Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Operating Assets: Property, Plant, and Equipment, Natural Resources, and Intangibles
Operating Assets: Property, Plant, and Equipment, Natural Resources, and Intangibles
Operating Assets: Property, Plant, and Equipment, Natural Resources, and Intangibles
11. Explain the impact that long-term assets have on the statement 9 5 Mod
of cash flows. 10 5 Mod
8-1
8-2 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS MANUAL
Problems Estimated
and Time in
Learning Outcomes Alternates Minutes Level
1. Understand the balance sheet disclosures for
operating assets. 6* 30 Mod
11. Explain the impact that long-term assets have on the statement 4 15 Mod
of cash flows. 5 40 Diff
10* 35 Mod
11* 20 Diff
12. Understand how investors can analyze a company’s
operating assets.
Estimated
Time in
Learning Outcomes Cases Minutes Level
1. Understand the balance sheet disclosures for 1* 20 Mod
operating assets. 3* 25 Mod
11. Explain the impact that long-term assets have on the statement 2 20 Mod
of cash flows.
QUESTIONS
1. Operating assets include property, plant, and equipment and intangibles. Examples
of assets considered operating assets are buildings, equipment, land, land
improvements, patents, copyrights, and goodwill. Operating assets are important to
the long-term future of the company because they are the assets used to produce a
product or service sold to customers. The operating assets allow a company to
produce a product efficiently and remain competitive with other firms.
2. The acquisition cost of an asset includes all the costs normally necessary to acquire
the asset and prepare it for its intended use. Acquisition costs include the purchase
price, freight costs, installation costs, taxes paid at the time of purchase, and repairs
made to prepare the asset for use.
3. The acquisition cost of assets purchased as a group should be determined by
allocating the purchase price on the basis of the proportions of the fair market values
to the total fair market value.
4. It is important to separately account for the cost of land and building because the
amount allocated to a building represents a depreciable amount, while the amount
allocated to land does not.
5. Interest should be capitalized when an asset is constructed by the acquiring
company over time, and the asset is not an item of inventory.
6. The decline in usefulness of an operating asset is related to physical deterioration
factors, such as wear and tear. It is also related to obsolescence and technological
factors and to the repair and maintenance of the asset. The depreciation method
chosen should match the decline in usefulness of the asset to the periods benefited
by the asset after all factors have been taken into account. However, the company is
not required to use the same method for all depreciable assets.
7. The straight-line method is the most popular method of depreciation for several
reasons, including its simplicity and ease of application. It is most appropriate for
assets that experience a decline in usefulness related to the passage of time. It may
also be used by companies that wish to report a stable income over time.
8. When the straight-line method is used, the residual value should be deducted from
the acquisition cost to determine the depreciable amount to be allocated over the
useful life of the asset. When the double-declining-balance method is used, the
residual value is not deducted. However, the asset should not be depreciated to an
amount that is lower than the residual value.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-5
9. Companies may use one method of depreciation for financial reporting and another
method for tax purposes because the objectives are different. The accountant’s
purpose in recording depreciation for financial reporting purposes is to allocate the
original cost of the asset to the periods benefited in a manner that matches the
decline in usefulness of the asset. The accountant’s purpose in recording
depreciation for tax purposes is to minimize the amount of income tax that must be
paid.
10. If an estimate must be changed, the change in estimate should be recorded
prospectively over the remaining life of the asset. Past amounts recorded for
depreciation are not changed or altered. The remaining depreciable amount should
be recorded over the remaining life of the asset, using the revised estimate or
estimates of residual value and asset life.
11. A capital expenditure is an amount that must be capitalized or added to the value of
the asset. A revenue expenditure is an outlay that should be recorded as an
expense in the year incurred. An item should be treated as a capital expenditure if it
increases the life or productivity of the asset. Otherwise, the amount should be
treated as a revenue expenditure.
12. The gain or loss on the sale of an asset should be calculated as the difference
between the selling price and the book value of the asset as of the date of sale. The
account Gain on Sale of Asset should appear on the income statement in the other
income/expense category.
13. Patents, copyrights, trademarks, and goodwill are examples of intangible assets.
Some companies have a separate category on the balance sheet titled Intangibles
for such assets. Other companies include intangibles in a category titled Long-Term
Assets or in the Other Assets category of the balance sheet.
14. Goodwill represents the difference between the acquisition price paid to acquire a
business and the total of the fair market values of the identifiable net assets
acquired. Goodwill can be recorded as an asset only when one company acquires
another. It cannot be recorded on the basis of internally generated factors that some
may refer to as goodwill.
