212 Reail B. Majares:
A musical masterpiece, Barenboim says, is a conception ofthe
Intat] cannot be decribed — beeause were it possible to describe
oe
nen eae
ies ey
RialsmorscrptofMalamisa
1880, Jose Rial, then a nineteen-yeat-old student, won first prize ina
ary contest in Mania His winning pecan allegorical essay entitled
Gontjo de os Dioses, narrates a coundl of the gods in ME Olympus to
mine who, among Homer, Vie and Cervantes ithe beter witerin
ofart and virtue Cervantes judged the winner forthe premium he
reson socal reform and the rule of eason. Speaking through Minerva,
fai prises Don Quine as “the magic hand that strongly guldes human
gna? the whip which punishes and corrects without bloodshed" With
ante, Rizal say “Trt came bak to occupy its place, announcing &
eta tothe wodld, chen corrupted”
Ris ayoung suaden'sesay earner ite dapay of Buropean easing
x even colony “petriotc” nthe preeminence assigned to a Spanish
ter Ye, tis sljy subversive as well One imagines Rizal saying thatthe
pps itself needed a Cervantes, when he praised the Spaniard for
hn he dd ina society ruled by “the obscurity of intelligence”
AMfected by a kind of madness, made more dismal and feantc
vsnenseupid authors ith feverish imaginations write about tsbad
‘Gee wat propagated everywhere and time was uselesly spent in
petniioas reading.
‘To attribute to Rizal this intention ie not just a case of hindsight (he
would become is country’s Cervantes), But a mater of the moment 26,
The year 1880, when Rizal wrote the esay, was also the year the
Propaganda Movement was born. A movement that emerged with the
verents of LB72" (he Cavite mautlny and execution of the priests Jose
Durgos, Mariano Gomez, and Jacinto Zama), the movement waned it
the face of epression but waxed again after 1880 when, nder Marcelo del
"Ue Propaganda was launched.i pierces ose Rizal and the Invention of a Mational Literature
1 deep “native tradition” and a wealth of local linguistic and cultural
ures, Asserting difference was a dominant theme ofthe Propaganda
Tiupired the effort of Rizal and colleague, ike Pedro Paterno, TH.
lo de Tavera and leabelo de los Reyes, in embedding the Philippines
hight and “ancient” Malay vistin: in studying and extoling the
tues of al languages; andin harnessing the popular” and the"Tolk” as
ores forthe creation of an integral culture
"Though schooled in the Buropean manner, Rizal hada studious interest
local cultural productions, as shown in his references to flldore, the
jan kamedya, and Prancico Balagas Hs falarty with vernacular
ature was evident in 1887, when he delivered in German a lectre on
log mnetrieal art before the Ethnographic Society of Bern, and in 1890
Tn he defended the integrity of Tagalog Uhateraguinst the attacks of
Spanish academician Vicente Barrantes.*
nal was the ist to attempt to write a “national” history that would
Juengage the county from being treated as a mere appendage to Spain.
ugh what he prodsced, lacking the time, wat a “shadow-history” in
orm of aerial annotation of Antonio de MorgasSucsos de as las
Pilipinas (2890), stil it stands a the frst attempt by a Flipino to rehearse
fs nationa history ofthe Philipines.
Rival recognized the importance of local languages as a caltura
source. Even in bis latt yeas, he had plans to stody Bisayan, Sabanon,
fed Mangyan, publish a Tagalog grammar, and produce a “universal”
Aicconary of Philippine languages He also considered writing a treatise on
tive aesthetic, In his reply to Barrantos in 1890, he sad:
alas we ow, wo no mouthed by he
. —
owe the propaga movement
alr clot forma, qual ght ad oe cana
'Spnh rasing» Span dantcer nse
meal dame Party wth Sendo aa
tn edi ar nf Ie ph acs
the fact hat the wining eey mes ont a