. and claims) pro and con.

3. Identifies and assesses the quality Merely repeats information provided, taking it as Examines the evidence and source of evidence;
of supporting data/evidence and truth, or denies evidence without adequate questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and
provides additional data/evidence justification. Confuses associations and correlations completeness. Observes cause and effect and
related to the issue with cause and effect. addresses existing or potential consequences.

4. Identifies and considers key Does not surface the assumptions of the author and Identifies and questions the validity of the assumptions
assumptions and the influence of does not examine the contexts, e.g., cultural, and and analyzes the issue with a clear sense of scope and
the context on the issue. political. context.

5. Identifies and assesses Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and
conclusions, implications and consequences of the issue or the key relationships consequences, considering context, assumptions, data,
consequences among the various elements such as context, and evidence. Objectively reflects upon own assertions.
evidence or assumptions. Regardless of the Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.
evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views
based on self-interest or preconceptions.
Overall Below expectation / Met expectation / Above expectation
Scoring: 3 – 10: Below expectation 11 – 20: Met expectation 21 – 30: Above expectation