Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection in Six Spinal Cord Injured Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth To Seven Children Under A Weekly Oral Cyclic Antibiotic Program PDF
Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection in Six Spinal Cord Injured Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth To Seven Children Under A Weekly Oral Cyclic Antibiotic Program PDF
Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection in Six Spinal Cord Injured Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth To Seven Children Under A Weekly Oral Cyclic Antibiotic Program PDF
http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/ijid
a
INSERM U657, PhEMI, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
b
Department of Infectious Diseases, AP-HP, CHU Raymond Poincaré, Versailles University, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré,
F-92 380 Garches, France
c
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AP-HP, Hôpital Poincaré, Versailles University, Garches, France
d
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital de Poissy, Versailles University, Garches, France
Received 29 February 2008; received in revised form 23 July 2008; accepted 1 August 2008
Corresponding Editor: Michael Whitby, Brisbane, Australia
KEYWORDS Summary
Antibiotic prophylaxis; Background: Pregnancies in spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients present unique clinical challenges.
Pregnancy; Because of the neurogenic bladder and the use of intermittent catheterization, chronic bacter-
Preventive strategy; iuria and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is common. During pregnancy the prevalence of
Spinal cord injury; UTI increases dramatically. Recurrent UTI requires multiple courses of antibiotics and increases
Urinary tract infection the risks of abortion, prematurity, and low birth weight. A weekly oral cyclic antibiotic (WOCA)
program was recently described for the prevention of UTI in SCI patients.
Objective: To test the impact of WOCA in six SCI pregnant women (four paraplegic, two tetra-
plegic).
Design: This was a prospective observational study. WOCA consists of the alternate administration
of one of two antibiotics once per week.
Results: We observed a significant reduction of UTI (6 UTI/patient/year before pregnancy to 0.4
during pregnancy and under WOCA; p < 0.001) and no obstetric complications. Infant outcomes
were good.
Conclusion: The WOCA regimen could be useful for UTI prophylaxis in SCI pregnant women.
# 2008 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1201-9712/$36.00 # 2008 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2008.08.006
400 J. Salomon et al.
Table 1 Evolution of UTI, antibiotic consumption, and bacteriological results in six pregnant SCI women before and after the
WOCA regimen, and obstetric and neonatal characteristics.
Patient
1 2 3 4 5 6
Evolution of UTI before/after WOCA
UTI (n/year/person) 3/0 12/0 3/1 6/0 4/1 8/0
Pyelonephritis (n) 1/0 0/0 9/0 1/0 2/0 1/0
Total hospital (days) 10/0 0/0 10/0 0/0 4/0 0/0
Antibiotic consumption before/after WOCA
Antibiotic (days/year/person) 60/50 80/50 70/55 60/50 70/55 70/50
Broad-spectrum antibiotic use (%) 70/0 60/0 50/0 40/0 60/0 60/0
Bacteriological results before/after WOCA
Positive urine sample (%) 75/40 80/40 85/40 100/40 80/30 80/50
MDR colonization Neg/Neg Pos/Neg Pos/Neg Neg/Neg Neg/Neg Neg/Neg
Obstetric characteristics 2 babies
Gestational age (weeks) 39, 40 38 38 39 39 38
Labor and delivery complications None None None None None None
Method of delivery V, F CD CD V F V
Neonatal characteristics 2 babies
Birth weight (g) 3250, 3150 3100 3000 3050 3250 3450
Problems breathing None None None None None None
Infectious infant morbidity None None None None None None
UTI, urinary tract infection; SCI, spinal cord-injured; WOCA, weekly oral cyclic antibiotic program; MDR, multidrug-resistant bacteria; V,
spontaneous vaginal delivery; CD, cesarean delivery; F, forceps delivery.
dysreflexia. The six women reported no specific complication were more likely to produce low birth weight babies (14%),
related to their SCI. All women delivered at term with a mean and some babies with fever required antibiotics (4.5%). There
gestational age at delivery of 39 weeks (range 38—40 weeks). was a trend towards having infants who had more dyspnea at
Two women had a normal vaginal delivery. Another one birth (15%).8 Baker et al.9 reviewed pregnancy in 11 SCI
delivered vaginally twice during the study period including women. Ten of the mothers experienced UTI and three
one forceps delivery. experienced pyelonephritis. In a retrospective study, Westg-
All newborns were born appropriate for gestational age ren et al.10 reported the outcomes of 29 SCI women who
and healthy, with a mean birth weight of 3180 g (SD 80 g). No experienced 49 pregnancies and gave birth to 52 children.
respiratory distress or other neonatal complications were Nine of the infants were born preterm and two were small for
reported. None of the neonates were diagnosed with MDR gestational age. The perinatal mortality rate was 3.8%. Cross
bacteria colonization. et al.11 reported on 22 SCI women who had 32 pregnancies.
