Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Remedial Law Bar Questions Compiled PDF
Remedial Law Bar Questions Compiled PDF
Remedial Law Bar Questions Compiled PDF
(b) Can the warrant of arrest be served on Danjo (a) Should Drylvik's motion to dismiss be
upon his return? (2.5%) granted? (2.5%)
Demo filed a motion for bill of particulars for the Republic The municipality of Danao, Cebu was a quiet and peaceful
to clarify certain matters in its amended complaint. The town until a group of miners from Denmark visited the
Sandiganbayan immediately granted the motion. Upon area and discovered that it was rich in nickel. In
submission of the bill of particulars by the Republic, Demo partnership with the municipal mayor, the Danish miners
filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the answers in the had to flatten 10 hectares of forest land by cutting all the
bill of particulars were indefinite and deficient responses trees before starting their mining operations. The local
to the question of what the alleged illegally acquired funds DENR, together with the Samahan Laban sa Sumisira sa
or properties of Demo were. The Sandiganbayan Kalikasan, filed a petition for writ of kalikasan against the
dismissed the case. municipal mayor and the Danish miners in the RTC of
Cebu.
(a) Was the Sandiganbayan correct in dismissing
the case? (2.5%) (a) Is the petition within the jurisdiction of the RTC
of Cebu? (2.5%)
(b) What can the defendant, in a civil case, do in
the event that his motion for bill of particulars is (b) What is the Precautionary Principle? (2.5%)
denied? (2.5%)
XXII
XIX
Danica obtained a personal loan of PhP 180,000 from
Drylvik, a German national, married Dara, a Filipina, in Dinggoy, payable in 18 equal monthly installments of PhP
Dusseldorf, Germany. When the marriage collapsed, 10,000 until fully paid. In order to complete her payment
Dara filed a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage at an earlier date, Danica instead paid PhP 20,000
before the RTC of Manila. Drylvik, on the other hand, was monthly, and continued doing so until the 15th month,
able to obtain a divorce decree from the German Family which payments Dinggoy all accepted. Later on, she
Court. The decree, in essence, states: realized that she had overpaid Dinggoy by 100% as she
should have already completed payment in nine (9)
The marriage of the Parties contracted on xxx months. She demanded the return of the excess payment,
before the Civil Registrar of Dusseldorf is hereby but Dinggoy completely ignored her. Thus, Danica availed
dissolved. The parental custody of the children of the Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Cases by filing
Diktor and Daus is granted to the father. before the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) a statement of
claim, together with the required documents.
Drylvik filed a motion to dismiss in the RTC of Manila on
the ground that the court no longer had jurisdiction over Should the MTC proceed with the case under the: (i)
the matter as a decree of divorce had already been Revised Rules Summary Procedure; (ii) the Rules of
promulgated dissolving his marriage to Dara. Dara Procedure for Small Claims; or (iii) the regular procedure
objected, saying that while she was not challenging the for civil cases? (5%)
divorce decree, the case in the RTC still had to proceed
for the purpose of determining the issue of the children's
2017 After working for 25 years in the Middle East, Evan
returned to the Philippines to retire in Manila, the place of
JUSTICE LUCAS P. BERSAMIN his birth and childhood. Ten years before his retirement,
Chairman he bought for cash in his name a house and lot in Malate,
2017 Bar Examinations Manila. Six months after his return, he learned that his
house and lot were the subject of foreclosure proceedings
commenced by ABC Bank on the basis of a promissory
I.
note and a deed of real estate mortgage he had allegedly
executed in favor of ABC Bank five years earlier.
What trial court outside Metro Manila has exclusive
original jurisdiction over the following cases? Explain
Knowing that he was not in the country at the time the
briefly your answers.
promissory note and deed of mortgage were supposedly
executed, Evan forthwith initiated a complaint in the RTC
(a) An action filed on November 13, 2017 to recover the of Manila praying that the subject documents be declared
possession of an apartment unit being occupied by the null and void.
defendant by mere tolerance of the plaintiff, after the
former ignored the last demand to vacate that was duly
ABC Bank filed a motion to dismiss Evan's complaint on
served upon and received by him on July 6, 2016. (2.5%)
the ground of improper venue on the basis of a stipulation
in both documents designating Quezon City as the
(b) A complaint in which the principal relief sought is the exclusive venue in the event of litigation between the
enforcement of a seller's contractual right to repurchase a parties arising out of the loan and mortgage.
lot with an assessed value of ₱15,000.00. (2.5%)
Should the motion to dismiss of ABC Bank be granted?
II. Explain your answer. (5%)
III.
Does the trial court have a reason to deny the motion?
Explain your answer. (4%)
Answer the following briefly:
VII.
(a) What elements should concur for
circumstantial evidence to be sufficient for
Elise obtained a loan of ₱3 Million from Merchant Bank.
conviction? (2%)
Aside from executing a promissory note in favor of
Merchant Bank, she executed a deed of real estate
(b) When is bail a matter of judicial discretion? mortgage over her house and lot as security for her
(2%) obligation. The loan fell due but remained unpaid; hence,
Merchant Bank filed an action against Elise to foreclose
(c) Give at least two instances when a peace the real estate mortgage. A month after, and while the
officer or a private person may make a valid foreclosure suit was pending, Merchant Bank also filed an
warrantless arrest. (2%) action to recover the principal sum of ₱3 Million against
Elise based on the same promissory note previously
(d) What is a tender of excluded evidence? (2%) executed by the latter.
(b) What is the Harmless Error Rule in relation to Is there a splitting of a single cause of action? Explain
appeals? (2%) your answer. (4%)
X.
On October 9, 2017, upon application of Regan, the trial
court, allegedly in the interest of justice, extended the
On the basis of an alleged promissory note executed by TRO for another 20 days based on the same ground for
Harold in favor of Ramon, the latter filed a complaint for which the TRO was issued.
₱950,000.00 against the former in the RTC of Davao City.
In an unverified answer, Harold specifically denied the
On October 15, 2017, Jeff entered the land subject of the
genuineness of the promissory note. During the trial, TRO.
Harold sought to offer the testimonies of the following: (1)
the testimony of an NBI handwriting expert to prove the
forgery of his signature; and (2) the testimony of a credible May Jeff be liable for contempt of court? Why? (4%)
witness to prove that if ever Harold had executed the note
in favor of Ramon, the same was not supported by a XIII.
consideration.
Police officers arrested Mr. Druggie in a buy-bust
May Ramon validly object to the proposed testimonies? operation and confiscated from him 10 sachets
Give a brief explanation of your answer. (5%) of shabu and several marked genuine peso bills worth
₱5,000.00 used as the buy-bust money during the buy-
XI. bust operation.
Immediately before he died of gunshot wounds to his Tomas filed a motion to dismiss the separate civil action
chest, Venancio told the attending physician, In a very on the ground of litis pendentia, pointing out that when the
feeble voice, that it was Arnulfo, his co-worker, who had criminal action was filed against him, the civil action to
shot him. Venancio added that it was also Arnulfo who recover the civil liability from the offense charged was also
had shot Vicente, the man whose cadaver was lying on deemed instituted. He insisted that the basis of the
the bed beside him. separate civil action was the very same act that gave rise
to the criminal action.
In the prosecution of Arnulfo for the criminal killing of
Venancio and Vicente, are all the statements of Venancio Rule on Tomas' motion to dismiss, with brief reasons.
admissible as dying declarations? Explain your answer. (5%)
(5%)
XIX.
XV.
Boy Maton, a neighborhood tough guy, was arrested by a
In an attempt to discredit and impeach a Prosecution police officer on suspicion that he was keeping prohibited
witness in a homicide case, the defense counsel called to drugs in his clutch bag. When Boy Maton was searched
the stand a person who had been the boyhood friend and immediately after the arrest, the officer found and
next-door neighbor of the Prosecution witness for 30 recovered 10 sachets of shabu neatly tucked in the inner
years. One question that the defense counsel asked of linings of the clutch bag. At the time of his arrest, Boy
the impeaching witness was: "Can you tell this Honorable Maton was watching a basketball game being played in
Court about the general reputation of the prosecution the town plaza, and he was cheering for his favorite team.
witness in your community for aggressiveness and He was subsequently charged with illegal possession of
violent tendencies?" dangerous drugs, and he entered a plea of not
guilty when he was arraigned.
Would you, as the trial prosecutor, interpose your
objection to the question of the defense counsel? Explain During the trial, Boy Maton moved for the dismissal of the
your answer. (4%) information on the ground that the facts revealed that he
had been illegally arrested. He further moved for the
XVI. suppression of the evidence confiscated from him as
being the consequence of the illegal arrest, hence,
the fruit of the poisonous tree.
Engr. Magna Nakaw, the District Engineer of the DPWH
in the Province of Walang Progreso, and Mr. Pork Chop,
a private contractor, were both charged in the Office of the The trial court, in denying the motions of Boy Maton,
Ombudsman for violation of the Anti-Graft and explained that at the time the motions were filed Boy
Corrupt Practices Act (R.A. No. 3019) under a conspiracy Maton had already waived the right to raise the issue of
theory. the legality of the arrest. The trial court observed that,
pursuant to the Rules of Court, Boy Maton, as the
accused, should have assailed the validity of the arrest
While the charges were undergoing investigation in the
before entering his plea to the information. Hence, the trial
Office of the Ombudsman, Engr. Magna Nakaw passed
court opined that any adverse consequence of the alleged
away. Mr. Pork Chop immediately filed a motion to
illegal arrest had also been equally waived.
terminate the investigation and to dismiss the charges
against him, arguing that because he was charged in
conspiracy with the deceased, there was no longer a Comment on the ruling of the trial court. (5%)
conspiracy to speak of and, consequently, any legal
ground to hold him for trial had been extinguished.
XVII.
XIV
The accused wants to have the case dismissed because
he believes that the charge is confusing and the
Pedro, the principal witness in a criminal case, testified information is defective. What ground or grounds can he
and completed his testimony on direct examination in
raise in moving for the quashal of the information? JUSTICE TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO
Explain. (5%) Chairperson
2015 Bar Examinations
XVIII
I. Lender extended to Borrower a Pl00,000.00 loan
John filed a petition for declaration of nullity of his covered by a promissory note. Later, Borrower
marriage to Anne on the ground of psychological obtained another Pl00,000.00 loan again covered
incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. He by a promissory note. Still later, Borrower
obtained a copy of the confidential psychiatric evaluation obtained a P300,000.00 loan secured by a real
report on his wife from the secretary of the psychiatrist. estate mortgage on his land valued at
Can he testify on the said report without offending the rule 11500,000.00. Borrower defaulted on his
on privileged communication? Explain. (5%) payments when the loans matured. Despite
demand to pay the llS00,000.00 loan, Borrower
XIX refused to pay. Lender, applying the totality rule,
filed against Borrower with the Regional Trial
Court (RTC) of Manila, a collection suit for
Tristan filed a suit with the RTC of Pasay against Arthur P500,000.00.
King and/or Estate of Arthur King for reconveyance of a
lot declared in the name of Arthur King under TCT No.
a.) Did Lender correctly apply the totality
1234. The complaint alleged that "on account Arthur
rule and the rule on joinder of causes of
King's residence abroad up to the present and the
action? (2%)
uncertainty of whether he is still alive or dead, he or his
estate may be served with summons by publication."
Summons was published and nobody filed any At the trial, Borrower's lawyer, while
responsive pleading within sixty (60) days therefrom. cross-examining Lender, successfully
Upon motion, defendants were declared in default and elicited an admission from the latter that
judgment was rendered declaring Tristan as legal owner the two promissory notes have been
and ordering defendants to reconvey said lot to Tristan. paid. Thereafter, Borrower's lawyer filed
a motion to dismiss the case on the
ground that as proven only P300,000.00
Jojo, the court-designated administrator of Arthur King's
was the amount due to Lender and which
estate, filed a petition for annulment of judgment before
claim is within the exclusive original
the CA praying that the decision in favor of Tristan be
jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Trial
declared null and void for lack of jurisdiction. He claims
that the action filed by Tristan is an action in Court. He further argued that lack of
personam and that the court did not acquire jurisdiction jurisdiction over the subject matter can
be raised at any stage of the
over defendants Arthur King and/or his estate. On the
proceedings.
other hand, Tristan claims that the suit is an action in
rem or at least an action quasi in rem. Is the RTC judge
correct in ordering service of summons by publication? b.) Should the court dismiss the case?
