Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Direct Energy Conversion: Chemistry, Physics, Materials Science and Thermoelectrics
Direct Energy Conversion: Chemistry, Physics, Materials Science and Thermoelectrics
ELDON CASE
MSU, Mechanical
S. D. MAHANTI CTIRAD
Engineering
CTIRAD UHER
UHER
Univ
Univ of
of Michigan
Metallurgy
MSU, PHYSICS Michigan
Physics
Physics
Theory Measurements
Measurements
Schock group
http://www.dts-generator.com/
Thermoelectric applications
Waste heat recovery
• Automobiles
• Over the road trucks
• Utilities
• Chemical plants
Space power
Remote Power
Generation
Solar energy
Geothermal power
generation
Direct nuclear to electrical
U.S. Energy Flow, 1999
Given that ~60% of energy becomes waste heat, even a 10% capture and conversion
to useful forms can have huge impact on overall energy utilization
How does it work?
http://www.designinsite.dk
δ = 0.0
δ = 0.1
0.2
σ⋅S
δ = 1.1
2
η
0.1 ZT = •T
κ total
0.05
Power factor
Total thermal conductivity
0
0 0.5 1 1.5
ZT
2 2.5 3 σ⋅S 2
avg
For Th = 800K
δ=Rc/R
Tc = 300K
Today’s situation
The most efficient materials today
for power generation: PbTe and
TAGS (TeSbGeAg alloy)
The most efficient material for
cooling Bi2Te3 Quantum Dot Layers in thin
PbTe: ZT~0.8 at 800 K (n-type) MBE-grown PbSe/PbTe
superlattices (Harman et al,
TAGS: ZT~1.2 700 K (p-type) ZT~3)
Bi2Te3-xSex: ZT~1 at 300 K
Further improvements are needed. PbTe
New materials needed PbSe 20 nm dot
m= effective mass E
τ=scattering time E
r= scattering parameter
κlatt= lattice thermal conductivity
T = temperature
γ= band degeneracy Ef
Phases shown
are promising new TE
Materials
Rb0.5Bi1.83Te3
β-K2Bi8Se13
APb2Bi3Te7
A1+xPb4-2xBi7+xSe15 CsBi4Te6
PbQ
Pb6Bi2Se9 Pb5Bi6Se14 Pb5Bi12Se23
Bi2Q3
Our first contact with cubic AgPbmSbTe2+m
Pb
Te
Sb
Ag
268
Unit cell volume (Å)
267
266
265
263
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
m value
(1) (a) Rodot, H. Compt. Rend. 1959, 249, 1872-4.
(2) (a) Rosi, F. D.; Hockings, E. S.; Lindenblad, N. E. Adv. Energy Convers. 1961, 1, 151.
(LAST-18) Ag1-xPb18SbTe20: Tunable properties
Changing x Comparison of ZT
Comparison of Thermopower 0.8
0 Ag0.73 (KF2207R2b)
Ag0.73 (KF2207R2b) 0.7 Ag0.76 (KF2228R3A2)
Ag0.76 (KF2228R3A2) Ag0.78 (KF2213R1B)
Ag0.78 (KF2213R1B) Ag0.80 (KF2213R2C)
-50 Ag0.80 (KF2213R2C) 0.6 Ag0.82 (KF2229R1A)
Thermopower (µ V/K)
ZT
0.4
-150
0.3
-200 0.2
0.1
-250
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0
Temperature (K) 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
Comparison of Power Factors Temperature, K
50
Ag0.73 (KF2207R2b)
Ag0.76 (KF2228R3A2)
Ag0.78 (KF2213R1B)
40 Ag0.80 (KF2213R2C)
Power Factor S σ (µW/cm K )
2
Ag0.82 (KF2229R1A)
Ag0.82 (KF2229R1B)
Ag0.82 (KF2229R1C)
Ag0.82 (KF2229R1D)
30
2
20
10
0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Temperature (K)
Synthesis: Heating cooling profiles
rock
time, h
1000 ºC
T, K rock
Cool to 50 ºC
in 24 h
S (µV/K)
composition from top to
bottom. m= 14
Strongly varying
properties from top to
bottom. m= 18
σ (S/cm)
“Sweet” spot exists with
very high ZT. m= 25
Mechanical properties
weak. m= 40
S (µV/K)
1000 -250
1
-300
LAST-18
500
-350
0.5
0 -400
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 0.35 W/mK (Harman PbTe/PbSe superlattice)
0
Temperature, K 300 400 500 600 700 800
Temperature (K)
Ag1-xPb18SbTe20
2.00
Ag Pb SbTe
0.86 18 20
1.50
ZT
1.00
0.50
0.00
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Temperature, K
Hsu KF, Loo S, Guo F, Chen W, Dyck JS, Uher C, Hogan T, Polychroniadis EK, Kanatzidis MG Science, 2004, 303, 818
What is the origin of the TE
properties of AgPbmSbTem+2
systems?