15. An argument in favor of expensing R&D is that it allows comparability among firms,
since all firms must record the item as an expense. Also, it is argued that R&D
should be expensed because it is very difficult to determine whether an asset exists
and, if it does exist, what periods are benefited by the asset. On the other hand,
many argue that R&D is an asset and should be recorded on the balance sheet.
They believe that if R&D is not recorded, the balance sheet is seriously understated.
8-6 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS MANUAL
16. The current view of the FASB is that some intangible assets have a limited life and
should be amortized over their legal life or useful life whichever is shorter. However,
some intangible assets are thought to have an “indefinite life” and should not be
amortized. This treatment of intangibles has been debated extensively and many
disagree with the current view. Some would argue that the value of almost all
intangible assets eventually becomes diminished and therefore amortization should
be recognized.
17. Amortization should occur over the shorter of the legal life or useful life. For
example, a patent has a legal life of 20 years. But if the invention under patent will
be useful over only 10 years, then the patent should be amortized over the shorter
10-year period.
18. If an intangible becomes worthless, the asset should be written off as an expense in
the period when the decline in value occurs. If the intangible continues to have value
but will provide benefit over a period shorter than was originally estimated, the event
should be treated as a change in estimate. The portion of the intangible that is
unamortized should be amortized over the remaining life of the asset.
EXERCISES
2. The amount of depreciation expense that should be recorded for 2007 is as follows:
Land = $0
Building$130,000/20 years = $6,500
Equipment$216,667/20 years = $10,833
Depreciation, accumulated depreciation, and book value for the straight-line method
should be as follows:
Accumulated
Year Depreciation Depreciation Book Value
2007 $10,800* $10,800 $49,200
2008 10,800 21,600 38,400
2009 10,800 32,400 27,600
2010 10,800 43,200 16,800
2011 10,800 54,000 6,000
*($60,000 – $6,000)/5 years = $10,800 per year
Depreciation, accumulated depreciation, and book value for the units of production
should be as follows:
Accumulated
Year Depreciation Depreciation Book Value
2007 10,000 × $0.36 = $ 3,600 $ 3,600 $56,400
2008 20,000 × $0.36 = 7,200 10,800 49,200
2009 30,000 × $0.36 = 10,800 21,600 38,400
2010 40,000 × $0.36 = 14,400 36,000 24,000
2011 50,000 × $0.36 = 18,000 54,000 6,000
Students may note that the units of production method results in a depreciation pattern
in this exercise that is the opposite of accelerated depreciation. That is appropriate
because of the pattern of usage of the asset.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-9
1. Accumulated
Year Depreciation Depreciation Book Value
2007 40%* × $6,000 = $2,400 $2,400 $3,600
2008 40% × 3,600 = 1,440 3,840 2,160
2009 40% × 2,160 = 864 4,704 1,296
2010 40% × 1,296 = 518 5,222 778
2011 178** 5,400 600
*Straight-line rate: 100%/5 years = 20%; double the straight-line rate = 40%.
**Since the asset should not be depreciated below residual value, the amount to be
recorded is $6,000 – $5,222 – $600 = $178.
3. Koffman may believe that the double-declining-balance method best matches the
decline in usefulness of the asset with the revenues produced by the asset. Koffman
may also choose this method because it allows more depreciation to be taken in the
early years of the asset life and thus delays taxes until the later years.
1. Depreciation, accumulated depreciation, and book value for the straight-line method
should be as follows:
Accumulated
Year Depreciation Depreciation Book Value
2007 $ 8,000* $ 8,000 $72,000
2008 8,000 16,000 64,000
2009 15,500** 31,500 48,500
2010 15,500 47,000 33,000
2011 15,500 62,500 17,500
2012 15,500 78,000 2,000
*($80,000 – $8,000)/9 years = $8,000.
**$64,000 – $2,000 = $62,000.
$62,000/4 years = $15,500.
8-10 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS MANUAL
2. Depreciation for 2007 and 2008 was not wrong. The company used the best
information available at that time to develop its estimate of depreciation. The
information available in 2009 made it necessary to revise the estimate of
depreciation. This illustrates the difference between a change in estimate and a
correction of an error.
2. The gain or loss should appear in the Other Income category of the income
statement to indicate that it is not part of the normal operating activity of the
company.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-11
2. The gain or loss should appear in the Other Expense category of the income
statement to indicate it is not part of the normal operating activity of the company.