Explain. (5%) (3%)
[a] Resolve the motion with reasons. (2.5%) Circe, sixty (60) days after her receipt of Sheriff
Pluto's return, filed a Motion to Declare Charybdis
[b] Distinguish "Summary Judgment" and in default as Charybdis did not file any responsive
"Judgment on the Pleadings." (2.5%) pleading.
a.) Should the court declare Charybdis in mental examinations, can the court order
default? (2%) his arrest? (2%)
Scylla seasonably filed her answer VI. A law was passed declaring Mt. Karbungko as a
setting forth therein as a defense that protected area since it as a major watershed. The
Charybdis had paid the mortgage debt. protected area covered a portion located in
Municipality A of the Province I and a portion
b.) On the premise that Charybdis was located in the City of Z of Province II. Maingat is
properly declared in default, what is the the leader of Samahan ng Tagapag-ingat ng
effect of Scylla's answer to the Karbungko (STK), a people's organization. He
complaint? (2%) learned that a portion of the mountain located in
the City of Z of Province II was extremely
III. Juliet invoking the provisions of the Rule on damaged when it was bulldozed and leveled to
the ground, and several trees and plants were cut
Violence Against Women and their Children filed
down and burned by workers of World Pleasure
with the RTC designated as a Family Court a
Resorts, Inc. (WPRI) for the construction of a
petition for issuance of a Temporary Protection
hotel and golf course. Upon inquiry with the
Order (TPO) against her husband, Romeo. The
Family Court issued a 30-day TPO against project site engineer if they had a permit for the
Romeo. A day before the expiration of the TPO, project, Maingat was shown a copy of the
Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)
Juliet filed a motion for extension. Romeo in his
issued by the DENR-EMB, Regional Director
opposition raised, among others, the
(RD-DENR-EMB). Immediately, Maingat and
constitutionality of R.A. No. 9262 (The VAWC
STK filed a petition for the issuance of a writ of
Law) arguing that the law authorizing the
issuance of a TPO violates the equal protection continuing mandamus against RD-DENR-EMB
and WPRI with the RTC of Province I, a
and due process clauses of the 1987
designated environmental court, as the RD-
Constitution. The Family Court judge, in granting
DENR-EMB negligently issued the ECC to WPRI.
the motion for extension of the TPO, declined to
rule on the constitutionality of R.A. No. 9262. The
Family Court judge reasoned that Family Courts On scrutiny of the petition, the court determined
are without jurisdiction to pass upon constitutional that the area where the alleged actionable
issues, being a special court of limited jurisdiction neglect or omission subject of the petition took
and R.A. No. 8369, the law creating the Family place in the City of Z of Province II, and therefore
Courts, does not provide for such jurisdiction. Is cognizable by the RTC of Province II. Thus, the
the Family Court judge correct when he declined court dismissed outright the petition for lack of
to resolve the constitutionality of R.A. No. 9262? jurisdiction.
(3%)
IV. Strauss filed a complaint against Wagner for a.) Was the court correct in motu proprio
cancellation of title. Wagner moved to dismiss the dismissing the petition? (3%)
complaint because Grieg, to whom he mortgaged
the property as duly annotated in the TCT, was Assuming that the court did not dismiss
not impleaded as defendant. the petition, the RD-DENR-EMB in his
Comment moved to dismiss the petition
a.) Should the complaint be dismissed? on the ground that petitioners failed to
(3%) appeal the issuance of the ECC and to
exhaust administrative remedies
b.) If the case should proceed to trial provided in the DENR Rules and
without Grieg being impleaded as a party Regulations.
to the case, what is his remedy to protect
his interest? (2%) b.) Should the court dismiss the petition?
(3%)
V. Ernie filed a petition for guardianship over the
person and properties of his father, Ernesto. VII. Plaintiff sued defendant for collection of P 1
Upon receipt of the notice of hearing, Ernesto million based on the latter's promissory note. The
filed an opposition to the petition. Ernie, before complaint alleges, among others:
the hearing of the petition, filed a motion to order
Ernesto to submit himself for mental and physical 1) Defendant borrowed P1 million from plaintiff as
examination which the court granted. evidenced by a duly executed promissory note;
After Ernie's lawyer completed the presentation of 2) The promissory note reads:
evidence in support of the petition and the court's
ruling on the formal offer of evidence, Ernesto's
"Makati, Philippines
lawyer filed a demurrer to evidence.
Dec. 30, 2014
Ernie's lawyer objected on the ground that a For value received from plaintiff, defendant
demurrer to evidence is not proper in a special
promises to pay plaintiff Pl million, twelve (12)
proceeding.
months from the above indicated date without
necessity of demand.
a.) Was Ernie's counsel's objection
proper? (2%)
Signed
Defendant"
b.) If Ernesto defies the court's order
directing him to submit to physical and
A copy of the promissory note is attached as deed of sale in favor of Aldrin, the former
Annex "A." obstinately refused to execute the deed.
Defendant, in his verified answer, alleged among b.) What is Aldrin's remedy? (2%)
others:
IX. Hades, an American citizen, through a dating
1) Defendant specifically denies the allegation in website, got acquainted with Persephone, a
paragraphs 1 and 2 of the complaint, the truth Filipina. Hades came to the Philippines and
being defendant did not execute any promissory proceeded to Baguio City where Persephone
note in favor of plaintiff, or resides. Hades and Persephone contracted
marriage, solemnized by the Metropolitan Trial
2) Defendant has paid the Ill million claimed in the Court judge of Makati City. After the wedding,
promissory note (Annex "A" of the Complaint) as Hades flew back to California, United States of
evidenced by an "Acknowledgment Receipt" duly America, to wind up his business affairs. On his
executed by plaintiff on January 30, 2015 in return to the Philippines, Hades discovered that
Manila with his spouse signing as witness. Persephone had an illicit affair with Phanes.
Immediately, Hades returned to the United States
A copy of the "Acknowledgment Receipt" is and was able to obtain a valid divorce decree
attached as Annex "1" hereof. from the Superior Court of the County of San
Mateo, California, a court of competent
jurisdiction against Persephone. Hades desires to
Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the marry Hestia, also a Filipina, whom he met at
pleadings on the ground that defendant's answer Baccus Grill in Pasay City.
failed to tender an issue as the allegations therein
on his defenses are sham for being inconsistent;
a.) As Hades' lawyer, what petition
hence, no defense at all. Defendant filed an
should you file in order that your client
opposition claiming his answer tendered an
issue. can avoid prosecution for bigamy ifhe
desires to marry Hestia? (2%)
a.) Is judgment on the pleadings proper?
(3%) b.) In what court should you file the
petition? (1%)
Defendant filed a motion for summary
c.) What is the essential requisite that you
judgment on the ground that there are no
longer any triable genuine issues of facts. must comply with for the purpose of
establishing jurisdictional facts before the
court can hear the petition? (3%)
b.) Should the court grant defendant's
motion for summary judgment? (3%)
X. An information for murder was filed against
Rapido. The RTC judge, after personally
VIII. Aldrin entered into a contract to sell with Neil over evaluating the prosecutor's resolution,
a parcel of land. The contract stipulated a documents and parties' affidavits submitted by
P500,000.00 down payment upon signing and the the prosecutor, found probable cause and issued
balance payable in twelve (12) monthly a warrant of arrest. Rapido's lawyer examined the
installments of Pl00,000.00. Aldrin paid the down rollo of the case and found that it only contained
payment and had paid three (3) monthly the copy of the information, the submissions of
installments when he found out that Neil had sold the prosecutor and a copy of the warrant of arrest.
the same property to Yuri for Pl.5 million paid in Immediately, Rapido's counsel filed a motion to
cash. Aldrin sued Neil for specific performance quash the arrest warrant for being void, citing as
with damages with the RTC. Yuri, with leave of grounds:
court, filed an answer-in-intervention as he had
already obtained a TCT in his name. After trial,
a.) The judge before issuing the warrant
the court rendered judgment ordering Aldrin to
pay all the installments due, the cancellation of did not personally conduct a searching
Yuri's title, and Neil to execute a deed of sale in examination of the prosecution witnesses
in violation of his client's constitutionally-
favor of Aldrin. When the judgment became final
mandated rights;
and executory, Aldrin paid Neil all the installments
but the latter refused to execute the deed of sale
in favor of the former. b.) There was no prior order finding
probable cause before the judge issued
the arrest warrant.
Aldrin filed a "Petition for the Issuance of a Writ of
Execution" with proper notice of hearing. The
petition alleged, among others, that the decision May the warrant of arrest be quashed on
had become final and executory and he is entitled the grounds cited by Rapido's counsel?
to the issuance of the writ of execution as a matter State your reason for each ground. (4%)
of right. Neil filed a motion to dismiss the petition
on the ground that it lacked the required XI. The Ombudsman found probable cause to
certification against forum shopping. charge with plunder the provincial governor, vice
governor, treasurer, budget officer, and
a.) Should the court grant Neil's Motion to accountant. An Information for plunder was filed
Dismiss? (3%) with the Sandiganbayan against the provincial
officials except for the treasurer who was granted
immunity when he agreed to cooperate with the
Despite the issuance of the writ of
Ombudsman in the prosecution of the case.
execution directing Neil to execute the
Immediately, the governor filed with the prejudicial to his rights were committed during his
Sandiganbayan a petition for certiorari against trial. On October 7, 2015, the private prosecutor,
the Ombudsman claiming there was grave abuse with the conformity of the public prosecutor, filed
of discretion in excluding the treasurer from the an Opposition to Jaime's motion. On October 9,
Information. 2015, the court granted Jaime's motion. On
October 12, 2015, the public prosecutor filed a
a.) Was the remedy taken by the motion for reconsideration. The court issued an
governor correct? (2%) Order dated October 16, 2015 denying the public
prosecutor's motion for reconsideration. The
public prosecutor received his copy of the order
b.) Will the writ of mandamus lie to
of denial on October 20, 2015 while the private
compel the Ombudsman to include the
treasurer in the Information? (3%) prosecutor received his copy on October 26,
2015.
c.) Can the Special Prosecutor move for
a.) What is the remedy available to the
the discharge of the budget officer to
prosecution from the court's order
corroborate the testimony of the
granting Jaime's motion for new trial?
treasurer in the course of presenting its
(3%)
evidence? (2%)
a.) Did the court properly impose that bail After Pedro's presentation of his
condition? (3%) evidence, the court rendered judgment
finding him guilty as charged and holding
Before arraignment, Oasis Jung's lawyer him civilly liable for P20,000.00.
moved to quash the other four separate
informations for violation of the child Pedro's lawyer seasonably filed a motion
abuse law invoking the single larceny for reconsideration of the decision
rule. asserting that the court erred in awarding
the civil liability on the basis of Juan's
b.) Should the motion to quash be judicial affidavit, a documentary evidence
granted? (2%) which Prosecutor Marilag failed to orally
offer.
c.) After his release from detention on
bail, can Oasis Jung still question the c.) Is the motion for reconsideration
validity of his arrest? (2%) meritorious? (2%)
XIII. Jaime was convicted for murder by the Regional XV. Water Builders, a construction company based in
Trial Court of Davao City in a decision Makati City, entered into a construction
promulgated on September 30, 2015. On October agreement with Super Powers, Inc., an energy
5, 2015, Jaime filed a Motion for New Trial on the company based in
ground that errors of law and irregularities
Manila, for the construction of a mini hydro frisked him but the latter found no contraband.
electric plant. Water Builders failed to complete The police officer told Hercules to get inside the
the project within the stipulated duration. Super police station. Inside the police station, Hercules
Powers cancelled the contract. Water Builders asked the police officer, "Sir, may problema po
filed a request for arbitration with the Construction ba?" Instead of replying, the police officer locked
Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC). After up Hercules inside the police station jail.
due proceedings, CIAC rendered judgment in
favor of Super Powers, Inc. ordering Water a.) What is the remedy available to
Builders to pay the former P10 million, the full Hercules to secure his immediate release
amount of the down payment paid, and P2 million from detention? (2%)
by way of liquidated damages. Dissatisfied with
the CIAC's judgment, Water Builders, pursuant to
b.) If Hercules filed with the Ombudsman
the Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute a complaint for warrantless search, as
Resolution (ADR Rules) filed with the RTC of counsel for the police officer, what
Pasay City a petition to vacate the arbitral award.
defense will you raise for the dismissal of
Super Powers, Inc., in its opposition, moved to the complaint? (3%)
dismiss the petition, invoking the ADR Rules, on
the ground of improper venue as neither of the
parties were doing business in Pasay City. c.) If Hercules opts to file a civil action
against the police officer, will he have a
cause of action? (3%)
Should Water Builders' petition be dismissed?
(3%)
XVIII. The residents of Mt. Ahohoy, headed by
Masigasig, formed a nongovernmental
XVI. AA, a twelve-year-old girl, while walking alone
organization - Alyansa Laban sa Minahan sa
met BB, a teenage boy who befriended her. Later,
Ahohoy (ALMA) to protest the mining operations
BB brought AA to a nearby shanty where he
of Oro Negro Mining in the mountain. ALMA
raped her. The Information for rape filed against
members picketed daily at the entrance of the
BB states:
mining site blocking the ingress and egress of
trucks and equipment of Oro Negro, hampering
"On or about October 30, 2015, in the City of S.P. its operations. Masigasig had an altercation with
and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, Mapusok arising from the complaint of the mining
the accused, a minor, fifteen (15) years old with engineer of Oro Negro that one of their trucks was
lewd design and by means of force, violence and destroyed by ALMA members. Mapusok is the
intimidation, did then and there, willfully, leader of the Association of Peace Keepers of
unlawfully and feloniously had sexual intercourse Ahohoy (APKA), a civilian volunteer organization
with AA, a minor, twelve (12) years old against serving as auxiliary force of the local police to
the latter's will and consent." maintain peace and order in the area.
Subsequently, Masigasig disappeared. Mayumi,
At the trial, the prosecutor called to the witness the wife of Masigasig, and the members of ALMA
stand AA as his first witness and manifested that searched for Masigasig, but all their efforts
he be allowed to ask leading questions in proved futile. Mapagmatyag, a member of ALMA,
conducting his direct examination pursuant to the learned from Maingay, a member of APKA,
Rule on the Examination of a Child Witness. BB's during their binge drinking that Masigasig was
counsel objected on the ground that the abducted by other members of APKA, on order of
prosecutor has not conducted a competency Mapusok. Mayumi and ALMA sought the
examination on the witness, a requirement before assistance of the local police to search for
the rule cited can be applied in the case. Masigasig, but they refused to extend their
cooperation.
a.) Is BB's counsel correct? (3%)
Immediately, Mayumi filed with the RTC, a
In order to obviate the counsel's petition for the issuance of the writ of amparo
argument on the competency of AA as against Mapusok and APKA. ALMA also filed a
prosecution witness, the judge motu petition for the issuance of the writ of amparo with
proprio conducted his voir dire the Court of Appeals against Mapusok and
examination on AA. APKA. Respondents Mapusok and APKA, in their
Return filed with the RTC, raised among their
defenses that they are not agents of the State;
b.) Was the action taken by the judge
proper? (2%) hence, cannot be impleaded as respondents in
an amparo petition.
