Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 Roses: Dominic J. Durkin
3 Roses: Dominic J. Durkin
3 Roses: Dominic J. Durkin
Roses
Dominic J. Durkin
I.Introduction 69
II.History 69
III.Morphology 70
IV. Cultivar Development 71
V. Vegetative Propagation 73
A. Cuttings 75
B. Budded Plants 75
C. Grafted Plants 76
D. In Vitro Plants 76
VI. Plant Culture 76
A. Soil 77
B. Planting 77
C. Nutrition 78
D. Temperature 79
E. Ventilation 80
F. Light 81
G. Plant Growth Management 81
H. Harvesting 82
I. Crop Planning 83
J. Pruning 84
VII. Insects, Related Pests, and Diseases 84
A. Insects and Related Pests 85
B. Diseases 86
VIII. Physiological Disorders 87
A. Bullheads 87
B. Blind Shoots 87
68
I. INTRODUCTION
II. HISTORY
Cut rose p r o d u c t i o n w a s d e v e l o p e d t o b r i n g the g a r d e n to the residents of large
u r b a n centers. Production sites w e r e restricted primarily by the transportation
system available; in the United States, they were f o u n d a l o n g the Atlantic Coast,
along the railroad lines serving the country, a n d in the Great Lakes area. After
W o r l d War II a n d the g r o w t h of the airline industry, cut rose p r o d u c t i o n s p r e a d
rapidly to areas of the c o u n t r y with superior climates, featuring bright winter sun
a n d night t e m p e r a t u r e s of a b o u t 60°F.
The rose is the strongest c o m p o n e n t of d o m e s t i c cut flower p r o d u c t i o n , in-
creasing f r o m $ 5 4 million in 1970 to $181 million in 1988. During the s a m e p e r i o d ,
the n u m b e r of p r o d u c e r s d e c l i n e d in nearly all states but California, a n d the
average p r o d u c t i o n value per grower increased a b o u t five times f r o m $157,000 to
$700,000, b a s e d mainly o n increased return per flower. I m p o r t e d roses, as a
p r o p o r t i o n of total sales, increased f r o m 0 . 2 % in 1970 to 4 2 % in 1988. Plantings in
Kenya, Mexico, M o r o c c o , Spain, a n d Z a m b i a s u g g e s t that this trend will continue.
The red rose remains the t o p color c h o i c e in the United States a n d J a p a n , but in
Europe red roses constitute less than 4 0 % of total sales. There is increased interest
69
70 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
III. MORPHOLOGY
Flowers are evident in the tip of rose shoots approximately 2 w e e k s after axillary
b u d growth begins, w h e n the shoot is less than 2 inches long. Not all flower b u d s
d e v e l o p to maturity, for there is an intense c o m p e t i t i o n a m o n g the g r o w i n g organs
Fig. 1 Blind shoots. (A) Entire blind shoot. (B) Close up of blind shoot. (C) Point of shoot
tip abortion.
3 ROSES 71
Fig. 2. Rose shoot morphology. (A) Shoot with flower. W, three leaflet leaf; X, five and
seven leaflet leaves. (B) Axillary bud shape, midshoot. (C) Axillary bud shape, upper shoot.
3 ROSES 73
Fig. 3. Side shoot growth. A, terminal flower bud; S, side shoots. Note that lower side
shoots are longer than upper shoots. Terminal flower bud will be larger when side shoots
are removed early in development.
Seedlings are transplanted to a well-aerated mix for the first flowering. Selected
seedlings are increased by b u d d i n g for tests in m a n y p r o d u c t i o n areas. It is the rare
seedling that p r o g r e s s e s f r o m this stage to n a m i n g a n d release in less than 6 years;
f r o m a seedling p o p u l a t i o n of 150,000, three or four might b e n a m e d a n d p a t e n t e d .
The patent protects the breeder rights to a cultivar under an international c o n v e n -
tion in effect since 1 9 6 1 . Usually, the grower pays a royalty o n e a c h p a t e n t e d
cultivar for the life of the plant. In effect, the p r o d u c e r rents the plants for the
duration of productive life a n d in this way, the rights of the breeder c a r r y over to
any s p o r t p r o d u c e d .
V. VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION
To preserve the specific characteristics of a rose cultivar, it is necessary to
increase n u m b e r s by vegetative m e a n s , usually by b u d d i n g . Grafting is still d o n e ,
a n d for r o c k w o o l culture, r o o t e d cuttings are often as g o o d as grafted or b u d d e d
plants.