Purchase of land: I
Proceeds from sale of land: I
Gain on sale of land: O
Purchase of equipment: I
Depreciation expense: O
Proceeds from sale of equipment: I
Loss on sale of equipment: O
MULTI-CONCEPT EXERCISES
Building Truck
Original cost $200,000 $20,000
Less: Depreciation for 2005 and 2006 16,000 6,667
Book value $184,000 $13,333
Plus: Capitalized costs 40,000 5,000
Depreciable amount $224,000 $18,333
Depreciation per year on building =
$224,000/23 years = $ 9,739
Depreciation per year on truck =
$18,333/4 years = $ 4,583
a. All research and development costs should be treated as an expense. The 2007
income statement should reflect an expense of $20,000.
b. Patent costs should be treated as an asset. The 2007 balance sheet should reflect a
Patent account of $10,000 – ($10,000/5 years) = $8,000.
c. The $8,000 cost of defending the patent should be added to the patent account and
reflected in the 2008 balance sheet.
2007 amortization = $10,000/5 years = $2,000
2008 amortization = $10,000 – $2,000 + $8,000 = $16,000
$16,000/4 years = $ 4,000
PROBLEMS
Section
1 2 3
50% 30% 20%
(a) $1,260,000 $630,000 $378,000 $252,000
(b) 1,560,000 780,000 468,000 312,000
(c) 1,000,000 500,000 300,000 200,000
2. The purchase of the land has no effect on total assets. Current assets (cash)
declines and long-term assets (land) increases and therefore only the composition of
assets on the balance sheet is changed.
3. Carter would be concerned with the value assigned to each section if it intended to
sell one or two sections and keep others. Carter would want the section it intended
to sell to be assigned the highest value in order to defer a gain. The value assigned
to buildings would be depreciated; therefore, Carter would want more value
assigned to the buildings in order to depreciate them and take advantage of the tax
shield.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-15
If the asset is not purchased, the company must pay income tax of $50,000 × 35% =
$17,500.
If the asset is purchased, the company should record depreciation of $20,000 per
year. The amount of income tax the company must pay is $50,000 – $20,000 = $30,000
× 35% = $10,500.
The amount of the depreciation tax shield is the amount of income tax saved by
purchase of the asset, or $17,500 – $10,500 = $7,000. The depreciation tax shield can
also be expressed as the amount of depreciation each year times the tax rate, or
$20,000 × 35% = $7,000.
1. O’HARE COMPANY
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Service Revenue $100,000
Depreciation Expense 15,000
Net Income $ 85,000
2. Net book value of property, plant, and equipment at December 31, 2006:
Net book value at 12/31/06 $ X
Plus purchases during 2007 292,000
Less book value of equipment sold during 2007 (350,000)
Less 2007 depreciation (672,000)
Net book value at 12/31/06 $4,459,000
X + $292,000 – $350,000 – $672,000 = $4,459,000
X= $5,189,000
MULTI-CONCEPT PROBLEMS
2. The pollution control equipment extended the life of the asset and should be
capitalized rather than expensed. It is difficult to determine whether Merton would
rather expense or capitalize the equipment. If the company can expense the
equipment for tax purposes, it would normally desire to do so.
3. Original cost of building $364,000
Pollution device capitalized 42,000
Less: 2006 depreciation (14,000)
2007 depreciation (12,600)
Book value 1/1/2008 $379,400
Less: 2008 depreciation ($12,600 × 3/12) 3,150
Book value at sale $376,250
Sale proceeds 392,000
Gain on sale $ 15,750
If the pollution equipment had been expensed (and original life of 25 years was used
for depreciation purposes):
Original cost $364,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation ($14,000 × 2 1/4 years) 31,500
Book value at 4/1/2008 $332,500
Sale proceeds 392,000
Gain on sale $ 59,500
2. Acquisition cost:
Cost of patent $ X
Less accumulated amortization at 12/31/07 (119,000)
Carrying value at 12/31/07 $ 170,000
X – $119,000 = $ 170,000
X= $ 289,000
Year acquired:
Accumulated amortization at 12/31/07 $ 119,000
Divided by annual amortization 17,000
Years owned 7 years
It was acquired in 2001
Estimated useful life:
Cost of patent $ 289,000
Divided by estimated useful life X years
Annual amortization $ 17,000
$289,000/X = $ 17,000
X= 17 years
The acquisition cost of $289,000 would have been reported as an outflow in the
investing activities section of the 2001 statement of cash flows.
3. Assuming the indirect method is used, the amortization expense relating to the
patent would be added back to net income in the cash flows from operating activities
section of the statement of cash flows.