After the prosecution had rested its case,
a.) Is their defense tenable? (3%)
BB' s counsel filed with leave a demurrer
to evidence, seeking the dismissal of the
case on the ground that the prosecutor Respondents Mapusok and APKA, in
failed to present any evidence on BB' s their Return filed with the Court of
minority as alleged in the Information. Appeals, raised as their defense that the
petition should be dismissed on the
ground that ALMA cannot file the petition
c.) Should the court grant the demurrer?
(3%) because of the earlier petition filed by
Mayumi with the RTC.
XVII. Hercules was walking near a police station when
b.) Are respondents correct in raising
a police officer signaled for him to approach. As
their defense? (3%)
soon as Hercules came near, the police officer
c.) Mayumi later filed separate criminal
and civil actions against Mapusok. How
will the cases affect the amparo petition
she earlier filed? (1%)
2014
IV.
ESSAY QUESTIONS At the Public Attorney's Office station in Taguig where you
are assigned, your work requires you to act as public
I. defender at the local Regional Trial Court and to handle
cases involving indigents.
Alfie Bravo filed with the Regional Trial Court of Caloocan,
a complaint for a sum of money against Charlie Delta. The IV(A) In one criminal action for qualified theft
claim is for Php1.5Million. The complaint alleges that where you are the defense attorney, you learned
Charlie borrowed the amount from Alfie and duly that the woman accused has been in detention for
executed a promissory note as evidence of the loan. six months, yet she has not been to a courtroom
Charlie’s office secretary, Esther, received the summons nor seen a judge.
at Charlie’s office.
What remedy would you undertake to address the
Charlie failed to file an answer within the required period, situation and what forum would you use to invoke
and Alfie moved to declare Charlie in default and to be this relief? (3%)
allowed to present evidence ex parte. Ten days later,
Charlie filed his verified answer, raising the defense of full IV(B) In another case, also for qualified theft, the
payment with interest. detained young domestic helper has been
brought to court five times in the last six months,
I(A) Was there proper and valid service of but the prosecution has yet to commence the
summons on Charlie? (3%) presentation of its evidence. You find that the
reason for this is the continued absence of the
employer-complainant who is working overseas.
I(B) If declared in default, what can Charlie do to
obtain relief? (4%)
What remedy is appropriate and before which
forum would you invoke this relief? (3%)
II.
IV(C) Still in another case, this time for illegal
Yvonne, a young and lonely OFW, had an intimate
possession of dangerous drugs, the prosecution
relationship abroad with a friend, Percy. Although Yvonne
has rested but you saw from the records that the
comes home to Manila every six months, her foreign
illegal substance allegedly involved has not been
posting still left her husband Dario lonely so that he also
identified by any of the prosecution witnesses nor
engaged in his own extramarital activities. In one
has it been the subject of any stipulation.
particularly exhilarating session with his girlfriend, Dario
died. Within 180 days from Dario’s death, Yvonne gives
birth in Manila to a baby boy. Irate relatives of Dario Should you now proceed posthaste to the
contemplate criminally charging Yvonne for adultery and presentation of defense evidence or consider
they hire your law firm to handle the case. some other remedy? Explain the remedial steps
you propose to undertake. (3%)
II(A) Is the contemplated criminal action a viable
option to bring? (3%) IV(D) In one other case, an indigent mother seeks
assistance for her 14-year old son who has been
arrested and detained for malicious mischief.
II(B) Is a civil action to impugn the paternity of the
baby boy feasible, and if so, in what proceeding
may such issue be determined? (5%) Would an application for bail be the appropriate
remedy or is there another remedy available?
Justify your chosen remedy and outline the
III.
appropriate steps to take. (3%)
VII(A) What "before-trial" remedy would you IX(C) May the testimony of Fr. Platino, the priest-
invoke in Angela’s behalf to address the fact that confessor, be allowed over Walter’s objection?
she had not been investigated at all, and how (3%)
would you avail of this remedy? (4%)
X.
VII(B) What "during-trial" remedy can you use to
allow an early evaluation of the prosecution
As a new lawyer, Attorney Novato limited his practice to
evidence without the need of presenting defense
small claims cases, legal counseling and the notarization
evidence; when and how can you avail of this
of documents. He put up a solo practice law office and
remedy? (4%)
was assisted by his wife who served as his
secretary/helper. He used a makeshift hut in a vacant lot
VIII. near the local courts and a local transport regulatory
agency. With this practice and location, he did not have
On his way to the PNP Academy in Silang, Cavite on big-time clients but enjoyed heavy patronage assisting
board a public transport bus as a passenger, Police walk-in clients.
Inspector Masigasig of the Valenzuela Police witnessed
an on-going armed robbery while the bus was traversing X(A) What role can Attorney Novato play in small
Makati. His alertness and training enabled him to foil the claims cases when lawyers are not allowed to
robbery and to subdue the malefactor. He disarmed the appear as counsel in these cases? (3%)
felon and while frisking him, discovered another handgun
tucked in his waist. He seized both handguns and the X(B) What legal remedy, if any, may Attorney
malefactor was later charged with the separate crimes of
Novato pursue for a client who loses in a small
robbery and illegal possession of firearm.
claims case and before which tribunal or court
may this be pursued? (4%)
VIII(A) Where should Police Inspector Masigasig
bring the felon for criminal processing? To Silang, MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
Cavite where he is bound; to Makati where the
bus actually was when the felonies took place; or
back to Valenzuela where he is stationed? Which I. In a complaint filed by the plaintiff, what is the effect of
court has jurisdiction over the criminal cases? the defendant’s failure to file an answer within the
(3%) reglementary period? (1%)
VIII(B) May the charges of robbery and illegal (A) The court is allowed to render judgment motu
possession of firearm be filed directly by the proprio in favor of the plaintiff.
investigating prosecutor with the appropriate
court without a preliminary investigation? (4%) (B) The court motu proprio may declare the
defendant in default, but only after due notice to
IX. the defendant.
For over a year, Nenita had been estranged from her (C) The court may declare the defendant in
husband Walter because of the latter’s suspicion that she default but only upon motion of the plaintiff and
was having an affair with Vladimir, a barangay kagawad with notice to the defendant.
who lived in nearby Mandaluyong. Nenita lived in the
meantime with her sister in Makati. One day, the house of (D) The court may declare the defendant in
Nenita’s sister inexplicably burned almost to the ground. default but only upon motion of the plaintiff, with
Nenita and her sister were caught inside the house but
notice to the defendant, and upon presentation of (B) in criminal cases – the prosecution may prove
proof of the defendant’s failure to answer. the bad moral character of the accused to prove
his criminal predisposition
(E) The above choices are all inaccurate.
(C) in criminal cases under certain situations, but
II. Which of the following is admissible? (1%) not to prove the bad moral character of the
offended party
(A) The affidavit of an affiant stating that he
witnessed the execution of a deed of sale but the (D) when it is evidence of the good character of a
affiant was not presented as a witness in the trial. witness even prior to his impeachment as witness
(B) The extra judicial admission made by a (E) In none of the given situations above.
conspirator against his co-conspirator after the
conspiracy has ended. VI. When the court renders judgment in a judicial
foreclosure proceeding, when is the mortgaged property
(C) The testimony of a party’s witness regarding sold at public auction to satisfy the judgment? (1%)
email messagesthe witness received from the
opposing party. (A) After the decision has become final and
executory.
(D) The testimony of a police officer that he had
been told by his informants that there were (B) At any time after the failure of the defendant
sachets of shabu in the pocket of the defendant. to pay the judgment amount.
(E) None of the above. (C) After the failure of the defendant to pay the
judgment amount within the period fixed in the
III. Leave of court is required to amend a complaint or decision, which shall not be less than ninety (90)
information before arraignment if the amendment nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days
__________. (1%) from entry of judgment.
(A) upgrades the nature of the offense from a (D) The mortgaged property is never sold at
lower to a higher offense and excludes any of the public auction.
accused
(E) The mortgaged property may be sold but not
(B) upgrades the nature of the offense from a in any of the situations outlined above.
lower to a higher offense and adds another
accused VII. The signature of counsel in the pleading constitutes a
certification that __________. (1%)
(C) downgrades the nature of the offense from a
higher to a lower offense or excludes any (A) both client and counsel have read the
accused pleading, that to the best of their knowledge,
information and belief there are good grounds to
(D) downgrades the nature of the offense from a support it, and that it is not interposed for delay
higher to a lower offense and adds another
accused (B) the client has read the pleading, that to the
best of the client’s knowledge, information and
(E) All the above choices are inaccurate. belief, there are good grounds to support it, and
that it is not interposed for delay
IV. A Small Claims Court __________. (1%)
(C) the counsel has read the pleading, that to the
(A) has jurisdiction over ejectment actions best of the client’s knowledge, information and
belief, there are good grounds to support it, and
that it is not interposed for delay
(B) has limited jurisdiction over ejectment actions
(D) the counsel has read the pleading, that based
(C) does not have any jurisdiction over ejectment on his personal information, there are good
actions grounds to support it, and that it is not interposed
for delay
(D) does not have original, but has concurrent,
jurisdiction over ejectment actions (E) The above choices are not totally accurate.
(E) has only residual jurisdiction over ejectment VIII. Which among the following is a requisite before an
actions accused may be discharged to become a state witness?
(1%)
V. Character evidence is admissible __________. (1%)
(A) The testimony of the accused sought to be
(A) in criminal cases – the accused may prove his discharged can be substantially corroborated on
good moral character if pertinent to the moral trait all points.
involved in the offense charged
(B) The accused does not appear to be guilty.
(C) There is absolute necessity for the testimony (B) where the judge who heard the case is not the
of the accused whose discharge is requested. same judge who penned the decision
(D) The accused has not at any time been (C) where the judge heard several witnesses who
convicted of any offense. gave conflicting testimonies
(E) None of the above. (D) where there are substantially overlooked facts
and circumstances that, if properly considered,
IX. Which of the following distinguishes a motion to quash might affect the result of the case
from a demurrer to evidence? (1%)
(E) None of the above.
(A) A motion to quash a complaint or information
is fi led before the prosecution rests its case. XIII. Contempt charges made before persons, entities,
bodies and agencies exercising quasi-judicial functions
(B) A motion to quash may be fi led with or without against the parties charged, shall be filed with the
leave of court, at the discretion of the accused. Regional Trial Court of the place where the __________.
(1%)
(C) When a motion to quash is granted, a
dismissal of the case will not necessarily follow. (A) person, entity or agency exercising quasi-
judicial function is located
(D) The grounds for a motion to quash are also
grounds for a demurrer to evidence. (B) person who committed the contemptuous act
resides
(E) The above choices are all wrong.
(C) act of contempt was committed
X. Which among the following is not subject to mediation
for judicial dispute resolution? (1%) (D) party initiating the contempt proceeding
resides
(A) The civil aspect of B.P. Blg. 22 cases.
(E) charging entity or agency elects to initiate the
action
(B) The civil aspect of theft penalized under
Article 308 of the Revised Penal Code.
XIV. When may a party fi le a second motion for
(C) The civil aspect of robbery. reconsideration of a final judgment or final order? (1%)
XVI. Extra-territorial service of summons is proper in the XIX. Danny filed a complaint for damages against Peter.
following instances, except __________. (1%) In the course of the trial, Peter introduced evidence on a
matter not raised in the pleadings. Danny promptly
objected on the ground that the evidence relates to a
(A) when the non-resident defendant is to be
matter not in issue. How should the court rule on the
excluded from any interest on a property located
objection? (1%)
in the Philippines
(E) All of the above. XX. The Labor Arbiter, ruling on a purely legal question,
ordered a worker’s reinstatement and this ruling was
XVII. When is attachment improper in criminal cases? affirmed on appeal by the NLRC whose decision, under
(1%) the Labor Code, is final. The company’s recourse under
the circumstances is to __________. (1%)
(A) When the accused is about to abscond from
the Philippines. (A) file a motion for reconsideration and if denied,
file a petition for review with the Court of Appeals
on the pure legal question the case presents.
(B) When the criminal action is based on a claim
for money or property embezzled or fraudulently
misapplied or converted to the use of the accused (B) file a motion for reconsideration and if denied,
who is a broker, in the course of his employment appeal to the Secretary of Labor since a labor
as such. policy issue is involved.
(C) When the accused is about to conceal, (C) file a motion for reconsideration and if denied,
remove, or dispose of his property. file a petition for certiorari with the Court of
Appeals on the ground of grave abuse of
discretion by the NLRC.
(D) When the accused resides outside the
jurisdiction of the trial court.
(D) file a motion for reconsideration and if denied,
file a petition for review on certiorari with the
XVIII. Maria was accused of libel. While Maria was on the
witness stand, the prosecution asked her to write her Supreme Court since a pure question of law is
involved.
name and to sign on a piece of paper, apparently to prove
that she authored the libelous material. Maria objected as
writing and signing her name would violate her right (E) directly file a petition for certiorari with the
against self-incrimination. Was Maria’s objection proper? Court of Appeals since a motion for
(1%) reconsideration would serve no purpose when a
pure question of law is involved.
(A) No, she can be cross examined just like any
other witness and her sample signature may be
taken to verify her alleged authorship of the
libelous statements.