Fig. 4. Hard and soft pinches. (A) Hard pinch made after stem matured. Note branch
angle and double breaks. (B) Soft pinch was made while the stem was immature. This pinch
generally produces one break but the diameter of the stem is usually larger than the parent
stem. Note leaf form. Leaves developed from bud scales.
3 ROSES 75
A. Cuttings
Cuttings are m a d e at any time of the year; shoots are allowed to mature for 7
to 10 days after the usual harvest s t a g e to increase f o o d storage a n d rooting
response. The cutting c a n be o n e , t w o , or three n o d e s but only the t o p leaf is
retained to delay g r o w t h of the upper axillary b u d until rooting is well a d v a n c e d a n d
to provide f o o d for the d e v e l o p i n g shoot. The b a s e of the cutting is lightly d u s t e d
with a rooting c o m p o u n d a n d cuttings c a n be stuck at a s p a c i n g of 1§ inches in the
row a n d 3 inches b e t w e e n rows. The m e d i u m s h o u l d have g o o d water retention
a n d excellent aeration; a mix c o m p r i s e d of an equal v o l u m e of peat m o s s a n d
horticultural g r a d e vermiculite exhibits these characteristics. Rooting in 3-, 4-, or
5-inch pots facilitates handling a n d planting. Rooting o c c u r s quickly at a m e d i a
temperature of 70° to 75°F, a n d misting s h o u l d b e u s e d to r e d u c e water loss. The
mix s h o u l d contain fertilizer b e c a u s e s o m e g r o w t h will o c c u r before planting; this
c o u l d include limestone a n d e p s o m salts, a minor element mix, a n d low levels of
5 - 1 0 - 5 fertilizer a n d p o t a s s i u m nitrate. A high nitrate soluble fertilizer at the rate of
2 p o u n d s per 100 gallons c a n b e u s e d after rooting. Decrease in misting frequency
s h o u l d begin w h e n roots are o b s e r v e d , in 11 to 14 d a y s , to harden the plants for
planting. The entire p r o c e s s s h o u l d b e c o m p l e t e in 4 to 5 w e e k s at the a b o v e
m e d i u m temperature.
B. Budded Plants
B u d d e d plants are still the m o s t popular. They are larger a n d c a n p r o d u c e
quality flowers in a relatively short time. There is variation in the rootstock, with
Rosa manetti b e i n g m o s t important in the United States, while R. canina a n d R.
indica (called R. odorata in the United States) are m o r e important in Europe a n d
Israel. B u d d i n g in the United States is d o n e in California, Arizona, a n d Texas,
while m u c h b u d d i n g is also d o n e in Spain a n d Israel. It is important to find an area
of low rainfall d u r i n g the harvest s e a s o n to harden the plants for harvest a n d
storage. After the field is leveled a n d f u r r o w e d for irrigation to a d e p t h of 18 to 27
inches, it is f u m i g a t e d 3 to 5 w e e k s later with methyl b r o m i d e a n d chloropicrin for
control of Verticillium wilt, soil pests, a n d w e e d s . By O c t o b e r 1, the soil is f u r r o w e d
for irrigation. The field is treated with herbicide by the e n d of O c t o b e r a n d if
n e e d e d , a preplant 1 0 - 3 4 - 0 fertilizer is p l a c e d to the side. Rootstock f r o m virus-
free b l o c k s are cut b a c k to 30 inches, b u n c h e s of 50 c a n e s are collected a n d
p l a c e d in 0.5% s o d i u m hypochlorite solution for 15 minutes for c r o w n gall control.
Canes are s a w e d into 9-inch lengths a n d d e b u d d e d of all but the t o p t w o b u d s ;
the stem bases are d i p p e d in indolebutyric a c i d (IBA) to p r o m o t e rooting, a n d
cuttings are planted f r o m late O c t o b e r to m i d - D e c e m b e r . Cuttings are w a t e r e d
after planting, all are rooted by early February, a n d b u d d i n g takes place about 8
w e e k s later.
Shoots of the desired variety are allowed to mature o n the plant after flowering,
leaves are r e m o v e d but petioles m a y b e left for ease of handling the b u d s . The
76 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
C. Grafted Plants
Plant reproduction by grafting is a minor part of p r o p a g a t i o n today. Costs for
g r e e n h o u s e s p a c e are high, plant care is expensive, labor is not available for plant
maintenance, a n d grafted plants require a long g r o w i n g p e r i o d before quality
flowers are p r o d u c e d . Grafting still is a significant p r o p a g a t i o n m e t h o d in G e r m a n y
a n d Holland where winter light conditions are unfavorable for flower p r o d u c t i o n .