4. The proceeds from the sale of $200,000 would be reported as an inflow in the cash
flows from investing activities section of the statement of cash flows. In addition, the
gain on the sale of $30,000 ($200,000 – $170,000) would be subtracted from net
income in the cash flows from operating activities section of the statement of cash
flows.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-23
ALTERNATE PROBLEMS
Piece
1 2 3
23.8% 23.8% 52.4%
(a) $480,000 $114,240 $114,240 $251,250
(b) 680,000 161,840 161,840 356,320
(c) 800,000 190,400 190,400 419,200
2. The purchase does not affect total assets; it affects only the composition of the
assets. Cash is a current asset; equipment is a long-term asset.
The tax shield if Rummy uses the straight-line method is $60,000 × 30%, or $18,000.
Rummy would choose accelerated depreciation because the company would save
tax earlier.
2. Net book value of property, plant, and equipment at December 31, 2006:
Net book value at 12/31/06 $ X
Plus purchases during 2007 277,000
Less book value of land sold during 2007 (204,000)
Less 2007 depreciation (205,000)
Net book value at 12/31/07 $1,555,000
X + $277,000 – $204,000 – $205,000 = $1,555,000
X= $1,687,000
b. Depreciation:
$2,700 × 66 2/3%* = $1,800
*Straight-line rate = 100%/3 = 33 1/3%, double-declining-balance rate = 66 2/3%.
Book value:
$2,700 – $1,800 = $900
c. Depreciation:
($8,000 – 1,000)/8 × 3/12 = $219
Book value at time of sale:
Accumulated depreciation = ($8,000 – $1,000) × 5/8 = $4,375
Book value = $8,000 – $4,375 = $3,625
Book value $3,625
Sale price 1,500
Loss on sale $2,125
d. Amortization:
$14,000/4 years = $3,500
$3,500 × 6/12 = $1,750
Book value:
$14,000 – $1,750 = $12,250
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-27
1. The proper cost to record for the acquisition is $190,000 ($168,000 + $16,500 +
$4,400 + $1,100). All costs, except the operating costs for the first year, should be
capitalized as part of the cost of the equipment. The operating costs of $26,400
should be expensed.
2. Depreciation reported in year 1 is $21,640 ($216,400/10). Depreciation that should
have been reported is $19,000 [($168,000 + $16,500 + $4,400 + $1,100)/10].
Operating costs are not included in the cost of the asset.
3. Key reported income of $55,000 – $21,640, or $33,360. The correct amount of
income should be as follows:
Income before equipment cost $ 55,000
Depreciation (19,000)
Operating expenses (26,400)
Net income $ 9,600
4. Key should not include operating costs in the value of the asset recorded on the
balance sheet. The effect of this error is to overstate assets on the balance sheet.
1. The $350,000 of cost that represents research and development should be treated
as an expense in the year of acquisition, 2002. The $23,800 of costs that represents
the patent should be treated as an intangible asset and amortized over the 20-year
time period.
2. Maciel should record amortization expense of $23,800/20 years, or $1,190 per year.
3. The book value of the patent after 5 years of amortization is:
$23,800 – (5 × $1,190) = $17,850. Since the patent is worthless, the amount of
$17,850 should be recorded as a loss.
2. Mansfield would replace the medium-sized delivery truck with a larger truck if the
replacement would result in additional net income in the future. Any additional
revenues generated as a result of Mansfield’s ability to deliver and sell more product
would increase net income. On the other hand, this increase would be offset by the
costs of acquiring and operating the new delivery truck.
CHAPTER 8 • OPERATING ASSETS: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND INTANGIBLES 8-29
2. Acquisition cost:
Cost of patent $ X
Less accumulated amortization at 12/31/07 (1,661,000)
Carrying value at 12/31/07 $ 1,357,000
X – $1,661,000 = $ 1,357,000
X= $ 3,018,000
Year acquired:
Accumulated amortization at 12/31/07 $ 1,661,000
Divided by annual amortization 151,000
Years owned 11 years
It was acquired in 1997
Estimated useful life:
Cost of patent $ 3,018,000
Divided by estimated useful life X years
Annual amortization $ 151,000
$3,018,000/X = $ 151,000
X= 20 years
The acquisition cost of $3,018,000 would have been reported as an outflow in the
Investing Activities section of the 1997 statement of cash flows.
3. Assuming that the indirect method is used, the amortization expense relating to the
patent would be added back to net income in the Cash Flows from Operating
Activities section of the statement of cash flows.
4. The proceeds from the sale of $1,700,000 would be reported as an inflow in the
Cash Flows from Investing Activities section of the statement of cash flows. In
addition, the gain on the sale of $343,000 ($1,700,000 – $1,357,000) would be
deducted from net income in the Cash Flows from Operating Activities section of the
statement of cash flows.