HAND IN YOUR ANSWER SHEET. b. A was charged with a non-bailable offense. At the
time when the warrant of arrest was issued, he
THERE IS NO NEED TO RETURN THIS was confined in the hospital and could not obtain
QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE HEAD WATCHER. a valid clearance to leave the hospital. He filed a
petition for bail saying therein that he be
considered as having placed himself under the
jurisdiction of the court. May the court entertain
2012 BAR EXAMINATIONS his petition? Why or why not? (5%)
REMEDIAL LAW
II
a. Discuss the "chain of custody" principle with for
respect to evidence seized under R.A. 9165 or Violation of R.A.
the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 9165
2002. (5%) Ho Pia and Sio Pao,
b. What do you understand about the "precautionary Accused.
principle" under the Rules of Procedure for
Environmental Cases? (5%)
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
III
TO ANY PEACE OFFICER
a. Distinguish error of jurisdiction from error of
judgment. (5%) Greetings:
b. A, a resident of Quezon City, wants to file an
action against B, a resident of Pasay, to compel It appearing to the satisfaction of the undersigned
the latter to execute a Deed of Sale covering a lot after examining under oath PDEA Director
situated in Marikina and that transfer of title be shabunot that there is probable cause to believe
issued to him claiming ownership of the land. that violations of Section 18 and 16 of R.A. 9165
Where should A file the case? Explain. (5%) have been committed and that there are good and
sufficient reasons to believe that Ho Pia and Sio
IV Pao have in their possession or control, in a two
(2) door apartment with an iron gate located at
a. A bought a Volvo Sedan from ABC Cars Jupiter St., Sta. Cruz, Laguna, undetermined
for P 5.0M. ABC Cars, before delivering to A, had amount of "shabu" and drug manufacturing
the car rust proofed and tinted by XYZ Detailing. implements and paraphernalia which should be
When delivered to A, the car's upholstery was seized and brought to the undersigned,
found to be damaged. ABC Cars and XYZ
Detailing both deny any liability. Who can A sue You are hereby commanded to make an
and on what cause(s) of action? Explain. (5%) immediate search, at any time in the day or night,
b. Mr. Sheriff attempts to enforce a Writ of Execution of the premises above described and forthwith
against X, a tenant in a condominium unit, who seize and take possession of the
lost in an ejectment case. X does not want to abovementioned personal property, and bring
budge and refuses to leave. Y, the winning party, said property to the undersigned to be dealt with
moves that X be declared in contempt and after as the law directs.
hearing, the court held X guilty of indirect
contempt. If you were X's lawyer, what would you Witness my hand this 1st day of March, 2012.
do? Why? (5%)
(signed)
V Judge XYZ
a. X was arrested, en flagrante, for robbing a bank. d. Cite/enumerate the defects, if any, of the search
After an investigation, he was brought before the warrant. (3%)
office of the prosecutor for inquest, but e. Suppose the search warrant was served on
unfortunately no inquest prosecutor was March 15, 2012 and the search yielded the
available. May the bank directly file the complaint described contraband and a case was filed
with the proper court? If in the affirmative, what against the accused in RTC, Sta. Cruz, Laguna
document should be filed? (5%) and you are the lawyer of Sio Pao and Ho Pia,
what will you do? (3%)
VI f. Suppose an unlicensed armalite was found in
plain view by the searchers and the warrant was
A PDEA asset/informant tipped the PDEA Director ordered quashed, should the court order the
Shabunot that a shabu laboratory was operating in a return of the same to the Chinese nationals?
house at Sta. Cruz, Laguna, rented by two (2) Chinese
nationals, Ho Pia and Sio Pao. PDEA Director Shabunot Explain your answer. (3%)
wants to apply for a search warrant, but he is worried that
if he applies for a search warrant in any Laguna court, VII
their plan might leak out.
a. Counsel A objected to a question posed by
a. Where can he file an application for search opposing Counsel B on the grounds that it was
warrant? (2%) hearsay and it assumed a fact not yet
b. What documents should he prepare in his established. The judge banged his gavel and
application for search warrant? (2%) ruled by saying "Objection Sustained". Can
c. Describe the procedure that should be taken by Counsel 8 ask for a reconsideration of the ruling?
the judge on the application. (2%) Why? (5%)
b. Plaintiff files a request for admission and serves
Suppose the judge issues the search warrant the same on Defendant who fails, within the time
worded in this way: prescribed by the rules, to answer the request.
Suppose the request for admission asked for the
admission of the entire material allegations stated
PEOPLE OF THE in the complaint, what should plaintiff do? (5%)
PHILIPPINES
Plaintiff
VIII
Criminal Case No.
-versus-
007
a. A sues B for collection of a sum of money.
Alleging fraud in the contracting of the loan, A
applies for preliminary attachment with the court.
The Court issues the preliminary attachment after
A files a bond. While summons on B was yet
unserved, the sheriff attached B's properties.
Afterwards, summons was duly served on B. 8
moves to lift the attachment. Rule on this. (5%)
b. Discuss the three (3) Stages of Court Diversion in
connection with Alternative Dispute Resolution.
(5%)
IX
- NOTHING FOLLOWS -
2011 (C) The plaintiff shall make the required deposit
and forthwith take immediate possession of the
property sought to be expropriated.
Bar Examination Questionnaire for Remedial Law (D) The plaintiff may appropriate the property for
Set A public use after judgment and payment of the
compensation fixed in it, despite defendant’s
appeal.
(1) Anna filed a petition for appointment as regular
administratrix of her fathers' estate. Her sister Sophia
moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the (5) Which of the following is a correct statement of the rule
parties, as members of the same family, have not exerted on amendment of the information in a criminal
earnest effort toward a compromise prior to the filing of proceeding?
the petition. Should the petition be dismissed?
(A) An amendment that downgrades the offense
(A) Yes, since such earnest effort is jurisdictional requires leave of court even before the accused
in all estate cases. pleads.
(B) No, since such earnest effort is not required in (B) Substantial amendments are allowed with
special proceedings. leave of court before the accused pleads.
(C) Yes, since such earnest effort is required prior (C) Only formal amendments are permissible
to the filing of the case. before the accused pleads.
(D) No, since such earnest effort toward a (D) After the plea, a formal amendment may be
compromise is not required in summary made without leave of court.
proceedings.
(6) Gary who lived in Taguig borrowed P1 million from Rey
(2) A pending criminal case, dismissed provisionally, shall who lived in Makati under a contract of loan that fixed
be deemed permanently dismissed if not revived after 2 Makati as the venue of any action arising from the
years with respect to offenses punishable by contract. Gary had already paid the loan but Rey kept on
imprisonment sending him letters of demand for some balance. Where
is the venue of the action for harassment that Gary wants
to file against Rey?
(A) of more than 12 years.
(B) not exceeding 6 years or a fine not exceeding (A) In Makati since the intent of the party is to
P1,000.00. make it the venue of any action between them
whether based on the contract or not.
(C) of more than 6 years or a fine in excess of
P1,000.00. (B) In Taguig or Makati at the option of Gary since
it is a personal injury action.
(D) of more than 6 years.
(C) In Taguig since Rey received the letters of
demand there.
(3) Angie was convicted of false testimony and served
sentence. Five years later, she was convicted of
(D) In Makati since it is the venue fixed in their
homicide. On appeal, she applied for bail. May the Court
contract.
of Appeals deny her application for bail on ground of
habitual delinquency?
(7) Which of the following is NOT within the power of a
judicial receiver to perform?
(A) Yes, the felonies are both punishable under
the Revised Penal Code.
(A) Bring an action in his name.
(B) Yes, her twin convictions indicated her
criminal inclinations. (B) Compromise a claim.
(C) No, the felonies fall under different titles in the (C) Divide the residual money in his hands among
Revised Penal Code. the persons legally entitled to the same.
(D) No, the charges are both bailable. (D) Invest the funds in his hands without court
approval.
(4) Which of the following is NOT CONSISTENT with the
rules governing expropriation proceedings? (8) Which of the following precepts forms part of the rules
governing small claims?
(A) The court shall declare the defendant who
fails to answer the complaint in default and render (A) Permissive counterclaim is not allowed.
judgment against him.
(B) The court shall render its decision within 3
(B) The court shall refer the case to the Board of days after hearing.
Commissioners to determine the amount of just
compensation. (C) Joinder of separate claims is not allowed.
(D) Motion to declare defendant in default is (13) Ramon witnessed the commission of a crime but he
allowed. refuses to testify for fear of his life despite a subpoena
being served on him. Can the court punish him for
(9) The Metropolitan Trial Court convicted Virgilio and contempt?
Dina of concubinage. Pending appeal, they applied for
bail, claiming they are entitled to it as a matter of right. Is (A) No, since no person can be compelled to be
their claim correct? a witness against another.
(A) No, bail is not a matter of right after conviction. (B) Yes, since public interest in justice requires
his testimony.
(B) Yes, bail is a matter of right in all cases not
involving moral turpitude. (C) No, since Ramon has a valid reason for not
testifying.
(C) No, bail is dependent on the risk of flight.
(D) Yes, since litigants need help in presenting
(D) Yes, bail is a matter of right in the their cases.
Metropolitan Trial Court before and after
conviction. (14) The right to intervene is not absolute. In general, it
CANNOT be allowed where
(10) As a rule, the judge shall receive the evidence
personally. In which of the following circumstances may (A) the intervenor has a common interest with any
the court delegate the reception of evidence to the clerk of the parties.
of court?
(B) it would enlarge the issues and expand the
(A) When a question of fact arises upon a motion. scope of the remedies.
(B) When the trial of an issue of fact requires the (C) the intervenor fails to put up a bond for the
examination of a long account. protection of the other parties.
(C) In default or ex-parte hearings. (D) the intervenor has a stake in the property
subject of the suit.
(D) Upon motion of a party on reasonable
grounds. (15) Which of the following grounds for dismissal invoked
by the court will NOT PRECLUDE the plaintiff from refiling
(11) Which of the following is in accord with the applicable his action?
rules on receivership?
(A) Res judicata.
(A) The court may appoint the plaintiff as receiver
of the property in litigation over the defendant’s (B) Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.
objection.
(C) Unenforceability under the Statutes of Fraud.
(B) A receiver may be appointed after judgment if
the judgment obligor refuses to apply his property (D) Prescription.
to satisfy the judgment.
(16) When may a co-owner NOT demand the partition of
(C) The trial court cannot appoint a receiver when the thing owned in common?
the case is on appeal.
(A) When the creditor of one of the co-owners has
(D) The filing of bond on appointment of a attached the property.
receiver is mainly optional.
(B) When the property is essentially indivisible.
(12) Bearing in mind the distinction between private and
public document, which of the following is admissible in
(C) When related co-owners agreed to keep the
evidence without further proof of due execution or property within the family.
genuineness?
(D) When a co-owner uses the property as his
(A) Baptismal certificates. residence.
(C) Yes, if it finds from the record that such (B) to satisfy the burden of proof in civil cases,
prejudicial question exists. preponderance of evidence.
(D) Yes, if it is convinced that due process and (C) to overcome a disputable presumption, clear
fair trial will be better served if the criminal case and convincing evidence.
is suspended.
(D) to rebut the presumptive validity of a notarial
(18) Which of the following conforms to the applicable rule document, substantial evidence.
on replevin?
(22) The accused jumps bail and fails to appear on
(A) The applicant must file a bond executed to the promulgation of judgment where he is found guilty. What
adverse party in an amount equal to the value of is the consequence of his absence?
the property as determined by the court.
(A) Counsel may appeal the judgment in the
(B) The property has been wrongfully detained by absence of the accused.
the adverse party.
(B) The judgment shall be promulgated in his
(C) The applicant has a contingent claim over the absence and he loses his right of appeal.
property object of the writ.
(C) The promulgation of the judgment shall be
(D) The plaintiff may apply for the writ at any time suspended until he is brought to the jurisdiction of
before judgment. the court.
(19) Gerry sued XYZ Bus Co. and Rico, its bus driver, for (D) The judgment shall be void.
injuries Gerry suffered when their bus ran off the road and
hit him. Of the two defendants, only XYZ Bus Co. filed an (23) What should the court sheriff do if a third party serves
answer, alleging that its bus ran off the road because one on him an affidavit of claim covering the property he had
of its wheels got caught in an open manhole, causing the levied?
bus to swerve without the driver’s fault. Someone had
stolen the manhole cover and the road gave no warning
(A) Ask the judgment obligee to file a court-
of the danger it posed. On Gerry’s motion and over the approved indemnity bond in favor of the third-
objection of XYZ Bus Co., the court declared Rico, the bus party claimant or the sheriff will release the levied
driver, in default and rendered judgment ordering him to property.
pay P50,000 in damages to Gerry. Did the court act
correctly?
(B) Ask the judgment obligee to file a court-
approved bond for the sheriff’s protection in case
(A) No, since the court should have tried the case he proceeds with the execution.
against both defendants upon the bus company’s
answer.
(C) Immediately lift the levy and release the levied
property.
(B) No, the court should have dropped Rico as
defendant since the moneyed defendant is the
bus company. (D) Ask the third-party claimant to support his
claim with an indemnity bond in favor of the
judgment obligee and release the levied property
(C) Yes, the court can, under the rules, render if such bond is filed.
judgment against the defendant declared in
default.
(24) Which of the following is NOT REGARDED as a
sufficient proof of personal service of pleadings?
(D) Yes, since, in failing to answer, Rico may be
deemed to have admitted the allegations in the
complaint. (A) Official return of the server.
(20) Which of the following has NO PLACE in an (B) Registered mail receipt.
application for a replevin order? A statement
(C) Written admission of the party served.
(A) that the property is wrongfully detained by the
adverse party. (D) Affidavit of the server with a statement of the
date, place and manner of service.
(B) that the property has not been distrained for a
tax assessment or placed under custodia legis. (25) A sued B for ejectment. Pending trial, B died,
survived by his son, C. No substitution of party defendant
(C) of the assessed value of the property. was made. Upon finality of the judgment against B, may
the same be enforced against C?