K n o w n as winter grafting, the t e c h n i q u e consists of grafting a s o f t w o o d scion with
one leaf on a bare-root d o r m a n t seedling understock, normally R. canina inermis.
More than 1 million plants w e r e p r o d u c e d in Holland in 1988 by a t e c h n i q u e called
"stenting." This consists of a graft of a s o f t w o o d scion with a single leaf o n a
s o f t w o o d understock cutting. Placed under mist, the graft union a n d rooting o c c u r
concurrently, in approximately 3 w e e k s p r o d u c i n g plants with potential for earlier
a n d larger basal shoots, a n d greater flower p r o d u c t i o n . Temperatures of 75°F
hasten the grafting process, but misting must b e u s e d to prevent desiccation.
W h e n the graft union is c o m p l e t e , temperature a n d humidity are r e d u c e d over a
p e r i o d of 7 t o 10 days to acclimatize the plants to g r e e n h o u s e conditions.
D. In Vitro Plants
Plant p r o d u c t i o n f r o m in vitro culture has s o m e potential for improving the rose
business. Thus far using this t e c h n i q u e has b e e n expensive, the plants have a high
p r o p o r t i o n of mutations, a n d t h o u g h vigorous, they p r o d u c e main b r a n c h e s of a
smaller diameter a n d shorter s t e m s than t h o s e plants p r o d u c e d by b u d d i n g or by
"stenting."
A. Soil
In the traditional rose g r e e n h o u s e , plants w e r e g r o w n in a b e n c h containing 5
to 6 inches of soil. Shallow soils t e n d to retain m o r e water than d e e p e r soils of the
s a m e structure. Roots have a high n e e d for o x y g e n , a n d b e c a u s e o x y g e n a n d
water c o m p e t e for the s a m e p o r e s p a c e , retention of m o r e water results in a lower
soil o x y g e n level. Plants in s u c h soils will b e less vigorous, m o r e p r o n e to chlorosis,
a n d slower to r e b o u n d f r o m heavy p r u n i n g or c r o p p i n g . In short, they will n e e d
careful attention t o cultural practices s u c h as m u l c h i n g , irrigation frequency, salinity
control, a n d the control of soil pests a n d diseases.
Soil preparation for p r o d u c t i o n in b e n c h e s begins w e e k s before replanting to
ensure that salinity levels are low, that nutrients are at the proper levels, a n d that
the soil p H is b e t w e e n 5.5 a n d 6.3. In addition to p r o b l e m s of chlorosis, poor root
g r o w t h a n d short s t e m s indicate p r o b l e m s in soil c o m p a c t i o n a n d limited aeration.
Plans s h o u l d b e m a d e to a d d materials to f o r m channels of large pores for q u i c k
restoration of soil air after irrigation. A m e n d m e n t s u s e d for this p u r p o s e include
c o a r s e s a n d , s p h a g n u m peat m o s s , haydite, scoria, a n d a variety of organic
residues, s u c h as various s e e d hulls, w o o d c h i p s , sawdust, manure, a n d straw. In
m o s t c a s e s , a m e n d m e n t s equal to 40 to 5 0 % of soil v o l u m e s h o u l d b e u s e d ,
particularly in heavy clay soil, but in practice, materials are m o r e c o m m o n l y a d d e d
in smaller a m o u n t s after several plantings, a c c e p t i n g the m o d e s t i m p r o v e m e n t in
plant g r o w t h for the lesser cost a n d effort. For these soils, use of a m u l c h provides
a gradual s u p p l y of organic materials that, if not contributing to i m p r o v e d soil
structure, at least minimizes the loss in structure over time. S t e a m pasteurization
of shallow soils is highly r e c o m m e n d e d to control soil insects, n e m a t o d e s , dis-
eases, a n d w e e d s .
Soil preparation in g r o u n d b e d s of g o o d agricultural soil is less d e m a n d i n g . After
restoring nutrient levels a n d c o r r e c t i n g salinity a n d p H , organic levels m a y b e
increased by addition of s o m e of the materials m e n t i o n e d a b o v e . The soil m a y be
pasteurized with s t e a m or treated with methyl b r o m i d e a n d chloropicrin, or it m a y
b e replanted after tilling.
B. Planting
Planting c a n b e d o n e at any time of year, but plant availability a n d the flower
market are usually decisive. A c o m m o n s c h e m e in the United States is to plant
after o n e of the holiday p e r i o d s , C h r i s t m a s , Valentine's Day, Easter, or Mother's
Day. This provides planting t i m e s of a b o u t J a n u a r y 1, February 20, April 10, or
May 15. The early planting will allow flowering for Easter, a n d the next for Mother's
Day.