HRTEM
Coherently embedded nanocrystals
Pb- rich region
8-10 nm
FCC lattice
10 nm
Ag Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb Pb Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb
Te Pb Te Pb Te Sb Te Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb Te
Pb Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb Pb Te Sb Te Pb Te Pb
Te Ag Te Pb Te Pb Te Te Ag Te Ag Te Pb Te
Pb Te Pb Te Sb Te Pb Pb Te Sb Te Pb Te Pb
Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb Te
Te Pb Te Pb Te Pb Te
Klemmens-Drabble theory
(W/cmK)
18
16 m=65
Conductivity
14
m=62
m~62
12
Random alloy m~30
Thermal
10
Thermal
m=18
8 m=10 m=18
LatticeLattice
6
Experimental Points
below theoretical
4
0 20 40 60 80 100
AgSbTe2 PbTe
Mol % PbTe
Temperature ( C)
o
600
Ag atoms act as acceptors
Sb atoms act as donors 400
AgxPb7Sn3SbyTe12,
Very low lattice thermal conductivity
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
t (hours)
Good homogeneity
12000
Ag0.3Pb7Sn3Sb0.1Te12
10000
Intensity (arb. units)
8000
6000
4000
2000
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2Theta
LASTT-16
Very low lattice thermal conductivity
320
280
240
Seebeck (uV/K)
200
160
120
80
40
0
320 400 480 560 640 720
T e m p e ra tu re , K
1.0 TAGS
0.8
0.6 PbTe
0.4
0.2
0.0
300 400 500 600 700 800
Temperature (K)
PbTe Se
1 0.9 0.1
(A)
0.5 Na Pb SbTe
1-x 20 22
nano
0
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Temperature, K
50 nm
Poudeu, Hogan, Kanatzidis Angew. Chemie, 2006,
SALT-20
2
LAST
NaPb SbTe
20 22
1.5 LASTT
TAGS
ZT
Tl BiTe
9 6
1 Bi Te Ce Fe CoSb SiGe
CsBi Te 2 3 0.9 3 12
4 6
PbTe
0.5
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Temperature, K
Conclusions
New approaches are succeeding in raising ZT
The (A2Q)n(PbQ)m(Bi2Q3)p (Q=Se, Te) system is a
rich source of new materials
Several new promising compounds identified
strongly anisotropic
cubic
nanostructured
LAST, LASTT and SALT family of materials
nanostructured
superior ZT
Strong thermal conductivity reduction achieved
through nanostructuring
Doping studies and processing conditions are
important in ZT optimization
Outlook
Further progress is expected on the TE figure of merit
Fundamental challenge:
• Translate current theoretical physical predictions on how to enhance
Power Factor (σ·S2) into actual chemistry in the laboratory
• Achieve minimum thermal conductivity (~0.3 W/mK) in a bulk
(nano)crystalline TE material
Research in new materials should focus on
• Understanding and controlling carrier scattering
• Controlling nanostructuring to manipulate phonon propagation
• Discovering new compounds
Long term: Waste heat recovery and conversion could be impacted
on a massive scale with low cost materials if ZT>2-3.
Thermoelectrics could help utilize existing depletable energy
resources more effectively
Thermoelectrics could also play role in renewable energy (e.g. solar,
etc)
Collaborators
Tim Hogan, Dept of Electrical
Engineering, MSU
S. D. (Bhanu) Mahanti, Dept. of
Physics, MSU
Ctirad Uher, Dept. of Physics, U of
Michigan
Simon Billinge, Physics, MSU
Eldon Case, MSU
Harold Schock, MSU
Bruce Cook, Iowa State
Terry Tritt, Clemson U
Art Schultz, Argonne NL
TE Research group
Dr Duck young Chung
Joseph Sootsman
Dr Kuei fang Hsu
Dr Eric Quarez
Aurelie Guegen
Ferdinand Poudeu
Jun-Ho Kim
Dr John Androulakis