Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Differences in Political Economy
National Differences in Political Economy
International business
Contents: National Differences in Political Economy
Political Economy
A term that stresses that the political, economic, and legal systems of a country are interdependent;
they interact and influence each other, and in doing so they affect the level of economic well-being.
Political Systems
These dimensions are interrelated; systems that emphasize collectivism tend toward totalitarian, while
systems that place a high value on individualism tend to be democratic. However, a large gray area
exists in the middle. It is possible to have democratic societies that emphasize a mix of collectivism and
individualism. Similarly, it is possible to have totalitarian societies that are not collectivist.
Economic Systems
Connection between political ideology and economic systems, primarily of two types:
Countries where individual goals are given primacy free market economic systems are fostered
Countries where collective goals are given primacy there is marked state control of markets
Variants resulted in the following types of economies:
(a) Market economy: what is produced & in what quantity is determined by supply/demand and
signaled to producers through a price system
(b) Command economy: planned by government
(c) Mixed economy: a balance of both of the above
Legal Systems
The legal system of a country is of immense importance to international business. A country’s laws
regulate business practice, define the manner in which business transactions are to be executed, and
set down the rights and obligations of those involved in business transactions. Like the economic
system of a country, the legal system is influenced by the prevailing political system (although it is also
strongly influenced by historical tradition). The government of a country defines the legal framework
within which firms do business—and often the laws that regulate business reflect the rulers’ dominant
political ideology.
Contract Law
Because common law tends to be relatively ill specified, contracts drafted under a common law
framework tend to be very detailed with all contingencies spelled out. In civil law systems, however,
contracts tend to be much shorter and less specific because many of the issues typically covered in a
common law contract are already covered in a civil code. Thus, it is more expensive to draw up
contracts in a common law jurisdiction, and resolving contract disputes can be a very adversarial
process in common law systems. But, common law systems have the advantage of greater flexibility
and allow for judges to interpret a contract dispute in light of the prevailing situation. International
businesses need to be sensitive to these differences; approaching a contract dispute in a state with a
civil law system as if it had a common law system may backfire (and vice versa).
Property Rights
Private action refers to theft, piracy, blackmail, and the like by private individuals or groups. While
theft occurs in all countries, a weak legal system allows for a much higher level of criminal action in
some than in others. Public action to violate property rights occurs when public officials, such as
politicians and government bureaucrats, extort income, resources, or the property itself from property
holders. This can be done through legal mechanisms such as levying excessive taxation, requiring
expensive licenses or permits from property holders, taking assets into state ownership without
compensating the owners, or redistributing assets without compensating the prior owners. It can also
be done through illegal means, or corruption, by demanding bribes from businesses in return for the
rights to operate in a country, industry, or location.
economies, adopted the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International
Business Transactions. The convention obliges member states to make the bribery of foreign public
officials a criminal offense.
What then is the nature of the relationship between political economy and economic progress?
This question has been the subject of vigorous debate among academics and policy makers for some
time. It is possible to untangle the main threads of the arguments and make a few generalizations as to
the nature of the relationship between political economy and economic progress, which are
highlighted above.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Are the Engines of Growth - There is wide agreement that
innovation and entrepreneurial activity are the engines of long-run economic growth. Those who make
this argument define innovation broadly to include not just new products, but also new processes, new
organizations, new management practices, and new strategies. Innovation is also seen as the product
of entrepreneurial activity. Often, entrepreneurs first commercialize innovative new products and
processes, and entrepreneurial activity provides much of the dynamism in an economy. Thus, one can
conclude that if a country’s economy is to sustain long-run economic growth, the business
environment must be conducive to the consistent production of product and process innovations and
to entrepreneurial activity.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Require a Market Economy - It has been argued that the economic
freedom associated with a market economy creates greater incentives for innovation and
entrepreneurship than either a planned or a mixed economy. In a market economy, any individual who
has an innovative idea is free to try to make money out of that idea by starting a business (by engaging
in entrepreneurial activity).
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Require Strong Property Rights - Strong legal protection of property
rights is another requirement for a business environment to be conducive to innovation,
entrepreneurial activity, and hence economic growth. Both individuals and businesses must be given
the opportunity to profit from innovative ideas. Without strong property rights protection, businesses
and individuals run the risk that the profits from their innovative efforts will be expropriated, either by
criminal elements or by the state.
The Required Political System - People in the West tend to associate a representative democracy with
a market economic system, strong property rights protection, and economic progress. Building on this,
we tend to argue that democracy is good for growth.
Economic Progress Begets Democracy - While it is possible to argue that democracy is not a necessary
precondition for a free market economy in which property rights are protected, subsequent economic
growth often leads to establishment of a democratic regime. Several of the fastest-growing Asian
economies adopted more democratic governments during the past two decades, including South Korea
and Taiwan.
States in Transition
The political economy of the world has changed radically since the late 1980’s. Two trends have been
evident:
(a) A wave of democratic revolutions swept the world
(b) There has been a strong move away from centrally planned and mixed economies toward a free
market economic model
Even though democracy is advancing it is important to remind students that democracy is still rare in
large parts of the world. In sub-Saharan Africa in 2004, only 11 countries are considered free, 21 are
partly free, and 16 are not free. Among the 27 post-Communist countries in Eastern and Central
Europe, 8 are still not electoral democracies and Freedom House classifies only 12 of these states as
free (primarily in Eastern Europe). And there is only one partial democracy among the 16 Arabic states
of the Middle East and North Africa, Iraq, where foreign occupiers are imposing a democratic system.
Managerial Implications
Two broad implications for international business
(a) Political, economic, and legal systems of a country raise important ethical issues that have
implications for the practice of international business
(b) The political, economic, and legal environment of a country clearly influences the attractiveness
of that country as a market and/or investment site