78 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
C. Nutrition
Most roses are g r o w n using a liquid fertilization s c h e d u l e b a s e d o n soil tests,
especially of p H a n d salinity, a n d an occasional foliar analysis. Α p H range of 5.5
to 6.3 allows m o d e r a t e solubility of the micronutrients. Salinity or soluble salts
should b e low at planting to allow for the increases following soil pasteurization, but
o n c e plants are established, aggressive nutrition practices should k e e p salts at a
level a b o u t intermediate b e t w e e n n o r m a l a n d excessive. Within the flowering cycle,
lower salinity at c r o p p i n g will reduce root loss n o r m a l in this p e r i o d . Following b u d
3 ROSES 79
D. Temperature
Growth rate of the rose is very responsive to t e m p e r a t u r e ; as temperature is
increased, g r o w t h rate increases. Flower quality is affected in the o p p o s i t e direc-
tion; as t e m p e r a t u r e is increased, petal n u m b e r a n d flower b u d size decreases.
Generally, roses are g r o w n at 62°F night t e m p e r a t u r e with a day temperature of
70°F under low light c o n d i t i o n s a n d 80°F under high light. Flowers will take a b o u t
40 to 48 d a y s to d e v e l o p at these t e m p e r a t u r e s . Selection of d a y a n d night
80 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
E. Ventilation
Greenhouses m u s t have air replacement for a n u m b e r of reasons. First, in m o s t
environments, sunlight p r o d u c e s a temperature rise in the g r e e n h o u s e that c a n
exceed the desired day temperature. Excess heat is dissipated with the exit of hot
air from the t o p of the g r e e n h o u s e . Even w h e r e heat a c c u m u l a t i o n is not a serious
p r o b l e m , c a r b o n dioxide levels are r e d u c e d by photosynthesis a n d m u s t b e replen-
ished by ventilation. C a r b o n dioxide c a n also b e a d d e d to the g r e e n h o u s e air,
either by b u r n i n g p r o p a n e or by use of liquid c a r b o n dioxide. O p t i m u m c a r b o n
dioxide levels in the 9 0 0 to 1000 p p m range increase g r o w t h rates a n d flower
quality.
Air replacement is also u s e d to m a n a g e g r e e n h o u s e humidity as a general
a p p r o a c h to control p o w d e r y a n d d o w n y m i l d e w s a n d Botrytis. Relative humidity
of the air is an important factor in the d e v e l o p m e n t of fungal spores. If the g r e e n -
house is c l o s e d to c o n s e r v e heat, the relative humidity of the air increases as the
temperature falls. In m o s t environments, the air b e c o m e s saturated, water will
c o n d e n s e on the leaves a n d flowers providing exceptional conditions for rose
diseases. In m o s t seasons, this c a n b e a v o i d e d by providing a d e q u a t e ventilation
as the temperature falls to allow e x c h a n g e of the h u m i d g r e e n h o u s e air for the drier
outside air. During s e a s o n s w h e n the outside temperature is near the night t e m p e -
rature, it m a y be necessary to c o m b i n e periodic heating with ventilation to d e -
crease the likelihood of saturated air. There is s o m e evidence that air m o v e m e n t
of 30 feet per minute m a r k e d l y reduces p r o b l e m s of Botrytis. W h e n this is p r o v i d e d
by the horizontal air flow s y s t e m , it also provides uniform g r e e n h o u s e temperature
a n d ease of distributing g r e e n h o u s e fumigants.
3 ROSES 81
F. Light
The light requirement of the rose is c o m p l i c a t e d by the effect of light o n trans-
piration a n d the effect of transpiration o n plant g r o w t h a n d quality. Generally, rose
g r o w t h a n d quality increase with increasing light to a b o u t 1200 μηηοΙ s e c - 1
nrr2
H. Harvesting
Roses are cut t w o times per d a y d u r i n g m u c h of the year a n d three times in the
s u m m e r w h e n d e v e l o p m e n t rates a n d m a r k e t s warrant. The stage at cutting varies
with cultivar, s e a s o n , a n d distance to market, but generally the rose is cut at the
tightest stage at w h i c h the flower will o p e n in plain water (Fig. 5). Tight roses will
often o p e n in preservative solution but b e c a u s e preservative use is still not w i d e -
s p r e a d , it is better to m a k e the test in water with roses c o m p a r a b l e to those being
s h i p p e d . For the nearby market, the m o r e o p e n rose will d e v e l o p better a n d m a k e
a better presentation. There is the belief a m o n g retail florists that m o r e o p e n roses
d o not last, but the o p p o s i t e is m o r e often true.