(D) that the applicant owns or has a right to the
possession of the property. (A) Yes, because the case survived B’s death
and the effect of final judgment in an ejectment
case binds his successors in-interest.
(21) 008-997-0001 In which of the following instances is
the quantum of evidence ERRONEOUSLY applied?
(B) No, because C was denied due process. (C) Claims for damages arising from quasi-delict.
(C) Yes, because the negligence of B’s counsel (D) Claims for funeral expenses.
in failing to ask for substitution, should not
prejudice A. (30) In a case, the prosecutor asked the medical expert
the question, "Assuming that the assailant was behind the
(D) No, because the action did not survive B’s deceased before he attacked him, would you say that
death. treachery attended the killing?" Is this hypothetical
question permissible?
(26) What is the proper remedy to secure relief from the
final resolutions of the Commission On Audit? (A) No, since it asks for his legal opinion.
(A) Petition for review on certiorari with the (B) Yes, but conditionally, subject to subsequent
Supreme Court. proof that the assailant was indeed behind the
deceased at that time.
(B) Special civil action of certiorari with the Court
of Appeals. (C) Yes, since hypothetical questions may be
asked of an expert witness.
(C) Special civil action of certiorari with the
Supreme Court. (D) No, since the medical expert has no personal
knowledge of the fact.
(D) Appeal to the Court of Appeals.
(31) The city prosecutor charged Ben with serious
(27) Which of the following is a duty enjoined on the physical injuries for stabbing Terence. He was tried and
guardian and covered by his bond? convicted as charged. A few days later, Terence died due
to severe infection of his stab wounds. Can the
prosecution file another information against Ben for
(A) Provide for the proper care, custody, and
homicide?
education of the ward.
(C) Collect compensation for his services to the (B) No, double jeopardy is present since Ben had
ward. already been convicted of the first offense.
(B) No, since causes of action pertaining to (B) No, at least one direct evidence and two
different venues may be joined in the RTC if one circumstantial evidence are required to support a
of the causes of action falls within its jurisdiction. conviction for bigamy.
(C) Yes, because special civil action may not be (C) No, the circumstantial evidence is not enough
joined with an ordinary civil action. to support a conviction for bigamy.
(D) No, since plaintiff may unqualifiedly join in one (D) No, the circumstantial evidence cannot
complaint as many causes of action as he has overcome the lack of direct evidence in any
against opposing party. criminal case.
(34) What is the doctrine of judicial stability or non (38) To prove payment of a debt, Bong testified that he
interference? heard Ambo say, as the latter was handing over money to
Tessie, that it was in payment of debt. Is Bong’s testimony
(A) Once jurisdiction has attached to a court, it admissible in evidence?
can not be deprived of it by subsequent
happenings or events. (A) Yes, since what Ambo said and did is an
independently relevant statement.
(B) Courts will not hear and decide cases
involving issues that come within the jurisdiction (B) No, since what Ambo said and did was not in
of administrative tribunals. response to a startling occurrence.
(C) No court has the authority to interfere by (C) No, since Bong’s testimony of what Ambo
injunction with the judgment of another court of said and did is hearsay.
coordinate jurisdiction.
(D) Yes, since Ambo’s statement and action,
(D) A higher court will not entertain direct resort subject of Bong’s testimony, constitutes a verbal
to it unless the redress sought cannot be obtained act.
from the appropriate court.
(39) Considering the qualifications required of a would-be
(35) Which of the following admissions made by a party in witness, who among the following is INCOMPETENT to
the course of judicial proceedings is a judicial admission? testify?
(A) Admissions made in a pleading signed by the (A) A person under the influence of drugs when
party and his counsel intended to be filed. the event he is asked to testify on took place.
(B) An admission made in a pleading in another (B) A person convicted of perjury who will testify
case between the same parties. as an attesting witness to a will.
(C) Admission made by counsel in open court. (C) A deaf and dumb.
(B) File an administrative action for gross (A) For Alex, probable cause; for Melba,
ignorance of the law against the trial judge. substantial evidence.
(C) File a special civil action of certiorari on (B) For Alex, preponderance of evidence; for
ground of grave abuse of discretion. Melba, substantial evidence.
(D) Appeal the orders of denial. (C) For Alex, proof beyond reasonable doubt; for
Melba, ordinary diligence.
(42) During trial, plaintiff offered evidence that appeared
irrelevant at that time but he said he was eventually going (D) For both, substantial evidence.
to relate to the issue in the case by some future evidence.
The defendant objected. Should the trial court reject the (46) In which of the following situations is the declaration
evidence in question on ground of irrelevance? of a deceased person against his interest NOT
ADMISSIBLE against him or his successors and against
(A) No, it should reserve its ruling until the third persons?
relevance is shown.
(A) Declaration of a joint debtor while the debt
(B) Yes, since the plaintiff could anyway subsisted.
subsequently present the evidence anew.
(B) Declaration of a joint owner in the course of
(C) Yes, since irrelevant evidence is not ownership.
admissible.
(C) Declaration of a former co-partner after the
(D) No, it should admit it conditionally until its partnership has been dissolved.
relevance is shown.
(D) Declaration of an agent within the scope of his
(43) Ben testified that Jaime, charged with robbery, has authority.
committed bag-snatching three times on the same street
in the last six months. Can the court admit this testimony (47) Defendant Dante said in his answer: "1. Plaintiff Perla
as evidence against Jaime? claims that defendant Dante owes her P4,000 on the
mobile phone that she sold him; 2. But Perla owes Dante
(A) No, since there is no showing that Ben P6,000 for the dent on his car that she borrowed." How
witnessed the past three robberies. should the court treat the second statement?
(B) Yes, as evidence of his past propensity for (A) A cross claim
committing robbery.
(B) A compulsory counterclaim
(C) Yes, as evidence of a pattern of criminal
behavior proving his guilt of the present offense. (C) A third party complaint
(D) No, since evidence of guilt of a past crime is (D) A permissive counterclaim
not evidence of guilt of a present crime.
(48) How will the court sheriff enforce the demolition of
(44) What is the right correlation between a criminal action improvements?
and a petition for Writ of Amparo both arising from the
same set of facts? (A) He will give a 5-day notice to the judgment
obligor and, if the latter does not comply, the
(A) When the criminal action is filed after the sheriff will have the improvements forcibly
Amparo petition, the latter shall be dismissed. demolished.
(B) The proceeding in an Amparo petition is (B) He will report to the court the judgment
criminal in nature. obligor’s refusal to comply and have the latter
cited in contempt of court.
(C) No separate criminal action may be instituted
after an Amparo petition is filed. (C) He will demolish the improvements on special
order of the court, obtained at the judgment
(D) When the criminal action is filed after the obligee’s motion.
Amparo petition, the latter shall be consolidated
with the first. (D) He will inform the court of the judgment
obligor’s noncompliance and proceed to demolish
(45) Alex filed a petition for writ of amparo against Melba the improvements.
relative to his daughter Toni's involuntary disappearance.
Alex said that Melba was Toni's employer, who, days (49) When may the bail of the accused be cancelled at the
before Toni disappeared, threatened to get rid of her at all instance of the bondsman?
(A) When the accused jumps bail. who committed the crime with him. Is Henry’s testimony
regarding what Asiong told him admissible in evidence
(B) When the bondsman surrenders the accused against Carlos?
to the court.
(A) No, since it is hearsay.
(C) When the accused fails to pay his annual
premium on the bail bond. (B) No, since Asiong did not make the statement
during the conspiracy.
(D) When the accused changes his address
without notice to the bondsman. (C) Yes, since it constitutes admission against a
co-conspirator.
(50) Which of the following MISSTATES a requisite for the
issuance of a search warrant? (D) Yes, since it part of the res gestae.
(A) The warrant specifically describes the place (54) Dorothy filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
to be searched and the things to be seized. against her husband, Roy, to get from him custody of their
5 year old son, Jeff. The court granted the petition and
(B) Presence of probable cause. required Roy to turn over Jeff to his mother. Roy sought
reconsideration but the court denied it. He filed a notice of
(C) The warrant issues in connection with one appeal five days from receipt of the order denying his
specific offense. motion for reconsideration. Did he file a timely notice of
appeal?
(D) Judge determines probable cause upon the
affidavits of the complainant and his witnesses. (A) No, since he filed it more than 2 days after
receipt of the decision granting the petition.
(51) Ranger Motors filed a replevin suit against Bart to
(B) No, since he filed it more than 2 days after
recover possession of a car that he mortgaged to it. Bart
receipt of the order denying his motion for
disputed the claim. Meantime, the court allowed, with no
reconsideration.
opposition from the parties, Midway Repair Shop to
intervene with its claim against Bart for unpaid repair bills.
On subsequent motion of Ranger Motors and Bart, the (C) Yes, since he filed it within 15 days from
court dismissed the complaint as well as Midway Repair receipt of the denial of his motion for
Shop’s intervention. Did the court act correctly? reconsideration.
(A) No, since the dismissal of the intervention (D) Yes, since he filed it within 7 days from receipt
bars the right of Bart to file a separate action. of the denial of his motion for reconsideration.
(B) Yes, intervention is merely collateral to the (55) Angel Kubeta filed a petition to change his first name
principal action and not an independent "Angel." After the required publication but before any
proceeding. opposition could be received, he filed a notice of
dismissal. The court confirmed the dismissal without
prejudice. Five days later, he filed another petition, this
(C) Yes, the right of the intervenor is merely in aid
time to change his surname "Kubeta." Again, Angel filed
of the right of the original party, which in this case
had ceased to exist. a notice of dismissal after the publication. This time,
however, the court issued an order, confirming the
dismissal of the case with prejudice. Is the dismissal with
(D) No, since having been allowed to intervene, prejudice correct?
the intervenor became a party to the action,
entitled to have the issue it raised tried and
decided. (A) Yes, since such dismissal with prejudice is
mandatory.
(52) The accused was convicted for estafa thru
(B) No, since the rule on dismissal of action upon
falsification of public document filed by one of two
the plaintiff’s notice does not apply to special
offended parties. Can the other offended party charge him
proceedings.
again with the same crime?
(53) Henry testified that a month after the robbery Asiong, (C) is a sham pleading.
one of the accused, told him that Carlos was one of those
(D) is considered not filed and should be (D) The trial court shall expunge his answer from
expunged. the record.
(57) The decisions of the Commission on Elections or the (61) What is the remedy of the accused if the trial court
Commission on Audit may be challenged by erroneously denies his motion for preliminary
investigation of the charge against him?
(A) petition for review on certiorari filed with the
Supreme Court under Rule 45. (A) Wait for judgment and, on appeal from it,
assign such denial as error.
(B) petition for review on certiorari filed with the
Court of Appeals under Rule 42. (B) None since such order is final and executory.
(C) appeal to the Supreme Court under Rule 54. (C) Ask for reconsideration; if denied, file petition
for certiorari and prohibition.
(D) special civil action of certiorari under Rule 65
filed with the Supreme Court. (D) Appeal the order denying the motion for
preliminary investigation.
(58) Which of the following states a correct guideline in
hearing applications for bail in capital offenses? (62) Which of the following renders a complaint for
unlawful detainer deficient?
(A) The hearing for bail in capital offenses is
summary; the court does not sit to try the merits (A) The defendant claims that he owns the
of the case. subject property.
(B) The prosecution’s conformity to the accused’s (B) The plaintiff has tolerated defendant’s
motion for bail is proof that its evidence of his guilt possession for 2 years before demanding that he
is not strong. vacate it.
(C) The accused, as applicant for bail, carries the (C) The plaintiff’s demand is for the lessee to pay
burden of showing that the prosecution’s back rentals or vacate.
evidence of his guilt is not strong.
(D) The lessor institutes the action against a
(D) The prosecution must have full opportunity to lessee who has not paid the stipulated rents.
prove the guilt of the accused.
(63) In a judicial foreclosure proceeding, under which of
(59) Apart from the case for the settlement of her parents' the following instances is the court NOT ALLOWED to
estate, Betty filed an action against her sister, Sigma, for render deficiency judgment for the plaintiff?
reconveyance of title to a piece of land. Betty claimed that
Sigma forged the signatures of their late parents to make (A) If the mortgagee is a banking institution.
it appear that they sold the land to her when they did not,
thus prejudicing Betty’s legitime. Sigma moved to dismiss
(B) if upon the mortgagor’s death during the
the action on the ground that the dispute should be
proceeding, the mortgagee submits his claim in
resolved in the estate proceedings. Is Sigma correct?
the estate proceeding.
(C) Yes, because the defense of prescription of (70) Upon review, the Secretary of Justice ordered the
action can be raised at anytime before the finality public prosecutor to file a motion to withdraw the
of judgment. information for estafa against Sagun for lack of probable
cause. The public prosecutor complied. Is the trial court
(D) No, because of the rule on Omnibus Motion. bound to grant the withdrawal?
(66) What is the effect of the failure of the accused to file (A) Yes, since the prosecution of an action is a
a motion to quash an information that charges two prerogative of the public prosecutor.
offenses?
(B) No, since the complainant has already
(A) He may be convicted only of the more serious acquired a vested right in the information.
offense.
(C) No, since the court has the power after the
(B) He may in general be convicted of both case is filed to itself determine probable cause.
offenses.
(D) Yes, since the decision of the Secretary of
(C) The trial shall be void. Justice in criminal matters is binding on courts.
(D) He may be convicted only of the lesser (71) Unexplained or unjustified non-joinder in the
offense. Complaint of a necessary party despite court order results
in
(67) Which of the following is a correct application of the
rules involved in consolidation of cases? (A) the dismissal of the Complaint.