8-30 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS MANUAL
CASES
1. A note to the statements indicates the company has land, buildings, leasehold
improvements, construction in progress, and equipment. The equipment account is
broken into various types of equipment.
2. The company uses the straight-line method of depreciation.
3. The estimated useful life varies from 3 to 5 years for some types of equipment to 40
years for some buildings.
4. The property and equipment has accumulated depreciation of $102,341,000 at
December 31, 2004, and book value of $503,690,000 at that date.
5. The statement of cash flows indicates purchases of $156,674,000 and cash received
from sales of property and equipment of $2,139,000.
ACCELERATED COMPANY
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Sales $720,000
Cost of goods sold 360,000
Gross profit $360,000
Administrative costs $ 96,000
Depreciation expense 144,000
Operating expenses 240,000
Income before tax $120,000
Tax expense (40%) 48,000
Net income $ 72,000
Since the balance of the Accumulated Depreciation account for Straight Company is
$240,000 and the depreciation expense is $120,000 per year, the assets must be two
years old. The amount of depreciation expense for Accelerated Company on the
double-declining-balance method is as follows:
2003: $600,000 × 40% = $240,000.
2004: $600,000 – $240,000 = $360,000 × 40% = $144,000.
The analyst should consider the difference in the cash flows of the two companies.
Accelerated Company has a lower net income but actually has a higher cash inflow.
This occurs because the depreciation expense results in a tax savings. It is not entirely
accurate to say that depreciation is a “noncash” expense because it results in a real
cash savings in the form of lower income tax.
For accounting purposes, the company should use straight-line depreciation because it
will better match the cost using the asset with the equal production levels. For taxes, the
company should also use the straight-line method because the increasing tax rates will
yield a higher cash savings from the tax shield. Depreciation is not a cash outflow, but
the tax savings results in a cash inflow because of reduced tax liability.
8-32 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS MANUAL
Students should be asked to determine the impact of using the first appraisal versus the
second appraisal. Both appraisals result in a total increase in assets of $20,000
($220,000 – $200,000), but they differ in the amount allocated to the land account.
Students should see that a second opinion may have been necessary to accurately
appraise the property, but, on the other hand, the appraisal may have been requested
to maximize the amount allocated to the depreciable asset, the building.
Students should be asked about the nature of the appraisal process. Is it possible for
two appraisers to have different estimates of the fair market value? Should the
accountant always accept the first appraisal? When is it acceptable to seek another
opinion? Are Terry and Tammy unethical simply because they sought a separate
opinion? The instructor may wish to draw a parallel to “opinion-shopping” on the part of
clients who seek an opinion of auditors or public accountants.
It appears that the concept of neutrality has been violated in this case. It is not wrong
for Terry and Tammy to seek a second appraisal if their motive was to develop an
accurate, unbiased measure of the land and building. However, if their motive was to
minimize the amount allocated to the land account, their actions must be questioned.
Both methods will result in the total cost of the asset being recorded on the income
statement over the life of the asset. However, depreciating the asset is much more
preferable because it matches the cost evenly over the asset’s life. You should try to
convince the manager that it is not correct to depreciate the asset over a longer life and
then record a large loss in the third year. If the manager is not convinced, you may have
to consider whether the matter should be discussed with his superior and/or the
company’s auditors.
Part 2
1. PEK COMPANY
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Sales $1,250,000
Cost of goods sold 636,500
Gross profit $ 613,500
Depreciation on plant equipment $85,400*
Depreciation on buildings 12,000
Interest expense 55,400**
Other expenses 83,800 236,600
Income before taxes $ 376,900
Income tax expense (30% rate) 113,070
Net income $ 263,830
*$58,400 + ($270,000/10 years).
**$33,800 + ($270,000 × 8%).
PEK COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $263,830
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities
(includes depreciation expense) 110,200*
Net cash provided by operating activities $374,030
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends (35,000)
Net increase in cash $339,030
*$83,200 + $27,000 additional depreciation.
2. PEK COMPANY
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Sales $1,250,000
Cost of goods sold 636,500
Gross profit $ 613,500
Depreciation on plant equipment $107,491*
Depreciation on buildings 12,000
Interest expense 55,400
Other expenses 83,800 258,691
Income before taxes $ 354,809
Income tax expense (30% rate) 106,443
Net income $ 248,366
*$58,400 + $49,091.
PEK COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 248,366
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities
(includes depreciation expense) 132,291*
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 380,657
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends (35,000)
Net increase in cash $ 345,657
*$83,200 + $49,091 additional depreciation.