The position of the cut o n the shoot will vary with market n e e d s for s t e m length
a n d on the height of the plants, the s e a s o n , a n d the leafiness of the plants. A s a
general rule, the cut will be m a d e to the first 5-leaflet leaf a b o v e the point of origin
of the flowering s t e m , but it will b e higher at the time of a holiday pinch or if the
plants have suffered a heavy leaf d r o p . In d e e p winter conditions without s u p p l e -
mental lighting, the cut will b e m a d e at the s e c o n d 5-leaflet leaf. Following a pinch
to the third to fifth 5-leaflet leaf, the cut will b e m a d e under the pinch to the next leaf
in the event of a single break a n d in the event of a d o u b l e break, the cut will be
m a d e to just below the first flower a n d w h e n the s e c o n d flower d e v e l o p s (a few
days to a w e e k later), it will b e undercut to the next five-leaflet leaf. During the s p r i n g
season w h e n plants are vigorous, flowering s h o o t s m a y be cut to the "knuckle," just
above the n o d e of origin, to gain additional s t e m length. Usually, t w o or three
shoots will d e v e l o p f r o m this cut, originating f r o m b u d s in the axils of the original
b u d scales (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5. Flower stages. Left to right: a, too tight; b, for distant market; c, for local market;
d, better for local market; e, open too far.
3 ROSES 83
Fig. 6. Knuckle cut on a flower from a soft pinch. A, node at which pinch was made; B,
point of cut; C, shoots originating from axillary buds of the original bud scales.
I. Crop Planning
A n efficient business must not only p r o d u c e excellent flowers at a saleable price,
but it must also m a n a g e the p r o d u c t i o n to satisfy the m a r k e t t h r o u g h o u t the year.
84 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
J. Pruning
If flower harvest is always m a d e a b o v e the origin of the flowering s t e m , the
plants will g r o w t o o tall. There are t w o w a y s to r e d u c e plant height. First, as a flower
is cut, rather than cutting it at the first 5-leaflet leaf, the s t e m o n w h i c h the flower
is g r o w i n g is cut to 24 inches a b o v e the soil after the first year of growth a n d to 6
inches higher after e a c h s u c c e e d i n g year. The a d v a n t a g e s of this system are there
is a continuous supply of flowers a n d these plants will p r o d u c e t w o to three m o r e
flowers per plant a n d the plant root system will remain in better condition with the
s u p p o r t i n g foliage. The d i s a d v a n t a g e s are that the harvest is slower, the g r e e n -
house is left in disarray b e c a u s e the lower s t e m is p r u n e d into the walkway, a n d
the decisions of where to m a k e the cut require c o n s i d e r a b l e experience.
In the s e c o n d p r u n i n g s y s t e m , the plants are p r u n e d with h e d g e cutters at the
24 inch level. Because a major loss of roots c a n b e e x p e c t e d following s u c h a
foliage loss, salinity s h o u l d b e r e d u c e d to the low to m e d i u m levels before p r u n i n g .
Additionally, to limit xylem s a p flow from the cut c a n e s a n d prevent stem dieback,
it is useful to p r u n e near the e n d of the watering cycle. The soil c a n be further d r i e d
to prevent s a p flow but this hardens the plant a n d delays b u d break. After p r u n i n g ,
all d e a d a n d w e a k w o o d is r e m o v e d , a n d it is a g o o d time to spray for spider mites.
B u d break c a n be accelerated by w a r m temperature a n d high humidity.
Where s u m m e r markets are limited, the flush of g r o w t h is sheared periodically
to increase n u m b e r s of g r o w i n g shoots a n d to stimulate d e v e l o p m e n t of basal
shoots for plant renewal.
2. Aphids
3. Thrips
4. Whiteflies
B. Diseases
1. Powdery Mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae)
underside of the leaf. In usual conditions, s p o r e s are not seen, but the leaves on
the current shoot m a y s h o w d a r k irregularly s h a p e d s p o t s ; leaf d r o p m a y b e heavy
a n d m a y include leaves f r o m the current g r o w t h . Heat a n d ventilation will aid in
control but in s e a s o n s w h e n the outside a n d inside temperatures are similar,
spraying will also b e required.