(D) Yes since MCM, as business entity, is a de (C) RIGHT ANSWER The respondent neglects to
facto partnership with juridical personality. perform a clear duty under a contract.
(69) Fraud as a ground for new trial must be extrinsic as (D) The petitioner has a clear legal right to the act
distinguished from intrinsic. Which of the following demanded.
constitutes extrinsic fraud?
(74) When is the defendant entitled to the return of the (A) The rule on foreclosure of real estate
property taken under a writ of replevin? mortgage is suppletorily applicable to
extrajudicial foreclosures.
(A) When the plaintiff’s bond is found insufficient
or defective and is not replaced. (B) In judicial foreclosure, an order of
confirmation is necessary to vest all rights in the
(B) When the defendant posts a redelivery bond purchaser.
equal to the value of the property seized.
(C) There is equity of redemption in extra-judicial
(C) When the plaintiff takes the property and foreclosure.
disposes of it without the sheriff’s approval.
(D) A right of redemption by the judgment obligor
(D) When a third party claims the property taken exists in judicial foreclosure.
yet the applicant does not file a bond in favor of
the sheriff. (79) The information charges PNP Chief Luis Santos,
(Salary Grade 28), with "taking advantage of his public
(75) Character evidence is admissible position as PNP Head by feloniously shooting JOSE
ONA, inflicting on the latter mortal wounds which caused
his death." Based solely on this allegation, which court
(A) in criminal cases, the accused may prove his
has jurisdiction over the case?
good moral character if pertinent to the moral trait
involved in the offense charged.
(A) Sandiganbayan only
(B) in criminal cases, the prosecution may prove
the bad moral character of the accused to prove (B) Sandiganbayan or Regional Trial Court
his criminal predisposition.
(C) Sandiganbayan or Court Martial
(C) in criminal cases, the bad moral character of
the offended party may not be proved. (D) Regional Trial Court only
(D) when it is evidence of the good character of a (80) Distinguish between conclusiveness of judgment and
witness even prior to impeachment. bar by prior judgment.
(76) X’s action for sum of money against Y amounting to (A) Conclusiveness of judgment bars another
P80,000.00 accrued before the effectivity of the rule action based on the same cause; bar by prior
providing for shortened procedure in adjudicating claims judgment precludes another action based on the
that do not exceed P100,000.00. X filed his action after same issue.
the rule took effect. Will the new rule apply to his case?
(B) Conclusiveness of judgment bars only the
(A) No since what applies is the rule in force at defendant from questioning it; bar by prior
the time the cause of action accrued. judgment bars both plaintiff and defendant.
(B) No, since new procedural rules cover only (C) Conclusiveness of judgment bars all matters
cases where the issues have already been directly adjudged; bar by prior judgment
joined. precludes all matters that might have been
adjudged.
(C) Yes, since procedural rules have retroactive
effect. (D) Conclusiveness of judgment precludes the
filing of an action to annul such judgment; bar by
(D) Yes, since procedural rules generally apply prior judgment allows the filing of such an action.
prospectively to pending cases.
(81) Which of the following matters is NOT A PROPER
(77) A motion for reconsideration of a decision is pro SUBJECT of judicial notice?
forma when
(A) Persons have killed even without motive.
(A) it does not specify the defects in the judgment.
(B) Municipal ordinances in the municipalities
(B) it is a second motion for reconsideration with where the MCTC sits.
an alternative prayer for new trial.
(C) Teleconferencing is now a way of conducting
(C) it reiterates the issues already passed upon business transactions.
but invites a second look at the evidence and the
arguments. (D) British law on succession personally known to
the presiding judge.
(D) its arguments in support of the alleged errors
are grossly erroneous. (82) The RTC of Malolos, Branch 1, issued a writ of
execution against Rene for P20 million. The sheriff levied
(78) Which of the following correctly states the rule on on a school building that appeared to be owned by Rene.
foreclosure of mortgages? Marie, however, filed a third party claim with the sheriff,
despite which, the latter scheduled the execution sale.
Marie then filed a separate action before the RTC of
Malolos, Branch 2, which issued a writ of preliminary
injunction enjoining the sheriff from taking possession and (A) Yes, provided it raises both questions of facts
proceeding with the sale of the levied property. Did and law.
Branch 2 correctly act in issuing the injunction?
(B) No, since the CSC Chairman and
(A) Yes, since the rules allow the filing of the Commissioners have the rank of Justices of the
independent suit to check the sheriff’s wrongful Court of Appeals.
act in levying on a third party’s property.
(C) No, since the CSC is a Constitutional
(B) Yes, since Branch 2, like Branch 1, is part of Commission.
the RTC of Malolos.
(D) Yes, since the Court of Appeals has
(C) No, because the proper remedy is to seek jurisdiction over the petition concurrent with the
relief from the same court which rendered the Supreme Court.
judgment.
(87) Which of the following is appealable?
(D) No, since it constitutes interference with the
judgment of a co-equal court with concurrent (A) An order of default against the defendant.
jurisdiction.
(B) The denial of a motion to dismiss based on
(83) What is the effect and ramification of an order improper venue.
allowing new trial?
(C) The dismissal of an action with prejudice.
(A) The court’s decision shall be held in
suspension until the defendant could show at the (D) The disallowance of an appeal.
reopening of trial that it has to be abandoned.
(88) Which of the following is NOT REQUIRED of a
(B) The court shall maintain the part of its
declaration against interest as an exception to the
judgment that is unaffected and void the rest.
hearsay rule?
(D) The court shall vacate the judgment as well (B) The declarant is dead or unable to testify.
as the entire proceedings had in the case.
(C) The declaration relates to a fact against the
(84) Which of the following is sufficient to disallow a will interest of the declarant.
on the ground of mistake?
(D) At the time he made said declaration he was
(A) An error in the description of the land devised
unaware that the same was contrary to his
in the will.
aforesaid interest.
(B) The inclusion for distribution among the heirs (89) To prove the identity of the assailant in a crime of
of properties not belonging to the testator.
homicide, a police officer testified that, Andy, who did not
testify in court, pointed a finger at the accused in a police
(C) The testator intended a donation intervivos lineup. Is the police officer’s testimony regarding Andy's
but unwittingly executed a will. identification of the accused admissible evidence?
(D) An error in the name of the person nominated (A) Yes, since it is based on his personal
as executor. knowledge of Andy’s identification of the
accused.
(85) As a rule, the estate shall not be distributed prior to
the payment of all charges to the estate. What will justify (B) Yes, since it constitutes an independently
advance distribution as an exception? relevant statement.
(A) The estate has sufficient residual assets and (C) No, since the police had the accused
the distributees file sufficient bond. identified without warning him of his rights.
(B) The specific property sought to be distributed (D) No, since the testimony is hearsay.
might suffer in value.
(90) In which of the following cases is the testimony in a
(C) An agreement among the heirs regarding case involving a deceased barred by the Survivorship
such distribution. Disqualification Rule or Dead Man Statute?
(D) The conformity of the majority of the creditors (A) Testimony against the heirs of the deceased
to such distribution. defendant who are substituted for the latter.
(86) A party aggrieved by an interlocutory order of the Civil (B) The testimony of a mere witness who is
Service Commission (CSC) filed a petition for certiorari neither a party to the case nor is in privity with the
and prohibition with the Court of Appeals. May the Court latter.
of Appeals take cognizance of the petition?
(C) The testimony of an oppositor in a land (B) Await a judicial finding regarding who was at
registration case filed by the decedent’s heirs. fault.
(D) The testimony is offered to prove a claim less (C) Sue Ben for breach of contract of carriage.
than what is established under a written
document signed by the decedent. (D) Sue both Ben and Cesar as alternative
defendants.
(91) The prosecution moved for the discharge of Romy as
state witness in a robbery case it filed against Zoilo, (95) A surety company, which provided the bail bond for
Amado, and him. Romy testified, consistent with the the release of the accused, filed a motion to withdraw as
sworn statement that he gave the prosecution. After surety on the ground of the accused’s non-payment of the
hearing Romy, the court denied the motion for his renewal premium. Can the trial court grant the
discharge. How will denial affect Romy? withdrawal?
(A) His testimony shall remain on record. (A) No, since the surety’s undertaking is not
annual but lasts up to judgment.
(B) Romy will be prosecuted along with Zoilo and
Amado. (B) Yes, since surety companies would fold up
otherwise.
(C) His liability, if any, will be mitigated.
(C) No, since the surety company technically
(D) The court can convict him based on his takes the place of the accused with respect to
testimony. court attendance.
(92) In proceedings for the settlement of the estate of (D) Yes, since the accused has breached its
deceased persons, the court in which the action is agreement with the surety company.
pending may properly
(96) To prove that Susan stabbed her husband Elmer,
(A) pass upon question of ownership of a real Rico testified that he heard Leon running down the street,
property in the name of the deceased but claimed shouting excitedly, "Sinasaksak daw ni Susan ang asawa
by a stranger. niya! (I heard that Susan is stabbing her husband!)" Is
Leon's statement as narrated by Rico admissible?
(B) pass upon with the consent of all the heirs the
issue of ownership of estate asset, contested by (A) No, since the startling event had passed.
an heir if no third person is affected.
(B) Yes, as part of the res gestae.
(C) rule on a claim by one of the heirs that an
estate asset was held in trust for him by the (C) No, since the excited statement is itself
deceased. hearsay.
(D) rescind a contract of lease entered into by the (D) Yes, as an independently relevant statement.
deceased before death on the ground of
contractual breach by the lessee.
(97) Which of the following NOT TRUE regarding the
doctrine of judicial hierarchy?
(93) Which of the following stipulations in a contract will
supersede the venue for actions that the rules of civil
(A) It derives from a specific and mandatory
procedure fix?
provision of substantive law.
(B) Should the real owner succeed in recovering (C) A higher court will not entertain direct
his stolen car from buyer X, the latter shall have
recourse to it if redress can be obtained in the
recourse under this contract to seller Y appropriate courts.
exclusively before the proper Cebu City court.
(D) The reason for it is the need for higher courts
(C) Venue in case of dispute between the parties
to devote more time to matters within their
to this contract shall solely be in the proper courts exclusive jurisdiction.
of Quezon City.
(98) Plaintiff Manny said in his complaint: "3. On March 1,
(D) Any dispute arising from this contract of sale 2001 defendant Letty borrowed P1 million from plaintiff
may be filed in Makati or Quezon City.
Manny and made a promise to pay the loan within six
months." In her answer, Letty alleged: "Defendant Letty
(94) Allan was riding a passenger jeepney driven by Ben specifically denies the allegations in paragraph 3 of the
that collided with a car driven by Cesar, causing Allan complaint that she borrowed P1 million from plaintiff
injury. Not knowing who was at fault, what is the best that Manny on March 1, 2001 and made a promise to pay the
Allan can do? loan within six months." Is Letty’s denial sufficient?
(A) File a tort action against Cesar. (A) Yes, since it constitutes specific denial of the
loan.
(B) Yes, since it constitutes positive denial of the
existence of the loan.
d. Suppose that shortly before he expired, Emilio On complaint of V, a criminal case for Reckless
was able to send a text message to his wife Imprudence Resulting in Serious Physical Injuries was
Graciana reading "Nasaksak ako. D na me filed against X before the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) of
makahinga. Si Mabini ang may gawa ni2." Is this Sta. Maria. Atty. L, the private prosecutor, did not reserve
text message admissible as a dying declaration? the filing of a separate civil action.
Explain. (3%)
V subsequently filed a complaint for Damages against X
II and Y before the Regional Trial Court of Pangasinan in
Urdaneta where he resides. In his "Certification Against
On August 13, 2008, A, as shipper and consignee, loaded Forum Shopping," V made no mention of the pendency of
on the M/V Atlantis in Legaspi City 100,000 pieces of the criminal case in Sta. Maria.
century eggs. The shipment arrived in Manila totally
damaged on August 14, 2008. A filed before the a. Is V guilty of forum shopping? (2%)
Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) of Manila a complaint
against B Super Lines, Inc. (B Lines), owner of the M/V b. Instead of filing an Answer, X and Y move to
Atlantis, for recovery of damages amounting to ₱167,899. dismiss the complaint for damages on the ground
He attached to the complaint the Bill of Lading. of litis pendentia. Is the motion meritorious?
Explain. (2%)
a. B Lines filed a Motion to Dismiss upon the
ground that the Regional Trial Court has c. Suppose only X was named as defendant in
exclusive original jurisdiction over "all actions in the complaint for damages, may he move for the
admiralty and maritime" claims. In his Reply, A dismissal of the complaint for failure of V to
contended that while the action is indeed implead Y as an indispensable party? (2%)
"admiralty and maritime" in nature, it is the
amount of the claim, not the nature of the action, d. X moved for the suspension of the proceedings
that governs jurisdiction. Pass on the Motion to in the criminal case to await the decision in the
Dismiss. (3%) civil case. For his part, Y moved for the
suspension of the civil case to await the decision
b. The MeTC denied the Motion in question A. B in the criminal case. Which of them is correct?
Lines thus filed an Answer raising the defense Explain. (2%)
that under the Bill of Lading it issued to A, its
liability was limited to ₱10,000. e. Atty. L offered in the criminal case his affidavit
respecting what he witnessed during the incident.