Three pregnancies aborted. Abnormal presentations
Discussion occurred in over 10%. Complications included autonomic
hyperreflexia and frequent UTI. Charlifue et al.12 collected
Modern reproductive technology and effective rehabilitation data relating to 47 women, of whom half had vaginal deliv-
may increase the number of SCI women considering preg- eries. Problems included autonomic dysreflexia, decubitus
nancy. Little attention has been given to reproductive health ulcers, and UTI.
issues, and especially the management of pregnancy, in SCI Preconception consultation with obstetricians and physia-
women. SCI women experience a more severe and frequent trists may improve the quality of follow-up and the adapta-
rate of complications than women without SCI. During preg- tion of treatments for such patients. The prevention and
nancy, the incidence of UTI in SCI patients increases from 8% management of UTI in SCI individuals is challenging.13 Urinary
to 45.5%.8 Several complications arise as a result of UTI: 25% complications are responsible for a large proportion of hos-
of women report the necessity to change their usual bladder pital-related episodes.2 Urinary bacterial colonization is fre-
management method. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity quent.14 Given the absence of controlled trials or prospective
increases. The usual treatments can be contraindicated by data, it is difficult to make evidence-based recommenda-
pregnancy (some parasympatholytic drugs, botulinum toxin tions. Daily antibiotic prophylaxis has yielded discordant
A). UTI can lead to specific complications for the fetus and results and is not recommended because of the risk of the
the mother. The greater incidence of low birth weight infants emergence of bacterial resistance and a decreasing effect
born to these women underscores a need to focus attention over time.15 There is currently a consensus to respect asymp-
on fetal and infant health. tomatic bacteriuria in SCI. Because of specific complications
Jackson and Wadley observed ruptured membranes, due to UTI during pregnancy, screening and treatment of
increased spasticity, and autonomic dysreflexia. Pregnancies asymptomatic bacteriuria is strongly recommended. The
402 J. Salomon et al.
efficacy of continuous long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis is tional prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:
uncertain and it can cause severe adverse reactions in the 784—8.
mother and/or the fetus as well as increasing antimicrobial 7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Perfor-
resistance.16—18 A recent study has shown the efficacy and mance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 7th ed.
Approved standard M2-A7. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee
safety of WOCA in the prevention of UTI in SCI patients.6
for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000.
In this prospective study of six SCI pregnant women under 8. Jackson AB, Wadley V. A multicenter study of women’s self-
WOCA, we observed a significant reduction in UTI and anti- reported reproductive health after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys
biotic consumption with no severe adverse events. We noted Med Rehabil 1999;8:1420—8.
no abortion or obstetric complications. All seven babies were 9. Baker ER, Cardenas DD, Benedetti TJ. Risks associated with
born at term, of normal weight, and healthy. Infant outcomes pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women. Obstet Gynecol
were uniformly good. The findings of our study are limited by 1992;80(3 Pt 1):425—8.
the small sample size but add to the literature. A larger study 10. Westgren N, Hultling C, Levi R, Westgren M. Pregnancy and
could confirm the safety and efficiency of the WOCA regimen delivery in women with a traumatic spinal cord injury in Sweden,
1980—1991. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:926—30.
as UTI prophylaxis in this specific high-risk population.
11. Cross LL, Meythaler JM, Tuel SM, Cross AL. Pregnancy, labor and
Ethical approval: This study was approved by the research
delivery post spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1992;30:890—902.
committee of the hospital. The protocol was explained to 12. Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Menter RR, Whiteneck GG, Manley MS.
each patient and an informed consent was obtained. Sexual issues of women with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest to declare. 1992;30:192—9.
13. Morton SC, Shekelle PG, Adams JL, Bennett C, Dobkin BH,
Montgomerie J, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for urinary tract
References infection in persons with spinal cord dysfunction. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2002;83:129—38.
1. Vazquez JC, Villar J. Treatments for symptomatic urinary tract 14. Galloway A. Prevention of urinary tract infection in patients with
infections during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev spinal cord injury–—a microbiological review. Spinal Cord
2003(4):CD002256. 1997;35:198—204.
2. Cardenas DD, Hooton TM. Urinary tract infection in persons with 15. Nicolle LE. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: review and discussion of
spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:272—80. the IDSA guidelines. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006;28(Suppl
3. Reid G. Potential preventive strategies and therapies in urinary 1):S42—8.
tract infection. World J Urol 1999;17:359—63. 16. Waites KB, Canupp KC, DeVivo MJ. Epidemiology and risk factors
4. Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epide- for urinary tract infection following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys
miology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients Med Rehabil 1993;74:691—5.
with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285—9. 17. Mylotte JM, Graham R, Kahler L, Young BL, Goodnough S. Impact
5. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 275. Obstetrics care of patients of nosocomial infection on length of stay and functional improve-
with spinal cord injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:625—7. ment among patients admitted to an acute rehabilitation unit.
6. Salomon J, Denys P, Merle C, Chartier-Kastler E, Perronne C, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:83—7.
Gaillard JL, et al. Prevention of urinary tract infection in spinal 18. Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm WE. Increasing prevalence of anti-
cord-injured patients: safety and efficacy of a weekly oral cyclic microbial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncom-
antibiotic (WOCA) program with a 2 year follow-up: an observa- plicated cystitis in women. JAMA 1999;281:736—8.