B. Blind Shoots
Rose shoots initiate flowers at an early s t a g e of d e v e l o p m e n t , but blind shoots
abort m o s t flower b u d s s o o n thereafter. Blind shoots increase in p e r i o d s of low
light, but the absolute n u m b e r of blinds m a y b e highest after p r u n i n g . More blinds
are p r o d u c e d f r o m the lower b u d s o n a s t e m , a n d it is c o m m o n to see a high
p r o p o r t i o n of blinds near the e n d of a c r o p . Increased c a r b o n dioxide a n d light
levels help to minimize n u m b e r s of blinds d u r i n g the winter p e r i o d .
C. Leaf Drop
Leaf d r o p is not u n c o m m o n in the rose. S o m e c o m m o n c a u s e s are s h a d i n g
f r o m foliage a b o v e , inconsistent irrigation a n d nutritional practices, plant a g e , a n d ,
occasionally, a reaction to a pesticide application. Additionally, heavy infestation of
mites a n d p o w d e r y m i l d e w will accelerate leaf a g i n g a n d c a u s e leaf d r o p .
88 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
D. Leaf Distortion
Rose leaves g r o w to maturity in 10 to 12 d a y s f r o m the e m b r y o n i c size in the
b u d . Spray applications d u r i n g this p e r i o d c a n d a m a g e the leaf a n d prevent
normal g r o w t h , p r o d u c i n g distortions. Water stress, usually c a u s e d by high light
intensity a n d low humidity, c a u s e s a tissue b u r n . In s o m e of the new, very tight
g r e e n h o u s e structures d u r i n g the winter, g r e e n h o u s e temperatures d o not require
the use of venting. It is not unusual to see, o n a single s t e m , a s u c c e s s i o n of normal
leaves followed by o n e to four small distorted leaves, a n d then a return to normal
size leaves. This p r o b l e m is t h o u g h t to result f r o m t e m p o r a r y limitation in the uptake
of micronutrients d u r i n g p e r i o d s of low transpiration.
E. Volatiles
The rose is sensitive to a large n u m b e r of chemicals, f r o m m e r c u r y metal
to mercuric c o m p o u n d s in paints a n d fungicides, to ethylene gas, a m m o n i a ,
Treflan herbicide, sulfur dioxide, a n d m a n y of the phenoxy-type herbicides. As a
general rule, if a c h e m i c a l has not been s h o w n to be safe on roses, a s s u m e that
it is not!
F. Sugar Damage
Roses p r o d u c e d under s u p p l e m e n t a l high density d i s c h a r g e (HID) lighting a n d
c a r b o n dioxide additions have b e e n s h o w n to transpire excessively, a fact that
might help in s o m e p r o b l e m s (see Section VIII,D) but that c a u s e s p r o b l e m s in the
handling of the cut flower. A l t h o u g h it is r e c o g n i z e d that roses require preservatives
if the potential vase life is to b e attained, use of sugar-containing preservatives has
c a u s e d considerable sugar b u r n o n these roses. It s e e m s that the rate of water
entry into the leaf cells is fast c o m p a r e d to the rate of sugar entry. With rapid water
loss from the leaves, the sugar concentrates outside the cell until cell d e a t h by
dehydration o c c u r s . Similar p r o b l e m s c a n b e o b s e r v e d in rose handling for roses
p r o d u c e d d u r i n g p e r i o d s of vigorous growth as in the s p r i n g s e a s o n .
Problems for the cut rose begin at harvest; if cut t o o early, the rose m a y contain
little stored f o o d . The correct harvest stages are difficult to define as cultivars vary
greatly, but in general, the rose s h o u l d be cut at the s t a g e at w h i c h the flowers will
continue to d e v e l o p for the final c o n s u m e r .
There are t w o s h o r t - t e r m p r o b l e m s of the cut rose; water loss increases at
harvest, a n d as water m o v e s into the leaves f r o m the s t e m , air enters the s t e m
base. The first p r o b l e m c a u s e s wilting of the flower while the s e c o n d limits the rate
of uptake w h e n flowers are p l a c e d in water. Hydration of the cut flowers in d e e p ,
acidified water usually solves the harvest water p r o b l e m s . T w o c o m m o n acidifiers
are citric a c i d at 350 p p m a n d a l u m i n u m sulfate at 200 to 600 p p m . The f o r m e r is
a faster hydrating agent, but sanitation is easier to maintain with a l u m i n u m sulfate
solutions.