At the pre-trial conference, B Lines defined as X’s lawyer wanted to cross-examine Atty. L who,
one of the issues whether the stipulation limiting however, objected on the ground of lawyer-client
its liability to ₱10,000 binds A. A countered that privilege. Rule on the objection. (2%)
V judgment was rendered against Mercedes for
₱1,000,000. The judgment became final and
Charisse, alleging that she was a resident of Lapu-Lapu executory and a writ of execution was
City, filed a complaint for damages against Atlanta Bank correspondingly issued.
before the RTC of Lapu-Lapu City, following the dishonor
of a check she drew in favor of Shirley against her current Since Mercedes did not have cash to settle the judgment
account which she maintained in the bank’s local branch. debt, she offered her Toyota Camry model 2008 valued at
P1.2 million. The Sheriff, however, on request of
The bank filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint on the Benjamin, seized Mercedes’ 17th century ivory image of
ground that it failed to state a cause of action, but it was the La Sagrada Familia estimated to be worth over
denied. It thus filed an Answer. ₱1,000,000.
a. In the course of the trial, Charisse admitted that Was the Sheriff’s action in order? (3%)
she was a US citizen residing in Los Angeles,
California and that she was temporarily billeted at VII
the Pescado Hotel in Lapu-Lapu City, drawing the
bank to file another motion to dismiss, this time As Cicero was walking down a dark alley one midnight,
on the ground of improper venue, since Charisse he saw an "owner-type jeepney" approaching him.
is not a resident of Lapu-Lapu City. Sensing that the occupants of the vehicle were up to no
good, he darted into a corner and ran. The occupants of
Charisse opposed the motion citing the "omnibus the vehicle − elements from the Western Police District −
motion rule." Rule on the motion. (3%) gave chase and apprehended him.
b. Suppose Charisse did not raise the "omnibus The police apprehended Cicero, frisked him and found a
motion rule," can the judge proceed to resolve the sachet of 0.09 gram of shabu tucked in his waist and a
motion to dismiss? Explain. (3%) Swiss knife in his secret pocket, and detained him
thereafter. Is the arrest and body-search legal? (3%)
c. Suppose the judge correctly denied the second
motion to dismiss and rendered judgment in favor PART II
of Charisse, ordering the bank to pay her
P100,000 in damages plus legal interest. The VIII
judgment became final and executory in 2008. To
date, Charisse has not moved to execute the
Dominique was accused of committing a violation of the
judgment. The bank is concerned that its liability
Human Security Act. He was
will increase with the delay because of the detained incommunicado, deprived of sleep, and
interest on the judgment award.
subjected to water torture. He later allegedly confessed
his guilt via an affidavit.
As counsel of the bank, what move should you take? (3%)
After trial, he was acquitted on the ground that his
VI confession was obtained through torture, hence,
inadmissible as evidence.
Antique dealer Mercedes borrowed P1,000,000 from
antique collector Benjamin. Mercedes issued a postdated In a subsequent criminal case for torture against those
check in the same amount to Benjamin to cover the debt. who deprived him of sleep and subjected him to water
torture, Dominique was asked to testify and to, among
On the due date of the check, Benjamin deposited it but it other things, identify his above-said affidavit of
was dishonored. As despite demands, Mercedes failed to confession. As he was about to identify the affidavit, the
make good the check, Benjamin filed in January 2009 a defense counsel objected on the ground that the affidavit
complaint for collection of sum of money before the RTC is a fruit of a poisonous tree. Can the objection be
of Davao. sustained? Explain. (3%)
Atty. Daro, counsel for the Chief of Staff, moves for the Wanting to receive the principal amount of the annuity,
dismissal of the Petition for failure to allege that his client Winston files for the probate of Pedrillo’s will in the Makati
issued any order to kill or harm Marinella. Rule on Atty. RTC. As prayed for, the court names Winston as
Daro’s motion. Explain. (3%) administrator of the estate.
In the course of his detention, X was subjected to three Sal Mineo died intestate, leaving a P1 billion estate. He
hours of non-stop interrogation. He remained quiet until, was survived by his wife Dayanara and their five children.
on the 3rd hour, he answered "yes" to the question of
whether "he prayed for forgiveness for shooting down the Dayanara filed a petition for the issuance of letters of
boy." The trial court, interpreting X’s answer as an administration. Charlene, one of the children, filed an
admission of guilt, convicted him. opposition to the petition, alleging that there was neither
an allegation nor genuine effort to settle the estate
On appeal, X’s counsel faulted the trial court in its amicably before the filing of the petition. Rule on the
interpretation of his client’s answer, arguing that X opposition. (5%)
invoked his Miranda rights when he remained quiet for the
first two hours of questioning. Rule on the assignment of XVII
error. (3%)
What is "res judicata in prison grey"? (2%)
XII
XVIII
In a prosecution for murder, the prosecutor asks accused
Darwin if he had been previously arrested for violation of
While window-shopping at the mall on August 4, 2008,
the Anti- Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. As defense
Dante lost his organizer including his credit card and
counsel, you object. The trial court asks you on what
billing statement. Two days later, upon reporting the
ground/s. Respond. (3%)
matter to the credit card company, he learned that a one-
way airplane ticket was purchased online using his credit
XIII card for a flight to Milan in mid- August 2008. Upon
extensive inquiry with the airline company, Dante
Policemen brought Lorenzo to the Philippine General discovered that the plane ticket was under the name of
Hospital (PGH) and requested one of its surgeons to one Dina Meril. Dante approaches you for legal advice.
immediately perform surgery on him to retrieve a packet
of 10 grams of shabu which they alleged was swallowed a. What is the proper procedure to prevent Dina
by Lorenzo. from leaving the Philippines? (2%)
Suppose the PGH agreed to, and did perform the surgery, b. Suppose an Information is filed against Dina on
is the package of shabu admissible in evidence? Explain. August 12, 2008 and she is immediately arrested.
(3%) What pieces of electronic evidence will Dante
have to secure in order to prove the fraudulent
XIV online transaction? (2%)
Czarina died single. She left all her properties by will to XIX
her friend Duqueza. In the will, Czarina stated that she did
not recognize Marco as an adopted son because of his 1. Enumerate the requisites of a "trial in absentia"
disrespectful conduct towards her. (2%) and a "promulgation of judgment in
absentia" (2%).
Duqueza soon instituted an action for probate of Czarina’s
will. Marco, on the other hand, instituted intestate 2. Name two instances where the trial court can
proceedings. Both actions were consolidated before the hold the accused civilly liable even if he is
RTC of Pasig. On motion of Marco, Duqueza’s petition acquitted. (2%)
was ordered dismissed on the ground that the will is void
for depriving him of his legitime. Argue for Duqueza. (5%) XX
XV
Azenith, the cashier of Temptation Investments, Inc.
(Temptation, Inc.) with principal offices in Cebu City, is
Pedrillo, a Fil-Am permanent resident of Los Angeles, equally hated and loved by her co-employees because
California at the time of his death, bequeathed to Winston she extends cash advances or "vales" to her colleagues
a sum of money to purchase an annuity. whom she likes. One morning, Azenith discovers an
anonymous letter inserted under the door of her office
Upon Pedrillo’s demise, his will was duly probated in Los threatening to kill her.
Angeles and the specified sum in the will was in fact used
to purchase an annuity with XYZ of Hong Kong so that
Azenith promptly reports the matter to her superior
Joshua, who thereupon conducts an internal investigation
to verify the said threat.
IV VII
XVI
Did the court acquire jurisdiction over Mary Rose? (4%) After his properties were attached, defendant Porfirio filed
a sufficient counterbond. The trial court discharged the
II attachment. Nonetheless, Porfirio suffered substantial
prejudice due to the unwarranted attachment. In the end,
Fe filed a suit for collection of P387,000 against Ramon in the trial court rendered a judgment in Porfirio's favor by
the RTC of Davao City. Aside from alleging payment as a ordering the plaintiff to pay damages because the plaintiff
defense, Ramon in his answer set up counterclaims for was not entitled to the attachment. Porfirio moved to
P100,000 as damages and P30,000 as attorney's fees as charge the plaintiff's attachment bond. The plaintiff and
a result of the baseless filing of the complaint, as well as his sureties opposed the motion, claiming that the filing of
for P250,000 as the balance of the purchase price of the the counterbond had relieved the plaintiff's attachment
30 units of air conditioners he sold to Fe. bond from all liability for the damages. Rule on Porfirio's
motion. (4%)
a. Does the RTC have jurisdiction over Ramon's
counterclaims, and if so, does he have to pay VII
docket fees therefor? (3%)
b. Suppose Ramon's counterclaim for the unpaid a. The writ of execution was returned unsatisfied.
balance is P310,000, what will happen to his The judgment obligee subsequently received
counterclaims if the court dismisses the complaint information that a bank holds a substantial
after holding a preliminary hearing on Ramon's deposit belonging to the judgment obligor. If you
affirmative defenses? (3%) are the counsel of the judgment obligee, what
c. Under the same premise as paragraph (b) above, steps would you take to reach the deposit to
suppose that instead of alleging payment as a satisfy the judgment? (3%)
defense in his answer, Ramon filed a motion to b. If the bank denies holding the deposit in the name
dismiss on that ground, at the same time setting of the judgment obligor but your client's informant
up his counterclaims, and the court grants his is certain that the deposit belongs to the judgment
motion. What will happen to his counterclaims? obligor under an assumed name, what is your
(3%) remedy to reach the deposit? (3%)
III VIII
a. Angela, a resident of Quezon City, sued Antonio, Bembol was charged with rape. Bembol's father, Ramil,
a resident of Makati City before the RTC of approached Artemon, the victim's father, during the
Quezon City for the reconveyance of two parcels preliminary investigation and offered P1 Million to
of land situated in Tarlac and Nueva Ecija, Artemon to settle the case. Artemon refused the offer.
respectively. May her action prosper? (3%)
b. Assuming that the action was for foreclosure on a. During trial, the prosecution presented Artemon
the mortgage of the same parcels of land, what is to testify on Ramil's offer and thereby establish an
the proper venue for the action? (3%) implied admission of guilt. Is Ramil's offer to settle
admissible in evidence? (3%)
IV b. During the pre-trial, Bembol personally offered to
settle the case for P1 Million to the private
Filomeno brought an action in the Metropolitan Trial Court prosecutor, who immediately put the offer on
(MeTC) of Pasay City against Marcelino pleading two record in the presence of the trial judge. Is
causes of action. The first was a demand for the recovery Bembol's offer a judicial admission of his guilt?
of physical possession of a parcel of land situated in (3%)
Pasay City with an assessed value of P40,000; the
second was a claim for damages of P500,000 for IX
Marcelino's unlawful retention of the property. Marcelino
filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the total The search warrant authorized the seizure of
amount involved, which is P540,000, is beyond the "undetermined quantity of shabu." During the service of
jurisdiction of the MeTC. Is Marcelino correct? (4%) the search warrant, the raiding team also recovered a kilo
of dried marijuana leaves wrapped in newsprint. The
V accused moved to suppress the marijuana leaves as
evidence for the violation of Section 11 of the
Within the period for filing a responsive pleading, the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 since they
defendant filed a motion for bill of particulars that he set were not covered by the search warrant. The State
for hearing on a certain date. However, the defendant was justified the seizure of the marijuana leaves under the
surprised to find on the date set for hearing that the trial "plain view" doctrine. There was no indication of whether
the marijuana leaves were discovered and seized before complaint to the National Bureau of Investigation, which
or after the seizure of the shabu. If you are the judge, how found that Edgardo had visited his lawyer twice, the first
would you rule on the motion to suppress? (4%) time on August 14, 2008 and the second on August 16,
2008; and that both visits concerned the swindling of
X Petronilo. During the trial of Edgardo, the RTC issued
a subpoena ad testificandum to Edgardo's lawyer for him
Jose, Alberto and Romeo were charged with murder. to testify on the conversations during their first and second
Upon filing of the information, the RTC judge issued the meetings. May the subpoena be quashed on the ground
of privileged communication? Explain fully. (4%)
warrants for their arrest. Learning of the issuance of the
warrants, the three accused jointly filed a motion for
reinvestigation and for the recall of the warrants of arrest. XV
On the date set for hearing of their motion, none of the
accused showed up in court for fear of being arrested. The Half-brothers Roscoe and Salvio inherited from their
RTC judge denied their motion because the RTC did not father a vast tract of unregistered land. Roscoe
acquire jurisdiction over the persons of the movants. Did succeeded in gaining possession of the parcel of land in
the RTC rule correctly? (4%) its entirety and transferring the tax declaration thereon in
his name. Roscoe sold the northern half to Bono, Salvio's
XI cousin. Upon learning of the sale, Salvio asked Roscoe to
convey the southern half to him. Roscoe refused as he
even sold one-third of the southern half along the West to
Arturo lent P1 Million to his friend Robert on the condition
Carlo. Thereupon, Salvio filed an action for the
that Robert execute a promissory note for the loan and a
reconveyance of the southern half against Roscoe only.
real estate mortgage over his property located in
Tagaytay City. Robert complied. In his promissory note Carlo was not impleaded. After filing his answer, Roscoe
sold the middle third of the southern half to Nina. Salvio
dated September 20, 2006, Robert undertook to pay the
did not amend the complaint to implead Nina.
loan within a year from its date at 12% per annum interest.
In June 2007, Arturo requested Robert to pay ahead of
time but the latter refused and insisted on the agreement. After trial, the court rendered judgment ordering Roscoe
Arturo issued a demand letter and when Robert did not to reconvey the entire southern half to Salvio. The
comply, Arturo filed an action to foreclose the mortgage. judgment became final and executory. A writ of execution
Robert moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of cause having been issued, the Sheriff required Roscoe, Carlo
of action as the debt was not yet due. The resolution of and Nina to vacate the southern half and yield possession
the motion to dismiss was delayed because of the thereof to Salvio as the prevailing party. Carlo and Nina
retirement of the judge. refused, contending that they are not bound by the
judgment as they are not parties to the case. Is the
contention tenable? Explain fully. (4%)
a. On October 1, 2007, pending resolution of the
motion to dismiss, Arturo filed an amended
complaint alleging that Robert's debt had in the XVI
meantime become due but that Robert still
refused to pay. Should the amended complaint be The mutilated cadaver of a woman was discovered near
allowed considering that no answer has been a creek. Due to witnesses attesting that he was the last
filed? (3%) person seen with the woman when she was still alive,
b. Would your answer be different had Arturo filed Carlito was arrested within five hours after the discovery
instead a supplemental complaint stating that the of the cadaver and brought to the police station. The crime
debt became due after the filing of the original laboratory determined that the woman had been raped.
complaint? (2%) While in police custody, Carlito broke down in the
presence of an assisting counsel and orally confessed to
XII the investigator that he had raped and killed the woman,
detailing the acts he had performed up to his dumping of
After receiving the adverse decision rendered against his the body near the creek. He was genuinely remorseful.