O n c e hydrated, the l o n g - t e r m p e r f o r m a n c e of the cut rose d e p e n d s o n m i c r o b e
control. The m o s t c o m m o n p r o b l e m involves bacteria in the water, but there are
p r o b l e m s with yeast a n d fungi as well. Control starts with the use of clean c o n -
tainers a n d either use of l o n g - t e r m sanitation m e a s u r e s like slow release chlorine
c o m p o u n d s or with frequent r e p l a c e m e n t of the water. Use of sugar containing
preservatives is not r e c o m m e n d e d at the p r o d u c t i o n level; storage temperatures
are t o o low for significant uptake, a n d sugar c a n m a k e the m i c r o b e control p r o b l e m
m o r e difficult. In contrast, preservatives are r e c o m m e n d e d whenever storage t e m -
peratures e x c e e d 38° to 40°F, usually at the retail level a n d always at the c o n s u m e r
level. A s water quality is variable, tests s h o u l d b e run to d e t e r m i n e w h i c h of the
available preservatives is m o s t effective.
Roses are g r a d e d by length, d e p e n d i n g o n market preferences starting at a b o u t
9 inches a n d running to 30 inches. G r a d i n g is frequently d o n e by m a c h i n e after
initial screening for m a l f o r m e d or c r o o k e d flowers (Fig. 7). Roses are p a c k e d in
b u n c h e s of 25 in the United States a n d 20 in Europe. Care m u s t be taken to avoid
tight w r a p s as the flowers will swell with c o n t i n u e d hydration, a n d they will bruise.
All s t e m s s h o u l d b e cut after w r a p p i n g so that at later m a r k e t i n g stages, approx-
imately 1 to 2 inches of s t e m c a n be r e m o v e d f r o m e a c h flower without u n w r a p p i n g
the b u n c h . Flowers that receive little or no recutting will b e slow to hydrate, a n d their
p e r f o r m a n c e in the vase is uncertain. For l o n g - s t e m roses, it is c o m m o n to w r a p
the s t e m bases with string or r u b b e r b a n d s . This w r a p s h o u l d b e p l a c e d at least
4 inches f r o m the s t e m b a s e to allow for easy recutting.
The flower box m u s t be large e n o u g h to a c c o m m o d a t e 400 to 600 flowers, rigid
e n o u g h to protect the flowers, a n d insulated well e n o u g h to k e e p out the s u b -
freezing temperatures of winter a n d to limit heat gain d u r i n g the rest of the year.
C a r d b o a r d boxes, often w a x e d to limit water loss a n d occasionally s p r a y e d with
Polyurethane to limit heat gain, are u s e d . Other insulators in use are newspaper,
fiberglass liners, or Styrofoam sheets. Flower b u n c h e s m u s t be i m m o b i l i z e d ,
s o m e t i m e s with w o o d e n slats cleated to the outside of the box or with rubber
b a n d s that are held by plastic pieces that fit t h r o u g h the sides of the boxes.
B u n c h e s are c o m m o n l y iced for additional heat control but w h e r e Botrytis flower
90 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
Fig. 7. Peduncle form. A, normal, straight peduncle; B, short, crooked peduncle often
resulting from excessive plant vigor.
REFERENCES
Augsburger, Ν. D., and Powell, C. C. (1986). "Greenhouse ventilation: Some basics on controlling
humidity." Roses Inc. Bull. Sept., 20-23.
Brown, W. (1989). "Water, pH and nutrient availability." Roses Inc. Bull. D e c , 28-35.
Brugger, Μ. F., Short, Τ. Η., and Bauerle, W. L (1987). "An evaluation of horizontal air flow in six
commercial greenhouses." Roses Inc. Bull. Oct., 3 2 - 4 1 .
Bryne, T. G., and Doss, R. P. (1981). "Development time of 'Cara Mia' rose shoots as influenced by
pruning position and parent shoot diameter." J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sei. 106: 98-100.
Bryne, Τ. G., Doss, R. P., and Tse, Α. Τ. Y. (1978). "Flower and shoot development in the greenhouse
roses, 'Cara Mia' and Town Crier' under several temperature-photoperiodic regimes." J. Am.
Soc. Hort. Sei. 103: 500-502.
Darlington, A. (1990). "Relative humidity control and plant growth." Roses Inc. Bull. Jan., 24-27.
Dixon, Μ. Α., Butt, J. Α., Murr, D. P., and Tsugita, M. J. (1988). "Water relations of the cut greenhouse
rose: The relationship between stem water potential, hydraulic conductance, and cavitation."
Scientia Hort. 36: 109-118.
Durkin, D. (1988). "Studies on the handling of cut rose flowers." Roses Inc. Bull. May, 5 3 - 6 1 .
Halevy, A. H., and Mayak, S. (1979). "Senescence and post harvest physiology of cut flowers, Part 1."
Hortic. Rev. 1: 204-236.
Halevy, A. H., and Mayak, S. (1981). "Senescence and post harvest physiology of cut flowers, Part 2."
Hortic. Rev. 3: 60-143.
Hammer, P. E., and Marois, J. J. (1989). "Nonchemical methods for postharvest control of Botrytis
cinerea on cut roses." J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sei. 114: 100-106.
Hanan, J. J. (1986). "Yield and quality of 'Samantha' roses in three inert media." Roses Inc. Bull. Oct.,
31-33.
Hanan, J. J., Holley, W. D., and Goldsberry, K. L. (1978). Greenhouse Management. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Hasegawa, P. M. (1980). "Factors affecting shoot and root initiation from cultured rose shoot tips." J.
Am. Soc. Hort. Sei. 105: 216-220.
Horst, R. (1983). Compendium of Rose Diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota: Published by The American
Phytopathological Society.
Hughes, Η. E., and Hanan, J. J. (1983a). "Effects of salinity in water supplies on rose production:
Experiment 1." Roses Inc. Bull. March, 16-19.
Hughes, Η. E., and Hanan, J. J. (1983b). "Effects of salinity in water supplies on rose production:
Experiment 2." Roses Inc. Bull. March, 20-22.
Langhans, R., ed. (1987). Roses: A Manual of Greenhouse Rose Production. Haslett, Michigan: Roses
Inc.
Laurie, Α., Kiplinger, D. C , and Nelson, K. S. (1979). Commercial Flower Forcing. New York: McGraw
Hill.
Lawson, R. H., and Horst, R. K. (1987). "Avoiding cane injuries may prevent rose canker." Roses Inc.
Bull. April, 40-44.
92 DOMINIC J. DURKIN
Marois, J. J., Macdonald, J., and Redmond, J. (1987). "Biological control of botrytis on rose." Roses
Inc. Bull. March, 47-60.
Marois, J. J., MacDonald, J., and Redmond, J. (1988). "Quantification of the impact of environment on
the susceptibility of Rosa hybrids to Botrytis cinerea." J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sei. 113: 842-845.
Marois, J. J., Macdonald, J., Tanner, L, Wagner, S., and English, J. T. (1989). "Control of Botrytis
cinerea on rose: Microclimate effects on disease development." Roses Inc. Bull. Sept., 42-48.
Mastalerz, J. W. (1977). The Greenhouse Environment. New York: Wiley.
Mor, Y., and Zieslin, N. (1987). "Plant growth regulators in rose plants." Hort. Rev. 9: 53-66.
Mor, Y., Johnson, F., and Faragher, J. D. (1989). "Preserving the quality of cold-stored rose flowers with
ethylene antagonists." Hortscience. 24: 640-641.
Nelson, P. V. (1981). Greenhouse Operation and Management. Reston, VA: Reston.
Pasian, C. C , and Lieth, J. H. (1989). "Analysis of the response of net photosynthesis of rose leaves
of varying ages to photosynthetically active radiation and temperature." J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sei.
114: 581-586.
Post, Κ. (1959). Florist Crop Production and Marketing. New York: Orange-Judd.
Powell, C. C , and De Long, R. E. (1989). "Studies on the chemical and environmental control of
powdery mildew on greenhouse roses." Roses Inc. Bull. Nov., 47-55.
Reid, M. S., Evans, R. Y., Dodge, L, and Mor, Y. (1989). "Ethylene and silver thiosulfate influence
opening of cut rose flowers." J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sei. 114: 436-440.
Rupp, L. Α., and Bugbee, B. (1990). "High intensity rose production using rooted cuttings." Roses Inc.
Bull. Feb., 4 1 - 5 1 .
Skirvin, R. M., Chu, C , and Young, H. J. (1986). "The tissue culture of rose," In Handbook of Plant Cell
Culture, vol. 5, edited by Evans, D. E., Sharp, W. R., Ammirato, P. V., Yamada, Y., and Bajaj, Y.
P. S. New York: Macmillan.
Smitley, D., and D'Angelo, T. (1988). "Biological and integrated control of spider mites in rose produc-
tion." Roses Inc. Bull. March, 57-64.
van de Pol, P. Α., and Breukelaar, A. (1982). "Stenting of roses: A method for quick propagation by
simultaneously cutting and grafting." Scientia Hort. 17: 187-196.