During the trial, the State presented the investigator to
client, the defendant, Atty. Sikat duly filed a notice of
testify on the oral confession of Carlito. Is the oral
appeal. For his part, the plaintiff timely filed a motion for
confession admissible as evidence of guilt? (4%)
partial new trial to seek an increase in the monetary
damages awarded. The RTC instead rendered an
amended decision further reducing the monetary awards. XVII
Is it necessary for Atty. Sikat to file a second notice of
appeal after receiving the amended decision? (3%) Ben sold a parcel of land to Del with right to repurchase
within one (1) year. Ben remained in possession of the
XIII property. When Ben failed to repurchase the same, title
was consolidated in favor of Del. Despite demand, Ben
refused to vacate the land, constraining Del to file a
An heir/oppositor in a probate proceeding filed a motion
complaint for unlawful detainer. In his defense, Ben
to remove the administrator on the grounds of neglect of
averred that the case should be dismissed because Del
duties as administrator and absence from the country. On
had never been in possession of the property. Is Ben
his part the heir/oppositor served written interrogatories to
correct? (4%)
the administrator preparatory to presenting the latter as a
witness. The administrator objected, insisting that the
modes of discovery apply only to ordinary civil actions, not XVIII
special proceedings. Rule on the matter. (4%)
Domenico and Gen lived without benefit of marriage for
XIV twenty years, during which time they purchased
properties together. After Domenico died without a will,
Gen filed a petition for letters of administration.
On August 15, 2008, Edgardo committed estafa against
Domenico's siblings opposed the same on the ground that
Petronilo in the amount of P3 Million. Petronilo brought his
Gen has no legal personality. Decide. (4%)
XIX
XX
XXI
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
2007 b. In the course of serving a search warrant, the
police finds an unlicensed firearm. Can the police
- I - take the firearm even if it is not covered by the
(Total 10%) search warrant? If the warrant is subsequently
quashed, is the police required to return the
firearm? Explain briefly. (5%)
a. What are the rules on the recognition and
enforcement of foreign judgments in our courts?
(6%) - VII -
b. Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced in the (Total 10%)
Philippines under those rules? Explain briefly.
(2%) a. B files a petition for cancellation of the birth
c. How about a global injunction issued by a foreign certificate of her daughter R on the ground of
court to prevent dissipation of funds against a falsified material entries there in made by B's
defendant therein who has assets in the husband as the informant. The RTC sets the case
Philippines? Explain briefly. (2%) for hearing and directs the publications of the
order once a week for three consecutive weeks in
- II - a newspaper of general circulation. Summons
(Total 10%) was served on the Civil Registrar but there was
no appearance during the hearing. The RTC
granted the petition. R filed a petition for
True or False. If the answer is false, explain your answer
briefly. annulment of judgment before the Court of
Appeals, saying that she was not notified of the
petition and hence, the decision was issued in
a. The surviving parties rule bars Maria from violation of due process. B opposed saying that
testifying for the claimant as to what the deceased the publication of the court order was sufficient
Jose had said to her, in a claim filed by Pedro compliance with due process. Rule. (5%)
against the estate of Jose (3%) b. G files a complaint for recovery of possession and
b. A defendant who has been declared in default damage against F. in the course of the trial, G
can avail of a petition for relief from the judgment marked his evidence but his counsel failed to file
subsequently rendered in the case. (3%) a formal offer of evidence. F then presented in
c. A motion is pleading. (2%) evidence tax declarations in the name of his
d. A counterclaim is pleading. (2%) father to establish that his father is a co-owner of
the property. The court ruled in favor of F, saying
- III - that G failed to prove sole ownership of the
(Total 10%) property in the face of F's evidence. Was the
court correct? Explain briefly. (5%)
1. What is the hearsay rule? (5%)
2. In relation to the hearsay rule, what do the - VIII -
following rules of evidence have in common? (Total 10%)
(5%)
1. The rule on statements that are part of a. X files an unlawful detainer case against Y before
the res gestae; the appropriate Metropolitan Trial Court. In his
2. The rule on dying declarations; answer, Y avers as a special and affirmative
3. The rule on admissions against interest. defense that he is a tenant of X's deceased father
in whose name the property remains registered.
- IV - What should the court do? Explain briefly. (5%)
(10%) b. The heirs of H agree among themselves that they
will honor the division of H's estate as indicated in
Husband H files a petition for declaration of nullity of her Last Will and Testament. To avoid the
marriage before the RTC of Pasig City. Wife W files a expense of going to court in a Petition for Probate
petition for habeas corpus before the RTC of Pasay City, of the Will, can they instead execute an
praying for custody over their minor child. H files a motion Extrajudicial Settlement Agreement among
to dismiss the wife's petition on the ground of the themselves? Explain briefly. (5%)
pendency of the other case. Rule.
- IX -
- V - (10%)
(Total 10%)
L was charged with illegal possession of shabu before the
a. Distinguish the effects of the filling of a demurrer RTC. Although bail was allowable under his indictment,
to the evidence in a criminal case and its filing in he could not afford to post bail, and so he remained in
a civil case. (5%) detention at the City Jail. For various reasons ranging
b. What is reverse trial and when may it be resorted from the promotion of the Presiding Judge, to the absence
to? Explain briefly. (5%) of the trial prosecutor, and to the lack of the notice to the
City Jail Warden, the arraignment of L was postponed
- VI - nineteen times over a period of two years. Twice during
(Total 10%) that period, L's counsel filed motions to dismiss, invoking
the right of the accused to a speedy trial. Both motions
were denied by the RTC. Can L file a petition for
a. On his way home, a member of the Caloocan City
mandamus? Reason briefly.
police force witnesses a bus robbery in Pasay
City and effects the arrest of the suspect. Can he
bring the suspect to Caloocan City for booking - X -
since that is where his station is? Explain briefly. (Total 10%)
(5%)
a. RC filed a complaint for annulment of the
foreclosure sale against Bank V. in its answer,
Bank V set up a counter claim for actual damages
and litigation expenses. RC filed a motion to
dismiss the counterclaim on the ground the Bank
V's Answer with Counterclaim was not
accompanied by a certification against forum
shopping. Rule. (5%)
b. A files a case against B. While awaiting decision
on the case, A goes to the United States to work.
Upon her return to the Philippines, seven years
later, A discovers that a decision was rendered by
the court in her favor a few months after she had
left. Can a file a motion for execution of the
judgment? Explain briefly. (5%)
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
2006 a. As a mode of appeal from the Regional Trial
Court or the Court of Appeals to the Supreme
Court. 2.5%
b. As a special civil action from the Regional Trial
-I- Court or the Court of Appeals to the Supreme
Court. 2.5%
c. As a mode of review of the decisions of the
1. What is the concept of remedial law? 2% National Labor Relations Commission and the
2. Distinguish between substantive law and Constitutional Commissions. 2.5%
remedial law. 2%
3. How are remedial laws implemented in our
- VII -
system of government? 2%
4. Distinguish jurisdiction from venue? 2%
5. What do you mean by (a) real actions; and (b) Mark filed with the Bureau of Internal Revenue a
personal actions? 2% complaint for refund of taxes paid, but it was not acted
upon. So, he filed a similar complaint with the Court of Tax
- II - Appeals raffled to one of its Divisions. Mark's complaint
was dismissed. Thus, he filed with the Court of Appeals a
petition for certiorari under Rule 65.
What court has jurisdiction over an action for specific
performance filed by a subdivision homeowner against a
Does the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction over Mark's
subdivision developer? Choose the correct answer.
petition? 2.5
Explain. 2.5%
- VIII -
1. The Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board
2. The Securities and Exchange Commission
3. The Regional Trial Court Does the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to review the
4. The Commercial Court or the Regional Trial Court Decisions in criminal and administrative cases of the
designated by the Supreme Court to hear and Ombudsman? 2.5%
decide "commercial cases".
- IX -
- III -
1. What are the requisites for the issuance of (a) a
1. What is forum shopping? 2.5% writ of preliminary injunction; and (b) a final writ of
2. Honey filed with the Regional Trial Court, Taal, injunction? 2.5%
Batangas a complaint for specific performance 2. Distinguish between injunction as an ancillary
against Bernie. For lack of a certification against remedy and injunction as a main action. 2.5%
forum shopping, the judge dismissed the
complaint. Honey's lawyer filed a motion for -X-
reconsideration, attaching thereto an amended
complaint with the certification against forum 1. Define a temporary restraining order (TRO). 2%
shopping. If you were the judge, how will you 2. Maya Regional Trial Court issue injunction
resolve the motion? 5% without bond? 2%
3. What is the duration of a TRO issued by the
- IV - Executive Judge of a Regional Trial Court? 2%
4. Differentiate a TRO from a status quo order. 2%
Jojie filed with the Regional Trial Court of Laguna a 5. Maya justice of a Division of the Court of Appeals
complaint for damages against Joe. During the pre-trial, issue a TRO? 2%
Jojie and her counsel failed to appear despite notice to
both of them. Upon oral motion of Jojie, Joe was declared - XI -
as in default and Jojie was allowed to present her
evidence ex palte. Thereafter, the court rendered its 1. What is an interlocutory order?
Decision in favor of Jojie. 2. What is the difference between a judgment and
an opinion of the court? 2.5%
Joe hired Jose as his counsel. What are the remedies
available to him? Explain. 5% - XII -
-V- Tina Guerrero filed with the Regional Trial Court of Bifian,
Laguna, a complaint for sum of money amounting to P1
May Congress enact a law providing that a 5,000 square Million against Carlos Corro. The complaint alleges,
meter lot, apart of the UST compound in Sampaloc, among others, that Carlos borrowed from Tina the said
Manila, be expropriated for the construction of a park in amount as evidenced by a promissory note signed by
honor of former City Mayor Arsenio Lacson? As Carlos and his wife, jointly and severally. Carlos was
compensation to UST, the City of Manila shall deliver its served with summons which was received by Linda, his
5-hectare lot in Sta. Rosa, Laguna originally intended as secretary .However, Carlos failed to file an answer to the
a residential subdivision for the Manila City Hall complaint within the 15-day reglementary period. Hence,
employees. Explain. 5% Tina filed with the court a motion to declare Carlos in
default and to allow her to present evidence ex parte. Five
- VI - days thereafter, Carlos filed his verified answer to the
complaint, denying under oath the genuineness and due
Explain each mode of certiorari: execution of the promissory note; and contending that he
has fully paid his loan with interest at 12% per annum.
1. Was the summons validly served on Carlos? - XVII -
2.5%
2. If you were the judge, will you grant Tina's motion In 1996, Congress passed Republic Act No.8189,
to declare Carlos in default? 2.5% otherwise known as the Voters' Registration Act of 1996,
providing for computerization of elections. Pursuant
- XIII - thereto, the COMELEC approved the Voters' Registration
and Identification System (VRIS) Project. It issued
Sergio Punzalan, Filipino, 50 years old, married, and invitations to pre-qualify and bid for the project. After the
residing at Ayala Alabang Village, Muntinlupa City , of public bidding, Fotokina was declared the winning bidder
sound and disposing mind, executed a last will and with a bid of P6 Billion and was issued a Notice of Award.
testament in English, a language spoken and written by But COMELEC Chairman Gener Go objected to the
him proficiently. He disposed of his estate consisting of a award on the ground that under the Appropriations Act,
parcel of land in Makati City and cash deposit at the City the budget for the COMELEC's modernization is only P1
Bank in the , sum of P300 Million. He bequeathed P50 Billion. He announced to the public that the VRIS project
Million each to his 3 sons and P150 Million to his wife. He has been set aside. Two Commissioners sided with
devised apiece of land worth P100 Million to Susan, his Chairman Go, but the majority voted to uphold the
favorite daughter-in-Iaw. He named his best friend, contract.
Cancio Vidal, as executor of the will without bond
Meanwhile, Fotokina filed with the RTC a petition
1. Is Cancio Vidal, after learning of Sergio's death, for mandamus to compel the COMELEC to implement the
obliged to file with the proper court a petition for contract. The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG),
probate of the latter's last will and testament? 2% representing Chairman Go, opposed the petition on the
2. Supposing the original copy of the last will and ground that mandamus does not lie to enforce contractual
testament was lost, can Cancio compel Susan to obligations. During the proceedings, the majority
produce a copy in her possession to be submitted Commissioners filed a manifestation that Chairman Go
to the probate court? 2% was not authorized by the COMELEC En Banc to oppose
3. Can the probate court appoint the widow as the petition.
executor of the will? 2%
4. Can the widow and her children settle 1. May the OSG represent Chairman Go before the
extrajudicially among themselves the estate of RTC notwithstanding that his position is contrary
the deceased? 2% to that of the majority? 5%.
5. Can the widow and her children initiate a separate 2. Is a petition for mandamus an appropriate
petition for partition of the estate pending the remedy to enforce contractual obligations? 5%
probate of the last will and testament by the
proper court? 2%
- XIV -
- XV -
- XVI -